At 4/12/09 03:40 PM, Bacchanalian wrote:
At 4/12/09 03:34 PM, Another-User wrote:
Would you like to explain the logic in this? I mean, to me it seems you are just making this information up.
In that case... you made up the following stereotypes...
13-19: immature
20-35: anti-social
35+: virgin for life
If you can deny the stereotype for n/a, then why can't you deny the above?
Fine, you win there. *Shakes fist at Bacch*
they have a 1:4 chance to successfully guess my age and flame me successfully
So in other words, because you believe there is no stereotype for n/a, you cannot be hurt by it. But because you do believe in the other stereotypes, you can be. Why not just stop believing that the other stereotypes apply? You know yourself better than anyone else anyway.
I believe there is a stereotype for N/A, the problem is nobody ever goes out and say "well ur age is n/a!!", as opposed to "u r a 50 year old virgin loser".
Besides, if it isn't obvious about how I post that I have a fragile internet-ego? Seriously, it shouldn't be that hard to find out. =P
How does them-knowing-your-age validate their flame?
Because the problem with age-stereotyping is that no matter how you act, people will still use the stereotype as a means to insult you, which gets quite annoying. I simply want for people to draw there own conclusions on me.
Besides, I want people to make assumptions about me and draw conclusions based on how I post, not my age.
People assume you're 13 when you put up n/a.
Really? Interestingly enough, I have had people try to age stereotype me about 6 times in this site (After a quick check through my PM's, too lazy to go through posts) and nobody has ever guessed the 13-19 bracket, so apparently they don't.