Future wars!

[Vinnyy]

Once we reach the year 3000 , we cannot have a war cause our technology will be so far advanced that our bullets could destroy the world so I don't want to imagine how powerful our nuclear bombs will be! The whole galaxy could go bye bye!

Having a war in the year 3000 might be unecesarry!

[Kev-o]

War is generally unnecessary anyway, regardless of time period. Guess what? Our weapons are already killing the planet and the people who inhabit it. Ever heard of depleted uranium?

[Lagatag]

Bullets? Lol, I doubt in a thousands years we'll still be using bullets.

[dobo69]

At 4/9/09 11:37 AM, Kev-o wrote: War is generally unnecessary anyway, regardless of time period. Guess what? Our weapons are already killing the planet and the people who inhabit it. Ever heard of depleted uranium?

actually a lot of the time war is necessary, even though most people dont want to believe that.

[Vinnyy]

At 4/9/09 11:37 AM, Lagatag wrote: Bullets? Lol, I doubt in a thousands years we'll still be using bullets.

Then we'll be using lasers and ray guns which is even more deadly!

[Vinnyy]

At 4/9/09 11:40 AM, WhiteDJ wrote: I don't think we will be using nuclear weaponry in the year 3000, if we even make it to year 3000.

Why wouldn't we make it to the year 3000?

[Kev-o]

At 4/9/09 11:38 AM, dobo69 wrote:

At 4/9/09 11:37 AM, Kev-o wrote: War is generally unnecessary anyway, regardless of time period. Guess what? Our weapons are already killing the planet and the people who inhabit it. Ever heard of depleted uranium?

actually a lot of the time war is necessary, even though most people dont want to believe that.

Yeah, sure, war can be necessary. Who it's necessary for is a completely different story all-together, and one of the major reasons why I refuse to support any war.

[Figter]

At 4/9/09 11:37 AM, Lagatag wrote: Bullets? Lol, I doubt in a thousands years we'll still be using bullets.

Na we will be using flaming guineapigs

[Draxonicar]

At 4/9/09 11:34 AM, Vinny99 wrote: Once we reach the year 3000 , we cannot have a war cause our technology will be so far advanced that our bullets could destroy the world so I don't want to imagine how powerful our nuclear bombs will be! The whole galaxy could go bye bye!

Having a war in the year 3000 might be unecesarry!

nukes will still be nukes moron
and bullets, by definition, will still be propelled balls of lead, nice try destroying the earth with them

idiot........

[Vinnyy]

At 4/9/09 11:42 AM, Figter wrote: Na we will be using flaming guineapigs

You have birdies over your head.

[awsomepunkdude]

what is with you with time?

[LegolaSS]

i qoute...

i dont know what weapons world war three will be fourt with... but world war 4 will be fourt with sticks and stones

[Kev-o]

At 4/9/09 11:48 AM, LegolaSS wrote: i qoute...

i dont know what weapons world war three will be fourt with... but world war 4 will be fourt with sticks and stones

Einstein lawlz.

[4urentertainment]

At 4/9/09 11:41 AM, Vinny99 wrote:

At 4/9/09 11:40 AM, WhiteDJ wrote: I don't think we will be using nuclear weaponry in the year 3000, if we even make it to year 3000.

Why wouldn't we make it to the year 3000?

Because you and I both know very well that the world will end in 2012.

[mudafuka]

What is the point of even considering this topic when the world will end on the 21 of December 2012?

[LTcolor]

you have it all wrong people, there will not be war, cause the government will make a new machine that can control minds. The brain is like a insane advanced motherboard, all they need to do is tap in and control ;)

[DoctorFaust]

I don't know about this one, so I'l take a stab in the dark.

I don't think we'll make it to the year 3000 to even start wars, because we're so dependant on oil and vehicles to transport goods into our country.

Well, actually I think the only ones in trouble there are us Brits, because we mostly import all our food from other countries, and no fuel would mean we'd notbe able to send out ships to pick up the food...

[godofsalt]

By that time there will be no resources left on earth people will fight with Fists, Legs and their Teeth.

And the Winner gets to eat the looser... cannibalism will be very sexy at that time

[GHOST-KILLA]

countrys need war its true unfortunately, war economy and all that

but in 1000 years we can kill the world? we already can with atombombs, if enough countrys use it at the same time it can cause deverstatatin effects, includin a nuclear fall out and can end the world, thats why there probably wont be a ww3

also we have defensive technology being perfected its not atm thats stops suchs attacks like missiles and that, give it 1000 years, probably even found away to stop bullets

[VJoe10]

"War, War Never Changes"

[steelsammy]

Not really. Our science wont be able to build something that strong, though our military tech is getting better. Advavces in Automatic weapons, air force, and armored vehicles and cavalry are better than they used to be, but nuclear technology is in little difference than in 1945 when the U.S. droped the first and only nukes ever used. Though range has increased, missle defence is strong. There will always be war.

[animehater]

I like to just imagine wars of the future being like one of those sci-fi style space ship battles over trade routes to Europa or some shit.

[Grizzli]

I doubt ther'd be war on EARTH. Probably the United Federation of Earth vs. some aliens who wanna take over Pluto. Them bastards.

[Sierra]

At 4/9/09 11:41 AM, Vinny99 wrote:

At 4/9/09 11:40 AM, WhiteDJ wrote: I don't think we will be using nuclear weaponry in the year 3000, if we even make it to year 3000.

Why wouldn't we make it to the year 3000?

Because, to get to the year 3000, we have to survive the year 2012. Apparently, that's when the world is going to end. The Mayan tribe predicted it over 500 years ago. At the end of the 13th Baktun (a period of 144,000 days or years or something), the world would end. It's supposedly the end of the 13th Baktun on the 12th of December 2012.

[RDSchley]

all future conflicts will be resolved by a nation Vs. nation DDR tourney...

[LokyGhostOfVengance]

Am I the only one worrying about the "World Ending in 2012 Accourding to the Aztecs" prophecy??

[Toxik-King]

Because, to get to the year 3000, we have to survive the year 2012. Apparently, that's when the world is going to end. The Mayan tribe predicted it over 500 years ago. At the end of the 13th Baktun (a period of 144,000 days or years or something), the world would end. It's supposedly the end of the 13th Baktun on the 12th of December 2012.

The Mayan calender ends in 2012. The world will also end in 2010.
You know why?
My calender ends then!

[Drugged]

At 4/9/09 11:37 AM, Lagatag wrote: Bullets? Lol, I doubt in a thousands years we'll still be using bullets.

What the fuck could we use? Our minds?

[animehater]

At 4/10/09 01:18 PM, thatoneguyfromDD wrote: What the fuck could we use? Our minds?

You never know.

[Zoraxe7]

Heres how WW3 will happen.

Some powerful country goes to war with another one, say, Russia VS China or the US or something, probably cause by a dispute between a powerful country and a weaker one allied to a stronger one.

Other countries will get involved because the worlds governments are interconnected with each other.

Nobody will use atomic weapons because that's just asking to be nuked in return.
At the end, a lot of people will die and the whole thing wasn't worth it, but since now a days more people live in cities than outside of them, and historically, cities are always the hardest hit areas from Natural disasters, disease, famine and war, massive causalities is unavoidable.

Particularly if you look at this statistic, more people have died from war and conflict over the last 100 years than the rest of human history combined, remember I said earlier that more people live in cities now? Do the math.

Of coarse, when such a conflict is unknown and unlikely to happen anytime soon.