Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

They should show the pictures they found...

At 3/12/09 08:40 PM, j2witz wrote: They should show the pictures they found...

That would be more publicized than this.

At 3/12/09 08:10 PM, DM692 wrote:

At 3/12/09 08:08 PM, NickScott wrote: not all of it is rape you doofus.

Never said it was, that's just an example, but if you want something else...

Making a 12 year old scream in pain and bleed from her pussy as you brutally shoot your load into her.

Doesn't sound a lot better, does it?

Oh God. I think "It" just went up

At 3/12/09 08:52 PM, DM692 wrote:

At 3/12/09 08:40 PM, j2witz wrote: They should show the pictures they found...

That would be more publicized than this.

I don't think that'd be the best idea in the world. . . Ever.
Maybe publising it wouldn't be the option that a normal person would take. The pictures I mean, not the story

the law system is messed up if a teenager want to private fap on his porn in the corner of his room why cant he do that?
seriously messed up.

At 3/12/09 09:20 PM, Snicp wrote: the law system is messed up if a teenager want to private fap on his porn in the corner of his room why cant he do that?
seriously messed up.

If they were privately viewing their porn this wouldnt have happened to them. These people were hunted down through their contact with other cp owners.

At 3/12/09 08:30 PM, FLAMEBOY97 wrote: Child:6-12
teenager:13-18
adult:21-59
senior:60-death
But still that is some freeky-deeky shit

oh my god. I'm neither adult or teenager. lol. WHAT AM I???

Seriously. Child porn is disgusting. But why is sending pictures through phones considered porn? It's not like you're distributing it through out the world. Idk. I just know that when some 40 year old perv rapes a 14 year old... the guy needs to be tortured. I watched a video of a rapist/child molester in some southeast asian country get burned alive. I laughed.

I dont see the big deal really.

its not right to rape a 13 year old, but its not right to rape anyone!!!

and speaking for myself, I never was interested in even looking for child porn.

Getting arrested just for viewing it seems absolutely ridiculous, you should just have it forcefully deleted and a warning, or ban.

I dont know, make the porn = jail.
view it = innocense... (perversion, but still innocense)

At 3/12/09 08:39 PM, Aci6 wrote: What I don't understand is people wanting to watch OTHER people have sex :/
That's just a little fucked up. I agree with the laws on this note, you're 'protecting' the people from seeing some pretty messed-up stuff.

And that right there is the problem with America, and actually, all other countries that I know of that aren't busy dying of the STD of the week or going through ten governments a month. Laws don't exist to protect people from things that other people could find objectionable; if you allow the laws to prevent people from accessing something that you object to, what's stopping the laws from preventing you from getting something that you want to get just because someone else finds it objectionable?

A government with victimless crimes (doing drugs, watching porn, etc.) is a government that decides moral issues that it should not have the right to decide, and it is therefore an absurd and completely backwards government. Of course, this means that all governments are absurd and completely backwards, but hell, I'm a radical. (I don't even fit into any traditional categories of political ideology; I'm not a libertarian because I oppose letting corporations do whatever the fuck they want, and I'm not a liberal because I oppose discrimination against the majority, which, unfortunately, is a major part of the liberal platform, thanks to the black supremacists who fucked it up.)

Anyway.

"Many were surprised to see officers at their doors, and at one location agents found a man standing nude before his computer, which had a working camera, Bankhead said. The images the camera captured were displayed on the computer screen."

^ haha

At 3/12/09 09:47 PM, Judzfell wrote: I dont know, make the porn = jail.
view it = innocense... (perversion, but still innocense)

I wish this were true.

At 3/12/09 08:13 PM, DM692 wrote: And this isn't alot better.

I've done that.

Sexting iz da shit.

High school is fucked up.

"Operation Shattered Innocence"?

SO LAME.

more like "operation teeny tiny tittays"

At 3/12/09 09:51 PM, TheOnlyJBK wrote:

At 3/12/09 09:47 PM, Judzfell wrote: I dont know, make the porn = jail.
view it = innocense... (perversion, but still innocense)

I wish this were true.

same.

Unfortunately, that will never happen because people are masochistic enough to like governments to regulate fucking everything.

At 3/12/09 09:52 PM, Luxury-Yacht wrote: "Operation Shattered Innocence"?

SO LAME.

more like "operation teeny tiny tittays"

haha. if you think all girls under 18 have tiny tits, you should see some of the chicks at my school.

unf.

I guarantee you it is just stupid kids that look at regular porn and think, well I'm the same age so it's legal for me.

Dad?

I hope they have fun getting raped in juvy.

(Ironic, isn't it?)

At 3/12/09 08:07 PM, TB1ZZL3 wrote: Epic failure is epic.

we have a /b/fag

At 3/12/09 08:06 PM, DM692 wrote: If you ask me, people like that DESERVE to be locked up. Tying a 13 year old to a bed post and raping her? That's just sick.

Yet 20 year olds can watch other 20 year olds get tied to a bed post and raped. It could be argued both ways.

Hell, I bet 75% or more of the videos and or pictures they were looking at, the girls and or guys actually WANTED the sex, so technically not rape. But with the court and all, it is legally rape. They should make new words.

At 3/12/09 10:29 PM, BlackPlastic wrote:

At 3/12/09 08:06 PM, DM692 wrote: If you ask me, people like that DESERVE to be locked up. Tying a 13 year old to a bed post and raping her? That's just sick.

Yet 20 year olds can watch other 20 year olds get tied to a bed post and raped. It could be argued both ways.

Usually its not actual rape and there is a major difference between that and an fat old fuck raping a 13 yr old in a video. Whether you like some cp or not you know its wrong.

At 3/12/09 10:29 PM, BlackPlastic wrote: Yet 20 year olds can watch other 20 year olds get tied to a bed post and raped. It could be argued both ways.

No rape is good, it's just that taking a 13 year old, who still has so much ahead of her/him, and humiliating him/her and traumatizing him/her will affect him/her for the rest of his/her life.

At 3/12/09 10:38 PM, DM692 wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:29 PM, BlackPlastic wrote: Yet 20 year olds can watch other 20 year olds get tied to a bed post and raped. It could be argued both ways.

No rape is good, it's just that taking a 13 year old, who still has so much ahead of her/him, and humiliating him/her and traumatizing him/her will affect him/her for the rest of his/her life.

Well, that goes to show that Karma does terrible things to people, doesn't it?

Child pornography is sick, retarded and pointless. What is the great thing about forcing AND seeing kids having sex? I mean, What the fuck?

Those teenagers deserved being arrested, seriously.

At 3/12/09 10:43 PM, ThePigeonMaster wrote: Child pornography is sick, retarded and pointless. What is the great thing about forcing AND seeing kids having sex? I mean, What the fuck?

They get off on the corruption of innocence. Thats all. Dont try to understand it.

At 3/12/09 10:45 PM, TheOnlyJBK wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:43 PM, ThePigeonMaster wrote: Child pornography is sick, retarded and pointless. What is the great thing about forcing AND seeing kids having sex? I mean, What the fuck?

They get off on the corruption of innocence. Thats all. Dont try to understand it.

Word. And don't worry, I'll never understand it because if I do, I'll end liking it.
Again, people who supports child pornography, are extremely retarded period.

At 3/12/09 10:50 PM, ThePigeonMaster wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:45 PM, TheOnlyJBK wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:43 PM, ThePigeonMaster wrote: Child pornography is sick, retarded and pointless. What is the great thing about forcing AND seeing kids having sex? I mean, What the fuck?

They get off on the corruption of innocence. Thats all. Dont try to understand it.

Word. And don't worry, I'll never understand it because if I do, I'll end liking it.
Again, people who supports child pornography, are extremely retarded period.

Of course that it is bad, but think about it, most of those kids on the videos and pictures most likely asked for the sex and enjoyed it.

At 3/12/09 10:51 PM, TheAztek wrote: Of course that it is bad, but think about it, most of those kids on the videos and pictures most likely asked for the sex and enjoyed it.

Well, that's actually another story. As TheOnlyJBK said, those people get off on the corruption of innocence. It's a damn shame but it's the truth.

At 3/12/09 10:51 PM, TheAztek wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:50 PM, ThePigeonMaster wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:45 PM, TheOnlyJBK wrote:

At 3/12/09 10:43 PM, ThePigeonMaster wrote: Child pornography is sick, retarded and pointless. What is the great thing about forcing AND seeing kids having sex? I mean, What the fuck?

They get off on the corruption of innocence. Thats all. Dont try to understand it.

Word. And don't worry, I'll never understand it because if I do, I'll end liking it.
Again, people who supports child pornography, are extremely retarded period.

Of course that it is bad, but think about it, most of those kids on the videos and pictures most likely asked for the sex and enjoyed it.

Children who ask to have sex with old men and enjoy it are only that way because a pedophile molested them in the first place and now they are fucked up in the head. Children dont just get an urge to be raped. Do you think they were asking for it when they were actually raped? Anyone who does must be a pedophile.

At 3/12/09 10:55 PM, TheOnlyJBK wrote: Children who ask to have sex with old men and enjoy it are only that way because a pedophile molested them in the first place and now they are fucked up in the head. Children dont just get an urge to be raped. Do you think they were asking for it when they were actually raped? Anyone who does must be a pedophile.

Who sais that it was old men having sex with them? It could of been that it was with their boyfriend the same age as them, it doesnt have to be a pedo.