The only gameplay glitch I got in Shellac was when the medal popup wouldn't go away and blocked the screen. Also I had to play the game twice because the medals didn't register the first time. Took less than 2 hours to play though the game twice though, so it wasn't too bad.
What I know for sure is that I'm not going to spend half a day trying to get the "Survive 3 bomb rounds" medal for 10 points. Seems like a colossal waste of time. I'm happy with the 12 medals I have from that game. I may play a few rounds every now and then to see if it comes up, but I'm not going to go out of my way to hunt it down.
I might consider going back to get the 100pt medals from Red Moon though, that game was fun. I always seem to die once when fighting the final boss though, does anyone have any tips for that fight?
.
In regards to the copyright discussion:
you're not right because you didn't say anything, you just kept saying stupid things just to troll me
Yeah, it's not like I talked to a lawyer about it and posted the conversation here to settle the issue once and for all or anything. That never happened.
But at least l know that l wasn't wrong when l said that a small tiny walkthrough doesn't have a copyright like the one that a book has...
Actually it's been unequivocally established that it does have copyright. Go read the conversation with my lawyer friend again, I specifically asked if a posted walkthru carries copyright and he said "of course."
That conversation established three things:
1) There is a reasonable expectation that if you post something it is your own original material. Thus "Posted by" implies "Written by" unless specified otherwise in the content of the ...contents.
2) Once you've posted something that meets the threshold of originality (or whatever it's called), and as mentioned earlier walkthrus do meet that threshold, you hold copyright on it without having to go out of your way to register it; it is automatic and intrinsic.
3) If you take copyrighted material and repost it without giving the original author credit, you are breaching copyright.
That's all information that came straight from the brain of a lawyer, who knows more about such things than you or I will ever learn. I'll make reference to these points as I describe what happened in this situation: Wylo posted the walkthru(1), which established his copyright(2), and you copied it from someone who copied it. Because it's in your news page, posted by you with no indication you didn't write it, it's expected by people visiting the page that you wrote it(1). Since copyright exists on walkthrus(2), by not crediting the original author you breached copyright(3). I'm really not sure how this could be any more clear.
Look, I accept that at the time you didn't think you were doing anything wrong; I've been in similar situations myself. It's your stubbornness and unwillingness to consider that you might have been wrong without knowing it that upsets me. One question, and if you answer it you don't have to say anything else because the rest of the discussion becomes moot: if Wylo asks you to add a citation that says which parts he wrote, will you do it?
