More lax? You're kidding? We're more fucking harsh. We just appreciate the effect of humour.
This too will pass.
Memento mori
More lax? You're kidding? We're more fucking harsh. We just appreciate the effect of humour.
This too will pass.
Memento mori
omg i thought it said "IF YOU WANNA KNOW MORE, TALK TO PRANK" on that first ad lol
At 3/3/09 01:58 AM, foshiznay wrote: Strangely enough; I haven't seen a single anti weed ad in Australia at all this year...
The voiceover guy has a great voice XD
Australia tends to just 'sweep weed under the carpet' and spend money on anti-smoking and binge drinking ads. I suppose it isn't considered as much of a problem here.
Woah, clever, haven't seen any anti-drug ads before, so this is indeed the best one yet.
AMV? In case you were wondering how I was blinded and why I am make shoes, click on my sig to find out. NAO!!!
fuck off TalktoFrank, trying to appeal to kids, bunch of cunts
Erowid should start putting up TV adverts
I must admit when I first watched it I thought it was a pretty good advert that reflected the actual effects of cannabis rather remarkably - not just for a government funded drugs ad but as a metaphor altogether. My major problem with that advert is that it is funded by a company that is still trying to keep cannabis illegal.
TalktoFrank have done awful adverts. Like the one with David Mitchell as the dog looking at people doing coke. Has anyone actually ever got a nose-bleed from cocaine or does that exist merely in the world of the anti-drug commercial? I could write a better anti-coke advert myself.
What's odd in the UK is, we have a group called Drugscope and a few other scientific advisors who provide proper scientific evidence to the government and are paid for by the government, and are probably somewhat involved with the TalktoFrank project; however the government stubbornly refuses to listen to any of their policy advice and goes in the complete reverse direction.
^^ an example of you out of control these drug losers are
At 3/3/09 10:53 AM, unowned wrote: ^^ an example of you out of control these drug losers are
how old are you? I'm presuming you're about my age, yet you post like a fucking retard. All we judge each other by here is text and opinions, and your flippant 11-year-old boy language and utter lack of expanding upon your opinions fall meagrely by the wayside compared to my wonderful prosodic writing and carefully-articulated viewpoints. Best poster '08, motherfucker.
The fact that I am so obviously superior to you and still take more drugs than you shatters your worldview so immensely that your only response is insult.
At 3/3/09 10:53 AM, unowned wrote: ^^ an example of you out of control these drug losers are
I'm comparing the "out of control drug losers" to you.
It's an interesting comparison I must say.
This too will pass.
Memento mori
At 3/3/09 10:51 AM, Earfetish wrote: Has anyone actually ever got a nose-bleed from cocaine or does that exist merely in the world of the anti-drug commercial?
Just for the record, I have.
But what we need is more of those commercials about safe driving. Thats a problem thats actually killing kids, infact I'm pretty sure it's the #1 cause of teenage death in every city in the world.
no, i started very young, so it wouldnt be possible
you know you got a problem when you talk about weed every single day
you arent going to get anywhere with your unimaginative literature, rght handed scum
At 3/3/09 11:03 AM, unowned wrote: no, i started very young, so it wouldnt be possible
you know you got a problem when you talk about weed every single day
you arent going to get anywhere with your unimaginative literature, rght handed scum
He will go into the ground just like every person but at least he had a good time.
At 3/3/09 11:03 AM, unowned wrote: no, i started very young, so it wouldnt be possible
you know you got a problem when you talk about weed every single day
you arent going to get anywhere with your unimaginative literature, rght handed scum
no, your in denial, and you got schooled.
At 3/3/09 11:08 AM, chaw wrote:
no, your in denial, and you got schooled.
denied that ive done a lot of drukqs
At 3/3/09 11:03 AM, unowned wrote: you know you got a problem when you talk about weed every single day
You don't have a problem until you scrape the shit out of same bowl for rez 3 times in one night, then give up and smoke a stem bowl from the discarded stems you pick out of your carpet.
At 3/3/09 11:03 AM, unowned wrote: you know you got a problem when you talk about weed every single day
TALKING about it now? I thought that I smoked it every day was bad, apparently I'm not allowed to talk about it!
Ted Turner smokes a spliff every day. Along with a million other successful people it would be no effort for you and I to name. Woody Harrelson, Joe Rogan, I dunno - Chomsky. A lot more smoke it less often.
you arent going to get anywhere with your unimaginative literature, rght handed scum
Who said I was necessarily trying to get somewhere solely on the back of my literature? it's unlikely for any writer. I'm more likely to become a teacher. but I'll still write for fun. Slagging me off for enjoying myself by creating art, awesome.
I do propose, however; do you not have any inkling that my life potential is at least equal to yours?
Maybe I've got better things to do than have a half-personal half-political argument with unowned. Like do my dissertation. For the degree that I'm finishing. In English Language and Creative Writing.
At 3/3/09 11:07 AM, nolife wrote: He will go into the ground just like every person but at least he had a good time.
Bingo. You only experience stuff once. Have some fun.
don't do drugs, kiddywinks. Arguing about drugs in front of 14 year olds is where my urge to argue on the internet and get my point across contrasts with my urge to be sensible.
At 3/3/09 11:14 AM, Earfetish wrote:
I do propose, however; do you not have any inkling that my life potential is at least equal to yours?
no, i am superior, and i dont even care, i do this for laughs, snort a 27 of kittens in 2 weeks and see where you end up mentally, g
At 3/3/09 11:23 AM, unowned wrote: i am superior, and i dont even care
lol, denial.
I despise that advert..
Adverts like that are what keep me on the drugs and stop me from watching TV..
Stop saying Britons you illiterate cunt.
lol, denial.
denial that im trolling weed users? dyslexic carer
did you know what if i was born 25 years before my birthdate i would have been forced to be right handed,
interesting read
im a very well rounded person, and more artistic
At 3/2/09 10:26 PM, Gwarfan wrote: Hahaha, those silly Britons. Although they may have bad teeth
Wow I see your still idiotic to believe such retarded sterotypes (and besides you americans have said the chineese have bad teeth so stop dissing the world because of your so brilliant teeth which only are that white because you had them whitend (whitend is when your teeth are like painted white by a dentist)).
At 3/3/09 11:40 AM, Trooper7 wrote: Wow I see your still idiotic to believe such retarded sterotypes
You have incredibly thin skin.
Ears don't let unowned get to you he smokes pot himself and is just trying to be funny.
i dont smoke pot, and im not trying to be funny
At 3/3/09 12:14 PM, unowned wrote: i dont smoke pot, and im not trying to be funny
well just so you know I think you're hilarious. very concise assholes are the best kind.
Of course.
Does anyone remember those anti-domestic violence ads where the guy throws a stapler at that person? I forget the name and can't find it :(
At 3/3/09 12:32 AM, Paryl wrote:At 3/2/09 10:32 PM, EL-7 wrote:Britons was an old term. And I think you mean British.At 3/2/09 10:26 PM, Gwarfan wrote: Hahaha, those silly Britons.Britons? Isn't it Britains?
British is the adjective, Britons is the noun.
I.E. The British People/The British crown/The British drugs adverts compared with just the Britons
At 3/3/09 01:14 PM, Dogbert581 wrote:At 3/3/09 12:32 AM, Paryl wrote:British is the adjective, Britons is the noun.At 3/2/09 10:32 PM, EL-7 wrote:Britons was an old term. And I think you mean British.At 3/2/09 10:26 PM, Gwarfan wrote: Hahaha, those silly Britons.Britons? Isn't it Britains?
I.E. The British People/The British crown/The British drugs adverts compared with just the Britons
Oh and I much prefered the Frank advert
'Son we need to have a talk'
'What about?'
'Drugs'
'GO! GO! GO!'
'Drugs are illegal, talking about them isn't'