At 3/27/13 02:21 PM, BrokenDeck wrote:
At 3/27/13 10:10 AM, LiquidOoze wrote:
Who wants free whistle points?careful, some of those reviews may only be "useless", if they are not BLATANT abuse. The only one that's abusive IMHO is probably the last one. The first few just seem useless...?
That's a difficult subject. The last one was definitely abusive. No doubt about it. But giving 0 stars for something someone put work in is never nice. To give 0 stars you have to press the x mark, and confirm you actually want to give 0 stars, agreeing it might be abusive. If you go out of your way to give 0 stars, but don't give constructive criticism, your review is abusive by default imo. Besides if you look closely I think two of the other reviews are abusive as well. One simply agrees with another definitely abusive review, failing to give constructive criticism and essentially saying the same things as the definitely abusive review. There's another review stating the audio is "worthless". I find that abusive as well. If someone put effort in it, it's never "worthless". It always means something to someone. There's always something good to say about someone's work, and something about how it can be improved. A good review does both. A useless review doesn't try or fails. A review intended only to bring the creator of the work down, is abusive. I count 3 of the later.
But I agree always think for yourself. Don't mark a review as abusive because someone else says so. Only when you agree.