Well, that's it for Youtube.com

[BFK]

Was nice knowing it.

[dooseyboy]

yeah one of my videos was flagged by slim shady records because it had a d12 song in it
lol

[b-rod]

Taken down by the "Man".

For shame "Youtube", for shame.

[RedDreadSky]

You've got to be kidding me.
Link?

[Doomhammr]

At 1/10/09 03:47 AM, b-rod wrote: For shame "Youtube", for shame.

Youtube would be sued otherwise.

[Proottalfain]

I don't know where/when you took this screenshot, but it is not now and on youtube. look at the "1" from the video length.

bad MSPaint cut I know.

[BFK]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aIPKcLZO e0

[RedDreadSky]

At 1/10/09 03:49 AM, Proottalfain wrote: I don't know where/when you took this screenshot, but it is not now and on youtube. look at the "1" from the video length.

bad MSPaint cut I know.

I checked to see if it was a difference between .com and .co.uk, but it wasn't..

[thisisL]

Youtube has been like that for like.... one?? two years now? I don't know... Youtube is a nazi by my standards

[Proottalfain]

At 1/10/09 03:51 AM, Otto wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:49 AM, Proottalfain wrote: I don't know where/when you took this screenshot, but it is not now and on youtube. look at the "1" from the video length.

bad MSPaint cut I know.

Different OS/browser?

I'm using XP and Firefox, but I doubt it would be the factor.

[BFK]

At 1/10/09 03:54 AM, Proottalfain wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:51 AM, Otto wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:49 AM, Proottalfain wrote: I don't know where/when you took this screenshot, but it is not now and on youtube. look at the "1" from the video length.

bad MSPaint cut I know.

Different OS/browser?

I'm using XP and Firefox, but I doubt it would be the factor.

Ubuntu/Firefox and I took the screenshot like ten seconds before posting the thread.

See link above.

[Proottalfain]

At 1/10/09 03:57 AM, BigFuzzyKitten wrote: Ubuntu/Firefox and I took the screenshot like ten seconds before posting the thread.

See link above.

Ubuntu probably has a different set of fonts...

[RedDreadSky]

At 1/10/09 03:59 AM, Proottalfain wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:57 AM, BigFuzzyKitten wrote: Ubuntu/Firefox and I took the screenshot like ten seconds before posting the thread.

See link above.

Ubuntu probably has a different set of fonts...

When you look closely, you can see the 0s are skinnier in one than the other..

[Andsoitbegins]

If google hadn't bought youtube...
I think it was google anyway.

[09er]

They deleted the pee pee monster videos.

[GoldbloodedDragon]

Who cares about copyright?

[benavides20]

At 1/10/09 04:15 AM, GoldbloodedDragon wrote: Who cares about copyright?

if there not copy rigthed then people can see the thing for free, therfore the maker of the thing gets no money for the people buying there music or people buying a rigth to use there music for amv's and so on.

[ArtistJ]

At 1/10/09 03:48 AM, Doomhammr wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:47 AM, b-rod wrote: For shame "Youtube", for shame.

Youtube would be sued otherwise.

they should take the lawsuit and fight it arguing that copyright law is outdated and no longer relevant in our hybrid society in which people should be allowed to add value to a pre-existing work and distribute it without the author's consent so long as no money is being generated by the editor for aforementioned distribution.

[BFK]

At 1/10/09 04:14 AM, 09er wrote: They deleted the pee pee monster videos.

fuck youtube

[GoldbloodedDragon]

At 1/10/09 04:14 AM, 09er wrote: They deleted the pee pee monster videos.

....what?

[Doomhammr]

At 1/10/09 04:26 AM, ArtistJ wrote:

Youtube would be sued otherwise.

they should take the lawsuit and fight it arguing that copyright law is outdated and no longer relevant in our hybrid society in which people should be allowed to add value to a pre-existing work and distribute it without the author's consent so long as no money is being generated by the editor for aforementioned distribution.

I have a pretty good feeling that Youtube's best interest is making money especially in these hard times so blowing money on legal fees isn't a bright idea for them. They'll kick back and let the "screw the man" college crowd fight that battle.

[RedDreadSky]

At 1/10/09 04:14 AM, 09er wrote: They deleted the pee pee monster videos.

Now this makes no sense anymore..

[esko-man]

Youtube is going down the drain thanks to the same do-gooders that made wikipedia a nazi funland.

[ArtistJ]

At 1/10/09 04:36 AM, Doomhammr wrote:

At 1/10/09 04:26 AM, ArtistJ wrote:

Youtube would be sued otherwise.

they should take the lawsuit and fight it arguing that copyright law is outdated and no longer relevant in our hybrid society in which people should be allowed to add value to a pre-existing work and distribute it without the author's consent so long as no money is being generated by the editor for aforementioned distribution.

I have a pretty good feeling that Youtube's best interest is making money especially in these hard times so blowing money on legal fees isn't a bright idea for them. They'll kick back and let the "screw the man" college crowd fight that battle.

their website will be used less if there is a ban on copyrighted audio included, hence generating less traffic and causing less hits per page, and Youtube will LOSE money. They are better off fighting this thing, we need sucsessfull mainstream companies to lobby for what the general population wants since our voice is not loud enough and our expendable cash is significantly less.

[Jon4life]

At 1/10/09 04:14 AM, 09er wrote: They deleted the pee pee monster videos.

I know, we were devastated.

[dogpup4]

Yep. Within the first five minutes of this guy's video, there was no audio.

[SuperHappyFace]

its becoming retarded these days.........

[StuffyOne]

I've seen it, too. Yet the videos I've seen said they had to pick one song from the YouTube Library or something.

[Armissea]

Oh no fucking way yeah its over man the place we all use daily is over. I dont wanna use limewire for shit like that

[Pokemonpoeguygcn]

At 1/10/09 03:45 AM, BigFuzzyKitten wrote: Was nice knowing it.

I like the old YouTube better