Iraq is done. . . Who is next?

[LordGilingham]

I vote France, those pricks need a lesson in respect. Who knows, maybe by the time you are reading this our milatry is already marching to Paris!

[DestructiveGoat]

no one cares about the french. but...this is the "war on terror" and i dont think the u.s. really needs much more respect because well... weve proven ourselves time and time again. personally id say bring our boys home because more are dying now then in the war itself.

[LordGilingham]

YOU FRENCH?!!

[LordGilingham]

At 12/18/03 08:11 PM, DestructiveGoat wrote: no one cares about the french. but...this is the "war on terror" and i dont think the u.s. really needs much more respect because well...

WAIT!!!
ARE YOU SAYING THE FRENCH ARE NOT TERRORISTS?!
What the hell have you been smoking?! THEY ARE THE ONES THAT INVENTED FRENCH FRIES!!! Those things have made more Americans fat than anyother thing in the word. They are the REAl terrorists.

[NEMESiSZ]

Why does there need to be a next? The US is great because it's the reluctant warrior. The US isn't on some endless bloodlust binge.

[LordGilingham]

HA HA HA HA cant you tell when someone is joking?! Anyways, if there is a next, France, or Iran should go!!!!

At 12/18/03 07:22 PM, Eskimo_Joe wrote: those pricks need a lesson in respect.

Isn't that a double negative?

[Dagodevas]

Well, I don’t believe that we should ATTACK them but there are a few France-based companies who should be questioned for selling weapons to Iraq.

[LordGilingham]

HA HA HA HA
I doubt there will be a next!

[Charles-Joseph-Clark]

At 12/18/03 09:18 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: Why does there need to be a next? The US is great because it's the reluctant warrior. The US isn't on some endless bloodlust binge.

America a reluctant warrior? HA! Don't kid yourself, you morons need a proper education. Normally I wouldn't bother with hopeless gun-fucking hicks like yourselves but right now, I feel particularly pissed off...

The US fights for one sole purpose: self-gain. To call America a warrior is like saying WWF wrestling is for real ("what? you mean its not?") Bush was only interested in one thing when he attacked Iraq: oil. America simply finds something they want and then take it without thinking twice. "Justice" is just an excuse the US uses to wage war. I mean how long has it been since anyone has seen or heard of the alleged "weapons of mass destruction"?

Let's go back to 1914, WWII. The americans were the absolute last country to join into the war. Why you ask? Because they had nothing to gain out of the war; they didn't care about what was right or wrong, thus they are not a warrior. Only after they got attacked by those foolish japs did US enter the war: they wanted revenge.

All this to say that the United-States of America has no pride whatsoever. They are a ruthless vulture that will chew any country up and spit it out when they have no more use to it. Not that I'm saying that will change, it's just the way things are... Just don't go thinking america is some great hero that will "liberate the world." It is a selfish, fashist and totally ethnocentric country!

[Matty233]

At 12/18/03 07:22 PM, Eskimo_Joe wrote: I vote France, those pricks need a lesson in respect. Who knows, maybe by the time you are reading this our milatry is already marching to Paris!

Well I'd like to hear exactly what France did to you, besides not help you in your little terrorist war (both sides were terrorist it seems). And because of that, french fries are now freedom fries for some americans. I'm guessing you're one of those people. And I highly doubt Bush would just swing into France. It's not a country in poverty, you know. Being the nice man Bush is, he will go for the weaker countries before the stronger ones. And believe me, France is one of the stronger forces. But I am reminded of somebody else who tried to take over France as well: Adolf Hitler is a good comparison to your little fachist post. Both were power-hungry morons who decided to take over the world, even though Americans are mroe discreet about it. But maybe in your own little world France would be a good idea to attack. I haughtily disagree to your opinion though. It seems you would take over an entire country to "show them a lesson in respect". Aren't you overexagerrating just a bit? But then again, I wouldn't expect any less from a gun-toting texan hick such as yourself...

[NEMESiSZ]

At 12/18/03 11:02 PM, Charles_Joseph_Clark wrote:

:It is a selfish, fashist and totally ethnocentric country!

You are an uneducated waste of oxygen, learn to spell, take a history class, do SOMETHING to improve your intelligence - then post here.

[Dagodevas]

At 12/18/03 11:02 PM, Charles_Joseph_Clark wrote: America a reluctant warrior? HA! Don't kid yourself, you morons need a proper education.

Bush was only interested in one thing when he attacked Iraq: oil

Let's go back to 1914, WWII.

I believe they call it hypocrisy.

[blueloa13]

At 12/18/03 08:32 PM, Eskimo_Joe wrote:
THEY ARE THE ONES THAT INVENTED FRENCH FRIES!!! Those things have made more Americans fat than anyother thing in the word. They are the REAl terrorists.

French fries were invented by the belguins so why dont you slap your blind hatred on them. Second, Americans are fat becuase they live unhealthy and can blame it on anyone.

[EvilGovernmentAgents]

At 12/18/03 11:02 PM, Charles_Joseph_Clark wrote: stuff

Well, I`m impressed. Some people can see what a country is like. All countries have their own interests. There is NO, repeat NO heroic save the children and run over the burglar in another country, country in the world. That`s how it is, and always has been.

Does that suck? Yes. But until someone learns how to create a better system that works, stuff.

And your gun loving hick comment was completely uncalled for. Cut it out.

[TheTio]

At 12/18/03 10:02 PM, Dagodevas wrote: Well, I don’t believe that we should ATTACK them but there are a few France-based companies who should be questioned for selling weapons to Iraq.

ARGH!!!! You have got to be fucking kidding me.

Iraq were raised into a major power by USA in the hopes that they would thrash Iran.

This is such a ridiculous idea, and I see a few morons talking about teaching France a lesson, yeah, way to put the world into a nuclear winter...we showed them sweaty mofos

[TheTio]

At 12/18/03 09:18 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: Why does there need to be a next? The US is great because it's the reluctant warrior. The US isn't on some endless bloodlust binge.

America is neither reluctant, or warrior like. Even great is questionable, you are simply on the top of the pile at the moment, things change.

You are somewhat correct though, US actions are in no way driven by bloodlust...I would say the main motives are greed and fear.

[NEMESiSZ]

At 12/19/03 04:47 AM, TheTio wrote: America is neither reluctant, or warrior like.

Just because you don't happen to like America doesn't mean any time someone says something positive about it, you need to claim it's wrong.

Then again, you're probably not that intelligent - but you're from New Zealand, you got dealt kind of a bad hand.

[JudgeDredd]

At 12/19/03 07:25 AM, NEMESiSZ wrote:

At 12/19/03 04:47 AM, TheTio wrote: America is neither reluctant, or warrior like.

Then again, you're probably not that intelligent - but you're from New Zealand, you got dealt kind of a bad hand.

HAhahaa. [Joker][Joker][Ace-Spades][Ace-Hearts][2-clubs]

"Ahh shucks, me too.." :(

America pwnz us! We is next!

[JMHX]

Actually, President Bush has stated that Iran, North Korea, and the Philippines must be dealt with to preserve safety.

[Slizor]

Why does there need to be a next? The US is great because it's the reluctant warrior. The US isn't on some endless bloodlust binge.

A "reluctant warrior" would not make war with a country it feels could threaten it in the future - that being the reason the US went to war.

[NEMESiSZ]

At 12/19/03 10:13 AM, Slizor wrote: A "reluctant warrior" would not make war with a country it feels could threaten it in the future - that being the reason the US went to war.

You mean the country every administration has deemed a threat since 1990? The country whose leader's removal was made policy by President Clinton in 1998? The country which tried to assassinate not one but two US Presidents?

You're right, Iraq was no threat, and Bush was clearly the only one who felt it was.

[D2Kvirus]

At 12/18/03 07:22 PM, Eskimo_Joe wrote: I vote France, those pricks need a lesson in respect. Who knows, maybe by the time you are reading this our milatry is already marching to Paris!

Yes, because the Germans won't back them up with another large army, and you wouldn't want to piss off the Russians by doing so. In fact, the rest of Europe that matters (ie, everyone but the Tonyland) will probably have a few bones to pick, if they don't nuke the shit out of the army advancing either from Iraq, or crossing the Atlantic.

Who to go for next? Hey, how about the US Military stage a coup and get Bush into Guantanamo? Or, better yet, Israel!!!

[bumcheekcity]

I will tell you for free that if you attack France, the whole of Europe, along with Russia will attack you. So dont try anything. Lesson in respect? Pah.

[D2Kvirus]

At 12/19/03 11:02 AM, bumcheekcity wrote: I will tell you for free that if you attack France, the whole of Europe, along with Russia will attack you. So dont try anything. Lesson in respect? Pah.

I think that's what I said...just in Viruszilla mode.

[bumcheekcity]

At 12/19/03 11:08 AM, D2KVirus wrote: I think that's what I said...just in Viruszilla mode.

Ah well, I reinforced it. I should learn to read ALL the posts before I reply. Ah well, c'est la vie.

[LordGilingham]

You guys are taking this WAY to seroiusly, I first meant it as a joke, but what the hell. Anyways, do you think all of Europe would side with France or the most Powerful country in the world? If this started a nuclear war, I think it would be smart to go with the super power!

[lapslf]

At 12/19/03 10:32 AM, NEMESiSZ wrote:

You mean the country every administration has deemed a threat since 1990?

Every American administration and perhaps some buttkissers. Just because the US government says it's a threat doesn't mean it actually is.

:The country whose leader's removal was made policy by President Clinton in 1998?

I rest my case.

:The country which tried to assassinate not one but two US Presidents?

Well, what would you do, if someone tried to kill YOU? Wouldn't you try to kill your killer?

You're right, Iraq was no threat, and Bush was clearly the only one who felt it was.

Oh, he didn't either. He just said it was, and enough moronic Yanks (let's not give away any names) believed him.

[bumcheekcity]

At 12/19/03 11:59 AM, Eskimo_Joe wrote: You guys are taking this WAY to seroiusly, I first meant it as a joke, but what the hell.

Well, you never know. We get a lot of anti-french here.

Anyways, do you think all of Europe would side with France or the most Powerful country in the world? If this started a nuclear war, I think it would be smart to go with the super power!

Do you know how much a lot of mainland Europe despises the stars and stripes? I dont think so, by what you said there. America is being seen as thumbing ts nose at them, and they do not like it one bit.

[LordGilingham]

At 12/19/03 02:43 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:
Do you know how much a lot of mainland Europe despises the stars and stripes? I dont think so, by what you said there. America is being seen as thumbing ts nose at them, and they do not like it one bit.

I guess I worded what I said wrong, I didnt mean to say Eurppe, I meant to say other countries like China and Japan. Those two are one of the most powerful countries in the world, and they dont like France too much. . .