Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Bill Bailey
Peter Kay
Lee Evans
Billy Connoly

Are all legends compared to those two

At 11/5/06 04:19 PM, MickTheChampion wrote:

At 11/5/06 04:15 PM, simple-but-sandy wrote:
But the majority of Britain is Protestant (about 98% of christians in the UK are Protestant)

Yeah, you don't think I know this already? Honestly, you Protestant retards run around Glasgow waving your Union Jacks and picking on minorities so much I'd have to be blind not to know you out-numbered us.

I thought the UK had stopped with the hate between catholic an Protestant.
Only a couple of sad little cunts like your self runnin around hating people which are basically the same.

At 11/5/06 02:08 PM, internet-lord wrote: Why the hell dont we just ask him.

LolOutLoud is Austrail in the EU??

No it's not. Maybe he's a european in australia.

At 11/5/06 01:25 PM, SovietClock wrote:

At 11/5/06 01:09 PM, internet-lord wrote:

Austraila is in the EU? Learn something new everyday i suppose.

Woah, woah, woah, woah, woah, WOAH! When the hell did this happen? That doesn't make sense! How can a country that's not even in Europe be a part of the E.U.?????

Australias not in the EU.

Theres a country in SOuth america which is in the EU though as well as overseas territory like Falklands, British virgin Islands etc.....
Turkey recently joined the EU even so only 5% is in europe the other 95% is in asia.
Russia is a contendor for the EU, even so most is in asia.

EU is Political not geographical.

lol Americas not Fascist, it's just people exagerating things.

Everyone called Margret Thatcher fascist, but she wasn't really, she was just a bitch.

Candians will hate it. So will the US lol it will never happen.

But it does look like the future will be a futre of super powers.

North american union
South america union
European union
African Union
China
India
Russia

At 11/3/06 05:02 PM, BanditByte wrote:

At 11/3/06 03:36 PM, zzzzd wrote: With out the Americans the war would probably of gone to the axis.
With out the British the war would of probably of gone to the axis.
With out Russia the war would of gone to the axis.

This part made me rofl. ZZZD. Sorry, but all that was really needed was America for the victory.

Your saying america could of stood up to the nazi's signle handly.

the Nazi's were better trained, better equiped and were better tactically an strategically. The allied victory was because of sheer brute force.
With out the russians, there would be millions more german soldiers to deal with.
With out Britain then Africa, Meditaranean an middle east would of been under Axis rule. And also the Commonwealth wouldn't of joined the war.

I really can't see how you americans can make such ignorant statements.
It's pathetic.

At 11/3/06 07:56 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: I wonder what all the Brits who criticize the US for allowing our government to "spy on" us are thinking about their previous statements. Funny how they made a stink saying that Bush is a dictator because of enacting domestic surveillance, yet Brits have had domestic spying way before we did, way before 9/11 in fact.

Is this relevant to the topic at hand, or is it just another jab at the brits?

90% of German losses were because of the russians.

America definitly did help a considerable amount with supplys.
America were the main force in the pacific theater an western front.

Britain Were the main force in africa. (America didn't do very well in africa)
All though Britain was heavily supplied by America in africa.

With out the Americans the war would probably of gone to the axis.
With out the British the war would of probably of gone to the axis.
With out Russia the war would of gone to the axis.

Cellardoor6 I'm not saying america wasn't a major major factor of the allied victory because it definitly was.

Howether it;s stupid and ignorant to say america was the most important.
Its just plain untrue and such a biased statement.

In the past i've let this go an let you belive your sad ignorant little statements, but it pisses me off an sickens me to hear wankers like you make such fucked up statements with Poppy day comin up.

your a fuckin disgrace to the brave soldiers who fought for there country, fuckin twat.

No more.

At 11/2/06 08:33 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 11/2/06 12:56 PM, BanditByte wrote:

At 11/2/06 12:53 PM, zzzzd wrote: America isn't really a saviour, they did alot in world war 2 but put just as much into it as most of the allied nations.

Roflcopter. Better not let cellar see you type that, man, he'll tear you a new ones.

Man zzzzd had to go and say that bullshit...here it goes..

This is thre truth: People think that American only came in towards the end, when actually the war ended BECAUSE American came in. The allies were losing miserably before the US entered with troops, even though the US was supplying almost ALL of the resources, fuel, food, weapons, ammunition, clothing, steel, vehicles, and so forth to the allies from the beginning.

Then when the US entered with troops, it was the only allied country to fight in every theatre of the war, Europe, Meditteranean, Africa, Pacific, and Atlantic. Then someone will suggest that Russia did the most fighting, yet they only fought on the easter front in Europe, but couldn't have even fought without America providing almost ALL of their war material.

Then when the war ended swifty after America joined in and took supreme allied command, the US was the only country that had the economy to rebuild the damaged countries. The US rebuilt France, Britain, Germany, Holland, Italy, Japan, The Phillipines and many other countries all free of charge. If the US didn't do this, Europe and certainly most of Asia would be 3rd world regions today.

If any other country come out of the war as powerful as the US did, they would have used their power to conquer, no other country in HISTORY had won a large war and come out on top and refused to conquer the people who started the war against them. Based on the historic traits of Britain, France, Germany, Japan, Russia and so forth, if they came out of the war as powerful as the US did, they would have conquered even their former allies due to their inherent imperialistic nature. But the US didn't dominate the weakened nations, the US rebuilt them, protected them, and allowed them to have independent democractic governments.

Americas the Birth child of our 'imperialistic nature' Ignorant cunt.

The US was the backbone of the allied effort in WWII. And the US is the backbone of the existence of all of the worlds current great powers. It's a simple fact, anyone who suggests otherwise is uneducated, brainwashed, or just bias to the point that they can't accept reality.

The US was ahuge fresh force to the allied efforts who had already been ravaged with war for the past 4years.

It's not arrogance, its a historic fact that the US was the most significant factor in WWII, and the biggest factor in the success and prosperity of Japan, Britain, Italy, Germany and France today. But people of these countries like to pretend that this isn't true so they can maintain their misguided criticisms of the US and live under the misconception that America is a selfish, imperialistic nation that does no good in the world, when really its the exact opposite.

And I'm spent...

America put as much into the war as most of the allied countries.
I didnt say anything about how important america was.

In Britain the american soldiers who died in the war are remembered an remebered as heroes an saviours along with the soldiers from Canada,Australia, New zealand....etc.

I was simply saying countries like canada, australia.etc put as much into the war as america did.

0.40% of canadas population died in the second world war.
0.58% of Australias population died in the war
0.74% of New Zealands Population died in the war
0.32% of Americas population died in the war.

Just because America has a much higer population and larger military, doesnt make them any more saviours than the rest of the allied forces

Alot of the alled nations helped rebuild other countries after the war, it wasnt just america.

You call us biased an brainwashed, what the fuck do you mean America was the most significant part of WW2.

It's impossible to make a statement like that. With out Britain, Axis would of controlled Africa, the middle east an Britain. Before America even entered the war.

And russia definitly was as important as well.

It's not a historic fact that america was the most significant part of ww2 Its a Sick, Biased, arrogant statement that only a brainwashed ignorant americunt like yourself could make.

Makes me sick inside, you sayin shit like that at this time of year.

wanker!!!!

America is definitly a super power, It;s not paticulaly a savoir or a bully.
I don't mind america as the worlds super power, Rather them than russians or chinese.

They don't bully countries paticulaly, There not evil, They have made some bad desicians.
They have had a certain amount of influence on other countries, howether thats starting to die away.

America isn't really a saviour, they did alot in world war 2 but put just as much into it as most of the allied nations.

At 11/2/06 12:18 PM, Cybex wrote:

At 11/1/06 09:19 PM, Athlas wrote: Having a better education system than England isn't exactly difficult. You're golden if you get accepted into a private school, but otherwise, you're fucked. The public schools in the UK are HORRIBLE.

Woah, i got to a state school and i got 6A*s and 5As for my GCSE's. I'm hardl 'fucked'. But yeah, i can see what you mean. There are some people in England who don't even realise that private schools and public schools are the same thing :P

lol Public schools you have to be a rich cunt, private schools you have to be a rich cunt an a cleve cunt. they shouldnt be called public schools really cause there not public.

State schools are the real public schools an theres nothing wrong with them, the one i went to has better grades than some private schools.

Only the ones in major cities are really shite.

At 11/1/06 08:09 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

But your leaving out Boeing. Only the biggest producer of military and civilian aircraft in the world. If Washington disappeared, the world would halt. Then they'd all have to settle for the shitty airbus planes har har.

Airbus has already taken over Boeing as the worlds leading Civilian aircraft manafacturer.
Stop being biased towards european companys cellerdoor :)

At 11/1/06 06:30 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: According to this this article , Seattle, Washington (where I live) is ranked to be home of the highest percentage of highly-educated Americans in the US.

Does everyone in seattle talk like frasier??

Cellardoor6 British don't brainwash there children in biased education, I think I can saftley say Britain, definitly england anyway are the most unpatriotic country.
We definitly don't bend history, I remember there was alot about the French, British an americans when we learnt it. We aren't taught Britain won signle handly like americans are taught they won. And we aren't taught americans single handly won.
If anything I can't remember learning much at all about the russians.

These debates are so stupid.
If America didn't join the war, either the axis would of won or there would of been many more deaths.

If the British an british commonwealth werent in the war then the war may of been won by the axis or there would of been many more deaths.

Same with the russians.

And the rest of the world.

The funny thing is because of america T.V an films an stuff, I used to think america was in the war from the start that they were the main people, that they really were the best an everythin. Because of american media. It wasn't till i was about 14 an atually started gettin interested in things for my self that i found out that i'd been mislead because of american influence.

So if British people atually get brainwashed into beliving what americans want us to belive, I dont wanna know what they do to americans.

Anyhows i'll say again. these debates should really stop with the 11th coming up.

At 10/30/06 08:15 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

Your government is almost identical to our government, and has the same foreign policies. Why don't you hate your own government and criticize it as much as you do the US government?

British critizise the british goverment alot more because we have alot more to do with are own goverment.

And I believe America is the greatest country in the world BECAUSE i've left the country and have been to many places. I wasn't as patriotic as I am now until I went to Europe, Asia, and South America. Even well-to-do countries like Germany and the UK are no where near as vibrant as the US economically, politically, socially and culturally.

no you belive America is the greates country in the world because your american.
I doubt an australian would go to america and all over europe then state that america is THE GREATEST country in the world.

After living in Europe for almost a year, I think I have the proper point of reference to judge what countries are better in terms of freedom, culture, and opportunity. When I was in Europe I felt almost isolated from the world.

How fuckin ignorant to state that your countries culture is better than all the different cultures in europe.

You felt Isolated from the world in the middle of the world?? you mean you felt isolated from americans.

In that cause, why don't you dislike the arrogance of people who claim America is so bad when they haven't ever been here either??? There are TONS of people from Britain who claim their country is the best country in the world and that America is awful, yet have never been to the US.

I wouldn't claim any countrys the best in the world an atually mean it as a fact like americans do.

Americans didn't save Britain, Britain wasn't invaded due to the British winning the Battle of Britain in the skys as well as the British,candian, australian an Commonwealth Soldiers standing between Britain an the NAZI's

I don't hate Americans or America I just hate how your all brought up to think America are the saviours of the world. And bend history to make america come out top.
And the way you continually say 'we saved your assses twice' even so in the first world America wasn't even a desisive part of the war, an the second world war, america was no more important to the victory as British or Russians.

To be honest with Rememberence day coming up, i reckon you should give it a rest with all the we saved your asses, Millions of soldiers didn't die so you could brag about them.
fuckin tit

And the USSR was a threat to the whole world. It was a statemate and eventually russia just collapsed.

At 10/30/06 01:49 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 10/29/06 02:30 AM, ImmoralLibertarian wrote:

At 10/29/06 01:53 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Thank God that your country is allied with the US otherwise your weak country would be easy prey for anyone who wants your oil and your skanky French-Canadian girls.

The only nation that tends to invade nations for their oil is the States….so that’s pretty damn ironic.

Are you a fucking moron, or does your misguided bias against the US cause you to completely ignore reality and ignore history??

I think his bias comes from the 'biased' posts you keep making.

The UK, spain, italy, and many other countries participated in the invasion of Iraq. In fact, the Royal Scots Dragoon (from your own fucking country) participated in the invasion.

I find it funny how Depending on the topic being pro or against iraq you say either..
' Americas not the only country in iraq, theres loads of others as well'
or
'All the other counties aren't doin anythin in iraq, americas the only one doin any proper fighting'

ignorant fuckin americunt

I think, In some circumstances they should take of those fucking things.
Two of the main things about it recently was a politician wanting to see the faces of the people who have come to ask him questions.

The other was a Subsitute teacher teaching in a primary school. And she was asked to take her viel off.

It's hard to have a proper conversation with someone who is covered up, you can't see there mouth or there facial expressions. And for Primary school children it's probably quite scary an un settling, not to be able to see the face of someone.
The same reason why clowns and people wearing masks scare children.

And to use Politcial correctness against polictican correctness what happens if your talking to a death person who lip reads, it's not fair on them if they can't understand people wearing Viels.

I'm not saying Muslim women should stop covering them selves up, but in some circumstances, E.G when your talking to a high up member of parliment or teaching school children!
they should take them off.

At 10/29/06 08:13 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 10/29/06 06:13 PM, neoptolemus wrote:

At 10/29/06 06:04 PM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote: And I'm sure I've heard, from many many separate sources, that american women go nuts over a british accent.

Note to self, go to america to pick up some sexy ladies...

You won't get any. American girls don't like British men any more so than women of ANY country like another man of ANY seperate country.

I have a fascination with German girls, that doesn't really mean anything. British women like Americans because we actually smile and laugh when we talk to girls. British guys just go "hmm yes, quite so" and try to hide their hideous teeth.

I don't reckon many british say that, an the ones who do wont get ne girls either side of the pond. And i've yet to see a british girl go mad over an american accent.

I know we treat the americans with disdain, but I thought that kinda shit just runs off their backs.

We do treat the Americans with disdain but it is alot more like an older brother treats their younger brother with disdain.. After all, technically America is Britains little brother.

A little brother that beat in in a war, that saved you from destruction twice. And that continutes to be the foundation of your economy, policies, and military doctrine. I think we usurped you as the bigger brother. WE have 5 times the people you have, an exponentially more powerful econony, military, and political influence.

Americas not the foundaton for anything British. If anything it's the other way round.

the First world war, America wasn't even a major factor to the allied victory. It was the french, the britsh empire an the Russian empire.
The Second world war, British won the Battle of Britain which if we lost would of led to a land invasion. You helped save france and helped win the war. Along with all the other countries who sent men to die,

and Don't start with that bollocks with rememberence day coming up.

How is Britain the bigger brother? You may be older, but you're a withering old man in that case.

I think americans should get out more, into the world. Like spain. Brits love spain. Except me. Too hot.

I don't like spain... The culture just doesn't appeal to me.. I'd prefer to go to Italy, Greece or someplace in Asia.

Its easy for people to say that Americans need to get into the world more. But the only countries that border us are Canada and Mexico, which many Americans go to. And it costs many thousands of dollars to get round-trip tickets to Europe. or Asia. Europeans have the luxury of travelling shorter distances to reach a different country because Europe is small and divided by many countries. The US is much larger, and the surrounding countries aren't nearly as interesting or hospitable as European countries.

Americans don't want to go to Central or South America because their countries are poor and don't have very good tourist areas. Therefore Americans don't have the luxury that Europeans do of going to many different countries in less time and with less money.

When I went across the English channel to Paris when I had my European trip, It cost what was equivalent to about $40 US dollars or about 27 GBP. It was quick and easy to go to a very different country.

You could of flown to rome for that amount.

To go to Paris from the US it costs about over $1000 and takes 9 hours by airplane.

Think about it...

Travelling around europe is nearly as easy as travelling from state to state these days.

At 10/28/06 12:51 PM, BillKillerz wrote: Canada and Australia still have the Queen on there Money, (i think they do anyway)

Yay ! I hate see this bitch on my $20 (CA) ! But when i turn it, i love see the inuit things !

Do somethin fuckin about it you twat, Instead of just bitchin. I don't reckon she would give a shit if you turned republic.

I can't belive loads of fuckin canadians gave her shit when she went over to Compliment and Thank Canada.
She's not the one who decideds to stop being your Monach, it's your priminister an your countrymen.

Fuckin bell end.

WTF!! lol he's the desendent of long shanks his fathers a night of the realm and He talks like a cockney! I thought he was a proper Cockney!

mental!!!

Did anyone else know this??

At 10/26/06 09:49 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:

You just do not understand how close the relations our leaders have to those oil nations. There is not a chance in hell in this fake war scenario we are making up that they would side with China. China is weaker militarily and economically and technologically than the US and dont have the relationship America has with the governments of the Mid East. They wouldnt have a chance of getting a drop of gas out of them if we didnt want them to. Even if they did, again, America rules the oceans. Nothing would get to them even if some country wanted it to.

Britannia rules the waves (traditionaly, lol)

1) You dont know that. I would say America would never go to war with China because they WOULDNT but this is hypothetical. If relations are that tense with China, the UK would be on Americas side I am willing to bet.
2) No offense to the UK, their Navy is downright puny compared to the USA's Navy. Even if they did go to open war against the USA (another stupid scenario that would never happen) they wouldnt harm a carrier group more than superfically. And we got quite a few carrier groups.
3) The UK would not go to open war against the USA EVER barring we have some sort of Hitler as Prez.

The UK's navy is tiny compared to the USA, but The USA and UK Navies are still considered the leading navies in the world (and sometimes the french navy)
And the whole of the EU Navy even so UK and France are the only ones as advanced as americas, the EU's is bigger than americas. The UK couldn't go to open war with the USA but the Whole of EU could, Not that it would ever happen.

Like I said, the only possibility even if it is a longshot. Russia would only side with China if they had a reasonable chance of winning, they are not suicidal. They would have to make a damn long pipeline and protect its airspace good as hell too, something I dont think they could do for a pipeline that would have to be that long.

It's more likely Russia would side with the EU as they have quite close relations nowadays, as Russia is even givin a seat with the EU, and the EU would most likely be on the US side because if US was to go to war with China it would most likely be about something the EU agree's with as well.

Again, what the hell is a criminal organization going to do when the most well armed military in the world shows up on their doorstep with multi million dollar tanks, artillery, planes, ships, etc. They would roll over. There job is not to fight like that.

lol The russian Mafia has no chance against the Us or any Great power or super power.
But they probably would give any invading country a hard time.

At 10/26/06 08:43 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: I said it before. But I'll say it again:

This will be the moons flag, if any country does in fact claim the moon and inhabit it.

looks like an old British colonial flag.

At 10/26/06 07:13 PM, Bull-Hound wrote: Okay, you pricks, I made a bad metaphor, but a metaphor nonetheless.

A Dodo, being a flightless bird with no natural enemies, meeting its own demise due to outside forces. Rome being the dodo, and the Huns, Goths, Visigoths etc being the Humans, Dogs and rats that killed the Dodo.

The Ostrich, being another flightless bird, has natural enemies such as the lion, hyena and Wild Dog and is still flourishing to this day. America being the Ostrich, and the natural enemies being Terrorists etc.

Mehh.....I suck at Metaphoring (Did I just make up a word? I think yes!)

America is still flourishing to this day, but it's only been 200 an something years.

thats like comparing an old man who died ages ago to a newly born baby.
lol
(just trying my hand at some meaphoring)

I can't see how you could compare the too.

Rome was a CITY which conquered the world to become a huge succesfull empire.

America isa massive bit of land which is full of resources which was colonised by a huge Succsesfull empire. Became a large population, revolted and got independence. Then grew an grew fairly peacefully away from the dangers of the rest of the world until unleashing there power in WW2 when the powerfull countries had basically collapsed.

I can't see America coming to an End anytime soon, but i can see other super powers emerging.

Coke is the most over-rated an shittyest drug goin, You wont get addicted of one line, like you can by smokin a lil bit of crack, but it's so shit.

do Md or Ket instead.

At 10/26/06 03:33 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 10/26/06 03:12 PM, zzzzd wrote: If you love her still, go for it.
You won't lose any dignity or anything.

You don't understand the situation. You don't understand the degree of betrayal.

Yea, cause i don't but you were apart for a long time, yea? girls get bored so do men.
The really bad bit would be when she promised she wouldnt after she did. fuckin slaaaagggg.

Nah go for it.

But never even consider shootin someone just for gettin his willy wet you fuckin nutter!!!

I'm sick of you. You end almost every post with some weird British insult.

I was only jokin mate, It just made me laugh the shotgun bit.

And I wouldn't actually shoot him. I was nowhere near that out of control. I just allowed myself to think about it for piece of mind at that time. I may have been drunken and emotionally unstable but I was still had my judgment intact.

fair enough,

At 10/26/06 03:14 PM, zzzzd wrote:

At 10/26/06 02:48 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

Would this make me a horrible person? Or would I be justified?

It would be fairly harsh. And don't go out wit her just to dump her.
You'll lose dignity for bein such a wanker. Just forgive her. (if she is sorry)

I think it would serve as a lesson to her. It would make us even, she would get a taste of her own medicine, and it would put the ball in her court so she would be faced with a decision to make. I think it would be brilliant.

nah, she's probs well upset already, either tell her you don't wanna get bak wit her cause she's a fuckin slaaagg or get back with her,
No sneaky shit. it's evil.

woops only ment to quote cellardoors bit
sorry for massive quote.

At 10/26/06 04:22 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 10/26/06 03:47 PM, Begoner wrote:

It's funny how some Americans can say that America isn't the greatest country in the world, but these uneducated Americans

The only people who don't think that America is the best country in the world are those who are uneducated? Well, I guess that those who conduct quality-of-life surveys which consistently place such countries as Ireland and Iceland above the US are "uneducated." The truth is that America is only around the 10th best country in the world, mostly because of the rigid social model.

So you are judging the 'greatness' of the US soley on its quality of life stats on the Human Developement Index? Even though the margin between the top 20 countries is almost negligible?

The poor will remain that way, unlike in slightly more advanced socialist countries where college education is free, welfare is more effective, and everybody has a chance to succeed.

There are many poor people in the US that gain success and succeed in American society. My dad is a perfect example of that, he picked potatoes up until he was 18, lived on a farm, and now hes a doctor that makes $200,000 a year...

But in order for people to 'succeed' in socialist countries, they have to submit to the economic direction that their GOVERNMENT decides. In Socialist countries, there is little to no true freedom, they are just worker-bees for their governments.

America is the most powerful, and most economically liberal country in the world. And is the center of the world economy. Therefore it is the greatest country, and for many other reasons.

At 10/26/06 03:58 PM, altanese-mistress wrote:

At 10/25/06 10:27 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Not just any country, any possible allegiance and coalition of countries would fail to defeat the US in armed conflict. In a conventional war with no nukes involved, the US is invincible in ANY possible scenario.

In a war between America and China, China could crush us simply by breaking off all relations; Wal-Mart would go bankrupt within a few months, and the economy would collapse.

You don't know what you're talking about. Even though the US does rely on cheap products from China, Chinese-related business only makes up about 15% of the US economy. US-related business, however, makes up more than 50% of the Chinese economy.

If China and the US got in a conventional war with no nukes involved. The US wields ALOT more economic power, China would collapse, the US would suffer but would survive.

Hell, even by invading entire continents (you said any possible allegiance) like Africa, or Latin America, we'd destroy the governments but be forced back by gurrilla warfare.

If we went to war with the European Union, it would be a hard fought war, but eventually Europe would most likely prevail.

Um no. Europe also depends HEAVILY on the US economy. AND their militaries are nothing compared to the military of the US. The EU is dominated by NATO, which is a US-led military organization and almost all the countries in it rely HEAVILY on US military support. The US military is the ONLY military in the world that can independently project force over the whole globe and engage in more than one regional war at the same time.

Europe and the USA both contribute about 15% each to the worlds Economy.
And they are also both are each others main trading partner.
The US spends 253 Billion (USD) on imports from EU
And the EU spends 154 Billion (USD) on imports from the US
So Both Rely hugely on each other, but the USA does RELY on the EU more.

Atually there are three nations with a Blue water navy which makes it possible to send there armys anywere in the world. USA, Britain and france.
And the EU could easily engage in more than one reginal war, Britain could be in one while france in another.

And the EU isn't dominated by NATO, America has as much say in EU policies, as EU has in americas.
Otherwise why were most of the EU not in the Iraqi war???
THe European economy is the largest in the world bar none, followed by America.
And the US spends huge amounts on there Military, no nation in the world comes even close. Howether the EU spends about a 5th of how much the USA does.
The UK and France do come close to how techecology advanced the US is.
I think America an Britain are designing a new state of the art fighter plane together.

Europe is starting to have much more impact on the world. As the EU grows, even russia wants in! (which i hope doesn't happen as it will run europe dry to bring russia to EU standards.)
More European films are becoming succesful.
The European 'AirBus' has taken over the american 'Boeing'

South Africa and South America are Copying the European Union.

With the South African Union and South American Community of Nations
The EU is becoming a super power through 'Soft Power' which is why there is no need to spend so much on Military.

If the US had a war with the EU and tryed to invade Europe, the EU would definitly prevail. And if the EU invaded the USA then USa definitly would.