i thought voting power didn't apply for audio

if you play with distortion that just normal, what you wanna do is mute them with ur hand
touch the strings again & they stop ringing, that way you can do those hardcore chugga chugga riffs

i love the xylophone...love most traditional instruments actually, even the bagpipes ^_^

mine went through in about 3 days
but of course that was a few years ago ^_^

*don't bother looking...erased*

i don't get it...you already have pro tools

i use ableton, it's a little strange. it's not like typical DAWs, it's more loop geared. it was designed kind of for live DJing...the interface is very compact, it does have an arrangement view but everything is still kinda loop based

these days all DAWs pretty much work the same so it's just a matter of how you like working
Cubase is a more old school style interface

ripping software isn't illegal

Reason is intuitive...if you've ever worked with audio modifiers you would quickly grasp it & start turning knobs. FL is more punch-in based or pattern oriented

as for which is better, these days it's not even debatable...back in the day Reason had a lot more features over FL, but today they're pretty similar

stronger protection would certainly cut down piracy, but it won't increase sales by much

At 1/24/08 09:40 PM, SineRider wrote:

At 1/23/08 12:48 PM, xXDathDalerXx wrote: ...that band Radioslave

Who the hell is radioslave? ;)

how convenient of you to leave my side note out ;)
audioslave
radiohead

whichever of the two it was, i'm not fond of that type of music so i really don't look into it much

At 1/24/08 10:40 AM, navij11 wrote: Not really, actually. A lot of people say "I don't know anything about this, but its free, so I'll steal it."

you're proving my point for me...if they don't know anything about it why would they buy it??
believe me man, these kinds of questions have been asked all over the internet & just about everyone says they wouldn't have bothered buying the album or software in the first place...& quite a few say they actually buy them because they first got them free & liked them

you don't need to count the actual beats in one minute...if you divide 1 minute in half it becomes 30 seconds, 30 seconds in half become 15 seconds

so all you need to do is count for 15 seconds & multiply it by 4 & you get the BPM
you can usually feel the tempo of a song naturally, from there you can gather how to count it up to a more accurate BMP

anyways, computers these days do all that thing for you automatically

i think it's just EQing your music

At 1/24/08 12:40 AM, lexus3 wrote: wrong! the software cracker may just be one person, but the hundreds of people who download his cracked vst are not!

so?? what's your point?? those are the same amount of people who were not going to buy it in the first place

gee, i have no idea how you could possibly measure the beats per MINUTE in a song

in my opinion piracy doesn't hurt anybody cause people who pirate are people who most likely wouldn't have bought the product anyway

the prices don't help either...sure, those guys need to eat, but some of it is just abusive
same deal with music. it's the reason they started selling 99 cent songs & that band Radioslave (i believe) put up their album for free & told people to pay what they thought it was worth

toon boom is better, but it costs just as much

i'de like to hear that too, cause i still believe they are taking you for a ride
maybe all it does is EQ your music, cause audio for radio is passed through the stations compressor & is EQed for radio play

sorry kid...that just can't be done
there are very few audio formats that can do that. mpeg4, wmaL & RA to name some
whoever is trying to sell you that is lying

look into lossy & lossless data compression

i use this place a lot
http://www.musictheory.net/

try to find some master classes where they study famous composers pieces

a DI box or an audio interface for your guitar
USB MIDI cable for your keyboard (if it doesnt have MIDI get one that does)

sometimes composers would change key within a song
try to learn about modulation

i see death as a natural part of life...just be glad she lived as long as she did, a lot of people don't make it past their 20's

thought you were going to pull a rabbit out of your arse

At 1/21/08 03:38 PM, ocelotofonslaught wrote: Direct in?

interface
look up audio firewire or USB interfaces
there are plenty for less than $100

or you can get a DI unit & a small mixer, which will also be 100 or less

or you can get a dedicated recording soundcard which is also about $100
trust me man, there are so many ways

you can get a used POD-xt for 100 or less & that can go straight into your crappy soundcard
wanna hear what a POD can do if properly mixed??
http://www.myspace.com/mendelb

At 1/21/08 01:32 PM, ocelotofonslaught wrote:

:Be my guest to show me a good $100 guitar recording sound.

just threw this together to show. it' crude. no effects, no compression, no drums, straight into interface for recording
the louder the better =)

http://rapidshare.com/files/85509001/mes singround.wav.html

people have never really believed in god...they just do whatever needs to be done out of convenience
take the Greeks or Romans for example, they had tons of gods & worshiped them, but they knew they weren't real

the same could be said for any religion, some people just need to feel that there is someone out there looking out for their wellbeing...but no one really believes, if they did they would follow whatever rules this god puts out. but most people do whatever the fuck they want

even christians adopted a bunch of pagan rituals & beliefs to appeal to a greater public...everything depends on what's convenient

At 1/21/08 04:58 AM, ocelotofonslaught wrote: Hi gain, not just acoustic. Oh, and decent sound quality.

yes...$100 or less

Paragon is a shemale
...case closed

At 1/20/08 10:38 AM, ocelotofonslaught wrote: I'm working on my live recording set up. Getting my guitar sound recorded is not a cheap or easy venture.

recording guitar is so cheap these days...you can do it for $100 or less

c# is mostly used as a RAD tool while the hardcore programming is done in a more traditional language
also it uses the .net framework, which uses more system resources & only works for windows of course