Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

They learned early on from resident evil that if you give too little ammunition, then a save file of 10 hours could be rendered unbeatable if the hero doesn't have enough ammo for a boss fight and is stuck with a knife. This left a lot of people bummed and aggravated, even the most hardcore survival horror games of today like Cry of Fear have either a useful melee system or give generous (but not too generous) ammo supply.

At 12/30/14 11:38 PM, simon wrote:

At 12/30/14 11:05 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote: What's the other feature again? Zombies?

DLC, the only thing I didn't like about this new cod. Offering Zombies as DLC only is a bad move, if Zombies was in the game and they offered more zombies then fine, but nah.

Greedy bums.

At 12/30/14 11:02 PM, Chdonga wrote: I can't vouch for all women, but there was this slut in my community college who never shut up about how much she loved the feel of cock inside her mouth.

You know how to fix that, right?

Not a bad year. Started a new job that I actually love. You could say my job as a lifeguard is how I compensate for a nonexistant romantic life and social life, and to that I'd say you're right. Quite right.

So yes, I finally found 2 ways to drown my sorrows. Bury myself in work, and pour ethyl alcohol down the gullet. Oh did I mention I turned 21?

Demoman voice: WOOOOOOOO!! Woooo.....woo?

I'm on the fence about this.

A writer for Gameinformer said that the campaign was the best since Modern Warfare 2, almost 5 years ago. That's saying a LOT, because I fricking loved MW2's campaign and still play it to this day.

Oh, multiplayer? What's the point if you can't either completely pummel little kids and make them cry, or just dick around with your friends and exploit the game / be an asshole troll?

I have neither skill nor friends so I wont bother with multiplayer.

What's the other feature again? Zombies?

I went wayyyy over 8000+ characters in my reply, so I chopped it in two. I don't know when I will get to the 2nd half of your reply. It's really complex, but that's a good thing. You definitely know a lot about this subject, much more than me.

At 12/30/14 07:53 PM, Light wrote: I don't see Whites up in arms about the disproportionate incarceration of blacks that the War on Drugs has inflicted or the crushing poverty that they endure every day. Sure, they may say they care, but actions speak louder than words, and the action, or should I say the lack thereof, that Americans have taken to rectify these injustices speaks volumes about their priorities and their compassion for those who don't look like them.

I see this argument sometimes. The reason black incarceration rate is so high is because black crime rate is so high. It's really that simple. Also, what action would Americans do that we haven't already done for the impoverished? My paycheck doesn't like the sound of that.

Anyway, there's a reason that black people feel oppressed by the forces of racism in this country and are, by and large, angry about the state of affairs in the U.S.

Crushing poverty, bad relations with law enforcement, discrimination in the workplace, and basically all the racist shit that some opponents(Not all, of course) of President Obama have insinuated about him. Newt Gingrich called him the food stamp president. Ted Nugent called him a subhuman mongrel. The entire history of the Southern Strategy that blacks are well aware of.

Being on some sort of government assistance used to be a mark of shame. It meant you didn't handle your expenses and now must leave your fate in the hands of Uncle Sam. America has always been a fiercely independent nation, and we use to look down on people who refused to stand on their own two feet.

That being said, if they can't, physically, cannot, make rent, I get that. If your dumbass mother of father drank or gambled all your money, I get that too. Those people deserve pity. But if you are physically able to work, I'm sorry. This is (was) the breadbasket of the world. We have resources. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

I won't defend Ted Nugent on that particular comment. He's an intense kind of guy, and is true to his feelings, but sometimes even the smartest men's words outpace their thoughts.

Gallup has been tracking the views on interracial marriage that Whites and Blacks have expressed over the past 55 years. Naturally, these days, approval of interracial marriage is pretty high. Among blacks, it's 96%. Among Whites, it's 86%. In total, 87% of all Americans support this.

I think that's pretty good. When have 96% of any group agreed on anything?

This is great and all, but it should be noted that there's still 13% of White people who don't approve of interracial marriage.

Well, by your data, 14%

And frankly, if you oppose interracial marriage, you're a racist. There's no getting around that. Sure, some Whites say they oppose it because of "the children being ostracized for being biracial" or some shit like that, but that's a pretty fucking flimsy excuse. I'm not saying that mixed-race kids have it great in this country, but their plight isn't so awful that it justifies opposition to interracial marriage.

I'm a libertarian, so I'm in full agreement. A contract between two individuals, be it nuptial or financial or w/e, is not of the government's concern.

Further, historically, "mongrelization" of the races was a similar reason that Whites in the 20th century opposed this practice and was in fact the reason it was outlawed until 1967. They wanted to keep the races pure, essentially. I suspect that that's the reason some Whites still oppose it today, which makes them racist.

To our shame, the progressive movement of the 1920s which was founded by men and women such as Margaret Sanger. Her views on other races would make your skin crawl. This is where eugenics, as we know it today, was started. And there are a lot of links between American social-progressive views on race towards the Third Reich's own policy towards any non-Aryans. Shame, a lot of misery over something that is literally skin-deep, as somebody pointed out in another topic about melanin.

Further, the link I supplied shows that Southerners are, naturally, most opposed to interracial marriage. It's ludicrous to suggest that it's because they're just more empathetic to the possible plight of mixed-race kids. The truth is they're the most racist. And here's the kicker: according to the Gallup source, a majority of Whites opposed interracial marriage until 1997. That was not very long ago. At all. And you still have 14% who don't approve of this. That is a significant number to me. Progress has definitely been made, but not enough.

To be fair, my criticism of those who oppose this practice extends to people of all races. Blacks who oppose this are racists as well. Same with Hispanics, Asians, and so on.

I looked up the Gallup poll (good source) to see how the question was worded. It's not about public policy, like barring different races from marrying, but a sign of disapproval, the "not in my backyard" crowd.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/163697/approve-marriage-blacks-whites.aspx

The article also said that, in 1958, 4% of Americans approved of interracial marriage. I'd say we've made a good bit of progress!

I'll stand by America where she has made good choices, and we have made leaps and bounds in our race relations, I feel.

At 12/30/14 07:05 PM, Monster-64 wrote: This is a serious question, and I require all of NG's maturity and experience to collaborate with me and help me solve this end puzzle piece that will bring meaning to my life.

xD

So, do women go for that? I would assume they don't like anal because who the fuck wants something in their ass?

This is a good question. Men have prostates, which is why sodomy "feels" good to those who go for it. But women do not have prostates, obviously. So, I hypothesize that all women secretly hate anal, but only like it if their partner does.

Also, what does a vagina feel like?

Bony, or cartilage-y

Sounds like American Pie

Joe Dirt got a half star by critics, but 5 stars in my heart

At 12/29/14 11:51 PM, naronic wrote:

At 12/29/14 11:40 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

At 12/29/14 11:16 PM, naronic wrote:

At 12/29/14 10:41 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

The source is clearly unreliable about the historical profile of Hitler, I'll give you that, but that does not by default automatically make them a horse shit factory about every thing. The article about South Africa was a valid source.

Says who? You?

I guess so. Doesn't take a PhD to see if somebody did their homework.
(You can make me look like a fool any time now by double checking the article on South Africa for errors)

What are the credentials of Rense? Does it employ any standards of quality control with it's articles? If so, why is it so clogged with bull crap?

I don't know the answer to any of these three questions. I just try to be fair and open minded about everything that I come across, and this M.O. has served me quite well.

At 12/29/14 11:24 PM, Light wrote:

At 12/29/14 10:53 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

Explain this a bit more, because you're drenching this topic with gasoline at the moment.

How? This topic is explicitly about American race relations, so the idea that a lot of Americans don't really give a shit about the plight of black people in the U.S. is something that should be discussed.

How do you know this?

Anyway, there's a reason that black people feel oppressed by the forces of racism in this country and are, by and large, angry about the state of affairs in the U.S.

What are these reasons?

You should look into those reasons through research,

That falls on the person who makes the claim.

because I get the feeling that my repeating them here might fall on deaf ears.

Well, you have my full attention.

I could cite the numerous statistics and historical evidence to substantiate my position, but I'm not sure it'll be all that effective.

We conservatives are very reasonable. Saying you have all the answers but withholding them is like saying you're a French model but not showing a picture....sure you are a model...

A majority of White Americans are uncomfortable with the idea that they may be more racist than they think, or that racism didn't cease to exist in this country after the 1960s.

I'd ask you to explain this, but the term racism has too many conflicting definitions to be discussed seriously anymore. But you can try.

If you're white, you're statistically likely to be one of those people.

Show me.

Better yet, why don't you talk to a black person or two and hear about their experiences with racism in the U.S.? A conversation about the issue can go a long way towards reexamination of one's views about this problem.

I don't think there is a thing wrong with my private views, but there is also nothing wrong with further discussion. I'll certainly give this a try.

At 12/29/14 11:16 PM, naronic wrote:

At 12/29/14 10:41 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote: Just because rense has one questionable article does not mean everything they produce is garbage. This is the ad homina fallacy. The website's prior, unrelated stories have no bearing on their honesty in this current story.

http://rense.com/general77/histor.htm
http://www.rense.com/general78/ilumm.htm
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
http://www.rense.com/general50/itle.htm

And no, it is not an ad hominem. Don't be ridiculous.

I was wrong, it's really closer to red herring.

It's not an ad hominem to ask for decent non-lazy sourcing, it's something I shouldn't even have to ask of a debater in the first place.
It doesn't matter if SadisticMonkey "backs what he says with sources" where those sources come from and how reliable they are MATTERS.

The source is clearly unreliable about the historical profile of Hitler, I'll give you that, but that does not by default automatically make them a horse shit factory about every thing. The article about South Africa was a valid source. But you don't like what it says. That's the case.

At 12/29/14 10:44 PM, Light wrote:

At 12/29/14 10:41 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

I understand the hypocrisy behind the Ayatollah's statement made on twitter, but how is "black lives matter" an insult?

The inverse is to say that, to Americans, black lives don't matter, which is grossly untrue,

U.S. history

Call Dr. Who

and current events seem to indicate otherwise.

Explain this a bit more, because you're drenching this topic with gasoline at the moment.

At 12/29/14 09:07 PM, Light wrote:

At 12/29/14 07:02 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

At 12/29/14 06:15 PM, Ranger2 wrote: Iran's Ayatollah Khameini recently tweeted #BlackLivesMatter on his Twitter page, sending a strong condemnation of US police policies.

I wonder if he's going to also tweet #HomosexualLivesMatter, #KurdishLivesMatter, or #Bahai'iLivesMatter too?

taunt
tônt
1.
provoke or challenge (someone) with insulting remarks.

This isn't the first time Iran has made such a taunt. China has said similar things too. And yes, it is very much the pot calling the kettle black.

I understand the hypocrisy behind the Ayatollah's statement made on twitter, but how is "black lives matter" an insult?

The inverse is to say that, to Americans, black lives don't matter, which is grossly untrue, which is why I don't think it's just an insult, I think it is a taunt between two nuclear-armed states.

EDIT:

At 12/29/14 08:47 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

At 12/28/14 02:07 PM, naronic wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general39/reose.htm

rense.com?
Are you really this much of a fucking idiot?

http://www.rense.com/general77/chinsec.htm

Just because rense has one questionable article does not mean everything they produce is garbage. This is the ad homina fallacy. The website's prior, unrelated stories have no bearing on their honesty in this current story.

It would be like Colonel Sanders backing PETA. Would it be ironic? Yes, but his past actions towards chickens don't have any traction with his current (hypothetical) political position.

tldr Don't dismiss individuals or entities so fastidiously, and that includes SadisticMonkey. You may not like what he has to say, but he will back it up with sources if you ask him to.

if there's nothing wrong with a source, but you just don't like it, that's your problem

Wishing they had a mother like @Sensationalism who will pay attention to them, unlike their queens/whorish black widow moms who either die or have 2 million other babies.

TO THE INSECT! The most misunderstood animal.

At 12/29/14 06:15 PM, Ranger2 wrote: Iran's Ayatollah Khameini recently tweeted #BlackLivesMatter on his Twitter page, sending a strong condemnation of US police policies.

I wonder if he's going to also tweet #HomosexualLivesMatter, #KurdishLivesMatter, or #Bahai'iLivesMatter too?

taunt
tônt
1.
provoke or challenge (someone) with insulting remarks.

This isn't the first time Iran has made such a taunt. China has said similar things too. And yes, it is very much the pot calling the kettle black.

HAI XENOMITTS I thought all dawgs were color blind

hyuk hyuk

More data to add to your pain and suffering ya misanthropic atheist

How else do you know your cat has autism?

Does she end every sentence with "and I mean that in the most offensive way possible" ?

Nothing.

Step by step instructions for how to pick up chicks

At 12/29/14 12:08 PM, NeonSpider wrote: Was going to come in with a bird joke but I see that angle's already been done to death here.

Ain't no such thing, hombre. In fact, I declare 12/29 to be NG bird day. I'll have another topic about birds along shortly.

You know, for all the hate EA gets, they are doing a campaign of sorts in some of their games to change gamers' image.

In High School Story, an iOS game, gamers are brash, bad asses who are as much jock as they are nerd. In the sims 4, the gaming skill was introduced, opening up a lot of options related to talking about gaming and etc., and everybody young old male female can become a master gamer.

For lack of a better word, it's propaganda, but it's good propaganda lol

Show off your bright plumage in a mating ritual.

If that doesn't work, just whip out one of these,

BAWK BAWK

What is going on in this thread? The last five posts, I don't even.

At 12/28/14 08:40 PM, Cordyceps wrote:

At 12/28/14 08:38 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

At 12/28/14 11:23 AM, The-Real-Giovanni wrote: I cannot believe you mooks are still holding arbitrary popularity contests.

How is the star syndicate these days?

oh hey anyone have a copy of 4chan Fandango? That was a fun-ass game.

I bet that's where most of the Stars ended up, in 4chan, or I should say back in 4chan. Like a turtle, they spend most of their lives in the sea (4chan) only to come to the beaches of Newgrounds to lay their eggs.

Sort of a circle of life thing.

At 12/28/14 11:23 AM, The-Real-Giovanni wrote: I cannot believe you mooks are still holding arbitrary popularity contests.

How is the star syndicate these days?

At 12/28/14 06:04 PM, Bit wrote: I would be a Bit surprised if I saw someone who was split male/female.

I see what you did there :3

It would be like if Marvel and DC made a comic together, and each page went abruptly from Marvel to DC right in the middle with no transition. Or if one of my Elton John albums abruptly changed to Slayer right in the middle of each song. My head would spin.

Yeah.....unfortunately for our transgender friends on here, this is typically the case for them in public. Long hair with big hands, breasts with male facial features, tall wearing female clothing...etc.

I think our brains are wired to simply categorize things in the world as male/female/thing. Which is why some languages like ancient Latin or modern Spanish have gender'd nouns.

I took Latin for 5 years. It's not out of any kind of supposed 'structure' that linguists and scholars consider "valus" to be masculine, "avus" to be feminine, or "tabula" to be neuter. It's simply out of convenience for the speaker.

At 12/28/14 02:04 PM, FinaLee wrote:

At 12/28/14 02:03 PM, Gagsy wrote: But its lonely.

The poor little fucker.

I know, poor dear. Shim would make a nice addition to an exotic bird collection.

At 12/28/14 01:22 PM, Vinnyy wrote:

At 12/28/14 01:18 PM, Shauna wrote: I can think of 10 animes that top that any old day.

Speaking of days...

Ahh, School Days...the anime that everyone says is the worst anime ever.

The ending was such a mind-fuck for a lot of people. Perfect example of a harem gone wrong.

Horribly, horribly wrong.

I'm curious why the hackers did it in the first place.

Was it just to see the world burn?

I got 1 vote, so I feel loved.

But really, where the duck is zeroasalimit these days? He had 50,000 posts