Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/1/14 11:07 PM, HarryFeltersnach wrote:

At 9/1/14 03:23 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote: Raul Julia in Street Fighter

Raul Julia in fuckin anything!

Only problem with that statement is that he was usually in good movies, thus defeating the criteria of the thread.

At 9/1/14 09:45 PM, TheGamechanger wrote: The Shining.

You're a silly goose, that movie was incredibly morally terrifying.

At 9/1/14 06:41 PM, Letiger wrote:

At 9/1/14 06:35 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote: OP, I'm gonna accuse you of being vzni on account of the similarity of the art style in your signature. I remember vzni as pleasant enough, though.

You mean the collection of Homestuck signatures that someone put up in the MSPA crew?

I don't even know.

OP, I'm gonna accuse you of being vzni on account of the similarity of the art style in your signature. I remember vzni as pleasant enough, though.

At 9/1/14 05:05 PM, TheKlown wrote:
Emulation is disgusting word. Emulation will never give the same feeling as it does playing on a real original Nintendo. You feel like a kid again playing on an original Nintendo. That and doesn't Emulators usually have sound issues and other graphical problems since its Emulating.

Maybe, I don't know. I kinda go with the times and move on because I'm not a child anymore, so I try to act like the adult I am. I barely even game anymore, usually too busy working on my photography career. But when I do, I try to play games that actually engage me rather than trying to recapture my childhood, which I accept is gone. Time moves on. Sure, I'll play older games, but ones that hold up because of their engaging content, not just out of nostalgia.

Don't seek to be a kid again, or you're gonna be treated like one. If you're literally losing money getting screwed with dead cartridges, give it up and emulate. Or work on a career.

Firefly. I LOVE Firefly, but I realize that Joss Whedon tends to burn out real quick. As it stands, we have no bad episodes. It went out at its peak

I like Rust Flower.

I'd suggest Finnish? I dunno, was watching Talvisota last night and it sounds pretty nice.

At 9/1/14 03:34 PM, TheGamechanger wrote:

At 9/1/14 02:45 PM, Jester wrote:

At 8/19/14 02:27 AM, TheGamechanger wrote: This is my top ten list. If you disagree with this list, make your own!

I don't dislike you but i'm obligated to tell you to kill yourself for putting Garfield ahead of Calvin & Hobbes

But Garfield is oftentimes more interesting and hilarious than Calvin and Hobbes!

Disagree. Also Marvel and DC aren't franchises themselves, they are a collection of franchises.

Anyways, I like The Punisher, specifically the MAX series.

Raul Julia in Street Fighter

How about doing a little research if you don't know it?

At the moment?

This photograph.
Single snap, manual focus.

At 8/30/14 06:36 PM, TheKlown wrote:

At 8/30/14 04:17 AM, Captain-Slugworth wrote: I love the fact you dislike Ebay
yet you keep coming back for more, just to get ripped off.

Where else am I suppose to get Old Nes Cartridges from? I don't know of any retro stores near me and I'm sure retro stores are probably even more expensive to buy from.

How about emulators? You want to play it on a tv, connect your computer to a tv. It's a lot less expensive

At 9/1/14 05:06 AM, alcavane wrote: I hate to say this but I have to admit that everything is perfect./details?id=cn.matrixgame.thesaints2RU

So what did you do on the game? Or are you just a marketing intern? You get a B-.

At 9/1/14 07:53 AM, Makakaov wrote:

Implying internet is only in usa.

yeah, that's what my first point was, that it's not

nothing he's not real dummy

Why did the bank robber go to prison?

Because he robbed a bank.

Why did the little piggy squeal?

He was going through the blades at the slaughterhouse.

At 8/31/14 09:11 PM, TeslaShockwave wrote: Congress & the FCC must hear from all of us! Site like Newgrounds would be harmed VERY badly by this!

HONESTLY, as a huge proponent of free speech, saying that this is a first amendment issue is denigrating actual first amendment issues for a few reasons:
The Internet is not strictly Americans, and therefore the first amendment doesn't actually cover the entirety of it, as it's an international thing, like the sea. Which really means it should be either lawless or laws being based on where the servers are.

Also, the Internet is a product/service these companies provide, you're not entitled to the internet at all. It's their product, their servers, their bandwidth and they can do whatever they want with it. If you're not happy, find another ISP.

Also, the FCC has nothing to do with the internet at all. They cover government-owned television and radio frequencies. The internet is a paid (premium) service, thus not under the FCC's jurisdiction

At 8/31/14 07:06 PM, solamander wrote:

At 8/31/14 07:00 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote:

At 8/31/14 07:21 AM, solamander wrote:

What's the brand, where did you get it?

I'm not sure of the brand, and I got it from a friend of mine.

Ask him. Or a local lawyer or police officer. They won't arrest you if you turn it in, I don't think

At 8/31/14 07:21 AM, solamander wrote: I recently got a knife that is sort of like a switchblade, except the blade comes out by flicking your wrist and locking the blade in place with this little mechanism on the handle. I want to start carrying a knife around, but where I live there are laws against gravity knifes. Can this be considered a gravity knife?

What's the brand, where did you get it?

At 8/27/14 05:46 PM, Vertyx wrote:

At 8/27/14 05:30 PM, TheGamechanger wrote: This is an interesting read.

To me it seems like this guy's saying I can't criticize women because they're women.

Unfortunately I believe in equal rights.

He's suggesting that even legit critique right now isn't going to be listened to and is going to muddle in with the actual harassment, become just another voice in the highly-misogynist cacophony, and help drive away people who have morals and aspirations. He's saying cool your jets right now, fucking drop it, and stop harassing people and let the shit sort itself out.

At 8/25/14 11:33 AM, Radaketor wrote:
You a filmmaker? I thought you were a photographer.

I dabble in both. Trained as a filmmaker, self-taught in photography. I do a lot of set photography when I can.

At 8/25/14 11:21 AM, Radaketor wrote:

At 8/25/14 11:18 AM, WrightOnTarget wrote: Really, you went to a screening for Wall-E? Neat! I didn't realize they still did showings of that, it's probably my favorite Pixar movie, along with Up.

Last time i went to the cinema was way back in 2008 so it was in '08.

Oh jeez. Wow.

I thought I was bad about going to the theater. Then again, it's bad how few in theater movies I see because of the fact that I'm in the business.

Full day, second page, and still no Chris Chan reference. I guess he is truly no longer relevant.

At 8/25/14 11:16 AM, Radaketor wrote: If you mean going to the cinema, Wall-E.
If not then it was either Rise of the Planet of the Apes or Battle for the Planet of the Apes.

Really, you went to a screening for Wall-E? Neat! I didn't realize they still did showings of that, it's probably my favorite Pixar movie, along with Up.

maybe they fucked up a take and were embarrassed at their poor cinematography

Sabotage. Was p good, Arnie's only legitimately decent performance

At 8/24/14 09:03 PM, The-Great-One wrote:

At 8/24/14 04:41 PM, Makakaov wrote: Watch The Room.

I did. From beginning to end. The cinematography was nice and the song that has become this movie's theme now is on of my favorite instrumental pieces. The story isn't bad, but film is an illusion so you need all the pieces to fit. One being acting. I have yet to see a movie that I didn't take something good from it. When I do, I will have seen the worst movie of all time.

What are you talking about, the cinematography was terrible, I love the room, but it's got really bland production values at best

At 8/24/14 08:15 PM, Timmy wrote:

At 8/24/14 04:19 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote: If someone's offended by something, they have every right to say so and should say so, so actual discussion can happen where both sides actually talk rationally. But no one wants to talk rationally about tough subjects, it seems.

We do discuss those tough subjects though.

Some user says, "I am offended by something and I have every right to say so, and should say so," and another user comes along and says, "You're being an oversensitive dickhole. Knock it off."

And thus the discussion has reached its natural conclusion.

Well, I'd have asked why they're offended, and if they're rational about it, they may realize it doesn't actually offend them.