Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Uh. Voltage. The letter is the 5th letter in my name.

My favorite number is five.

At 8/14/14 12:06 AM, TheMajormel wrote: dont tell me to go to vg forum, its way too slow to acquire info

1. do you play video games?

yes

2. what is your favorite kind of videogame?

can't really describe it. is this myspace? are we surveying eachother?

3. what do you think about fighting games?

Super Smash Brothers is not a fighting game. MUGEN is a fighting game. It's actually like a typo fighting engine, yet you can put together anyone and everyone. I try to match Goku and Vegeta against Akuma from Super SF2 Turbo and it's hilarious just to watch. That's fighting games.

Hilarious to watch.
SSB is a fighting game again.

3a. are you good at them?

If SSB was a true fighting game yes. If we're talking Super Street Fighter 2 or MvC3U, not really. I'm not bad at arcade Tekken.

3b. do you like playing them with friends

They're ok.

3c. do you think there is anything wrong with them (in general)?

Yes Mr. Questionaire. The problem about fighting games is that the player REGULARLY never sees their visual combination of moves on screen. Ironically I was just thinking when I saw a pic of SSB action. If you could figure that out, it'd be so much funner to acquire the concept of a character by seeing how the moves are done. Some people are mindless and still don't get it. But that's my beef with fighting games.

NG Rumble, SF2, Saturday Slam Masters - fine fighting "games." Both are oddly similar btw.

4. how was your day?

No.

At 8/14/14 03:30 AM, JRob wrote: Simple - toss one of these

haaaaa you so funny TAKE YOUR PURIFICATION BACK YOU KNAVE

At 8/13/14 09:53 PM, argotto wrote: Oh what were we complaining about? Oh right right, yeah it SUCKED back then so I won't miss whatever it was you miss.

lol someone didn't rumble in the jungle back in the day~~~~ ur the reason the site is so soft~~~~

At 8/13/14 09:52 PM, NeonSpider wrote: Personally though I don't think kids should be on the Internet at all. Like, not even on "kid-friendly" sites or what have you. Don't censor the Internet to "keep kids safe". Keep kids off the Internet entirely. Full stop. They don't belong on it at all.

And I think schools should use private LANs for school work that requires computers/etc...

the problem with private LANs are that they do not allow access to the internet which is where they primarily funnel the idea of an educated reference. generally it's on a filter, and that filter means you can't connect to a lot of sites. but in school the filters were really weak. some would allow youtube, some wouldn't - i got to a porn site somehow by accident once - also, the administrators there don't facilitate any sort of punishment for misuse of the web.

At 8/13/14 05:38 PM, Magical-Zorse wrote: Those kids can go fuck themselves, if I want the content I'm contributing to this great website to be explicit, then I can and if they wanna bitch about it they can go eat shit on deviantart.

we aren't deviantart dude, we existed long before deviantart was a major popular outlet for art. and we are a site that hosts content that is purely entertainment. the objective isn't to be a community effort over there. my point is that people come to newgrounds of all ages and places and content that they need to restrict either to themselves or others is their choice - for instance I'm not a fan of most "A" content, "A" content is generally pointlessly overly excessive about adult themes and overarc the reason you showcase something that isn't true "A" content.

so that's why content ratings exist anyway because sometimes you have to place standards or limits. kids shouldn't watch a lot of the content but they do and there's no telling them to stop, but that doesn't mean we should be liveleak with a reason to hit "yes or no" on 18+ content. remember what NG needs and wants: something new, fresh, interesting, worth hitting the 5 - not another dick-in-a-toilet joke, awesome parody, or Gmod music video shit. and if you really look on this site you'll see a lot of popular animations are mixed between the ratings.

At 8/13/14 08:21 PM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote: Gagsy probably stole it from you. You'll have to fight to the death to regain the honour that was rightfully yours.

no! gagsy lives in the UK, the PMing system is different over there. expect it in the near future CherryTree.

At 8/13/14 08:25 PM, stafffighter wrote: Not to be crass, but it'd be just as disrespectful to sugarcoat it. Those two sickness are closely tied and ultimately it comes down to what Daniel Tost said about Heath Ledger "He swallowed a fish full of pills. He knew how that nap was ending." It sounds bad but to say it plainly is the only course you can really call correct.

pretty much my reason, i researched into Jimi Hendrix's death and he was on a snowball of drugs (though not a snowball like what would kill Layne Staley and Chris Farley), I don't think you're aware you're about to die when you start taking those because the euphoria is upside down on how to stay alive. With that being said I still think it's safe to say an overdose is really just an unintentional suicide.

At 8/13/14 05:48 PM, CiviLies wrote: If I did it on purpose it'd be murder, if by accident, probably manslaughter. I do see what you mean, though. Were those comics purposely trying to kill themselves with drugs, or did it just happen?

i think suicide by overdose is not always intentional, probably very 50/50 - but if you take that risk, I think it's safe to say that suicidal tendencies are mixed and hidden before an idol takes their last hit

At 8/13/14 03:31 PM, Radaketor wrote: To be fair, he only said the "How about you grow on my dick and accept that?" thing because you said "You might disagree but it'd be best if you grew upon my idea than trash it."

yup it was a satirical thing - it wasn't "I was offended," it was more or less just the snootiness of that 'you might disagree' thing struck a bad chord in me when I egged myself to read this post

he only thought you'd been here for 12 days because he had no evidence that you'd been a user with another account before.

and from this, regardless of 2 days or 2 years or whatever, that's just not nearly enough time to spend here to understand how the ad system works or especially make suggestions to it. it is what it is

At 8/13/14 03:19 PM, Cronizone wrote: And you are an asshole just for replying you didn't try and attack me.

Permission by mod to go on full offensive on this fool.

At 8/13/14 02:35 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: The comment sounded like a blanket reply to any and all people rightly pointing out the problem your idea would bring rather than specifically to the ones insulting you.

that's because addressing anyone personally is too hard, and time consuming.

also chronizone, if you scroll back up to my response I never personally attacked you - I personally attacked your idea followed by your logic to the idea, and yet you call me "a fucking asshole." i don't think i'll pull out any stops on you, but you need to know that sense-offender is totally right.

you are ignorant of the criticisms and don't really try to analyze or properly address the major flaws people point out which by majority opinion have a lot of reasons to not build upon your idea, which is already built off the current system.

At 8/13/14 02:37 PM, CherryTree wrote:

At 8/13/14 02:31 PM, Gagsy wrote: Congratulations man.

Thanks man!

yeah, "dude!" u earned it!!!

At 8/13/14 02:09 PM, All-American-Badass wrote: I've heard good thing about Subarus. Also those things are practically unstoppable in the winter so if you live somewhere with actually winters you've made a great choice.

Yes, a friend of mine actually outran a cop because the cop cars were still Crown Vics, he was driving a 2000 Subie Outback PoS, went from 0 to 60 in 4 seconds in a snow storm with 6 inches of snow on the ground

At 8/13/14 01:51 PM, Ragnarokia wrote:

At 8/13/14 01:39 PM, Voltage wrote:

At 8/13/14 12:38 PM, Ragnarokia wrote: Males and females should carry one

multiple*

Indeed, but at least one for sure, having more is always good but it can be a bit weird if you carry too many with you. As if you are saying "Yes, I will be fucking 100 people tonight!"

well how do you know some people don't engage in having sex once a day sometimes they have it at least 12 times a day which may or may not require anywhere from 2 to a 4 a session therefore roughly 24~48 condoms are required yes I am serious

At 8/13/14 09:26 AM, Phobotech wrote: Inspired by this cracked article, lets make two lists.

First, make a list of everything you've done yesterday. You don't have to include sleeping, eating, shitting or pissing, but how you actually spent your day. Something in chronological order, and they can be rough estimates.

For example.

12 AM Final Fantasy 3
1 AM Final Fantasy 3
2 AM Chat
3 AM Chat
4 AM Chat
5 AM The Delivery Driver
6 AM SLEEP
------
11 AM Wake up
12 PM Deliver the goods
1 PM Typing this f***king list

Now for the second list...write down in just a few words the five things that are most important in life. Preferably in order.

Life, Liberty, The Pursuit of Happiness, Expression, <3.

In the honest brutal truth of things, what could you have done yesterday that coincides with your top five most important values? What could you do today or tomorrow?

Lived my life, expressed my freedom in more than a few ways, I remained happy (into the next day anyway), I expressed myself in more than a few ways, and <3

What are your top five most important things in life, and do you regularly tend to them on a daily basis?

Make a game, make a popular video/animation, get rich, die trying, being authentic greatness. no tho. u need money for getting rich silly puss.

Are you managing your time?

no and i love not being able to

If you aren't, then really ask yourself what is it going to take for you to pull your head out of your ass?

look bro i am phenomenal

At 8/13/14 01:02 PM, Radaketor wrote:

At 8/13/14 12:31 PM, SCTE3 wrote:

At 8/13/14 12:26 PM, FRAYDO wrote: it has been two days where is his gold aura already???

Hint, hint, it's never happening.

Oh?

Oh shit man, look out! We have a new mod!! This guy is definitely official. I can tell by this picture! That isn't faked... ladies and gentlemen, watch out! BrenTheMan you better LTFO. We have a MF SOB coming to down down here at the OG NG.

At 8/13/14 12:38 PM, Ragnarokia wrote: Males and females should carry one

multiple*

At 8/13/14 11:55 AM, KatMaestro wrote: ☑ Reddit mod
☑ 2009 user
☐ Being a good user

☐ Has an idea of who 10 major figures at Newgrounds are

Voltage gently caresses all of your leg before fucking you all senseless in the dark, Voltage impregnates all of you whether or not you're a woman or martian. Voltage is also really bad at roleplaying and talking in the third person, but he also likes marshmallows and the role they play in sex.

whoops i thought this was a "support women with dildos" thread, not a discussion about dildos

bren the man

bren the man yes this is a review 4 u i u were freidns on skype wen i called u, ask u hook u up u wondlt respond. im givinj u 2 star out of 10 Bcuz I was wantning to nkow when u can make tha cat. u didn make the cat well u i talk 2 ur best man friend mankeep told me 2 tell u 2 remeber ? 2 look in ur pmc box. well u didn look I told u that u could look n whan u didnt look u dindt look @ me whe u were on tha gogle c+ so u I give u a C+ u tried man bat u disrecarded me form skype.; I don lick that idea u are sprourintg fom ur mout u say TAT 2 my face, so b ut u made a good kork piece of]wom here so i gave u 3 stars out of 10 good try u realy put ur work in yoru form style bat its 2 edge 4 my wat i have 2 c with my eyes itseld. Thank u bren So 3 stars out of 10

At 8/13/14 05:02 AM, Letiger wrote: I love seeing traps get their tight boy asses filled.

double penetrated. i mean double agreed.

also, 2006 - trademark year for the word "phail," and how nobody talks about using that word.

I dunno man, people are weak and all sensitive and shit for nothing. They don't do anything, they cry when they don't get it or can't make a funny or relate. Or just don't post. Hence why in that thread I posted, "that'll do Bret," a reference shot to the Montreal Screw Job.

Get it, Montreal Screw Job?! HAHAHAHA FUCK YOU GUYS THAT WAS BRILLIANT

At 8/13/14 02:31 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: I posted the link as an example of how certain groups of Canadians don't respect common property in their own country.

you know what's awkward yurgie? when your logical, infallible ecosystem humanitarian starts speaking, I get a huge boner

At 8/12/14 03:44 AM, Phobotech wrote: To the uninitiated, loud = power. Sometimes thats correct.

indeed - that means holes throughout the exhaust and muffler, along with a blown shock plug, do not make the car "powerful." it makes it "in need for repair, obnoxious, and a target for a pullover"

Revenge probably depends on your religion and nationality. For some, vengeance "killing" is not even a question of morality. It is simply an obligation and an imperative. As for 'vengeance,' if you cannot FEEL the act of vengeance then do not pursue the concept of vengeance. Because your childish act will result in a karmic blowback, or worse, murder. Or even worse, your electricity stops working because the guy at the power company doesn't like you.

At 8/12/14 08:05 PM, CiviLies wrote:

At 8/11/14 10:50 PM, Voltage wrote: mitch hedberg, chris farley, john belushi, hunter s thompson, drake sather, now robin williams all have one thing in common - they were all great comedians and potentially actors and all took their own lives

I thought Hedberg and Belushi died of drug overdoses?

jeez civilies, can you just insert a heroin cigarette into my arm and accidentally kill me?!?! it'll be counted as murder cuz u gave me the drug overdodse.

At 8/13/14 02:40 AM, TeslaShockwave wrote:

At 8/13/14 02:09 AM, Voltage wrote:
lmao, dude do you understand Subies? It's either go big or go home.

I plan on hypermiling it so...

Drats, sorry. I thought you wanted a Subaru 'cuz it was a Subaru. Here, I think this is more your forte.

At 8/13/14 02:29 AM, Cronizone wrote:

At 8/13/14 01:42 AM, Voltage wrote:

Third, don't tell us to "grow on your ideas and accept it." How about you grow on my dick and accept that? You've been here for like 12 days and you think your ideas on a website that's been around 486 TIMES the amount of days makes it pretty obvious you have no idea what you are talking about. I don't even think you're trolling either.

(You might disagree but it'd be best if you grew upon my idea than trash it.)

(You also might disagree, but stark criticism is important in marketing decisions)

Oooooh wait I'm sorry, 2 years. That actually makes your suggestion even worse. See, I think pitching ideas to NG is a ballsy move yes, but I don't think you put more than an iota of effort in the concept because as I've noted - being here 12 days (or apparently 2 years) makes you not understand exactly what the deal is behind the concept of front page.

Many artists want to be known and want their works featured. When you take out the element of purpose in how you attain front page by "buying" the right to be on front page, it would make us like America's top radio or especially like YouTube, where companies will march in, buy that $50 and throw out their trash to be front paged - or, artists with money with shit works that front page their material. While we're at it:

Plus prices are reasonable for what they do.

No, you threw out a random "5, 25, 50." You based it on current Supporter costs with some really junky thoughtfulness. What is with the extra $25 for "Legend?" What about "$5" for 1 month of no ads, that doesn't make much sense. Why spend $5 for a month of no ads? You are apparently downgrading the supporter because a "savior" can only afford the $25? I don't think this idea would work, and is way too simple when you think about it.

The fact you also make no effort to keep it to ad-free for a year for what was the previous supporter would piss a lot of people off, and if you extended it a year (by listening to my criticism) you'd realize "$10 to be adfree a year" makes a hell of a lot more sense than $5 a month to be ad free. No one would take that offer. That's $70 a year to be ad free, with middle ground retained at "$25 per 6 months, $50 right off for a year." The $50 has the exact same benefits as a $25 per 6 months individual yet pay less within the year... ?

And you might sell some of these $50 rink-a-dink packages, but because of it you will drive potential future supporter/"saviors" away. This idea pisses me off and it's not even the fact it's a new idea that would just outright sucks, it just sucks and your suggestion to an issue we've kind of thought about for half a decade was probably not thought up for a few days in the last years you've been here. It took you anywhere between 1 hour of loose thinking and the 4 minutes it took you to smoke a join.

You really are a fucking asshole, and I hope you know that.

I'm not the one who'd hound TomFulp to review my work because I pay $50 a year to put my bullshit all over the front page and drive people away from this site. I don't think I'm being an asshole. I'm being honest. Thanks.

At 8/13/14 01:20 AM, TeslaShockwave wrote: In a day or two, I am going to purchase a new 2014 Subaru Impreza (CVT). I test drove it already, and its really fun to drive. Despite only having 148 HP

lmao, dude do you understand Subies? It's either go big or go home.