Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/19/07 02:36 PM, dySWN wrote:

At 4/19/07 09:45 AM, Alphabit wrote: Unless we reduce the population by only allowing people with an IQ of 180+ to breed... Then they pass on their smart genes to their children

I think that's called eugenics. It went out of style in the late 1940s. I'll give you three guesses why.

Because of hitler. D'uh

At 4/17/07 08:56 PM, Bolo wrote:

At 4/17/07 07:27 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: You're just parading your ignorance right now. When you refer to "automatic weapons" you refer to FULLY automatic weapons which require vast paperwork to get a hold of and have almost never been used in a crime in the US.

Q: What kind of weapons were used in the Columbine massacre?
A: Automatic weapons, and a few shotguns.

:In the collumbine masacre 2 shotguns were used and a few semi automatics:
"When the cafeteria bombs failed, Harris and Klebold met near Harris' car, armed themselves with two sawed-off shotguns, a 9 mm Hi-Point carbine, and a 9 mm TEC-9 semi-automatic pistol (all placed in a duffel bag), "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_S chool_massacre#April_20.2C_1999:_shooting_at_
Columbine_High_Schoolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre#April_20.
2C_1999:_shooting_at_Columbine_High_School

I've been doing some reading and it turns out that Quantum theory tells us that particles are controled by chance.

At 4/8/07 12:53 AM, Ravariel wrote: Not to rain on the parade, but Newtonian physics are wrong...

Im not a physics major or anything, but I've sort of got the idea that Newtons laws are good at explaining normal everyday things While Einsteins laws explain things that arent so normal (what happens if youre traveling at the speed of light). Are you saying that maybe NEwtons laws dont apply to this?

At 4/7/07 11:11 PM, Der-Ubermensch wrote:

At 4/7/07 11:09 PM, vic000 wrote: it be possible to predict the future?

If one could actually come up with that massively complex equation and take into consideration the massive influx of all types of outside/ environmental stimuli.. then I don't see why not.

Hope they do that before I die.

Everyone brings up good/freaky points; but doesnt Newton prove freewill doesnt exist? Is it possible to make a choice? Is it my choice to write this? In the future will it be possible to predict the future?

At 4/7/07 10:22 PM, dooseyboy wrote: i have thought of this before
the boidy thopugh made of these atoms are controlled by the brain wich presumably is also made of atoms.
free will is what you make it but if you can control atoms you can own the world

So you agree that free will doesnt exist?

If all particles and objects in the universe obey Newtons laws, then is it possible to have free will?

At 4/5/07 10:50 AM, Dre-Man wrote: 1.) They won't.

2.) SETI is a waste of good tax dollars.

End thread.

If the Universe is infinite then there has to be life in many planets

At 4/4/07 10:23 PM, SolInvictus wrote:

At 4/4/07 07:39 PM, vic000 wrote: If scientists were to to find Extra Terrestrial life, it wouldn't be prokaryotes or eukaryotes,

why wouldn't it be?

Because prokaryotes and eukaryotes evolved on earth, so its unlikeyl you will find them any where else.

If scientists were to to find Extra Terrestrial life, it wouldn't be prokaryotes or eukaryotes, so how would they know it is a living organism? I would imagine any ET life would be completely different.

Viruses arent living things, and they cant survive and multiply outside of their host cell, and neither can bateriophages.