Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Oh the irony. It's a sad state of affairs when someone willing to cause physical harm to another takes the moral high ground over him.

Get a clue - considering the age gap and the fact that she's probably pubescent, this is not an act of pedophilia. We're also not given any context into how young she looks, or if he's harrased her. You seem someone typical of your age - a tough-guy wannabe hidden behind the context of inforced morality.

I'm in no way in defence of this kid, only against your ridiculous attitude and immaturity.

Alcohol is bad for pregnancy
Everclear is 190 proof

Interprete that data how you will.

Four weddings and an orgasm

At 9/15/07 03:25 PM, fli wrote: If you add the "u"--

Then you would have the pronounce it "Co-lure."

British used to spell it without the U. It was only added with an U so that they can distinguish themselves from other English speaking peoples in the world as world-class snobs.

Without the U, it sounds like coller.

At 9/15/07 05:02 AM, dELtaluca wrote:

At 9/15/07 04:42 AM, PanzerKorpse wrote: let us have our own english.

then don't fucking call it english

;)

In which case, all British dialects should stop calling themselves English - they're much further from RP than American English. Besides, English is mostly a blend of Latin, French and Scandinavian; if we want to talk pure English, we'd have to start talking Anglo-SAxon and Celtic; which is now considered poor-man's English.

Excuse the blabbering, but this is my subject of experice :)

Words are often spelt differently from their phonology due to etymological trends and the great vowel shify. Take knight - it used to literally be pronounced kanigta, and good was "god" (hence God simply being Old Anglo-Saxon for "the good one". ) So-called exceptions are not exeptions, there is a distinct reasoning for their fall from convention.

However, a there is a valid point to be made about prescriptivism. Since most of our language comes from Latin and French, we've adopted (technical term "borrowed") their rules. For example, can you spot the three things wrong with this correct looking sentence?

"The shop I quickly ran to was better than the one next to it".

Problem 1: "Quickly ran" involve splitting the infinitive "to run", which should be one concrete lexical item. However, this is only potent in Latin - the English infinitive cannot technically be split.

Problem 2: We've stranded the preposition in its clause. It should be "the shop to which I ran". However, once again, the error is only significant in French-Latinate.

Problem 3: The sentence is hanging; we needed to add "was" at the end.

As you can see, grammar should not always be taken so seriously, the semantics is governs is often inhereted through interlinguistic transitions. They are only concrete to a particular person's definition of when "correct English" can be defined.

Should we be using "f"s instead of "s" (lithographic s), since that's what we used to do? Should we pronounce death as "deeth" like we used to? Should bite be written as "byt"? Prescriptivism (or being a grammar-nazi) is difficult to justify. Nevertheless, it's more professional to just write according to modern convention.

There's a goldmine of them here

http://www.somethingawful.com/d/comedy-g oldmine/make-porn-worksafe.php?page=1

I don't know about her, but I know what Santa wants for Christimas.

At 9/14/07 08:09 AM, Wyvern-Knight wrote: then are you trying to say they should tolerate torture and deaths?

No-one tolerates the torture - American soldiers are punished immensly if they torture prisoners - but they never torture inncoents, they've only ever tortured terrorists. You also state that they shouldn't tolerate deaths, despite the fact that they are causing the vast majority.

Also, a war is soldiers against soldiers, not mujahideen against innocents, Iraqis and journalists.

mujahideen are just a group. theyre terrorists i accept,again this doesnt make all Islam world barbarians, as U.S.A soldiers dont make all U.S.A. sick torturers. And sorry but my prophet wasnt torturer or something,as most hadith are wrong and were miswritten by Islam-haters at that time.

The USA army, once again, punishes its own soldiers severely if they torture anyone. The American army is totally representative of USA morality - do not kill in cold blood under any circumstance.

However, you've missed the point once again. The mujahideen do not represent all muslims, but they utterly and totally represent the precepts of the Qur'an and consequently of Islam.

and Islam terror organistaions dont make all Islam realm barbaric terrorists.

If you mean the masses, then true; if you mean the religion, then false.

Also, if we will look to past times, dont forget about sadistic actions of Catholic churches.

I'm not a Catholic, nor have I ever defended Catholism, I openly find all theistic religion to be abhorrent. Look up the fallacy of Tu Quoque.

What comments. My exact words were "you won't believe how many Muslims want Shariah". nWhat's wrong with that - I've seen surveys and had enough personal experience and contact to validate that as true. Most people are unaware of how many actually do want shariah.

well you wrote many muslims instead of Muslims and ripped off the Anti-islamic mark on you.

I'll leave the NG community to read the above. I made my point very clear, and you did not contribute a new rebuttal.

The quotes I gave were from your Qur'an. Way to staghfar again, Allah is displeased with you for rejecting His Words.

I readed its Turkish edition from few different publishers,didnt saw a quote like that.

From this exchange, it seems highly unlikely to me that you've actually read the Qur'an at all. Nevertheless, I gave the references, check on an Islamic site for the verse if you don't believe me.

Theyre mushirkeen if they worship someone/thing else then god, again Qur'an said to fight with disbelievers in THAT times, as there were harsh conditions for Muslims and many mushrikeen totured and killed them. it doesnt say us to fight with them today. But Al quaida does hiding under these quotes.

Show me the Qur'an reference then. Surah 9:5 makes no such a contextual reference, and it was the last Surah to be revealed.

This means he is a prophet,dont search for else meanings.

What prophets in islam do you know that have been entered by the Holy Spirit (God's own essense)? Only Isa in the Qur'an is said to have had this.

no its not ok, dont know what you call them but we call it hurafe , which are mostly wrong traditions of Islamic countries. again,tradition of countries,not teachings of Islam.

All of those are ordanced by the Qur'an. 4:34 orders wives must be beaten for disobedience, 5:38 orders amputation of theives, flogging is ordaned in 24:2, etc. I shouldn't have to be giving such references for someone who's allegedly read the entire Qur'an. Look them up, I won't make the post too large by posting them.

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/

well,if you call Allah a myth,so what? Then you deny there is Allah or God,then you are Atheist.

Alright...

What?

Do you know what Sahih means? Why do you think Bukhari and Muslim ahadith are branded Sahih by the entire Sunni population (the vast majority of Muslims)?

Hint: Sahih means "correct"

At 9/14/07 08:14 AM, Z-Sector wrote:

At 9/14/07 07:07 AM, EndGameOmega wrote: delicious copypasta

Evolution has just as many holes in it as religion. Also, scientific "laws" are debunked quite often. Like, there was this fish, right? (forget the name, caco something) scientists looked all over the world, but couldn't find it. With this, they concluded, "this fish is extinct!" and believed that for hundreds of year as a scientific fact. Then in the 30s, some guy was fishing in the Indian Ocean, and caught quite a few of these extinct fish. Thus, a "proven law" was debunked, by some no-name fisherman.

You're talking about the coecelanth. In any case, you're clearly confusing a theory with a hypothesis. There is yet to be a found any kind of evidence against the theory of evolution, nor does the theory contain "holes". It's an easily falsifiable theory if untrue. Find a giraffe that predates the okopis, or humans that predate their ape-like ancestors - anything to that effect will immediately dispprove evolution.

At 9/13/07 04:17 PM, Wyvern-Knight wrote: no i am not twisting,thats what you meant. wolf in the clothes of sheep...

Wolves in the sense that they are not as tolerent as they seem. Which is an accurate description, which you continue validate with your hatred of all criticism.

i dont have the pics now, but i most clearly remember they tortured nude people with hot water. also why terrorists dont count? theyre people aswell(not supporting terrorists or something)

I do not condone torture of any human being (unlike your prophet, who was a horrific torturer according to your own Islamic hadith). However, tortuing terrorists is nothing compared to torturing innocents, which Islamic mujahideen habitually do. Incidents of torture in Abu-ghraib are infact very rare, and the perpetrators are punished.

and Islam terror organistaions dont make all Islam realm barbaric terrorists.

Didn't say it did. It makes Islam as a religion barbaric, since they are doing exctly what it commands them to do against the kuffar. According to 98:6 in your Qur'an, disbelievers aren't even humans.

i didnt said you changed your words,its just you wrote your text at first place with word :'many' to get rid of the anti-islamic person comments on you at the moment you wrote the text.

What comments. My exact words were "you won't believe how many Muslims want Shariah". nWhat's wrong with that - I've seen surveys and had enough personal experience and contact to validate that as true. Most people are unaware of how many actually do want shariah.

no Allah wont say something like that to Jesus, because he pulled him to sky when some people try to assasinate him.

The quotes I gave were from your Qur'an. Way to staghfar again, Allah is displeased with you for rejecting His Words.

and in real bible it doesnt say something about jesus is a god. In four wrong Bibles written by Jesus' followers,Jesus looks as if he ascended to godhood. and still no Christian i know worships Jesus and i cant decide if the Jews are mushrikeen or not by looking to some text.

Again, they are Mushirkeen according to the ayat in your own Qur'an. Once again, you've proven you know nothing about your own scripture.

You also appear to know nothing about Christianity, since Jesus is said to be the carrier of God's word through the Holy Spirit; exactly as your Qur'an says (Ru7 Allah).

you beat me down to it.lol celebrate that you have proven your Iraqian. But i still think your a bush and american lover.

I prefer American morals to the heinous ones in Islam (beating your wife is OK, thieves are amputated, adultresses are flogged/stoned, killing disbelievers is OK, women are inferior to men, etc).

well yea, i can tell my maturity to you if you want. i will be 15 years old next month.

Age has little to do with maturity.

Only if theyre attheist ....or buddhist.

What difference does that make? Allah can still be called a myth, just as Zeus, Hubal, Osiris, Ju-Ju, Yahweh, Ormazd, et all can be.

I am Sunni,and you find fake things.I bet youre Shii,or worse, Alevi?

I'm an atheist, obviously. The Hadith I found are Sunni hadith, and you've once more proven how little you know about your faith. Ask any remotely educated Sunni about Imam Bukhari or Muslim, and they will tell you that they are authentic.

At 9/13/07 05:49 PM, MoonClock wrote: That's because Evolution is a crock of shit. I refuse to believe I evolved from a fucking monkey.

Let me put you at rest then - you didn't.

Readup on the ToE before you dismiss it; I can tell just by that one nescient sentense that you know nothing about it.

At 9/13/07 01:56 PM, tatsumaru7 wrote:

At 9/13/07 11:45 AM, Uxorious-Widow wrote:

At 9/13/07 10:11 AM, Lastin wrote: This guy is obviously ignorant and a douchebag. He doesnt see the real truth. And Muslims are everywhere, sure he can spam this here in the net, but when he says this out loud he's a dead man

Was that supposed to be a defense of Islam?

so what if it was?

Saying he's a "dead man" if insults Islam in public should be ringing some alarm bells in your head about the peaceful religion of Islam. Use your common sense.

that we're wolves in sheep clothing. and that we are actually NOT peaceful. you mean we all muslims are actually potential terrorist.

Excuse me, but "you racist bitch" doesn't say much about how peaceful you are, neitehr did your large screed which saught out to insult me rather than defend my constructive criticism. Oh, and how can I be racist (i.e. prejudiced against race) if Islamism is not a race?

no my post had something to do with that comment. you mean actually muslims are fiendish people that love to terrorize others,but hide it and kill people whenever they can.

That's not what I said at all. Way to go twisting my words. I said they support injustices against the kuffar, as with many of the Muslims I know. They only hide it from Westerners.

also if american soldiers dont kill them with cold blood,what they do?

Target terrorists but accidently kill innocents. Not as bad as directly killing innocents in cold blood, wouldn't you agree?

torturing people all ways a person can do then killing them without reason is what?

Show me one incidence of an American torturing an Iraqi civilian to death (convicted terrorists in Abu Ghraib do not count).

i think you must ask this to brave u.s. soldiers. and you say they dont kill people like cold blooded killers,then do they say this before they kill? : "i am sorry but i will torture you with hot water,rape your wife and strangle your children. i am sorry."

Again, you're making things up as you go along. A few isolated cases does not make the entire army rotten - they serve by very scrict and humane precepts of conduct, and soldiers that transgress this are punished by their superiors.

wow,you can be a good politic eh?

What are you talking about? I clearly stated that many do, I never came close to the concept that all, or even most, do. Read the post again, liar.

no i am not wasting your time, i know what it means. than God, as far as all christians i know worship God, not Jesus. Jesus is a prophet, as Mohammed is. And we dont worship Mohammad.And Christians i know dont worship Jesus. No comment about jews since i dont know about their religion well.

Looks like I have to do all the work again, because someone hasn't read their own scripture.

And the Jews say, "Ezra is the Son of God;" {9:30} <--- This is shirk

"And (remember) when Allah will say (on the Day of Judgment): O Jesus, son
of Mary! Did you say unto men: 'Worship me and my mother as two gods beside
Allah?' {5:116} <----- This is shirk

Ergo, Christians and Jews are mushirkeen, ergo they are enemies. Get it?

I am %100 positive youre american. go ahead,follow the steps of bush and disguise as a Iraqian.

I'm getting pretty sick of this, pal. Ana Iraqi ghasban'anek; encheb. Ma indi il'nifsii a keleilak lil la-nehiya. Deny it all you want.

Hmm i have no problems with civilians of America. i think i have problem with Bush and Anti-Islam faggotts of u.s.a. And why do they kill civilians? i dont know this,its not all Islam world making the massacre,its Islam terror organizations. There are also Christian terror organizations,so stfu.

Name one modern Christian organisation that comes remotely close to the barbarity of Al-Qaida, Hizbullah or any other mujahideen. Are you comparing demonstrations and clinic bombings to world-wide systematic barbarity?

It's also telling of your maturity that you'd refer to anti-Islamists as "faggots".

In mythology.

Sure, but that classifies them as mushirkeen. Besides, one could just as easily say that Allah is "mythology", too.

go on, find more stories. i know its completely fake.

Are you a Sunni? If so, enta staghfurrit. Go and ask your imam for forgiveness, denying the hadith of Bukhari and Muslim is blasphemy fee il deen Sunnii.

At 9/13/07 10:11 AM, Lastin wrote: This guy is obviously ignorant and a douchebag. He doesnt see the real truth. And Muslims are everywhere, sure he can spam this here in the net, but when he says this out loud he's a dead man

Was that supposed to be a defense of Islam?

I shouldn't be replying to this pathetic screed, but might as well. This typical hot-headed rude Muslim's proven my point.

Yeah, we are wolves in sheep clothing. thats why U.S.A soldiers keep annihilating Muslims,eh?Also ur not Iraqi and stfu racist bitch.We dont have hatred to anybody if you dont invade our country and kill our people.

Whine all you want, I'm an Iraqi - and I couldn't care less if a rude little troll like you believes me. What have I said that's even remotely racist?

The Americans, unlike the mujahideen, do not kill civilians in cold blood. In any case, your post had nothing to do with the "wolves in sheep's clothing" comment.

Well no one wants sharia in Turkey.

Did I say all did?

And Qur'an doesnt say Christians are disbelievers. It says about Atheists, thats what it means by disbelievers.

It says that Christians worship Jesus and Mary beside God, and that Jews take Ezra to be the son of God; that makes them mushirkeen. Do you know what mushirkeen even means, or are you wasting my time?

So Qur'an doesnt tell us to slay your country.

What?

They are peaceful for sure but you cant say theyre all terrorists because there is an Islamic terror group. and Wow,sure they hate you. you seized their country and raped thir children and women. thats what your soldiers are. complete shit. What about your catholic shits? they burnt anyone whoever isnt Catholic.

Spurting the usual anti-Americanisms, I see. Why do they kill innocent civilians (including Iraqi police recruits) for the war-crimes of a handful of soldiers? Besides, most of the mujahideen are Egyptian/Jordanian.

Mohamed did said so because his father worshipped statues,this is Atheism

No it's not, it's polytheism. Hubal was a God.

because worshipping statues means they dont believe in Allah(god) and worships objects instead of Allah. and Allah(god) ordered him to say his father will be in hell by sending Cebrael(the messenger angel) Also he didnt ordered to destroy Quarish. only information you will find is fake and written by Islam-haters like you.

"It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them." {Sahih Muslim B19 #4321}

"Then came Abu Sufyan and said: Messenger of Allah, the blood of the Quraish has become very cheap. There will be no Quraish from this day on" {Sahih Muslim B19 #4395}

And if you dont believe that Cebrael talked with Mohammed, then it wasnt jesus talking in his mother's body,it was playback, and Jesus' mother wasnt pregnant by miracle of Allah,she got raped eh?

What's Christianity got to do with this? I'm not a Christian.

No,You PEACE out.

Huh?

At 9/13/07 07:42 AM, Night-Ranger wrote: You people need to learn to respect your women!!! >:C

Nice use of the possessive pronoun there ;)

At 9/13/07 07:09 AM, DingoTheDog wrote:

At 9/13/07 06:56 AM, Uxorious-Widow wrote:

At 9/13/07 06:51 AM, DingoTheDog wrote: At 9/13/07 06:32 AM, Uxorious-Widow wrote::

I've also read all of the Islamic defenses for this, such as 2:256 (let there be no compulsion in religion) which was abrogated by Surah 9 (the penultamte Surah to be revealed). Trust me mate, you're not dealing with an amature. I'm a an expetionally capable Islamic exegete.

So if the book is a huge manual of hatred then why is the vast majority of Muslims peaceful?

Not asking that to be a smart arse. Your are far more in the know than myself on the matter.

Long response, but please read it all!

No probs, it's a fair question. However, you've commited the fallacies of vacuous reasoning and ad populum. Look them up if you don't know what they mean. In any case, that's not the biggest problem with your reasoning:

What you should be asking is - how can the moderates, who perhaps study the Qur'an at whim, compare to extremists, who read nothing but the Qur'an! I should also explain that most (that's right, most) Muslims are wolves in sheep's clothing. I'm an Iraqi, so many confide in me - and I've heard your average peaceful moderates spew immense hatred behind closed doors, even going as far as laughing at beheadings of the kuffar. They're not as peaceful as they seem mate, believe me.

The Qur'an orders that all good conduct be expressed to the Islamic ummah - you should reject your friends and even parents if they are disbelievers. What you should remember is that, as much as they hate it, they are living in a non-Islamic country, so they are exposed to "peaceful" lies about Islam so that Islam can grow without impedement. It must cloak itself behind a peaceful facade to survive. You won't believe how many Muslims actually want sharia (the worse law ever written - look it up).

I'll leave you with this mate. According to the ahadith (historical accounts of Islamic history during Mohammed's life), Mohammed claimed his own father would go to hell because he was not a Muslim, and he condoned the genocide of a group of people called the Quraish (including women and children). I can source this hadith for you if you like.

Peace out.

At 9/13/07 06:51 AM, DingoTheDog wrote:

At 9/13/07 06:32 AM, Uxorious-Widow wrote:
How could you explian 9:5, that says "kill the mushirkeen (associators of partners with God) wherever ye may find them"? Does the verse say "kill the Quraish who broke the treaty", or "just fight in self-defense"?

Under your logic of whipping out a single segment from an entire holy book to determine the religions workings we can say that all jews would let their daughters get raped instead of any male guests who happen to be staying at their inns.

Those bastard jews! They ate all my mana as well!

I've read the Qur'an, not just c&ped some random verse. The entire book works to that effect. I've also read a lot of it in Arabic, so I cannot be accused of reading mistranslation. The book is a huge manual of hatred encompassing over 100 ayat preaching hatred and describing, in detail, the agony of the kuffar in jahenam.

I've also read all of the Islamic defenses for this, such as 2:256 (let there be no compulsion in religion) which was abrogated by Surah 9 (the penultamte Surah to be revealed). Trust me mate, you're not dealing with an amature. I'm a an expetionally capable Islamic exegete.

At 9/13/07 06:31 AM, Conspiracy wrote:

At 9/11/07 05:30 PM, McPaper wrote:

At 9/11/07 04:09 PM, Smithers555 wrote: KILL MUSLIMS LOL

This. This is why you Americans are stereotyped as stupid.

I'm with you. Even though I'm American, theres stupid fucks like that guy who still don't really know what happened during 9/11.

It wasn't Muslims dumb shit.

Don't tell me, it was the American government, or even better - the joooos?

Do you have any evidence to prove that 9/11 wasn't a terrorist attack? Here's a run down of the one's I've heard over the years:

Towers fell as if by demolition - So wait, what was the point of demolishing the towers? I thought it was an excuse to invade Iraq?

There were warnings before the attack - 9/11 wasn't the first terrprist attempt. The owner of the towers actually made a loss despite insuring them.

It was done to earn oil money - Why lose billions in economy just to make money back again? For a country so obsessed with money as to claim the lives of its own people, you'd think they'd be a little more efficient.

No-one was in the plane - What about the cell-phone calls?

I could go on, but I can't be bothered. None of the conspiracy theory "evidences" hold any water.

At 9/13/07 05:56 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote:

At 9/11/07 04:09 PM, Smithers555 wrote: Today, during the moment of silence, I realised that the cause of September 11, 2001 was Muslims. If there were no Muslims, the WTC would still stand.

Uh...killing people is against Islam and the "jihad" is highly illegal in Islamic terms.

Uh, you gonna prove that, or are you just spurting out the mantras you've heard Muslims repeat over and over?

How could you explian 9:5, that says "kill the mushirkeen (associators of partners with God) wherever ye may find them"? Does the verse say "kill the Quraish who broke the treaty", or "just fight in self-defense"?

At 8/28/07 05:16 AM, Rozner wrote: There is no such thing as Emo people. Emo is a genre of music. You cannot see a walking genre of music, can you Silly?

I guess there's no such thing as popular people, since pop is, afterall, just a genre of music.

This adient site should bring out the lexiphanicism in you.

Luciferous Logolepsy

At 4/2/07 02:45 PM, Origina-l wrote: hi, its been a few days since i posted in here again, and i have a question for you all

what's the hardest, most extreme <insertsubgenre/>metal song ever?

i have no idea, so i thought id ask you guys

The best bet would be "Pandemonic Hyperblast" by Anaal Nathrakh. Any definition you once had of "extreme" will be completely shattered.

I'd probably label them as extreme black metal. They are notoriously known as the soundtrack to the apocalypse.

My favourites of each genre.

Heavy metal
Judas Priest - Especially SWOD and Stained class. They were the projenators of heavy metal, and will always have a special place in music's history. #1 Metal band of all time.

Extreme/Black
Anaal Nathrakh - About as extreme as metal gets. Good to listen to if you're easily bored. Waiting for the barbarians is their best track.

Thrash
Metallica (old) - They thrashed like no-one had trashed before. No subsequent thrash metal band can begin to compare to Metallica's zenith.

Progressive
Green Carnation - They produced the single most epic, enjoyable song in metal; Light of day, day of darkness. Makes other so-called epics look like AxCx's music.

Death metal
Possessed - Early death was the best. Possessed exemplifies how the once great genre should have remained.

Folk
Agalloch - The sort of music you could listen to for hours. They've pulled of a very difficult genre perfectly. Their vocals and riffs are very emotional.

Sludge/Avant-grade
Isis - Ideal music for ambient soundtraks. Post-metal owes this band big time. Carry is a particular favorite.

Experimental
Mr Bungle - They're certainly not afraid to project metal's loony side. They produce music which is entertaining and uplifting. Not many artists can say that. Watching them live a pleasure (utter shame they've split).

Post-metal
Pelican - I never thought I could sit through 10+ minute songs with no vocals without falling asleep, but this band proved me wrong.

Fusion
Opeth - Though otherwise amatur-ish; Blackwater Park was a fantastic hit, which was brilliant on all levels. Lamentably, all their other albums (bar the first two) were emotionless and rushed overall. Which is ironic, since April Ethereal and A Fair Judgment were their best individual songs.

At 3/31/07 11:41 AM, Origina-l wrote:

At 3/31/07 08:36 AM, Goatchrist wrote: Updated list of bands which are commonly mistaken as being METAL
Rammstein

i was told that OLD rammstein made metal

They didn't.

There was really no need to make an entire artical on this. You just have to wander what compelled someone to start it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_drop_the _soap

At 3/29/07 01:57 PM, PeteXT200 wrote: i do. Although i don't live in America ,I do hear lots about him, he's just a blood thirsty idiot.

What is it with this ignorant fad? Has hating Bush become fasionable or "cool"?

People who mock Bush clearly having nothing with which to back up their claims. I rarely see a rational argument used in criticising him. Sure, he's not a gifted orator, many people aren't. That doesn't make him an idiot. Deciding to go to war against a blood-thirsty tyrant and instal a democrasy in Iraq does not make him blood-thirsty, either. You think he enjoys killing innocent children in Iraq? Turns him on does it?

Bush is neither tyrant nor fool. God, this world's been overrun by contentious liberals.

I'm gonna start dreaming my way to a larger cock.

Allah, if you're listening...

At 11/3/06 04:43 AM, alexsmolik wrote:

At 11/2/06 06:41 AM, Revenant wrote: Felt like I had razorblades in my mouth after watching that.

I had some second thoughts about shaving for the week-end !
Cartoon number 26 is out. I'll admit I didn't really get it lol... But hey ... I guess ... vampires drink blood ... poop.... lol.

I thought he just shat in his cape. Hence the disturbed look when he realised the toilet was surprisingly poop-free.