idea stolen from pushup thread

great, i like less cars on the road and less smoke in my nose

At 7/10/08 06:53 AM, slowerthenb4 wrote:

Despite growing consensus among experts that a Carbon Tax is the best way to make the
switch to alternatives, there is no legislative support for it because of lobbying power of the
energy industry. Only a carbon tax would enact the changes needed before irreversible
damage is done.

and all that means is emissions are bad, but the lobbying power is against it, there arent any better ways to reduce it

At 7/3/08 04:22 AM, MojoFilter wrote: Attempts were made at banning alcohol,
and?
it's what we've got

damn, i like your reasoning

So, overall, I'm glad pot smokers are treated as criminals. Because they are

because

http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2 003/12/22/whyIsMarijuanaIllegal.html

BROMMPP

you can watch this documentary and find out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HLzmH9VB 6A

THC has a LD50 value of 1270 mg/kg
caffeine ld50 is 192 milligrams per kilogram in rats

google ld50 if youre too stupid

and caffeine is more lethal than thc so you can start going after the coffee drinkers, like yourselfs

here ill spell it out in a chain

"hey i tried mixing my friends music on some drug i never stated so i probably never even done it and i did bad so he hit me!"

http://www.mayanmajix.com/art1699.html
ill have to spell this one out "this guy did this on lsd, which contradicts your lies above"
"but youre so stupid you think its about music"

At 5/28/08 02:39 AM, SleepyFox wrote:

At 5/28/08 02:37 AM, unownedJR wrote:

Genetics is related to making music? Haha, haha.

no, the process of sequencing dna, and the process of mixing music, both require concentration right? im comparing them, crick on lsd sequencing dna is like a producer high on drugs mixing music

whats being educated? all you do is make shitty off topic responses,

At 5/28/08 02:36 AM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote:

Also, you don't listen to a fucking DNA helix, you retard.

im comparing mixing and sequncing dna, which contradict your "its too hard to do high"
youre so stupid

At 5/28/08 02:34 AM, SleepyFox wrote:

Music is not related to biological science.

its auditory perception on music. read the experiences, plus that takes more concentration than mixing dumbass

Also, Crick and Watson stole the work from someone else's X-ray pictures of a DNA molecule.

that was disproved, isnt there an picture of a note written by the woman and she said she was wrong

At 5/28/08 02:03 AM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote:

HE BACKS HIMSELF UP USING WIKIPEDIA.

i didnt use wikipedia here, so continue producing dry music?

At 5/28/08 02:02 AM, SleepyFox wrote: My God you're like a 6 year old girl having a tantrum, Cellardoor style.

yes just diverge away in failure

At 5/28/08 01:58 AM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote:

Blaming people for your shitty scores.
I supposed dumbass junkies are in denial in other things, so they deny their lack of talent.

well its quite obvious watching the scores drop after a discussion and i explained myself in the post before that you ass, and theres nothing wrong with them

telekenises?

http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=canna bis+music&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=site %3Ashroomery.org+%22music+sounded%22&btn G=Google+Search&meta=

the intial effects might be halucinatory, but after thats its enhanced perception

At 5/26/08 04:47 PM, unownedJR wrote:
its all for profit

like starbucks

At 5/26/08 04:45 PM, BenjaminBigelow wrote:
Excuse me. I'm not just talking about weed. All illegal drugs are made illegal for a reason, and people that take them get bad side effects. Doesn't it make sense not to hurt/kill yourself?

The reasoning behind DuPont, Anslinger, and Hearst was not for any moral or health related issues. They fought to prevent the growth of this new industry so they wouldn't go bankrupt
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/ca nnabis_culture11.shtml

dupont is the same company that devilered zyklon b for the nazis, which was used to kill the jews

its all for profit

At 5/26/08 04:40 PM, Pugberto wrote: when the people smoking it can just stop smoking it themselves which would solve this problem.

make some sense
the money evens out, with them working in prison and having their profits reaped
the government doesnt care, but if want more government control on drugs, maybe move to north korea, they probably dont even have drug information for the public

We're trying to protect you.

are you trying to group yourself with people who know what theyre talking about? atleast they probably read a wikipedia article on cannabis, you havent provided anything, instead you say it ignorantly, calling it "dope" or pot or whate

noones trying to protect you, when you got all these tax paying people selling dangerous products that arent so "taboo"

ive never had one like that, well i had doubtful ones, got mad when i skipped
ive had creepy nice ones, didnt care about what i do

i skipped the majority of the time and dropped out and each year, and got upped the next for being special, by multiple counselors, and my third year i just did a little text and 'excelled' at it and got upped that way. why everyone else had to repeat or do a summer program

At 5/22/08 03:24 PM, Purpin wrote:
You need to learn grammar as well.

i said you're instead of your is that good enough?

At 5/22/08 03:20 PM, Purpin wrote:
What?

And considering I can't understand half the stuff your saying,

you dont see the irony? i think grammar is more of a requirement than apostrophes

At 5/22/08 03:19 PM, Jezuz wrote:
i dont get how you cant not no not how your not getting how what im saying its age is the point that im trying to say i dont get how what your not getting about how what im not speaking.

i make more sense than that, so kill yourself

At 5/22/08 03:16 PM, Purpin wrote: It was also severely populated with words that seemed to be typed at random.

and his lacks proper grammar, but i still can understand it? can you try doing the same? Do I have to type like this?

do i have to use your instead of you're when your're is the correct one?

At 5/13/08 10:35 PM, Treerung wrote: I blazed today and I ended up almost having a panic attack in the supermarket.

yeah, you just need to tell yourself to calm down

Honesty, I think they should legalize nitrous bars(oxygen bar but for nitrous =p).

canadian tire is alright

At 5/13/08 10:28 PM, arcansi wrote: it's pathetic miscreants like you that hold no social status to support your opinion

that makes so sense whatsoever, how would being an upperclass or whatever be 'support'

At 5/13/08 10:21 PM, arcansi wrote: You told me to use google,

read the definition of experience

Ok, list one that's damaging to your body.

thats what youre supposed to do

At 5/13/08 10:13 PM, arcansi wrote:
I give up.

your argument = listing effects, one list somehow beieliving that has to do with "damaging your body"
my argument= hundreds of quotes that contradict those

but your argument is retarded, hey ill list caffeine effects as "damaging effects" and instead of arguing quote for quote ill just sidetrack and call you a troll

At 5/13/08 10:02 PM, arcansi wrote: I cannot concur with your last statement in any possible way. I do not agree with you, being the ignorant twat you are, as you have no knowledge of the prohibition,

what prohibition? what does this have to do with anything?
you laugh at what you do not understand and you seem to dodge my arguments completely and accuse me of your wrong doings being the hypocrite that you are.
you havent made any arguments, all you did was list effects and purpot them as damaging (in a very stupid way"

Post something meritable on this thread to make your argument arguable.

I discredited your source, youtube, as it is a video sharing site and we all know videos can be fake (e.g. my master hand example).

it was on a tv show, that got uploaded on youtube, i said google for mulitple quotes that contradict those effects, but you sidetrack in to this:

You sir, fail to represent your point of view with anything that stands to the test of logic and deduction.

teen agnst

On another note, if the U.S. needed more money,

were not talking about incentives

At 5/13/08 09:55 PM, unowned wrote:

but like i said, you can get multiple quotes that contradict those effects you listed, just use google, coordination and concentration and such

and since youre so pathetic youll probably wait a half an hour and to extend your stupidity