so i read in a tabloid that bush was scuicidal
tabloids not good refrence
ill get a link and tell me what you think

uh, not to burst your little bubble, but this aint new. They've been at risk for a while. Honestly, ones Commubist, the others not(i dont know what SK is). Also Sout Korea is allies with the U.S which is an enemy of the NK. And NK has Nuclear weopans and no food. kind of a problem between the two.

Obviously their are going to be conspiarsits(mind my spelling) behind everything. their are people who belive Obama is a terrorist becouse his middle name is Husan(or something like that).
The human sichy revolves around fear, and trying to control that fear. now trying not to get to overly involved in my belife, the cospiracist are mainly trying to coupe with their fear of the power of the goverment, so they try to get people against it to increase their own sense of power. Pretty much the same with Racist propaganda, and other historic events. ( i have a blog on this topic on onother website, but ill repost on NG)
As far as their "facts" go:
1. an f-16(or some other fighter jet) was seen flying over NYC on 9-11.
Goverment defense:
1. NORAD sent jets to be onsite in the case of required interception, in which case the passenger jet would be shot out of the sky.
"fact"
2. the debris from the Penssylvania crash went to far away from the crash site
Factual defense
2. the debris were not to far away, rather just 6 miles DRIVING distance, but only 2 miles in a straight line. (you cant drive on water, but plane debris can be sent through the sky over a body of water)
And then there's more but im tired so im not going to type to much

At 2/11/09 05:11 PM, Patton3 wrote: It'sbn a while since I've heard about these 9/11 "Truth" people. They're the ones who think the U.S. staged/allowed it to happen, right?

yes some have facts, some dont

At 2/8/09 01:26 PM, superperson101 wrote: If you remove all things christian-related, including, but not limited to: praying, crosses etc. Then that means that all things related to religion should be removed. That means no no getting on the floor and praying to allah, only the theory of evolution, no statues, no turbans, no bibles (satanic, christian, book of morman), etc. Also, did you hear about the judge that said national atheist day is April 1st?! I think that is funny as hell.

yes, i agree, but only if all christian things are removed. But what they mean by religion is not allowed in schools, is that a public school cannot teach the student the teachings of any religion unless it's in the cericulum(excuse my spelling)
For example:
In 6th grade my school learnd about anciant civilizations and their beliefs. There for we learnd the basics of muslim, judhaism, buhdaism, christianity, etc.
As far as Darwins' theroy that is tought in my school, and as far as i know it is in all public schools. Though what is tought in a school depends on the following;
1. public/private
2. local laws
3. state laws
4. national laws
5. civilian perrmission to teach*
6. student has permission if needed*
*in some cases districts take it safe and hold meetings as to what the parents want their kids learning, and if there are those who wish not to have their kid/s learn that subject then the school makes each kid get permission first. this is mainly the case with sex ed for example.

what was the name of the video, i need to upgrade my browser for the page your link brought me to to work.
it said,
"IT's time to upgrade your browser. Blah blah blah. continue to comcast.com (or what ever the extension is) anyway?"

(mind my spelling)(the following is kinda pg-13 or higher)
I completely agree with you.
And unfortunatly my scanner isnt working, becouse i wrote a political cartoon(not so good but to the point) on the subject.
Mainly, i would like to say, that from the U.S perspective it would be great to buy "made U.S", though most of our things our made in china.
My beliefe is that China is like a prostitute, in a sense where the U.S pays the chinese Goverment(pimp) for the sweat shops(the prostitute) to fuck us with cheap products(sex that comes with STDs). This is becouse recently, before the penute crisis, when i turned on my chinese made TV (that broke yesterday by the way, i only had it for a year) i would see something about lead tainted baby toy products.
And now that China is becoming a super power becouse the U.S is paying it so much money its soon easaly going to be able to wage war(bitch slap, or what ever that is called) on the U.S when we, the U.S runs out of money altogether and goes back to supplieing itself(masturbation).

I agree, the professer acted as any professional should in that situation. As for the conspirasit (please mind my spelling), he however didn't even read the census that he should have read weather or not he belived it was true. Mainly becouse it would give him more reason to say its falsified.
I do belive the case of 9-11-01 is of all major topics, an important one to address, though this would have gotten more views several years ago. I should know, i still post about North Korea and Russia.
But until someone can come up with actual facts and not just reasons of way the goverment would pose an attack, i really only see their attempts as a lesser plee for atention from a "traped scuicidal teen" in a sence.
Either way al-quada is a growing problem and did need to be faced, though a little more planning rather than action would be better. But Bush lost his chance of being a good president, in which he could, if it wornt for the Middle Eastern War, scince thats where he made most of his mistakes, though thats another topic for another thread.
Funny interpritation though, Ididn't know Charlie Sheene was a beliver of the "9/11 Truth" conspiracy.
Huh, i still like two and a half men, funny show.

At 2/9/09 08:44 PM, Conspiracy3 wrote:

At 2/9/09 08:39 PM, universal-fear wrote: i am using firefox, but its on a 10 year old computer

It doesn't matter how old the computer is. Are you using the latest version of Firefox? -

no
i see your point

and what country are you from

USA

and whats yor reasoning for saying democracy doesnt work

It puts power in the hands of the idiots at the expense of the truly intelligent/hardworking/competent people.

when you put it that way i agree, but im not so sure
i admit we dont have the best system but we dont have the worst
also if you hate the system get the fuck out of hear you stupid commi

i am using firefox, but its on a 10 year old computer
and what country are you from
and whats yor reasoning for saying democracy doesnt work

At 2/9/09 07:33 PM, Conspiracy3 wrote:

At 2/9/09 07:27 PM, universal-fear wrote:

Why is it so easy for a woman to abuse rape and domestic violence laws? Granted, there are some real cases of rape, but there are also cases in which the law is abused. Women sometimes will have consentual sex with a man and then intentionally beat themselves up and cry rape. Sometimes the woman marries the man first so she can walk off with all of his money after she does so. Why is it that when a woman claims to have been abused by her husband a jury will almost always listen to her, yet when a man claims to be abused by his wife the jury barely ever listens to him?

Why is it that on TV shows if a man slaps a woman he is seen as a cruel and abusive man yet when a woman takes even farther extremes such as kicking a man out of his own home it is seen as comedy? Why is it that on TV shows it is much more common to show a man cheating on his wife than a woman cheating on her husband? Why is it that our culture provides such a bias towards the woman in cases involving marriage disputes?

Feminism in the 1920s was about equality, today it is about inequality and taking the money, dignity, freedom, and eventually life of every man.

thats wear you get a little "iffy". Becouse not all women do this, also the ones that do are sycho, and there are even men and kids that do this. But for the topic, they get away with it becouse there really is no substanctal evidance saying they faked it, if their was then most likly, givin the situation she would be charged. Also what you mention rarly happens.

What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty." If there is very little evidence as to whether it was faked or whether it is real shouldn't the court side with the defendant?

Thats pretty much what I was saying. That becouse there is no substancial (wrong spelling, i know) evidance that it was faked, the court only has what evidence it has, and if it points towards a faked crime or a real incidense (also spelled wrong, plese excuse) then thats what they have base it on

As far as Tv Sitcoms go its becouse the Moral Majoraty belives it would teach young impreshionable kids that its ok and funny. Which gennerally is true. Also by law everyone goes to court no matter what the police think, thats beouse of the "innoocent untill proven guilty" law.

So it is okay and funny for a woman to abuse a man but it is not okay or funny for a man to abuse a woman? Is that what we want our children to think?

Funny...Yes...Right...No. Yet thats not what I'm saying. You have to relise(spelled wrong) that I'm 14 and am trying to explain a very complicated subject so i may not be as clear as I should be on things. I'm saying that the majority (spell check please) of the program veiwers would rather see a strong man get kicked out by a weaker female. This is for many reasons;
1.It's funny as hell to see a strong man get beat up by a weaker person, and since woman are often portraid as weak, it makes it funny. Also the impression that males are stronger than females makes it funny when a female beats a male. This is why I said TV is not a good refrence, espescally(i stopped careing about the spelling a while ago) sitcoms which are suposed to be in accurate and funny.
2. TV is based around the majoraty(i dont care) of its viewers. If the veiwers want to see a man jump off a building, a man will jump off a building in show.
3. As far as whats right and wrong, there is none. Only Just and Un-Just. Meaning what you think is right is right for you, and not based on what someone else thinks.
For example;
If 99.9% of America belived that showing hard core porn to kids to teach them about safe sex, then you would no longer have to be 18 years of age to rent porn or look it up online, and schools would start showing it during sex-ed classes. This is becouse America is worried about majoritys (really i did) and to make them happy becouse they have more power over that .1%. Its pretty much Democracy. Infact thats the key word for this topic, Democracy, that and Majority.

For example:
Every Tv Show has a the wife getting beat up, every wear you go a wife is "beat up". For loughs. But no one tells you its fake, and just for laoughs, (and im asking you to thinkg seriosly, not as though yor Mr. Right) wouldn't you think it was ok for you to beat up you your wife when you grow up?

What about when a show lets you see a man getting slapped, punched, and forced out of his own home onto the streets by his wife and it is seen as perfectly acceptable?

Same as above

As far as i can tell you on that its becouse they are trying to make it seem like she is being protective of her family. Also Women in sit comes usually are not those that are easily able to defend them selfs, so they kick the man out rather than the woman becouse they feel the audiance belives the man can handle himself.

If feminism is all about a woman "being able to take care of herself" isn't this contrary to the feminist agenda that they try to put forth?

Well you have to relise(dont care) thatthis isnt run by feminists.
Just a whole bunch of producers wanting money.
If you want feminist programming watch "WETV"
(That was a joke)

For shows showing men cheating on women, its mainly becouse, as far as i know, men cheat on women more then the other way around.

I'm not sure whether or not it is true, but even if it is true it is not true to nearly the extent that TV portrays it as.

Once again TV is not a good refrence(shut up) its all based around polls, ratings and what the veiwers want. If the veiwers want more women cheating on men then the show would do that.

BTW: Please use proper grammar and spelling. Your posts are getting hard to read.

I'll try

Why is it so easy for a woman to abuse rape and domestic violence laws? Granted, there are some real cases of rape, but there are also cases in which the law is abused. Women sometimes will have consentual sex with a man and then intentionally beat themselves up and cry rape. Sometimes the woman marries the man first so she can walk off with all of his money after she does so. Why is it that when a woman claims to have been abused by her husband a jury will almost always listen to her, yet when a man claims to be abused by his wife the jury barely ever listens to him?

Why is it that on TV shows if a man slaps a woman he is seen as a cruel and abusive man yet when a woman takes even farther extremes such as kicking a man out of his own home it is seen as comedy? Why is it that on TV shows it is much more common to show a man cheating on his wife than a woman cheating on her husband? Why is it that our culture provides such a bias towards the woman in cases involving marriage disputes?

Feminism in the 1920s was about equality, today it is about inequality and taking the money, dignity, freedom, and eventually life of every man.

thats wear you get a little "iffy". Becouse not all women do this, also the ones that do are sycho, and there are even men and kids that do this. But for the topic, they get away with it becouse there really is no substanctal evidance saying they faked it, if their was then most likly, givin the situation she would be charged. Also what you mention rarly happens.
As far as Tv Sitcoms go its becouse the Moral Majoraty belives it would teach young impreshionable kids that its ok and funny. Which gennerally is true.
For example:
Every Tv Show has a the wife getting beat up, every wear you go a wife is "beat up". For loughs. But no one tells you its fake, and just for laoughs, (and im asking you to thinkg seriosly, not as though yor Mr. Right) wouldn't you think it was ok for you to beat up you your wife when you grow up?
As far as women taking it to farther extremes, well, id probly run out of words trying to explain it, becouse i really dont know how.
As far as i can tell you on that its becouse they are trying to make it seem like she is being protective of her family. Also Women in sit comes usually are not those that are easily able to defend them selfs, so they kick the man out rather than the woman becouse they feel the audiance belives the man can handle himself.
For shows showing men cheating on women, its mainly becouse, as far as i know, men cheat on women more then the other way around.
Yet when it comes to Tv, its not a good example becouse its just catering to the majority of the audiance. As for shows such as cheaters, not alot of men want the fact that their girlfriend doesnt think their enough of a man posted all over the world, that would make it hard to get another GF.
Also Men arnt as aware of the fact that their Gf is cheating on them, so like i said as far as i know men cheat more on women then the other way around.

Furthermore, why is divorce court so biased towards the woman? Women almost always win in divorce court especially when it comes to child custody. Even in extreme cases where a man has no criminal record and a woman has been convicted of past felonies the woman still usually gets the child. The woman usually gets most of the money.

Our child support laws are completely illogical. Why should a man be forced to pay child support if he has no visitation rights? Why should a man pay for a child that he isn't even permitted to see? Child support in and of itself is illogical. Either a parent have custody (or partial custody) of the child or a parent have no monetary connection whatsoever. Child support laws are often abused. It is not a rare occurance for a woman to lie about taking birth control, secretly poke a small hole in a condom, and lie saying that she will get an abortion if she is pregnant and still the man will have to pay child support.

my last post answerd part of this.
As far as child support, the parents that do have partial custody over their children hardly payit (atleast from my expirence.)
Also my question is why do men always quit a good job(by always i mean most) to work at Bk. i relize that they beleive that they dont have to pay as much, but in reality, their just screwing them selves.

At 2/9/09 05:28 PM, Conspiracy3 wrote:

During the Vietnam war the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 due to the fact that 18 year olds could be drafted into the military. This set the precedent correlating between draftability and voting rights. So why is it exactly that women have the right to vote but cannot be drafted into the military? Why are women granted a major right of citizenship but not given a major responsibility of citizenship?

i see what you mean, in fact i've wonderded the same thing, and then i realized, women have more responsibility when it comes to taking care of the family (not my belife, they just do). there for it would be generly immorl to take them from their kids when their husbands, who usually feel as though they have to protect their families, could do it. Women have a more nuturing form of parental care built into their natural instinct, while males have a more aggressive and prottective natural instinct.
Along with the females maternal nature, their children offen feel saffer in a time of danger near them beacouse they are the most familiar to them.
Though in the case of a mother not being present for a childs life (for whatever reason) and the father taken that role they often (or should i say are) excused from the draft.
Also the U.S knows that if they did draft women, a whole bunch of religios bullshit(not that im not religious) will start going to the supreme court about how immoral it is.
This all leads to my idea, that nobody paid attention to, that the majior religions and belifs have the power over the goverment.
but thats another thread i posted, so look that up
Religious dictation

does anyone know were i cn get the latest version of pivot??
or is 2.2.5 the latest?

anyone know were i can find one, perferably free, but cheap also works

any one mind telling me how it started, why it started, who started it, and what ypur opinion is on the music

can some one inform me on how this started, why, and the history
also give your opinion on east or west coast rap
or southern, underground, japanese, etc.

yay, iv always hated that dance
but this isnt as bad as dodge-ball being band
now we have "ILLUSION"
which is just dodge ball with pins in the back
and "ocasionally" someone gets in the way of the ball
its fun
there's many styles to
but thats getting off subject

You know, come to think of it, i dont know what i would say. There are to many options. I would have to use several days to say them all. O'well, I'm not planning on dying soon.

Though If i died now...
Me,"I don't wanna die a vergin."

Me-"well at least ill die with my dignity in tacked...oh crap i just craped my pants"
people around-lough

though i mught have to steal some of your answers
their funny

It's the first time I've pointed out.

i wasnt just speaking about you, i was saying in general
i posted a thread before, everyone just started ragging on me about my spelling

and ya your right i should be nicer, but my day is kinda going heywire, and im not particularly cheery today sorry

PS - Embrace is spelled wrong in your signature.

i know, stop pointing that out
i havnt gotten around to fixing it

At 12/9/08 08:43 PM, Reticence wrote: Hell no you can't.

why not

i give them all credit and state that it was not my work, but that of linkin park?

mine phone's kinda sucks
3904242
but i came up with a cool one that i wish i had
2(2)3(f)2(a)7(s)8(t)4(4)8(u)
then there's my moms old studnts which spells out
FUCKING

i know i herd about that. They trampled him. He was in longisland. poor guy. I even made a post on my account about it

click here, I dare ya. It aint any thing bad. just do it.

hypnosis will only work on those who let it, and it is true that you cant truly make them do things they normally wouldnt. Yet this also has alot to do with maturity.
For example: A 3 year old is more likly to get hypnotized more than an 18 year old.
Though as far as brain development, the more incontrol you are of your thoughts the harder it is.
For example: A middle age man or an old man that has been spending his life meditating would have a better chance of not getting hypnotized compared to a twenty year old man that spends his days partying and making some wrong choices.
I could go deeper than that short explanation, but im not really a good long typing person. Also i am just talking through some stuff i learnd in variouse places. I cant be really sure that everything im saying is true, but it is almost the same deal as drug addictions, but slightly diffrent.

At 11/29/08 09:01 PM, SlimeManMan wrote: Satanists worship the purest personification of evil in the Western culture mindset. Kinda easy for there to be misunderstandings. I know some Satanists, and they guys I know are OK... they don't kill and rape people. Yet.

yet??? hat are they planning on it.

:note...I do know what you men by this, so dont think im retarded

thankyou heroicspatula. though i do find that name somewhat humerous, though it is probably supposed to be.