He looks like he lost a bit of weight, but at least he grew his hair out a bit. I personally like the new look.

Not even Poirot and Miss Marple are safe from those damn Japanese bastards!

Wow, your boyfriend must be loaded...

At 7/8/08 03:48 PM, JohnnyWang wrote:

At 7/8/08 03:37 PM, Mendou wrote:
Knock it off Johnny, that's not school-appropriate.

Well, however alluring Our Lady is, I'm pretty sure no-one'll catch heat for that.

Also, lol, america.

I trust all you guys wear underwear with your national flag printed on it?

Yeah me keiki, dat manga be all wrong scene. We be more lax nah mean? We like dey pinapples more den we like dey flag scene.

At 7/8/08 04:09 PM, BleedLife13 wrote:

At 7/8/08 04:01 PM, Sawke wrote:

At 7/8/08 04:00 PM, PowerRangerYELLOW wrote: because mayans know everything

well unless they have a plan to save us who really cares when the earth will end?

The Mayans didn't have a plan to save us, but Jesus Christ dose. Oh, and I already know that like fifty people are guna tell me not to make this a religious thread and to go to hell are something like that. Because most people are cruel on NG. Im just saying if you dont want your children are you to suffer just try it. PM me for advice (you probably wont but Im just giving people an option.)

Talking about the bible? That was a good book, but the ending was a bit unrealistic imo. Still, its number on the bestseller's list, and fiction will be fiction.

At 7/8/08 09:14 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:

At 7/7/08 07:07 PM, Kuro wrote:
You don't get enough lesbian ten year old characters on TV these days.

Ain't that the truth...

Better then straight ten year olds anyways.

Fuck yeah absolutes! But really, Conservatives recognize that there will always be change in the world, but they don't go ahead making radical policies at the spur of the moment. One who just has change for the sake of change is doomed to failure. You need to know what works well with your government, and what has not worked well. You also have to observe the founding principles of which your country was built on. You should not make too many changes that would differ from those basic principles. Too promising and vague a word "change" is. People will, for the most part, always think that things can be better, because things always CAN be better. However, this hopefulness leads to people believing that all change is good change. Recall another famous democrat who was obsessed with "change". Jimmy Carter. He sure did "change" a ton of things, like changing our well working foreign policy, and gave up the rights to the panama canal, which we built ourselves. This "change" harmed us, and it is but one of many examples of what happens when you have change for the sake of change. Notice the example of Obama. He promises Change, and he mentions what he wants Change in, but he never really talks at detail the specifics of the "change" he will make. This is reckless and foolish. Yet change is such a poison-filled word, offering hope while neglecting any knowledge. Many people cling on to this hope, and what appears like a life boat may well be an anchor. So is it illogical to not be hasty about change? I think, given the examples in the past, that it is only logical to NOT be hasty about it. Change is like the element of sodium, handle it carelessly and it will explode. But, taking the proper time and precautions, like the conservatives do, it can become an improvement to the quality of human life.

Can I have your stuff?

Successful troll is successful.

Go to NY, I miss it so. Luckily, I'm going back there in a month. DO NOT GO TO MINNESOTA. I've only been here for a week and its awful. Theres like nothing to do at all.

Looks like suicide is the only option.

At 7/6/08 02:35 PM, Grubby wrote: And only China is cruel?

What about your fucking Japs?

Huh? Think that your fucking country is the best you little nip?

lol internet tough guy.

At 7/6/08 02:00 PM, WilliWowza wrote:

At 7/6/08 01:38 PM, Gagsy wrote: Come on Will, skinned alive? I'm always against the killing of innocent animals, but people will always do it. As long as it's done humanly that's the best animal rights people can hope for. It's the same with humans in my view. If someone dies, we all hope that it's a painless death. No one, animal or human should suffer in their final moments.

So why is it so unjust to kill this animal one way, yet everyone can legally buy a can of Raid and go around spraying as many insects as they like whilst I have to watch them spasm and painfully die a slow, choking death.

Who are we to judge which creature deserves to live over another? If we accept that these creatures have feelings and don't deserve to suffer then what about fish, or insects, or plants? I don't see where it will end, but playing God and saying this animal deserves to live but this one doesn't usually just because one's bigger or cuter isn't right to me.

Hold it. We, as humans, attach values to different animals. In no way do ants help us, we kill them because they are pests, and thus harmful to us. Now, animals that are helpful to us, like those with fur, we are inclined to like, thus wishing them a painless death. In iraq, dogs are killed due to being pests to them. We are sickened by how animals that provide us with something, like fur, are being cruelly killed. We like most animals due to what they provide us with, and thats a fact.

Meh, care more about the humans getting metal rods shoved up their reproductive organs first I'd say.

At 7/6/08 11:45 AM, JackPhantasm wrote: I agree with JoS. But does JoS agree with me?

I think that no matter the cause, we should try to do something about it. If it even is something.

Also making our tools of living more efficient couldn't hurt.

Well, altering a natural process may have bad effects, so no, if GW is natural, we should not tamper with it.
And of course making tools of living better won't hurt, it would cause us to get more bang for our buck.

At 7/6/08 01:39 AM, Gendo wrote: I'm eager to go through it, followed it for a bit but I've yet to really give it a serious watch. Too bad BULLSHIT SUBS sucks dicks and their tracker is crap.

Was it the type that has so many fucking Japanese words that you bang your head against the wall in frustration?

I just got started on Akagi, but I still like Kaiji better, must be due to the crying.

At 7/6/08 03:06 AM, fli wrote:

At 7/6/08 12:18 AM, uhnoesanoob wrote: But to be sure, you must have been safer in your relationships, while the one with HIV did not look into his partner too much. Think of it like this- If you know how to use fireworks safely, you can launch them tons of times. If you have no clue, the first time can blow your hand off. Just because you did more does not make you as reckless as he was, in fact, considering he only had one other boyfriend, it goes against his nature not to check for HIV, which is one of the STDs gays are more prone to getting. You played it safe, he did not. You may feel sorry, but don't feel angry at the world, the only one you should feel angry at is his HIV positive boyfriend.

Who knows. I'm assuming that neither one got tested before... until he got sick.
As for me... I regularly test myself, and if I'm in a relationship... I force the other get tested too

See? It shouldn't be a shock that you didn't get and he did, you took the precautions, he didn't.

But I've been wanting to be on a trial for Truvada, a new HIV/AIDS drug which may possibly have some use in preventing infections. It's on trial and I've put my name in it, but they haven't called me. This is in the Bay Area, and the qualifications are: Male between 21 to 50. Sexually active. Gay.

Thats you all right.

But... this stuff is poison, really. It does stuff to your body like... give you a hunch back and makes the fat in your legs disappear. Makes you moody, and you'll have stomach cramps and digestive problems.

But if this drug is a key to prevention, I'll take it. Better to take it when I'm not infected than take it when I'm infected, right?

Depends if the side effects can outdo the good. On one hand, HIV tests take a while to get back. On the other hand, you could have a totally bad reaction to this drug. Research as much as possible before you do.

At 7/6/08 12:29 AM, Kuro wrote: So I started watching Kure-nai based exclusively off of seeing a couple of pictures of Murasaki.

It's a bit different to what I was expecting, but I made a point of finding out as little as possible about the series before watching it.

Do you enjoy it? Or is it boring?

At 7/6/08 12:16 AM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote:

At 7/6/08 12:13 AM, Molotov wrote: One Piece owns all.

at least for the next decade or two.

I swear, that shit rips the fuck off of Fist of the North Star.

Not nearly as GAR as it though.

At 7/5/08 11:59 PM, fli wrote: Heck no.
I would never want to get HIV or AIDS.

This is the reason why I dumped Agustin. I can't have piece of mind if I'm worried about the fidelity of my partner because, for me, it's like this:

Fidelity = health.
It should be with everyone.

So, when I caught him cheating for the second time around, to me... this was utter disrespect for my health, and... even my life.

Nonetheless--
It just makes me think. I mean, I'm not a bad person... but, between Isaias and I-- it would seem more likely that I would be the inflicted one. In a sense, there's no worldly justice.

It's like...
when a rich man finds 1000 bucks on the ground...
or a homeless guy loses his possessions when the soup kitchens burns.

But to be sure, you must have been safer in your relationships, while the one with HIV did not look into his partner too much. Think of it like this- If you know how to use fireworks safely, you can launch them tons of times. If you have no clue, the first time can blow your hand off. Just because you did more does not make you as reckless as he was, in fact, considering he only had one other boyfriend, it goes against his nature not to check for HIV, which is one of the STDs gays are more prone to getting. You played it safe, he did not. You may feel sorry, but don't feel angry at the world, the only one you should feel angry at is his HIV positive boyfriend.

Spatula Shuriken FTW.

All these narutards and bleach junkies make me sick. Ranma 1/2 pwns ass. Comedy, romance, some actually
GARish fights, and no stupid plot devices like the endless most powerful villain EVAR kinda stuff you see in
shows like DBZ. Oh, and Black Lagoon kicks ass as well. Kaiji is my favorite modern anime, because men with phallic noses who cry are awesome. But here is a serious picture of people running for no apparent reason.

At 7/5/08 08:07 AM, Sajberhippien wrote: Americans never stop amazing me.

Care to actually contribute to the thread?

Anyways, I believe the welfare status at the moment is what's causing some of the homelessness. Yesterday, I saw a woman buy a shitload of useless junk, and she paid for it with food stamps. Without some of the welfare I feel more people will be encouraged to get jobs, thus reducing the level of homelessness a tad.

At 7/5/08 09:55 AM, Mikey-1 wrote: Hmm, I enjoy watching a good Anime once in awhile, so maybe this club could be good for me, plus I'd get to meet some people.

Anyway, any of you remember Slam Dunk? Your thoughts on it? Personally, I think that the ending wasn't that good, because it was quite the cliffhanger. Good thing the manga didn't end exactly like the Anime though.

I've heard of it, but I don't tend to watch sports anime. But trust me, there can be a lot worse endings then just a cliffhanger.

At 7/4/08 12:54 AM, zoolrule wrote: There is no such a thing as "creditable scientists" who deny Global Warming.

There are just Scientists that were paid high enough by the corporations.

Prove that all scientists who deny global warming are paid by the corporations. Go.

My uncle recently did a debate for the federalist society, and I think he did a smashing good job. Here's a link to it for all interested, it's about the death penalty. My Uncle gets the floor first, and one of the best things I think he says is that the ACLU should not complain about death penalty costs as they are the ones who drive it up! I do suggest you check it out, it is a rather good debate.

Talking with him won't do anyone good, he's just a puppet for the Ayatollahs. But hell, talking can't hurt can it?

Hey guys, I just wanna let you know that I'll be here less often for the next month due to my internship at my uncle's publishing company. Oh and Ranma is better than Lucky Star.

At 7/2/08 12:23 PM, arxarts wrote: many people (especially way right christians, no offence) believe it is natural.

Mr. Gore is a brilliant man, but like all brilliant men and women, he is arrogant, and therefore thinks he has the power to call other people "ignorant", "deniers", etc.

However, global warming is happening, even though our most influential activists are complete jackasses.

Well, yes it IS happening, but the big question is is it manmade, and is it natural. Remember, the "little Ice age era" ended about 10 decades ago, so the warming of the earth may in fact be a natural process. And Al Gore is far from brilliant, if anything he is a glorified mouth piece for those scientists who believe in global warming.

We all know that Global warming is a tad bit overblown. However, one thing I was shocked to find out is that Al Gore calls ANYONE who differs from his global warming idea a "denier". I learned this recently, after my uncle got me a book called "The Deniers", by Lawrence Solomon. The book gives a list of people Mr. Gore calls the deniers, and the most interesting part of it is that the deniers are actually pretty credible scientists. I find it odd that these people are called the deniers, shouldn't they at least have the dignity of being called skeptics?