Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

who really cares

i think we are all of topic if its is illegal to eat horse meat, that would be proviencal sociaslm not national thant would come down to say kansas saying farms cant grow wheat any more or raise bison.

this would seem wise young grasshoper

my little brother flipped my xbox while it was on and i dont have a buffing kit does anybody know any way else to do this

my little brother keeps on sleeping in my sisters room and when this happens shes a bitch to me all day long. ive tried to bribe him and force him. nothing ive thought of works.

can i please get more ideas

it has come to attention that Toyota should change their motto for some more safer

i think one that could fitting would be

"ok green light"

who else should change their mottos

we all have to be optimistic on this situation at least Toyota doesn't lie about their motto. they keep moving forward

i have only on good jew joke and i like to have a couple more goods ones just in case

two jews walk into the bar
the catholic uses the door

its also shit

At 3/23/10 11:00 PM, StuffyOne wrote: I hope you're not classifying Newgrounds and 4chan to be social networking sites like Myspace and Facebook.

in the general sense of the word

facebook,myspace,twitter(gay),4chan, or Newground

whats better myspace or facebook

why make it weird it a legitimate question

Don't make it weird.

my sister has this little kid and whenever i come over my nephew is asleep and and has his butt in the air and i have no idea why

this vista i have is pretty new i have had for a while now and i just dont see much wrong with at face value but what are the problems supposed to be

i have this vista it was given to me just about out of the box but i tryed playing mercs 2 wrold in flames and they are compatable i just get really horaibble lag time even offline.

please help

is stemcell right in the fact that it could be a actual human or that i could one day cure all of mankinds illnesses

man is wondering who the first member on NG

man brazil and columiba
just to see who would get conquered

At 10/17/09 08:37 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote:

At 10/17/09 07:07 PM, Guest8792 wrote: I died inside reading this. :(

It could be worse, you could be a Lions fan.

i second that too

At 10/17/09 08:27 PM, Drakim wrote:

i think in the farmers case it would really be more of a base of power by paying people with food. but anarchy is really more over something you would see in the apocalyptic times. but anarchy is never really going to happen because there will all ways be some sort of goverment

At 10/17/09 06:27 PM, ASKDodge wrote:

At 10/17/09 06:07 PM, ubermanng wrote: all right heres a problem say in the near future the world split in to countries based on continents excluding the americas. so say its all like one big ass death match. what would happen????????

Everyone would die

alright Australia is neutral

feel free to add the scenario

At 10/17/09 06:15 PM, ReiperX wrote:

At 10/17/09 06:07 PM, ubermanng wrote:

Here's the problem with your question. What is the motivation for the mergers? What is the motivation for the "Death match" as you call it. Going to war for no real reason is much different than going to war to protect against an invader. Then again going to war for revenge on a massive attack is different than that as well. Technology, topography, training, moral, numbers, ect all weigh in differently depending on the scenario.

ok i see your point.

the people are are running out of the things that need their civilization needs to exist. there has political treaties that made the merger. and each continent is jealous of the other and each of the countries has the backing of the people. tell me if it needs more.

all right heres a problem say in the near future the world split in to countries based on continents excluding the americas. so say its all like one big ass death match. what would happen????????

At 10/17/09 11:49 AM, Warforger wrote:

At 10/17/09 11:42 AM, Xavierthewarlord wrote:

No. Size has nothing to do with it, going by your logic, Europe would be weak and Africa is fucking rich.

thats not true considering the fact that by the first winter nazi germany was seriously over extended there supply lines were to long. they had soviet rebels and citzen be hind the lines considering the barley reached the Urals size had a big part in it. the the decide that they need the oil and that happened to be in the caucuses, and along that route hitler seen stalingrad and and he sent half the invasion force after it with nothing to show

At 10/4/09 09:48 PM, ReiperX wrote:

(firing missiles into a crowded area to take out a car with their target in it).
man they were at war and besides the fact that Israeli was created after ww2 because people of jewish decent are actually the Israelites from the old testimant. so really before ww2 all jews were displaced by muslims and they would not give up the land so the un decied to give a shit load of guns and tank and planes to them an told them to knock them selves out. and ever since then the were seen as the enemy and have sever dimpolamatic crisis to deal with consedering the the 7 day s wars in which israeli beasted shit up form what was seen as the israeli empire of the old testiment

At 10/12/09 07:38 PM, TDwizBang wrote:reason.

also, it really wouldnt be democracy if our leaders decided a group was guilty until proven innocent...

yeah but in most parts of the world you are guilty until proven guilty, and since your guilty any group not just religous groups but polictical gang rebels even even those pro government militia groups would fall under that category. so for the sake of the argument if obma were to do something that a conservative milita group did they woundnt care why they would see two options to kill him or to have large protests, and im not telling people to go out kill people.

thus even down to our parents things we do would be until proven innocent like that tatoo you got when you were 17 that said "i heart mom"

the thing about not having party politics though would have serious issues then and now. granted we do not decide who we want to nominate for presidency(a lot of that is done by senators), we wouldn't have a generalized ideas with out the parties. in other words we would have to decide among fifty gillion different candidates and sponsoring them would be a bunch bullshit, and our democratic system is different then the rest of the world, which many uses fucking england bull shit. with out the parties we would have have men trying to accomplish thing by them selves and i would be a mix of communism(dare i say it) and anarchy.