Well, the inpact his little movie film has made will give him a huge advantage.

I stopped believing in an omnipotent god, but for the sake of the argument, I'll defend the chase from a Biblical point of view.

What if God has the power to do anything, and make the world how he wishes, but cannot undo his last wishes by the swing of a rod? In other words, what if god has unlimited power to introduce new phenomena but not to erase old phenomena entirely?

This would mean that God does not know what the future brings, or that he does not know what mankind will do, because there is free will?
Maybe God has only limited sight into the future, and he can only see what will happen up to five years or so?

Socialism isn't even a great ideology in theory. It rejects difference between people.

The free market has killed our health-care. People are now queing up, and waitinglists are getting longer and longer. Everyone is insured, but the system if slowly choking in it's own budget-savings.

House Docters are dissapearing. That is what the free-market is doing to health-care.
I'm a supporter of the free-market, except on this point. Sounds a bit selective, I know.

Sarcasm am I right?

Well, I still think it is a big commercial cry for a good image. All those bands are lining up to have a good political correct image. Even though I'm an heratic and don't believe in man-made globalwarming.
I'm superduper serial.

Don't be concerned. Earth's climate is recovering from the so called little ice age in the 17th century. And ofcourse from the cooler period around the '60's. In about 30 years it will wear off, and if not, enjoy your summer!

Isn't it true that it actually is George Bush's policy to keep the dollar weak so the trade deficit is clearing up?

The Main problem is over-consumption. You guys buy to much stuff!
You have a negative on you're supply balance(or whatever you call that thing in English) so you export less then you import. But if the dollar is weak, that can only mean that in the future you will export more, because of the cheap dollar.

At 6/25/07 06:30 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: Answer the following;

For each of the following questions, if your answer is :

Yes i do hate... Add +2 points,
Sort of, i dislike... add +1 point
No, i dont. Add +0 points.

Figure out your score.

1) Do you hate the people of a nation [a nation with a population larger than the number of people that you yourself know and socialize with]

nah

2) Do you hate the people of a religon [hating atheists is included] [a religon with a number of adherants greater than that of the number of religous adherants that you know of]

Dislike

3) Do you hate the people of a style of thinking [A people adhering to a style of thinking with a population bla bla bla you know what i mean.]

Absolutely!

4) Do you hate a particular Sexual orientation [Gay, Straight, Bi, Asexual, Trisexual, transexual, and autosexual included]

I hate metrosexuals does that count?

5) Do you hate the people of a particular legalized profession [in your own country] [lawyers, Doctors, Technitions,]

I hate security personel.

6) Do you hate a particular style of music, and those wholisten to it?

Yes

7) Do you hate a particular form of entertainment?

Yes

8) Do you hate the particular supporters of an economic System?

No

9) Do you Hate War?

No

10) Do you hate peace?

No

11) Do you hate a type of philosophy?

Yes

0 = Good for you
1-4 = Fairly Tollerant
5-10 = Your Average citizen
11-15 = An angry person
15-20 = Likely to join a Genocidal Campaign

I'm an angry person, what i expected.

Now that part 1/2 is finished, lets move on to part 2/2.

If you've answered yes to any of these, consider the following:

- how many people do you know that fit the 'i hate categories' For example, if you said yes to #6, how many 'Classical' listeners do you know, how many Rock and roll listeners do you listen to, Show tunes, Rap, Etc. Etc.

Let's express my hate for the so called "jumpstyle" movement.

- what are your experiences with this group?

They wear the metrosexual style of clothes, but criticize mine. They listen to this monotonous type of "house" and they do this silly dance on it which practicly repeats itself along the whole track.

Well if this was about all it wouldn't be such a deal, i would just put them into the "dislike" catagory. But there is more! When they are alone, they wouldn't even think about making their standard-comment about my long hair and slayer-shirts, but when they are with a group, they try to act like they are grunting, to make a fool out of me.
They start asking questions like: " why do you listen to such music? Why do you worship satan? Why do you smoke?"

They don't even care about the answer, they just seem to enjoy the fact that their scene is populair and mine isn't. ANd they get that whiney little grin on their face.

Most of the time they are easy to ignore or to let them shut up. But they always sieze their chance when a teacher is nearby or whatever.

- How do you react to these people on a daily basis, how does it effect your life?

I make comments like: " ah yeah, so you like monotonous base lines, variated with little bleeps?"
Most of the time they answer these questions with such a low intellect that it makes my day again.

But sometimes it is not enough, and i have to start treatening them. When it gets worse i push them, but that's about it, cause they take a walk.

- After Reading these, do you feel you may have exagerated the term 'hatred'

No

Seriously, why don't they name him "Forreal"?

I ought it amusing.

Yes, the herd mentallity is what causes the might, and thus the need to destroy anything different. But this is not different from, for example, populair music.
Only less violent. I listen to metal, but some people really get mad at me for listening to that, simply because it's different.

I guess it's just the nature of the proles.

Religion causes might. Might causes hate. Hate causes violence.

So it is not religion itself that causes trouble, the people that gain controll because of religion are.

Psychological health is still health. If you can get the positive effects of nicotine without the negative effects of tobacco i call it healthy, it's subjective.

At 6/22/07 08:36 AM, Korriken wrote: last time I checked inhaling too much water vapor leads to pneumonia.

its still not healthy, Nicotine is a poison.

Ofcourse, but it is just as "bad" as caffeïne now.

A Belgian company has discovered the "ultimate way to solve the smoking problem."
A cigaret that only contains water vapor, nicotine and flavour.
I haven't found an English link yet, but results are promissing.
I think i'm going to change my strikes for these!

Yeah, in my village, making out is prohibited at the high-school.
But at my own school, you'd have to stare at many couples each lunchbreak. Tough choice.

Anyway, the school shoudn;t implement moral on the students, moral is a choice not an obligation.

Lol, I have the funny feeling CBB is an alt.

It's occuring in The Dutchielands too! The labour party,(PVDA) the freedom party (vvd) and the Christian democrats all have similar policies if you'd close one eye and look at it from a distance. OFcourse they favour different groups in society, while the Christians favour the middle class, the freedom party favours the upper-class and entrepreneurs, and the social democrats favour the lower middle class and upper-lower class.

Still these parties haven't become populist, they just know the rules of ruling. If they form a coalition (which is necessary here) they need policies that can easily be addepted to one another.

And they need policies that suit the whole nation best.

Not just one ideal.

At 6/17/07 01:26 PM, Tri-Nitro-Toluene wrote:

At 6/17/07 01:12 PM, gijfef wrote: Also any other extreme left party is unlikely to win and you could end up helping the tories by not voting for labour who are the only party who will actually win.

Conservatism is not the same as Thatcherism.

That's a shame, Tatcher is my heroe! She's like Rita Verdonk, only more succesful. Both are Iron Maidens.

I only smoke inside if i really MUST to. I don;t even like smoking inside, my own smoke smothering my face isn;t as nice as seeing it wandering away in the wind.

Tell me your hatred for smokers.
Why you hate them, what makes you sick about them etc.

I myself are a smoker, but i get sick of all complaints non-smokers have. And they only use arguements that indicate why they won't smoke themselves.
Not why I shouldn't be smoking.

Sexual moral is still moral. It's not absolute.
If those paupers want to risk pregnancy and std's and want their reputation harmed, let them go ahead. And let their example be used.

I would even misuse such girls if i had the chance. But I live in a rather conservative area, so there is only choice between fat and fatter.

What about metrosexuals? I mean, I go to this alternative rock café, which is at special celebrations(liberation day, queens-day) filled up with those pesky metrosexuals.
They should be ban-able too!

At 5/27/07 07:28 PM, Vann wrote: Yeah, but wouldn't we all be wanting more constantly as we built up resistance? It would most likely lead to a war over meth control. In my opinion the perfect country is a communist country, the only issue is communism is only perfect on paper because humans are selfish idiots.

What is wrong with selfishness? Being an egoïst is not Idiotic. It can be very rational. My own private welfare and luxury is far more important then the life of an anonoymous person.

Still, there are scientists that work on the paranormal. And many paranormal activities have occured. ANd how do you explain exorcisms?

The way the soviets putted communism into practice was utterly different from the way Marx wanted it to be.
Lenin changed the words "community" and "state." So that all production belonged to the state instead of everyone.

So if we are talking about Leninism, then yes i would pick Fascism. Fascism is different from National-Socialism. The fascists had a great cultural interest, and did a lot for the city of Rome by repairing Roman monuments and so.

I would rather live in a country with an economy that rewards people for what they produce rather then what they need.

Left extremism is a huge problem in Germany. Remember the R.A.F. and A.F.L. the police didn't want any trouble so they prevented terror attacks.

Left extremists are far more dangerous then muslim extremists or neo-nazis.
Because they got their backs covered by non-violent groups that says they can
"understand" why they use violence. I'm talking about leftism in general like now, cause animalists and antiglobalist situations are a lot alike.

Terror attacks by those are mostly eufemised by the media, or not even mentioned.
But when Neo-Nazis are protesting it becomes a headliner.

At 5/21/07 12:41 PM, Smartdog wrote: i'm sorry... olive skinned??? I dont know alot bout religion but does that mean he was green???

Lol no, it means your mediteranian.
But that only means jesus was geographicly spoken, white. Arabians, Jews, hell even mexicans are white. They are just part of another sub-race not another race.