Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/16/12 10:32 PM, TheTruth34 wrote:

Well I don't like Romney but if you have been watching the debate you will see that he is lying and he keeps flipping his words around

Oh. Kind of like his opponent in this election. That's politics.

OK, reality check............Obama looks poised to win again in the election, but the Dems WILL NOT retake the house and, very likely, will not be able to maintain a real, working majority in the Senate.

Those fantasies of Marxian redistribution of wealth, via "Obamunism", are not going to happen.

What we will probably get is at least 2 years of gridlock.......unless those fools can learn to cooperate.

At 10/16/12 09:29 PM, TheTruth34 wrote: Mitt Romney is lying about just about everything tonight. He will say anything to get into the white house. why won't he be honest about his policies?

Anything in particular or is this merely an "I hate Romney" rant?

At 10/16/12 03:50 PM, stonecold-basilisk wrote:

May 2004,

A little bit out of date. Since 2009, the rhetoric among the far right extremists (NSM, KKK, etc) has become increasingly strident. I guess they don't like the President's "Paint job".

At 10/16/12 03:50 PM, stonecold-basilisk wrote:

The most active criminal extremists in America are the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front, not Muslims.

I think Al Qaeda is happier with one big attack (9-11) than a bunch of little attacks against KFCs. It seems to have affected America a lot more.

At 10/13/12 06:55 PM, Crazywill wrote: This thing takes your opinions and processes it to match your opinions with your optimal candidate. Apparently.

This site might have been here before, but I didn't see it, so new thread it is I guess.

I took that test.......I'm a proud Paultard.

I'm voting for Johnson.

Fuck the Republocrat party!

At 10/13/12 05:25 PM, Warforger wrote: Oh what horrible people Liberals tend to be and how great Conservatives are.

http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/0/5/4/150054.jpg?v =1

Yup. A bunch of racist ignoramouses.

Still, a bunch of bigots tweeting each other about Obama isn't as low as bullying a 12 year old kid.

At 10/16/12 12:57 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 10/16/12 12:40 PM, TucoM wrote: The unions are telling their members the same sort of doomsday bullshit if Romney gets elected.

I understand the loose connection between what the CEOs are doing and what Unions and Attack ads say, but there is one key difference that makes this one stand out. Whereas neither Unions or the creators of attacks ads have any power to enact their doomsday claims, the CEOs have the direct power to enact them.

Think of it like some random person saying you're going to get shot if you do something versus a guy visibly holding a gun telling you that. The first guy would come off as a warning, the second would come off as a threat. That's the line is very close to being crossed here, if it has not been crossed already.

No CEO is going to shut down their operations for the mere reason that Obama has been elected. This would leave them with millions in assets (properties, buildings, machinery, vehicles, etc.) that, not only are not making him any money, but they actually will cost him money in taxes, upkeep, and other costs.

It's all, as I say, bullshit.......Romney and Obama are closer to center than most people realize.....or want to admit.

At 10/13/12 02:40 PM, Jmayer20 wrote: I hear alot of republicans say they are the party of small government

The REAL party of smaller government.

At 10/13/12 05:34 AM, aviewaskewed wrote: Nobody has the balls for it...

The end.

Never going to happen. The army is waaaay too strong, and nobody actually gives enough of a damn. Never gonna happen.

The military might be strong, but our civilian leadership lacks the balls to openly kill Americans.......but, yeah, nobody gives enough of a shit to revolt.......at this time.

The unions are telling their members the same sort of doomsday bullshit if Romney gets elected.

It's all bullshit, scare tactics.

At 10/12/12 10:25 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:

:as well many others such as law,

?????

:age,

Let 3 year olds vote? LOL 18 is a decent compromise.

:retarded mental function,

I didn't know we disenfranchised "special" people.

:incarceration,

Too bad!

:work,

Most people who vote actually work.....they find the time.

:out of the country during voting period,

Absentee voting

:health issues in general both mental and physical etc .....

I'm sure we can do without really insane people voting.

Anyone who is eligible and really cares, will find a way to cast their ballot.

Move to safe location it's very simple really meanwhile let the retards use there archaic primal part of the brain and there bullets until they kill each all other off "god willing".

Unfortunately, that won't happen. Whoever wins will make the rules.

Any terrorist network who communicates via social media deserves to get busted.

Beyond that........................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
..........,.
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
........ ONE, EIGHT, SEVEN ON AN INTERNET COP!

At 10/12/12 09:57 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:

You say apathy but that is not the right word at all as a choice to not vote took at leased as much thought but more than likely more than the choice to vote. Trust and as you say apathy are very different. There are many people who could give a dam about politics because they are to busy living and enjoying life and to you that is apathy which is a complete false statement. To loose trust in the system means one is actually thinking and using there brain functions therefore not voting is contrary to apathy.

Not voting because one loses trust in the system is a form of voter apathy.

:"a bunch of crazy gun toting pro military, religious, fascists turning out to vote to do there part to usher in the "fascist utopia".

Obama is a gun toting, pro military, religious nut? OK, he does love drone strikes, but he really, really hates what is in my gun cabinet.

I believe in the non-aggression principle as it is one that can not be argued against without admitting that you condone the initiation of violence. An eye for an eye leave's "US" all blind.

And.........if that fails?

At 10/11/12 02:31 PM, stonecold-basilisk wrote:

The Solution is simple - the Greek government should spend a ton of tax money on cops and then put them all over the streets.

Not so simple.......the whole problem in Greece is because they are OUT of money.

This video reminds me of a Biden speech.

At 10/11/12 09:44 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:

People not voting is actually an expression of having no trust in the system.

That is.........a good description of one reason behind voter apathy.

:You could say that low voter turnout is as legitimate as high turnout as long as the right to vote exists but that is very highly dictatorship like and as well it is very pretentious. I choose not to vote and that is my right and I expect you to respect it just as I respect your right to vote.

I'm not telling you whether or not you should vote. Your choice on the matter is just that......your choice. All I'm saying is that boycotting elections will be seen by the powers that be as mere voter apathy. Your first sentence in your post says exactly that.

Real radical changes in our system may require armed revolution........and that's a big can of worms that might best be left unopened.

At 10/11/12 09:05 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:

At 10/11/12 07:24 PM, Warforger wrote:

You do realize that politicians won't give a shit if you don't vote right? In fact many politicians particularly Republicans try to keep people from voting.

Just because you might not mind letting your bussy get diddled by your favorite politicians does not mean actively withholding your vote is a bad idea until they clean up there collective act.

Boycotting the vote isn't going to help. They'll write it off as apathy instead of protest.

At 10/11/12 10:49 AM, TheMason wrote:

At 10/11/12 08:10 AM, TucoM wrote: The $50 question isn't "Should she be fired?" but "Can she be fired?".

Depends on how strong the teacher's union in Philly is.

Pretty much.

At 10/11/12 04:23 AM, Feoric wrote:

I thought it was obvious that I was joking.

Parody sometimes loses it's punch on the net.

At 10/10/12 11:43 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:

This thread is not about so called "Conspiracy theories" this thread is about Libya's move to a "Gold Standard".

How much gold for a bride?

The $50 question isn't "Should she be fired?" but "Can she be fired?".

At 10/10/12 05:20 PM, Jmayer20 wrote: Lets say we found out what the terrorists were plotting before they hijacked those planes and we arrested them before they could do it.

This would involve out intel agencies not have their heads up their collective asses. Good luck with that.

At 10/10/12 05:05 PM, stonecold-basilisk wrote:

Why do we put our own country first when we have internet and can speak to people from any country?

'Cuz it's fun.

At 10/11/12 12:20 AM, Feoric wrote:

But we sure as hell don't want a combination of both. North Korea is actually the Democratic People's Republic of Korea! That's all the proof you need!

Just because they call themselves a Democratic Republic, it doesn't make them one.

By the same token, I could call myself a porn star, but that won't make my phone ring from a barrage of porn producers with job offers.

At 10/10/12 09:17 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:

"blackwater pussies" ?

A private army company. They're pussies.

At 10/10/12 08:54 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:

:Next there will be Private Military putting you in a FEMA camp and you will say hey it's ok because they are "Private" owned.

Send me some Blackwater pussies. I need compost for my garden.

At 10/10/12 08:57 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:

At 10/10/12 03:35 AM, aviewaskewed wrote:

"Again, you DON'T. HAVE. FREEDOM. OF. SPEECH. ON. THIS. WEBSITE."

LOL you have no idea apparently how fascist that sounds. Yes no freedom of speech because it's "Private owned" LOL ok.

That's how it and life work.

Deal with it.

At 10/10/12 12:16 AM, TheUkobach wrote:

What do?

You can stop lying, for starters.

Motion sickness is for the weak.

I'm off the scale.....in both directions.