Be a Supporter!
Response to: Anti Gay Grounds.....! Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

At 4/7/01 09:52 PM, Captain_Bob wrote: I saw both Tanner's and adambomb's replies coming a mile away....
The Still Gay? contest is not anti-gay. It's just pic that has Hitler asking "Are you guys gay?" When Hitler himself was involved in a homosexual sarcastic. I am one of the most frequent contributors to that post, and I have no predijuce against gays or lesbians. Some have irony to them, such as my Hitler relationship. It requires a certain sense of humor that is shared by most NGers, but not all obviously.

are you fuckin' serious? he was involved in a homosexual relationship?

Response to: Minor Threat, Subhumans, and punk. Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

At 4/12/01 03:05 AM, astrozombie916 wrote: oh and you will be happy to know that i now consider myself an AFIEND (AFI+FIEND=AFIEND)

fuck yeah.

Anybody heard of Billy Brag? He's mentioned in a Rancid song, and I heard he's good... Any songs in particular, or info you have on him?

Response to: Minor Threat, Subhumans, and punk. Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

At 4/12/01 02:50 AM, astrozombie916 wrote:
At 4/12/01 02:44 AM, NOFX wrote:
Drink sex cigarettes...LOL I Love it!
ha ha ha. :(

Btw, thanks Perdix. I really appreciate it.
its a song...Apathy... n/m

oh i thought you meant because Minor Threat is a straight edge band...

Response to: Favorite Punk Ballads Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

Definitely:

Rancid - Wars End.

Don't even argue with me on that one.

Response to: Favorite Punk Ballads Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

At 4/12/01 02:39 AM, astrozombie916 wrote:
At 4/12/01 02:18 AM, astrozombie916 wrote: Whats are your favorite punk ballads

Here are mine:

AFI- MorningStar
Misfits- Some Kinda Hate
Rancid- Ruby Soho (im not sure if this qualifies as a ballad, but it kicks ass)
ANSWER ME GOD DAMNIT!!!

what qualifies something as a ballad?

Response to: SON OF SAM! Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

At 4/12/01 12:58 AM, OutcastedMisfit wrote: All you fiends will appreciate this. During the Samhain reunion tour last year, Davy Havok of AFI, Todd Youth of Danzig, and London May and Steve Zing of Samhain hooked up, and formed a band named "Son of Sam." Their first album comes out next Tuesday, but it's already all over Napster. Check it out, the album is named "Songs from the Earth." This is going to be one of the best bands ever! WHOO! If you don't beleive me, check out Nitrorecords.com.

I'm soooooo excited.

How'd my pants get wet...

Response to: Minor Threat, Subhumans, and punk. Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

Drink sex cigarettes...LOL I Love it!

ha ha ha. :(

Btw, thanks Perdix. I really appreciate it.

Response to: Minor Threat, Subhumans, and punk. Posted April 12th, 2001 in General

NOFX, have you heard of Son Of Sam??(not to be one of those people who knew about it "first", but I told outcastey :P)

No I haven't heard of Son of Sam. Would you care to provide a few songs.

Geez, so much good music I'm discovering. Old Screeching Weasel I'm beginning to like also...

Response to: Best Song Ever Posted April 11th, 2001 in General

My current favorite songs are:

Minor Threat - I Don't Wanna Hear It
Living End - Prisoner of Society

Minor Threat, Subhumans, and punk. Posted April 11th, 2001 in General

I've heard a few songs of Minor Threat. I really like them. I really like the song "I Don't Wanna Hear It" and others. Got any more good songs by Minor Threat? I want their really good songs.

Any other great punk would be cool. Hey Perdix, my computer crashed and I lost all my Subhumans songs. Can you gimme a few titles of the good ones so I can get them back?

Response to: I'm the first to post, worship me.. Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

At 4/6/01 12:49 AM, TerraFirmaX wrote:
At 4/6/01 12:35 AM, NOFX wrote: Get You the Hot Bullets of Shotgun to Die!

(the next all your base are belong to us.)
Zack's right, it isn't as memorable. BTW, what _is_ that game?

i dunno. forget.

Response to: how white guys fucked up kung fu Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 09:00 PM, untitled wrote: Why do you fucken people think Pujo is racist?

The point he's trying to make is that Americans ruined Kung Fu, and I agree we did. But we must also consider the fact that Pujo is jealous that he hasn't got a BJ yet, while an American fool gotten one by taking advantage of his student. Yes I read the entire thing, and it's pretty interesting.

Anime is also fucking gay, i'm American and my damn brother is obsessed with anime. I'm sick of fuck'en hearing damn japanese toons all fucken day. Yap Yap Yap Yap Yap Yap Yap Yap Yap Yap, that's all I fucken hear all fucken day. It's mostly boring low-quality crap. Americans only watch anime to see naked toons, period. That's all anime is fucken good for, an orgasm. God damn, if you walked into my brothers bedroom you'd think he was japanese, he's fucken obsessed, brainwashed, whatever it just scary that teens get so obsessed with asian stuff. Whenever I check my cache I always see the damn asian whore sites my brother visits, he's so fucken stupid he never cleans it out. The worst part about it is that my mommy blames me for it since im on the computer all day. Don't get me wrong though, every 10 or so years another good anime will come to america. Until then the only anime im watching is porn.

preach brotha' preach!

how white guys fucked up kung fu

Get You the Hot Bullets of.... Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

Get You the Hot Bullets of Shotgun to Die!

(the next all your base are belong to us.)

Get You the Hot Bullets of....

Response to: Still Gay? Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

At 4/6/01 12:27 AM, SafetyCrew wrote:
gray? the word is "gay".
Hence the "D'oh" you moron.

Hey, get wrappin' on that script and all. this post is starting to boggle the mind...

Still Gay?

Response to: Still Gay? Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

It's been so long... I bet they aren't gay anymore...

Response to: art Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 10:49 PM, Pujo wrote: third

You call that art?

jk.

DOODLER!!! Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

WOOOOOOO! You are user of the day!

/me shouts and dances with glee.

Weren't you already UOTD tho...?

Response to: «¥» Quality Control «¥» Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

Double posting just to set a folder on fire? I was hoping it was an accident, but this kind of makes it look intentional. *frowns* Well, maybe in a way it will do some good. More people might read this thread.

actually, i got some internal server error or something. server was notified. didn't do it on purpose...

As for fairness. Changing this system would require a halt on the portal, running a program to double the rating of all of the current entries, and then up the portal back with the new system. The average top 10 instead of being a 3.54 would not be a 7.08 which seems a lot better when dealing with the newer scale.

well, let's just move the top ranked portal entry up to a 9.5 and set the curve at that. it'd take a little work, but it'd be worth it!

Response to: «¥» Quality Control «¥» Posted April 6th, 2001 in General

Because for reviews, it takes time to write them, and in some ways, it is more accurate than voting. Anyone can click the button, but taking the time to fill out the boxes, and write a message is a little more time consuming. I'd be curious about the top 50 ranked reviews. And someone obviously cares, it's in the statistics chart.

that's the biggest crock of shit i've heard in a long time. many reviews for movies like Final Task and stuff are 0. That's blatantly corrupt. Dude, how can the Final Task be an overall 0?

Not everyone takes the time to do a quality review, unlike yourself and many other portal reviewers.

Response to: offspring Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 10:13 PM, TerraFirmaX wrote:
At 4/5/01 09:45 PM, robojoe100 wrote: offspring is the coolest if you love the offspring goto http://offspring.com today!
Bands suck.

nah, just sellouts.

Response to: Solid proof that Tom is evil Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 08:12 PM, EvilGeishaWoman wrote: At 4/5/01 08:04 PM, NOFX wrote: : : : the middle finger is so trite now days. you guys do it like it is actually offensive. if you really wanna offend somebody, stick your testicles between your legs, and say "look what i sat in" and drop your pants, exposing your pimply ass and a "gnome's butt".

That's not really a possibility for me, pal.

that's why i responded to D-Fenz, and not you!

Response to: ng contests Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 05:04 PM, EvilGeishaWoman wrote:
At 4/5/01 04:16 PM, Cerberust wrote: I don't know if this ideas been proposed already, but oh well. I think id be cool if tom had contests every once in a while where he gave out a certain subject or item or event, and people with flash would make a flash movie depicting or representing that issue. Then they could post it and it would go on a new portal column that could be called contest entries, people would vote, and at the end of the given time period, the winner would win experience points, or a cd player or shopping spree or some prize like that, it hink thad be cool.

also check out my flash movie race of beings pt1, it doesnt have a loading bar though so low bandwidth people give it a minute to load please.

thank yall fer yer time.
been done.

what ever happened to that portal deletion contest. anybody end up winning that? i wants me a shirt...

Response to: Solid proof that Tom is evil Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 05:19 PM, Soul_Auctioneer wrote:
At 4/5/01 05:15 PM, EvilGeishaWoman wrote:
At 4/5/01 05:12 PM, Soul_Auctioneer wrote: Here see for your self!
Haha, whatever.
Thats not nice giving a wounded bloke the bird!

Right back atcha

the middle finger is so trite now days. you guys do it like it is actually offensive. if you really wanna offend somebody, stick your testicles between your legs, and say "look what i sat in" and drop your pants, exposing your pimply ass and a "gnome's butt".

Response to: «¥» Quality Control «¥» Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

I got passed the double post screen... muhahaha!

Sorry.

Anyway, Wade, I think that the 5 point scale is too small. I think somebody else, P-Chan maybe, also backed me up a long time ago on this, that movies are kinda in the middle. If we had a Larger scale, such as 7 or 10, then i think it'd be better.

Response to: «¥» Quality Control «¥» Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 01:52 AM, LordKyu wrote:
At 4/5/01 01:07 AM, NOFX wrote:
Keep it the same.
You do realize that any entry that has more than 100 votes is free from the portal threshold. Which means even if it has a rating of 0.07 it will stay in the portal forever as long as it has over 100 votes.

corrupt voting.

I'm saying 1.75. If it's not that high, then it just isn't worth it.
In the previous discussion, Wade has said that even 1.0 for a threshold rating was too high, due to things like the corrupt voting that you have mentioned in your response.

Well, then they'll just have to deal with it. If it's really good, I won't get voted below 1.75.

Stupid. This is horrible. NG as a whole is getting ruined, and the voting corrupt. The top movie is at 3.5 last time i checked (not including HS2 because that'll drop fast and hard). I think that the top movies should be at something like 4.5, since they are good. Standards aren't getting higher, scores are just getting lower and lower. Tallying the number of Blams would "promote" this dark voting.
Then why not use the other side of the coin as well. Keep track of how many things people have voted on that jumped it up into the Top 10? And as a personal opinion, there would not be as many dark users if there were not so many poor quality portal entries. There are several entries that were uploaded with titles like "Vote X" with the others comment asking to have their entry voted off from the portal.

Ha! Tons of people vote crap onto the Top 10, while not a lot of people get too many Blams. It's not the same...

No. No. No.
Why would be able to sort by votes, review ratings, most reviews, and those types of things be bad? The portal is for the users. Why not let the users display how they wish to view things. Also, addition listing options might lead to people seeing portal entries that are lost in the middle of the high and low. The things that rarely get any views anymore.

Who would care if there are 100 votes on the movie? What significance does that have? Reviews? Who cares? That's just "stoopid". If you wanna see things in the middle of the portal, go down the top 50 and go to view all. or after you vote on a portal entry, go to a random one. # of votes is just dumb, and it'd instigate more corrupt voting by causing people to search for things at the checkpoints, like movies at 24 votes and such that they hope they can get a Blam off of. The portal is being made into a joke, or a game if you will. It's supposed to showcase art, not have the art a sideshow to see who can get the most Blams.

That's the whole point of experience you idiots. It's so that the hardcore fans who have been with the site for the longest have the most power. It isn't who has sat in front of their computers the longest, but rather experience with the NG community as a length of time.
There is no need for slander or name calling. Your response about this makes perfect sense, and is a very good reason on why not to allow a second voting.
Don't speak for the people, because not all people want change such as you.
This post was created from the user responses of a previous one that I had made. In this previous thread, many of the users agreed that the limit on the threshold needed to be changed. Please read the other thread. It can be found at:

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=2148

I don't care. Don't say everyone. 'Cuz that don't include everyone, just you and a few other people. The NG community as a whole doesn't want all these reforms, and I'm just saying I'm one of those that wants to keep things as is.

Response to: «¥» Quality Control «¥» Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 01:52 AM, LordKyu wrote:
At 4/5/01 01:07 AM, NOFX wrote:
Keep it the same.
You do realize that any entry that has more than 100 votes is free from the portal threshold. Which means even if it has a rating of 0.07 it will stay in the portal forever as long as it has over 100 votes.

corrupt voting.

I'm saying 1.75. If it's not that high, then it just isn't worth it.
In the previous discussion, Wade has said that even 1.0 for a threshold rating was too high, due to things like the corrupt voting that you have mentioned in your response.

Well, then they'll just have to deal with it. If it's really good, I won't get voted below 1.75.

Stupid. This is horrible. NG as a whole is getting ruined, and the voting corrupt. The top movie is at 3.5 last time i checked (not including HS2 because that'll drop fast and hard). I think that the top movies should be at something like 4.5, since they are good. Standards aren't getting higher, scores are just getting lower and lower. Tallying the number of Blams would "promote" this dark voting.
Then why not use the other side of the coin as well. Keep track of how many things people have voted on that jumped it up into the Top 10? And as a personal opinion, there would not be as many dark users if there were not so many poor quality portal entries. There are several entries that were uploaded with titles like "Vote X" with the others comment asking to have their entry voted off from the portal.

Ha! Tons of people vote crap onto the Top 10, while not a lot of people get too many Blams. It's not the same...

No. No. No.
Why would be able to sort by votes, review ratings, most reviews, and those types of things be bad? The portal is for the users. Why not let the users display how they wish to view things. Also, addition listing options might lead to people seeing portal entries that are lost in the middle of the high and low. The things that rarely get any views anymore.

Who would care if there are 100 votes on the movie? What significance does that have? Reviews? Who cares? That's just "stoopid". If you wanna see things in the middle of the portal, go down the top 50 and go to view all. or after you vote on a portal entry, go to a random one. # of votes is just dumb, and it'd instigate more corrupt voting by causing people to search for things at the checkpoints, like movies at 24 votes and such that they hope they can get a Blam off of. The portal is being made into a joke, or a game if you will. It's supposed to showcase art, not have the art a sideshow to see who can get the most Blams.

That's the whole point of experience you idiots. It's so that the hardcore fans who have been with the site for the longest have the most power. It isn't who has sat in front of their computers the longest, but rather experience with the NG community as a length of time.
There is no need for slander or name calling. Your response about this makes perfect sense, and is a very good reason on why not to allow a second voting.
Don't speak for the people, because not all people want change such as you.
This post was created from the user responses of a previous one that I had made. In this previous thread, many of the users agreed that the limit on the threshold needed to be changed. Please read the other thread. It can be found at:

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=2148

I don't care. Don't say everyone. 'Cuz that don't include everyone, just you and a few other people. The NG community as a whole doesn't want all these reforms, and I'm just saying I'm one of those that wants to keep things as is.

Response to: Puju you say some stupid shit...ASS Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

At 4/5/01 04:54 AM, da_zing_man wrote:
At 4/5/01 04:22 AM, Will_Stamper wrote: I can't spell worth a good god damn, back to bed I go.
yeah.... go ta hell pujo

ya anti-anime nazi bastard!

anime does suck, in my opinion. you're being the nazi here, not allowing people to have their own opinions... hypocrite.

Response to: «¥» Quality Control «¥» Posted April 5th, 2001 in General

Q: At what number of votes should it be checked for deletion. Should it be every 100 votes? Should it be every 25 like it is now, except without a cutoff point for the threshold?

Keep it the same.

Q: What should the threshold be for the portal? Dare we go as high as 0.75 or 1.00 or should we start low to try it out, leaving the threshold at 0.25 or 0.50?

I'm saying 1.75. If it's not that high, then it just isn't worth it.

Q: Should it check the ratio of the last 100 votes, and if that ratio is less than 0.50 should it get deleted?

What?!?!

Q: Should it not be determined on each of those, but rather a combination of those listed above. What other determining factors for deletion could we use?

NG discretion is used and i trust them.

Also, other options to be added into the Portals effect. Could we have the Portal keep track of how many entries we have voted off from Newgrounds? I would like people to know that I have voted off an average of three a day for this month, maybe even more.

Stupid. This is horrible. NG as a whole is getting ruined, and the voting corrupt. The top movie is at 3.5 last time i checked (not including HS2 because that'll drop fast and hard). I think that the top movies should be at something like 4.5, since they are good. Standards aren't getting higher, scores are just getting lower and lower. Tallying the number of Blams would "promote" this dark voting.

Can we get options added to be able to sort the portal by review ratings? How about by the number of votes? Are there any other search options people would like?

No. No. No.

Would it be practical to allow multiple deposits for experience. This first one at 5 votes, the second at 100 votes, the third at 250 votes? Are there more ways to earn experience? Could there be? What should they be?

That's the whole point of experience you idiots. It's so that the hardcore fans who have been with the site for the longest have the most power. It isn't who has sat in front of their computers the longest, but rather experience with the NG community as a length of time.

This about sums it up from my end. I am really hoping something will become of this. If you know people who use the portal, please direct them to this post. I would like to get as many opinions and responses as possible so the Newgrounds Staff can see people really are interested in a change.

Don't speak for the people, because not all people want change such as you.

Tom is running this site fine and everyone should quit jockin his scrotum for little things. Sure things can be tweeked, but that just means more strain on Tom. After all, small adjustments here and there would mean that Pico 2 would be further postponed, and I don't know of a single sould who'd want that!

Response to: Aspiring Animation Question Posted April 4th, 2001 in General

At 4/4/01 11:31 PM, Doodler wrote:
I really dont know, honestly.

Animating is fun and all, but i dont think i draw well enough to be a professional...i like programming as well, so i'm probably going to stick with the web as some never-used webdesigner.

-Doodler

drawing comes with practice. starting out in these early years will help. besides, you are the doodler! i constantly am caught drawing in class or at home, or in public places, even while i'm trying to talk to people. i just can't stop doing it!

Response to: I'm the only person Online on BBS Posted April 4th, 2001 in General

At 3/21/01 05:22 AM, Notorius wrote: I'm in school now, and the teacher allowed me to go to computer lab for the whole fuckin double lessons, cause they know that I'm leaving the school so all the teachers say there is no point for me to stay in the class. So I'm using this crappy school coputer and I'm the only person who's online on the BBS, haha.

on the school computer yet you have your animated gif (on the school comp)?