oh god

'ts been ages since i posted anything..but i might give this COW a try...

hey everybody

i'm trying painter out for a change...it's awesome, but it'll take me a while to get to know it...

and by the the trial version will have expired and i'll be looking for a crack :( haha

whack fifteen minutes

definitely improving mate

keep it up!

SHOW US MOAR

At 2/1/09 11:03 PM, falz3333 wrote: some small improvements.

you might want to clean it up a little

the sketchy look isn't as nice unless you get it perfectly right.

i like how you're drawings have gotten much more precise and defined

keep it up, and dont be afraid to experiment a little :D

</usless_opinion>

Who's dick do i gotta draw to get some comments over here??

hi-rez cuz this quality is raeping my detailz

thought i'd give photography a shot...

get it???? LOLOLOLOLOL

no but srsly i recently bought a camera and thought i'd experiment with a new medium... believe me it's awesome... i wish i knew more about it :(

And triple posting.

I guess my sister did'nt appriciate the fact that I was lurking around with my camera while she was studying...

At 1/26/09 09:13 AM, TomAzza wrote: quick question.

disregard that I bought it anyway..

first shots evar. this is me wallet.

quick question.

I'm thinkign of getting into photography, but i am one camera and a couple of hundred dollars short.

I found a Nikon bridge camera in a local shop for roughly 200 euro, from what i gather these kind of cameras are like digital cameras with a smaller sensor than DSLRs, but have some of their advantages and functions, like adjustable shutter speed, aperture and ISO settings...

apparently you can't change the lenses, unlike bad ass digital SLR's but still you can add enhancements for macro and stuff...

my point being : would it be a good idea to buy one of these bridge cameras for getting into photography? i would like to go for a DSLR but unfortunately, I dont have the cash, and point and shoot cameras seem to take away the fun of it.

discuss

nice job on the skeletons zac, i hope you dont mind though i wanted to give you a small pointer on your anatomy sketches.

dont take it as an offence if i scribbled on your sketch, it's just easyer that way...

i think the pectorals are a little too "square" and big, and i thought i'd help you out with some lower-neck/upper-thorax anatomy, since it seems it was what you were mostly focusing on.

hope to see moar arts soon.

also, the tree is cool.

nice job on the skeletons zac, i hope you dont mind though i wanted to give you a small pointer on your anatomy sketches.

dont take it as an offence if i scribbled on your sketch, it's just easyer that way...

i think the pectorals are a little too "square" and big, and i thought i'd help you out with some lower-neck/upper-thorax anatomy, since it seems it was what you were mostly focusing on.

hope to see more from ya.

At 1/16/09 08:17 AM, FrostedMonkeyFlakes wrote: ...and I think his eye is a bit too high and far back.

yeah you're right about the eye and jawline...i'll see if i'm half bothered to fix it...

At 1/16/09 08:13 AM, q13qew wrote: Why u didnt finished the legs??

boredom?

and it is spawn from the comics.

At 1/16/09 07:45 AM, Peglay wrote:

At 1/16/09 07:42 AM, TomAzza wrote: INNUVASHIUN!

But the chest looks kinda empty....r u going to add some chains on him?

yeah yeah i'm just working on lighting for now

he wouldnt be spawn without chains

and @ munz i know he still does... probably because of how i approached the pic, i drew the cape over him insted of doing both toghether... well i'll see how it goes...

INNUVASHIUN!

At 1/14/09 04:51 PM, hippl5 wrote:

Filters too! Don't forget the filters!

Yessirry! You can't spell filter-raped-crap without "filter"!

well it might be more orange than red

but i had this since the enviroment contests so...

update

just a little cape detail...

i know it looks weird, i plan on blending the picture once i've finished the cape, that way it wont look like he's just pasted there...

plus i gotta work on the background, overall lighting, chains, and lots and lots of random stuff

At 1/14/09 05:55 AM, Jonas wrote:

Again, could be wrong, but just pointing that out.

you're probably 100% right on that one, I used some images on the internet as reference, The last time i saw a spawn comic was years ago :(

At 1/14/09 12:12 AM, tomocles wrote: how's this?

well i dont know about ungirlyfing...

but you definitely want to fix his sword-arm anatomy, his bycept area is too long, it looks like his arm is attached to his lower rib cage.

At 1/13/09 10:23 PM, Razac wrote: woah nice!

thanks man, it's good to see you're still hanging around :D

At 1/13/09 08:51 PM, ReNaeNae wrote: Like if it's a special project. But some people seem to think every image they make is a special project. Da nerve!!

I understand where LaserKarl is coming from, and I understand the problem with "clogging" the forum up, but i just wanted to shout out that the only reason i did this was to get more critiscism and observation off of it, since anything i post in my art thread get's pretty much ignored anyway.

Believe me it's not because I think it's "special", or in anyway different from any other piece posted on the forum, as i said it's just something i'm hoping to improve as i finish.

regardless, if it's this annoying to users i'll just leave it be

At 1/13/09 05:32 PM, Lemmiwinks91 wrote:

i think the cape makes the lighting look dodgy on him cus the underneath is so black

i know this is nowhere near to be finished, there wont be any black part like that, plus blending and other crap is in order, otherwise it'll look like some copy/paste shit.

ok i sketched the cape a bit... i still have no idea of how to do it... and it's scaled down a lot to fit the DAMNED SIZE REQUIREMENTS...

ANYWAY i plan to have it finished tmorrow evening

At 1/13/09 12:15 PM, RedCoin wrote:

Disregard this, the veins are fine.

lol thanks

and thanks for the general comments,

As for the chin i know it's a bit longer...i though it would look a little more particular, instead of looking like a simple black silhouette of some buffed dude jiuced up on steroids. XD

At 1/13/09 08:38 AM, LaserKarl wrote: how do you judge shadows?

good shadows go to heaven and bad shadows go to hell.

And the thread opener's just fail..

At 1/13/09 11:40 AM, ornery wrote: Nice sense of light you have going to far. I would definitely try to maintain that. Dont let it become bulled down by a crappy background.

thanks, yeah i'm kind of worried of fucking it up with the rest of the pic, but i'll try and keep it as constant as this.

At 1/13/09 10:59 AM, ShitBits wrote:

Jeez,relax a little there.Theres no need to go crying over a simple question

dont worry i'm not upset

hahaha

At 1/13/09 10:43 AM, DooDooMeaT wrote: Do you actually work with that checker board crap in the background?

dude the checker board crap is what photoshop renders when there's nothing there, instead of plain white.

and it's a cropped screenshot

and no i dont work with the checkerboard crap in the background

and fuck you.