6,082 Forum Posts by "TNT"
The UK Prime Minister lives on 10 Downing Street!
At 12/18/13 09:01 PM, Sekhem wrote: looks like some stupid furry shit
Not necessarily. In fact, most of the characters are human.
no thanks
Alrighty then!
you are a stain on the great state of texas
I want to leave a mark when I die... BA DUM TSSH!
Ever wanted to be a red panda, a soldier, an anime character, or even Satan himself? Then FaceRig is what you'll need!
"FaceRig a program allowing anyone to become any character they want with its full expression palette by just sitting in front of their webcam at home. It is currently in development."
indigogo link: http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/facerig
This looks freaking amazing! If this is only a prototype, I can't wait to see what it looks like when it's done. What do you guys think?
At 12/11/13 05:41 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: frigi's answer to my post in this thread was a PM he sent me and which went a little like this: "GO FUCK YOURSELF ASSHOLE PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!!! GO FUCKING FUCK YOURSELF ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
I highly recommand that nobody takes him seriously, ever.
Funny. He answered my post via PM as well...
"you are a worthless piece of shit you motherfucking asswipe! How dare you breath the same air as me! fuck yourself you asshole!!!!
I HATE YOU!!!!!! I HATE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
He's so delightful.
I'm alright. I've been playing the acoustic guitar for almost 5 years, and I'm just started to play the electric a few months ago. I did this cover of Alice in Chains with both of my guitars, and mixed it with mixcraft 6.
At 12/10/13 07:15 PM, frigi wrote:
if you work at a restaurant as a waiter...you are worthless. If you died today nobody would really care. NOBODY. Not your parents, not your friends, no one. You are a bottom feeder. just kill yourself already and stop making society fall because of you.
One of my first jobs was at Pizza Hut, and I was a delivery driver. I was thankful that I had a job in the first place, especially during the recession that the USA was going through. Sometimes I don't get tips, but when I do, I am very thankful for them.
All I have to say is... fuck you.
I did what I had to do for my job, and quite frankly I felt I did an excellent job. There have been people I've worked with who doesn't give a crap about their customers, and are just there because they want to get paid. I understand that some customers can be complete assholes, but I strive to make sure I meet their expectations. If I didn't, then there isn't much I can do about it because you can't please everyone.
Also, fuck you for taking some of the tip money left on the table for other servers. That's called stealing, even if you just threw it in the trash. If you don't want to believe in the tip system, fine by me. But you're an asshole to go out of your way to call anyone worthless because they have a specific type of job. They're much more productive than some homeless person on the street that actually begs for money...
Trolling or not, you're scum.
At 11/26/13 10:19 PM, Psycho666 wrote: 101 dalmatians...
You can buy a Dalmatian for less than $5?!
At 11/24/13 08:39 PM, Wriggle wrote:Ohio is the South?Gotta love the south- The peoples rights are still somewhat respected here.Read Terry vs. Ohio (1968).
What I'm trying to say is that you can't deny an officer from doing the Stop and Frisk anywhere in the United States.
Even in the South.
At 11/24/13 04:32 PM, Wriggle wrote:At 11/24/13 03:34 PM, AxTekk wrote:
Gotta love the south- The peoples rights are still somewhat respected here.If I don't consent to search than they would best not touch me if they want to avoid a lawsuit.Wriggle bro, you're lovely and all but you're way too naive. Cops wouldn't give a shit. Judges wouldn't give a shit. You aren't as free as you think you are.
Read Terry vs. Ohio (1968).
At 11/18/13 10:46 PM, Elitistinen wrote:At 11/18/13 10:32 PM, bhsqad15 wrote: Because they always get involved in my business they even treat me like a child and i am 18 years oldYou shouldn't live with your parents if you're 18.
I just became a senior in high school when I was 18. So you're saying I should have moved out by then as well?
Ok. You can't be racist to someone's nationality, but people can be racist to Hispanics.
At 11/17/13 01:03 PM, LazyDrunk wrote:
Right, and we could reflect that difference by substituting "fault" with "decision" whenever we can, because fault implies an unjustified reasoning, and that confuses some people if you aren't intending the implication.
Well... you're right. I could have used my words more appropriately, so I'll be more careful next time.
I guess in the end, this is a perspective issue. You've made some very good points. It's true that different scenarios and actions can alter the effect of the end result. However, I just felt what pox said was odd, even if he meant to be vague.
Anyway, I did go off topic in this thread. After all, this topic is about the issues with the N-Word. So, lets move back to that topic. :)
At 11/17/13 11:51 AM, LazyDrunk wrote:At 11/17/13 11:36 AM, TNT wrote:
OK, but the person behind the gun is the one that pulled the trigger (unless accidental misfire by dropping it). Rather it is on purpose or an accident to shoot someone, the shooter is the one that's fully responsible because he's the one with the gun, and the mindset to pull that trigger. The way that poxpower said it is like saying the victim is partly to blame for a drunk driving accident.
What you should consider is extenuating circumstances, like hostage negotiation, self-defense and duties of war.
I have considered them. However, it doesn't change the fact that the person behind the gun was the one who shot that victim/target (unless there's another person shooting the same victim/target as well, then we could argue which bullet killed the victim first). For hostage negotiations, if the suspect shot the hostage, then it's his fault. If the sniper hits his target (i.e. the suspect) or accidentally hits a hostage, then it's his fault. And it holds true in the extreme case if the hostage somehow gets the suspect's gun and shot him; it's the hostage's fault for shooting him.
Keep in mind, I'm not saying that there's no such thing as a justifiable shooting, but I'm pointing out on who's responsible for that action to occur.
Take auto insurance claims for example. Merely being on the road enables a portion of the blame to be assigned to the victim, though the accident is mostly the other driver's doing. The way pox explained it (astutely, I should add) left room for outlying circumstances such as two drunk drivers hitting eachother or a successfully executed hostage crises.
How is it the victim's fault if he's obeying the law on the road? Are you implying that the law abiding driver on the road is at partial fault because he was there at the wrong time?
In regards to two drunk drivers hitting each other, one of the drunk drivers is responsible for that accident (like he ran through the red light onto oncoming traffic where the other drunk driver hits him perpendicularly). So it's up to the police to figure out which one caused the accident while placing both of them in jail for DWI.
But yeah, I can see where it's easy to get lost in words and forget the elasticity they have. That flex is why we're all here, working out the kinks and getting some, too.
I think pox should have elaborated a little bit on how he's mostly to blame if he shot someone, but it could just be me...
At 11/17/13 11:25 AM, LazyDrunk wrote:At 11/17/13 11:23 AM, TNT wrote:A rational person needs a compelling reason to shoot someone in the face.At 11/16/13 11:32 PM, poxpower wrote:But if you are hurt by me shooting you in the face, then I am mostly to blame.MOSTLY?! How in the hell in any way, shape, or form, is the victim partly blamed for that?
OK, but the person behind the gun is the one that pulled the trigger (unless accidental misfire by dropping it). Rather it is on purpose or an accident to shoot someone, the shooter is the one that's fully responsible because he's the one with the gun, and the mindset to pull that trigger. The way that poxpower said it is like saying the victim is partly to blame for a drunk driving accident.
At 11/16/13 11:32 PM, poxpower wrote:
But if you are hurt by me shooting you in the face, then I am mostly to blame.
MOSTLY?! How in the hell in any way, shape, or form, is the victim partly blamed for that?
I have no respect for anyone that uses the N-Word in an insulting or labeling way. Sure, for those who must say it on a regular basis are protected by Free Speech, but it doesn't mean I'll shake their hand when they introduce themselves afterward. There are many things I can tolerate, but this isn't one of them.
Aledo coaches have been cleared of bullying.
Good.
Led Zeppelin, though good, are very overrated.
The Aledo Bearcats (a highschool football team) defeated the Western Hills Cougars 91-0. Because of the huge blowout, one Western Hills parent filed a bullying complaint because of Aledo's win.
From what I've read, it never mentioned the Aledo Bearcats shouting insults, or throwing punches at the Western Hills Cougars. All its states is that the bullying complaint was filed because of the score. While the Aledo Head Coach felt bad about the score, he will continue to have their team work hard to win each game.
So apparently, if any sports team does incredibly well against an opponent, they're bullies? Is it just me, or is this the most ridiculous bullying complaint I've ever heard of?
It's been two days since I've defeated A Machine for Pigs, and after letting it sink in a little, I think I gave it too much praise.
I still think the plot is great and everything else, but the fact I wasn't scared as much is more of a big deal than I realized. So yeah, the first one is better in my opinion.
Frictional Games released an indirect sequel to The Dark Descent called, Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs!
I've just completed A Machine for Pigs, and in my opinion, it is better than The Dark Descent. Almost everything about the game is better than The Dark Descent. Unlike the previous game where I beat the game within 5 days (on and off), I completed A Machine for Pigs in 3 1/2 hours non-stop! The story kept me glued in, the sound was marvelous, the graphics were improved a little, and they even removed the annoying tender boxes! That's right, you can now keep your lantern on for just about forever.
I only have one criticism for this game, and it isn't as scary as The Dark Descent. I got really frightened in a couple of scenes, but I got more of it from the previous game. However, the game makes up for it in every other aspect.
Well guys, I think I went on long enough with my opinion. For those who have played Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs, what are your thoughts?
A Machine for Pigs is available on Steam.
At 9/9/13 12:27 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:At 9/9/13 12:22 AM, TNT wrote:Oh yeah .270 are pretty good I had a teacher who used one for hunting said it shot SRAIGHT like in a video game. Though I prefer conventional rounds like .223 or .308 when I go hunting I usually use .308 high velocity mid grain rounds accurate and deadly it takes the deer out humanely.
I actually own a Remington 700, but its a .270 instead of a .308. It's a great hunting rifle if you're ever interested in deer hunting.
That's awesome! But I want to get back on topic regarding Texas's new law. I don't want mods seeing this and go, "Well, this has gone off topic, so I shall lock this!"
The funny thing about this law is, despite my concerns, I'm considering getting one now. I'm a senior in college majoring in Criminal Justice, and I'm also a licensed security guard. Not only does this help squeeze in a CHL course in my busy schedule, but if I feel comfortable enough, I can upgrade my security license to become armed.
Still, for every person like me, there's also a person who has no experience with guns. I'm really interested to see how the instructors will pull it off. Perhaps in the future if I decide to take the course, I'll post here stating how it went, and if I feel it was effective enough that 99% of the newcomers have learned something.
At 9/9/13 12:06 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:At 9/8/13 11:27 PM, Camarohusky wrote:if you want a good rifle try Remington 700 ad if you want that lethal accuracy and power go with a .308, besides WWII rifles go for like 2-3 grand a pop not worth it.At 9/8/13 02:01 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: a good old Remington 870 should be good enough for you.Never been a shotgun kinda guy. I would more likely collect WWII rifles, like the Garand and Springfield.
I actually own a Remington 700, but its a .270 instead of a .308. It's a great hunting rifle if you're ever interested in deer hunting.
At 9/8/13 12:30 PM, metalhead676 wrote:At 9/6/13 09:32 PM, sephiroth4312 wrote:They mean fatal force. Like if they illegally enter your home or start brutalising A member of your family you can shoot them down like the dogs they are.At 9/4/13 12:48 AM, metalhead676 wrote:And how does that help? Sounds like using it would just piss off the officer and make the problem worse...At 9/4/13 12:46 AM, TNT wrote: The top two links are the same.My bad, the state of indiana has a law that okay's use of force against police who are stepping out of their bounds as officers of the law. that was what's supposed to be in the second link.
They better have those body-worn cameras on them when it happens. Otherwise, there will be too much of a gray area to know what really happened. Did the cop get attacked by the member of the family first or not? Was this member of a family a wanted felon? This is why making cops where those cameras on their bodies so important because it provides the real picture of what happened.
At 9/8/13 11:38 AM, Camarohusky wrote: More important, let's teach gun owners how to properly store their guns. Most (read: nearly all) criminals who have guns got them in a pipeline that originates from home robberies. People wanting to keep their gun close for self defense are unwittingly and stupidly creating the problem they wish to defend themselves from.
That brings up a relatively good point. Smart criminals, when they burglarize a house, knows that safes are easy targets. So having a tiny safe that has a pistol inside it can create a bit of a paradox. The safe is meant to protect your belongings, but in reality, criminals know that if they see a small enough safe that they can carry, they'll just take the whole thing!
Other than gun safety and penal codes, I don't know what's all in a CHL course. Hopefully they also teach proper gun storage that works.
It's dumb mainly for the name.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ79pCJBcJ8
But hey you know what, my wife would like that!
At 9/4/13 08:03 PM, KillerSkull wrote: So I just picked up the movie "Salo or the 120 days of Sodom " and I must say I am quite nervous in watching it because of the nature of the film and I hear it is indeed tough to watch. However, I also hear it is very artsy and in general a great film. Has anyone here seen it? Can anyone give me more info on what I'm getting into? Should I eat popcorn while watching this movie?
Going to watch it within the next week or two.
No, I haven't seen that movie. In fact, I haven't heard about it until you mentioned it on this thread. From what I saw on wikipedia however, it sounds so messed up, that I have to see it to believe it.
At 9/4/13 06:43 PM, The-Act wrote:At 9/4/13 06:35 PM, BigBadtheBazz wrote:metalYou're big..aswell as Bad. And i'm thinking your name is Bazz.
I know you so well.
I like your cat. It's cute...
