At 10/1/08 04:52 PM, Dookiemaister wrote: i got an idea earlier today so i sketched it up quickly...before i forgot it.

picture's kinda bright

Conscience doesn't have a mustache, and he looks like he's smiling, he almost never smiles.

Fucking great timing, my wacom pen broke.

Classes:

Flash History
Actionscript 101
13375p34k (LOTE)
Audio Practice
Voice Acting
Cock Jokes 101
Gym (LOL)

At 9/23/08 05:29 PM, ihatetoasters wrote: Oh god not another "If Newgrounds Was A..." Seriously I am so sick of these threads...

I'd be one of the cool kids.

Who are you again?

What's this whole Garfield thing about?

At 9/22/08 10:12 PM, YoungAndWise wrote: Tree Tutorial.

Next time, try using the portal search bar located at the top, on the Newgrounds banner. I just searched for ''Tree Tutorial'' and I found it in the first result.

That's the wrong one, though. I already saw it.

I can't find this tutorial I saw a while ago, it was about how to draw trees, help?

At 1/23/07 09:18 PM, elmosera wrote:

At 1/23/07 09:07 PM, AshfordPride wrote:

At 1/23/07 09:06 PM, Gendo wrote: Ashford needs to see this topic, it's fucking golden.

I have no words. If I died right now, I'd be okay with that.

you sir, are god

facepalm

At 9/19/08 02:52 PM, BlueHippo wrote:

At 9/19/08 02:16 AM, remyzero wrote: Hey Tom, you are on the front page of Cold Hard Flash!

Haha, nice interview. I like when Tom talks about his and Dan's old games, and just kinda smirks ;3

Also I spotted myself :0 That was in the green shirt with the NG sticker on the back next to Tom oboyoboy.

And for the record I want to shove that butt plug into the madness character's face crack. A neat style though ;P

god I need to make some new flash...

I find it hilarious when I looked at tags, and it doesn't say Tom Fulp anywhere... Instead it says Adam Phillips....

At 9/16/08 05:14 PM, ThisUserNameSucks wrote: Would a review be abusive if a person voted down just because it doesn't have an element that it's not supposed to have? If so, There She Is!!!~ step 4 and step 1 on the next page

Well?

Would a review be abusive if a person voted down just because it doesn't have an element that it's not supposed to have? If so, There She Is!!!~ step 4 and step 1 on the next page

At 8/26/08 05:12 PM, biohasard wrote: sammo.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 5784

I'm pretty sure that's useless.

At 8/24/08 09:34 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote:

At 8/24/08 09:27 PM, ThisUserNameSucks wrote: No one really knows...

*facepalm*

Ah damn forgot to quote. I was responding to whoever asked how many whistle points you get for flagging an abusive review.

No one really knows...

At 8/22/08 03:24 PM, an0x wrote:

At 8/22/08 03:21 PM, darkmaster962000 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 5880 Is the first one abusive?

Yes, flag it because it is very spammy. If anything has over four lines of something like that, you should flag it.

No. Shut up. It's not abusive or spammy in anyway, maybe useless, but not abusive. Over four lines? I've seen reviews over four lines that have been full of well-mannered constructive criticism.

Who cares? It's gonna suck anyway.

At 10/1/07 11:36 AM, Narfer wrote: A little kid came and i said "Hello! :D" And he punched me right in the face and spat on me.
I got so friggin angry that i said "You little kid...!" And his parents got angry at me and i did have to say sorry to that little bitch >:(

You got in trouble for calling him a kid.... wtf? Did I miss something?

I read this article once, and this proves that the parents are the problem.
This little kid has this rare disease which made him look like he was constantly breaking out in hives, and I feel bad for the kid
Somewhere in the article it says that the mother of the child took him to a playground. The kid did nothing wrong, and some bitch of a mother comes up to her and has the fucking ovaries to say "Could please take that mask off your son? It's scaring my child."
Not completely related to the topic, but some parents are bitches, I bet that woman's kid grew up to be the kid who screams in restaurants.

At 4/25/08 11:53 PM, Christian676 wrote: Fuck you.

Aww, the little kid can't accept that him and his friends are tossfaces

Your mum

lulz, see what I did thar?

We also have a BONUS PRIZE created by elliez3! Munglai will be receiving a rag with StrawberryClock sewn on it.
Oh.... Sweet... Jesus... <barfs>

Fat Anime Collab 3 (blam)

I have no moneys

At 8/17/08 04:55 PM, Bryan wrote:

At 8/17/08 03:11 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote: Hey, is this stolen? The original game was for gameboy, the author here just re-created it as a computer version.

Should we flag it as stolen or not?

It passed. Time to get Wade on the phone.

Mhm, the kid also stole footage from another hardworking artist on this website and put it to LINKIN PARK MOOSIC!!! We're turning into youtube one user at a time D':

At 8/17/08 03:24 PM, Sectus wrote:

At 8/17/08 03:11 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote: Hey, is this stolen? The original game was for gameboy, the author here just re-created it as a computer version.

Should we flag it as stolen or not?

I say we flag it until its pulled

No shit, sherlock.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 3787 Insults the author

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 4273 Insults the author

At 8/13/08 02:32 PM, djmrules wrote: Lots.
Not sure. I guess they'd be more spam than abusive.

I don't want to make the same mistake the some other person on this thread made, am I going to get penalized for flagging these?

At 8/13/08 02:14 PM, perfect-insanity wrote: he's got 13 more just like it on his userpage
http://jajasd.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh/2

Odd how he just signed up today, eh?

At 8/3/08 05:20 PM, tomthecool wrote:

At 8/3/08 05:03 PM, ThisUserNameSucks wrote:

At 8/3/08 04:18 PM, Phil wrote: Ignore a lot of low leveled users with garbage whistles, it's normally never abusive in any way.

Shut the fuck up asshole.

He was a bit harsh to tell others to "ignore you", but let's face it - what he said has quite a bit of truth in it. If a high-level, deity whistle guy posts a load of links, I don't check their content very carefully; but if someone like you posts links I'll always read everything through for myself to make sure. ANd from experience, more than 50% of these links are not what I'd call abusive.

Sorry guys, I don't mean to "beat a dead horse" also so long after the post, but I just realized something, what the fuck does levels have to do with flagging abusive reviews? What if I didn't like voting? Will I always be marked as a noob flagger even if I have Deity Whistle status just because I'm a low level?