Haha, oh wow. Your friend is a dick.

That program deletes vital parts of your operating system.

At 1/29/09 11:29 PM, MonkeyV wrote: I believe that the first one was "I fuck your mother"

Yeah. It was derived from Solardave's (I think) "I drink your milkshake" sig.

Serving peanut butter? In a school? What the fuck?

Your staff is full of idiots. There was a kid in my class who was allergic to peanuts. I brought in an Oh Henry bar one day and...things did not end pretty.

Who da man? You da man.

/broseph

But srsly, that's cool and stuff.

For me, it's Shadowcaothsdfgdfgtail9--wait, fuck, I can't even pronounce it let alone spell it. At first I disliked his presence just for the name, but now it's so much more.

I will be back tomorrow to perform a ctrl+f on this thread

At 1/28/09 10:36 PM, RedDreadSky wrote: Whenever I feel like that's going to happen, I use my open mouth as a protective shield.

Smiley related.

Thanks for the pro tip. I'll try that next time.

This one time, I beat a guy at arm wrestling and a girl promptly challenged me right after. She beat me and the guy laughed, quickly realized what this meant for him, and shut up. That's the most awesome thing that has happened to me at arm wrestling.

Am I good at arm wrestling? lolno.

What do I think of it? Pretty fun sometimes, so I like it. It gets pretty lulzy too.

There's a windowed fridge full of salads, sandwiches, and milk. Every day except for fryless Wednesday, they sell fries and onion rings, and for 5 bucks there's a special. The special consists of food you'd find in a good restaurant and as far as I know, besides pizza they've never done the same thing twice. Also, soup. Every school day, no matter what, there's soup. Also also, a drink machine.

The cafeteria is inside the school but is not managed by the school district, so that explains the awesomeness.

At 1/28/09 09:17 PM, KronikAvenger wrote: fyi its impossible to suck your own dick
|unless you get some ribs removed

Assumptions, assumptions. I wasn't trying to suck my dick, but I've seen it done before. Contortionists, yeh know.

At 1/28/09 09:15 PM, thisisL wrote: How stupid do you have to be to jizz in your own damn eye

At 1/28/09 09:16 PM, Tehpivot wrote: How in hell did you do it?

Did you get "passionate" with yourself?

I haven't done it in a while. Sitting upright and leaning forward during climax were contributive factors as well.

Why my face was that close in the first place doesn't matter, but yeah, I've got splooge in my eye. I washed it out as best as I could, but fuck this stings. Has this happened to anyone else? How long will my eye be like this?

This thread is bad, and you should feel bad.

At 1/28/09 01:45 AM, SessileNomad wrote: i would say this thread delivers, but only anon can do this

and we all gots screen names

Parkinson's is now known world wide. Because of Michael J. Fox.

copypasta

Please die.

Michael J. Fox doesn't need to shake his dick after peeing. Because of Parkinson's.

At 1/27/09 12:20 PM, yhar wrote: WHat a shit idea, I don't like IE from a web dev point of view, but it's necessary for a lot of microsoft things, such as updates and shit like that, if everyone starts using firefox without realising why they're using it (Better standards than IE and more secure) then they'll be all "WTF THIS SHIT AINT WORKING FUCK YOU FIREFOX!!!".

Ridiculous idea.

Vista and Windows 7 (not sure if others do this too) do not rely on Internet Explorer to update. The general public need not worry. As for "shit like that", read the thread.

At 1/27/09 12:12 PM, Snake-Arsenic wrote:

At 1/27/09 11:58 AM, Thimbles wrote: Are you replying to me?

I was just letting everyone know that trying to uninstall IE will cause more problems than it solves, that's all.

Wrong button? Didn't read the quote? I've done that once, dun worry.

Is the patch big or something? I had a friend who had a small bald spot at the back of his head, lower neck area. Kid got more ass than a toilet seat.

At 1/27/09 10:57 AM, CanadianSnowman wrote: Again I state...

You cannot take IE out of newer version of Windows.

Far to many components both third party and Microsoft are build around it.

Are you replying to me?

At 1/27/09 11:08 AM, Alfie wrote: They already said they will disable certain codes in IE, and replace them with either an offline alternative, or an embed (developer end) of the new chosen browser.

...Yeah, so? They still need to develop a way, and I was explaining that it is entirely possible to remove IE from future installs.

Hopefully, MS or somebody will develop a patch for people who've already installed their Windows OS based on the outcome of this situation.

At 1/27/09 10:17 AM, CanadianSnowman wrote: Internet Explore is a core portion of Windows you can't delete it.

Except EU is talking about Microsoft giving end users the ability to safely install their operating system without Internet Explorer in the first place, and instead a mainstream alternative. The only problem being Microsoft needs to develop a way to make the Windows Help and Support system work without components of IE, not to mention some third party programs rely on IE's HTML rendering components. Since they've discontinued sales of XP, there wont be a problem with updating. Lolwikipedia.

"While computer users and OEMs are already free to run any web browsing software on Windows, the Commission is considering ordering Microsoft and OEMs to obligate users to choose a particular browser when setting up a new PC," the company reports in the filing.

At 1/26/09 11:52 PM, AnonymousAlchemist wrote:

At 1/26/09 11:47 PM, MonkeyV wrote: Well shit, that much ice cream for just some blood?
Sign me up.

I forgot to mention that it is a "pint of blood for a pint of ice cream." That isn't so much blood, right? And all that free ice cream...*drools*

I wish I could sign you up.

I'd get even MORE ice cream!

Well fuck. I just googled what a pint is in metric and that's a bit more blood than I'm comfortable with giving. I used to think a pint was half that or something. Yeesh. Doesn't mean I wouldn't do it for the ice cream, though. Saving lives is just a bonus.

At 1/26/09 06:14 PM, lawlmaster wrote: Now you know not to leave your wallet around where others can get it.

Yeah, I'll bet he didn't THAT coming. Doesn't he know all mothers routinely break into their child's car and take things that don't belong to them?

fsdgffahsd

At 1/25/09 04:08 PM, life wrote: https://www.newgrounds.com/store/cart/ad dress

At 1/25/09 04:08 PM, ArykSB wrote: now!

It only works if you actually have something in the cart.

At 1/25/09 01:58 PM, bgraybr wrote: Imagine that cats had no hair and produced a slime to protect their skin, then what would stop you from putting it out on the street?

Nothing, as it would be an inconvenience to me. But that's what animal shelters are for. I would have as much sympathy for it as a fat lazy room mate. If it's been domesticated and doesn't have the skills to live in the wild, then we have a moral obligation to shelter the being until such a time where it can gain those skills or die. If it's wild, then what's the problem?

How do you know they can't suffer? Less complicated=/=no pain.

That's the point; They're so minuscule and simple in design in comparison, they cannot even dream (quite literally) of the mental anguish, lust, pleasure, grieving, that more intelliget animals experience. As I said earlier, what matters is the moral boundaries society has currently carved between companionship, benefit, and loss, and what outweighs the other.

Have you ever fished with worms? The whole time they try to escape, and when you hook them they really squirm.

hurr durr

At 1/25/09 01:38 PM, bgraybr wrote: So, you admit that you only care about cats because they benefit you.

"Only" Haha, try again.

The only thing cats do is look cute. If your cat was as a big as a house it would kill you for fun, so no companionship. The reason people like cats is because they're cute.

If the only reason you have that's holding you back from killing a cat or leaving it out on a cold street is it's looks, then you and I have a very different set of morals.

Worms are not cute, they are slimy and most people hate them. That is why people kill them.

If there was any kind of guilt which accompanied killing them caused by something like, say, evidence of much higher sentience than we thought, then I'm sure there would be laws against it. But they can't suffer, so no one gives a shit. Might as well be a stick of butter.

At 1/25/09 01:24 PM, Digital-Terror wrote: Every hacking group on the internet would be turned against the government. Not a very smart thing to do.

Haha, yeah right. They'd probably find themselves a job with the government to counter inter-vigilantes. Censoring the internet could bring thousands of jobs :D

...nah.

At 1/25/09 01:00 PM, bgraybr wrote:

At 1/25/09 12:09 PM, Thimbles wrote:

I don't care, that's my point.

Explain? I was arguing against "worms aren't cute so no one cares"

And a kittens sentience is also extremely low compared to a humans.

Sentience is based on a beings ability to perceive and to suffer. Whether or not one animal is better at it than others doesn't matter, but it's the level at which we consider it to be morally acceptable to expend the being for our own benefit that does matter, and how we go about doing it. Not to mention, unlike dogs and cats, worms can't be domesticated for work or companionship. There's no assumed bond and there never can be.

At 1/25/09 11:25 AM, bgraybr wrote: Its like using live worms as bait- but oops worms aren't cute so no one cares.
Kittens are just animals, they can do what they want if they want to do it.

With their level of sentience being so undeniably low, how can you care? Fuck off. I'd feel worse using a stick of butter. At least I could have put that on some toast.

At 1/25/09 11:59 AM, Le-Froid wrote: No.

Why the hell do you sit down in a shower?

Because it feels nice. I've actually fell asleep doing that once. The cold water woke me up.

You deleted the desktop shortcut. The actual disk space reserved for the recycle bin and the ability to navigate to it with explorer AND it's functionality still exists.

At 1/24/09 10:47 PM, VitalNovix wrote:

At 1/24/09 10:32 PM, Electric-Bla wrote: Phishing, not hacking.
You should have checked the domain name.

Use Mozilla, or Google. They usually let you know when you hit a phisher.

Agreed. The only flaw is that the site has to have been reported first.