At 10/14/09 09:51 PM, michelinman wrote: If they legalized pot, I'd grow my own. For sure.

Ah, but can you deny that you'd buy a bag/pack of joints at least once? Or maybe if you were just feeling particularly lazy that day?

And we all know how active those stoners are. They're so motivated!

Not a personal judgement against you, but I think 90% of the people who claim they'd just grow their own would probably make a single half-hearted attempt before trying to rationalize adding pot money to their budget.

I love how the number of reading users jumps when someone posts to a bunch of threads here, but very few people actually post.

HI GAWKERS.

At 10/14/09 09:30 PM, DarkBetaStudios wrote: Personally, I think the best way for the Economy to rebound, we should tax the Obsenely rich big time.

Even though you quantify your statement by specifying obscenely rich, I guarantee you some trickle-down asshat will come in here claiming that would hurt the economy.

At 10/14/09 09:43 PM, darkrchaos wrote: I don't like the idea of the bill. we're losing all are private-see. sooner or later there will camera following us around, and the government will say, it to protect u... Can't we protect ourselves? we're not kids we can take care of ourselves.

I'll believe you're not a kid when you stop speaking like one.

At 10/9/09 10:31 PM, Freedomblades wrote: Before the day of TV adds i dont think there was a time when people would walk about the street in masses yelling out why this guy is the bad guy but this guy isnt

No, mudslinging goes back quite far.

At 10/12/09 03:58 PM, amaterasu wrote: The scientific community does not as a whole accept evolution as "fact", which is what you imply when you say "correct". The community accepts it as the most plausible theory right now.

What planet do you live on?

Evolution isn't a theory. It is an observation.

The origin of species is, on the other hand, a theory.

At 10/12/09 05:40 PM, ASKDodge wrote: In the face of aggression and the threat of attack, is it justifiable to entirely destroy an enemy?

No.

Didn't some zombie jew say something about turning the other cheek?

Perhaps Islamic extremism reaches a point where it directly threatens western civilization or a rogue state obtains the means to cause irreparable damage to our infrastructure and way of life.

If Islamic radicals can topple our civilization, we've already lost.

In such circumstances, where a pre-emptive strike becomes not only a viable course of action, but a serious consideration, would you condone the use of violence to prevent an attack which may never come, or maintain neutrality in the face of aggression and instead opt for diplomacy?

It never becomes viable. Take 9/11. Invading Afghanistan beforehand would not have stopped it. The terrorists were here, in the states, living among us.

At 10/8/09 08:15 PM, WoogieNoogie wrote: Get informed, then let's discuss this.

Look, this is just formalizing a plan to do damage control in the event of a major cyber attack.

Read through the bill. Think about it.

This isn't about controlling you. This is about protecting us.

Legalize pot.

Tax the hell out of it.

Let the hippies pay for welfare.

At 10/10/09 06:33 AM, UpoqvoSAMMIovpoqU wrote: Do reality TV shows accurately represent real life

No.

or are they twisted by picky editing or completely faked from the beginning?

All of the above.

Is it morally right to laugh at people who have bad voices or act, or do we laugh "with" them because they understand?

No.

Reality TV is crap. Just don't watch it. If you ignore it, if we all do, then it will go away.

Well, you do have that ever-present surveillance thing going on...

At 10/11/09 12:30 AM, falz3333 wrote: http://kotaku.com/5378792/china-cracks-d own-on-online-gaming

well not all videogames.... but this shit is getting crazy over there. They say Massively Multiplayer Online(MMO) games promote "drug smuggling and prostitution". WOW. that is exactly what I want to do after I finish a session with FFXI.

Actually, it does provide a conduit for communication, as well as a cover.

Even if you don't do it, it's not so far fetched.

At 10/9/09 05:55 PM, FUNKbrs wrote:

At 10/4/09 01:01 PM, SteveGuzzi wrote: Isn't this what the whole "devil's advocate" thing is about?

PWNT.

Is the DAG even active at this point?

At 10/12/09 09:21 PM, SevenSeize wrote: I know not a damn think about programming and actionscript makes me wanna slit my wrists. But I draw decent and own a wacom tablet. (I work in CS3, AS2 if that matters) Whatcha workin on?

I've got the tech side down. What I need is an artist. It's a game. You'd be doing foreground stuff, characters, NPCs, items.

At 10/12/09 04:53 PM, stafffighter wrote: The way Peters (legal) father felt about Lois, no way in hell was he giving consent.
But the doctor said that peter was just below the line so maybe his case wasn't considered severe enough to nullify his marriage.

You're thinking about this more than any healthy person should.

At 10/12/09 10:23 AM, Proteas wrote: Question; if Peter Griffin is legally retarded, then wouldn't that make his marriage to Lois null and void, and any sexual act comitted considered rape since the retarded can't legally give consent?

Parents gave consent? Perhaps he wasn't retarded (ok, ok, maybe just slow), and suffered brain damage.

I'm starting a new project in flash. Need an artist. Anyone up for some fun?

At 10/11/09 06:15 PM, adrshepard wrote: So you've mentioned one group of minorities, the disruptive minorities in Congress. You must have other examples in mind, otherwise you would really only have a problem with the legislative process.

What about old people, swallowing up tax dollars so they can keep living without doing anything, simply for its own sake?

Fundamentalist Christians.

I'd probably still believe in got if it wasn't for all their horse shit in the name of christ.

How did this get to 2 pages with no one mentioning goatse or tubgirl or lemonparty?

You're all fined 1 internet point each. =[

At 10/11/09 09:38 AM, Proteas wrote: Just the thought of Woody Harrelson and Kirsten Dunst making out makes me want to do a full body dry heave.

Ah, but Woody Harrelson kissing an upside down Tobey Maguire, that's what your fanfic is really about, right?

Right?

At 10/10/09 6:07 AM, FidelCastro wrote: "Many believe that he still has not earned the right to receive such a distinction," he wrote in a column published in state media. "But we would like to see, more than a prize for the US president, a criticism of the genocidal policies that have been followed by more than a few presidents of that country."

I think he's onto something.

At 10/8/09 10:13 PM, Malachy wrote: Last night I found out Harvey Danger broke up.

I thought they'd done that once before, so I looked it up, and apparently they have a going out of business sale every fall.

Also, for the longest time, I thought Harvey Danger was Barenaked Ladies. True story.

At 10/8/09 03:40 PM, TheMaster wrote: Ace giveaway.

I thought so, myself.

Amazing how little attention this is getting. =\

Apparently they'll also be giving away king packs and full game codes on facebook, too.

Got this PM the other day.

Since when were you a mod? I last remember you as the guy most people hated in the Poitics forum.

iLOL

At 10/6/09 10:39 AM, Elfer wrote: No I'm pretty sure that Obama doesn't exist and therefore can't alter the future in anyway.

I mean, if he exists, where's the birth certificate?

I'm not saying I think Barak Obama doesn't exist. But I've never seen anyone prove that he does exist.

At 10/5/09 06:28 PM, fli wrote:

ballsy little creatures...

We're just as afraid of them as they are of us.

Photoshop, I've missed you.

At 10/5/09 09:05 PM, Ericho wrote: By regulars, do you mean like someone who has over 4,000 posts? Or perhaps someone who is in the Top 50 in Flash and Audio reviews? Well then, I'm happy to join in and be a part of the longest thread in the history of Newgrounds!

Uh.

Dude, no one cares about your site stats. They're all over in C&C/WIH2. Just be yourself, no politics in the lounge.

And fyi, if you have to ask, the answer is probably no.

At 10/3/09 11:06 PM, puddinN64 wrote:

At 10/2/09 08:54 PM, TheShrike wrote: First-round knock-out.

Chicago is a shithole.

But isn't Rio de janeiro basically a third world country place? I think it has like 29 million people, with at least 50% living in shacks.

Hey! South America's never hosted the games.

Looks like all that egalitarian athletic competition bullshit is starting to show.

At 10/5/09 07:12 PM, ChrisPNipple wrote: It's not the fanboys that started it, it's the commercial.

holy shit.

Are you like 10 years old or something?

At 10/5/09 06:35 PM, Robotchk12 wrote: It's not like the people who already grow it are going to stop. It's their hobby. They have fun with it. Are you going to stop being a mod because some government-hired dork is becoming a mod?

Weakest argument ever.

Why buy marijuana from sketchy druglords armed with guns when you can buy organic weed from the hippy co-op for cheaper? Hippies who'd be paying local, state, & federal taxes. Hippies who would be as heavily armed and law-abiding as any other small business.

This country needs jobs. This would create jobs overnight, not to mention removing violence and gangs from the picture at a level the war on drugs has never been able to duplicate.