Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/3/05 10:52 AM, Evil_Alex37 wrote: How does the sexual harrassment issue tie into the anti-liberal kids book?

I have no idea honestly

At 9/3/05 06:44 AM, blamurai wrote:

At 9/3/05 06:41 AM, TheReveiwer wrote: I read your freakin reveiw of Mutilation Concentrate and would like to say

your the one who needs f**kin help!

You were warned baout the violence level yet you saw it andgave it a bad reveiw a piece of art work like that

were you too dense to see the deepness of it

her insanity destroyed her !and almost everything around her you dumbsh*t!

It's blammers like you that make me hate all blammers

??? ... YEAH RIGHT ON BROTHA That is why I am neutral I wanna keep the shit outta the portal I take no side.. i don't hate every thing but I don't want the shit

Hella Yeah!

I'm a light aura because I respoect hard work and good flash
oh and the bad house analogy doesnt work because you have to pay for houses you get these flashes for free so any logical reveiwer would adgust their reveiws accordingly

Besides this one was deep and thought provoking

((P.S I dont have his E-Mail address))

I read your freakin reveiw of Mutilation Concentrate and would like to say

your the one who needs f**kin help!

You were warned baout the violence level yet you saw it andgave it a bad reveiw a piece of art work like that

were you too dense to see the deepness of it

her insanity destroyed her and almost everything around her you dumbsh*t!

It's blammers like you that make me hate all blammers!

However, I do agree that moderate political correctness (PC) is a good thing, but remember what I said about being sued for saying words like "babe". The place those kind of lawsuits occurs most often in is none other than the workplace. It cost a lot of jobs and, frankly, I find it appalling that people can lose jobs for calling some woman a "babe" (which is a compliment!).

I heard for recalling a seinfield ep someone got fired all a girl has to do is say sexual harassment andboom someones fired how's that equel?

and my general idea of rights is as long as what your doing isnt DIRECTLY harming someone it's okay ((Like in my veiw you can marry whomever you wish not directly harming I beleave public nudity should be allowed people can look away but you cant force someone to watch your public nudity if they dont want to))

If you're saying what I think you're saying, he isn't using the red lines to illustrate racism, he's using them to point out that the two captions were by two different companies, and thus were taking different connotations towards looting.

I pointed out that the red lines also abstruct some of the text dundundunnnn...

At 9/3/05 12:39 AM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 9/3/05 12:33 AM, TheReveiwer wrote:

if it were a true democracy we woudlnt vote for represenitives we would go to the gov HQ and represent ourselves

Yes, I know. We're called a Democratic Republic...or Constitutional Republic depending on who you ask.

Yeah but personally I would rather represent myself just point me int he direction to go and I'll march right up to whoever and let loose a string of complaints

At 9/2/05 10:44 PM, FadeEntertainments wrote:

At 9/2/05 09:44 PM, TheReveiwer wrote: I dont think the people running the ballots would know who Flash007 is

so if and when you start running give us a sign of some sort like in a speech say "I'm a Liberal Athiest"

Ya, and you get my support, even if I cant vote.

Yeah we need more LIberal Athiests in power

that way the people g et what they need and the church and state stay seperate

At 9/2/05 11:46 PM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 9/2/05 09:47 PM, TheReveiwer wrote:

it would be the ACLU or osmeone like em who would stand up for the minoritys rights to have red cars

I thought this was a democracy?

if it were a true democracy we woudlnt vote for represenitives we would go to the gov HQ and represent ourselves

besides here we have things called rights that no one can ingrenge even if red cars hurt someones eyes

you used thick red lines and I think the photos of random people floating when looting was the story because the floting peps were colored was the point

So their a group that says F**k you to both parties and fights for the rights of the people

why are their pepople opposed to thatr ((Other then the NEo Nazi Neo Conservitive f**ktards out th ere))

They don't care what the American people say. To them their attitude is "We know whats best for America, you don't" They do whatever they damn well please and use judicial activism to get it.

They care for the peoples rights

like if "the people" vote for example no red cars

it would be the ACLU or osmeone like em who would stand up for the minoritys rights to have red cars

((RED CARS ARE AN EXAMPLE A RANDOM EXAMPLE THE GENERAL POINT IS WHAT IS BEING COMMUNICATED I expereanced something like the situation I'm avoiding witht he whole Lisa Simpson Tenticle Hentai thing))

If "THe People" voted for no Hentai

it would be the ACLU standing for our right to have Hentai

((ANOTHER EXAMPLE))

FLASH007 FOR PRES!

FLASH007 FOR PRES!

You heard the man! Me in '08! Write me in on the ballet! I'm sure to win...right?

Wait, I need to be older, and I don't think that writing in Flash007 will connect to me...hmmm...

Yoda! '08!

I dont think the people running the ballots would know who Flash007 is

so if and when you start running give us a sign of some sort like in a speech say "I'm a Liberal Athiest"

At 8/31/05 09:24 PM, schfourteen-teen wrote: damn, that's just f'd up

what are your thoughts? it pisses me off.

I dont get it all it does is take me to some sign in thing

you do know the ACLU is primarly for seperating the churcha nd state and standing or minoritys rights

Goddamnit...

The American Civil Liberties Union, or ACLU, is a non-governmental organization devoted to defending civil rights and civil liberties in the United States.

Jesus H Christ. The ACLU is about the law and constitution more specifically. Not your twisted views of what it should be doing.

So their a group that says F**k you to both parties and fights for the rights of the people

why are their pepople opposed to thatr ((Other then the NEo Nazi Neo Conservitive f**ktards out th ere))

Yeah, they stand for minority rights, and ONLY minority rights. They don't seem to want to help minorities as much as they want to fight the majority.

why would htey do anything for the majority every other group is already

The ACLU has been a thorn in my side lately. Everytime a petifile or a psychopath does some sick shit, the ACLU is right there to defend them,

Hey everyone needs to be defended from persecution
and the ACLU does stand for minoritys rights
It's just with the war and the Hurricane the ALU doesnt get too much face time

even though they can't be cured. But when real issues of free speech get attacked, basically stating opinions different from their's, they are nowhere to be found.

you do know the ACLU is primarly for seperating the churcha nd state and standing or minoritys rights

and when was it that they attacked anyone for the oppinions being different

quit spewing RNC BS

At 9/2/05 12:14 AM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 9/2/05 12:11 AM, TheReveiwer wrote:

it is a good reason a source that isnt supposed to be taught as fact in schools

But were they teaching it as fact? Or were they comparing like they do in my early american lit. class?

well te absitence classess teaches one of their rules as fact now doesnt it

At 9/2/05 12:05 AM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 9/2/05 12:03 AM, TheReveiwer wrote:

Where COngress beguins sessions with prayer where God was only recently removed formt he pledge of allegence ((Orrigionally no mention of god was there))

We dont read what's on the dollar everyday of our lives.

You didnt reply to the congress ting

Yeah I ammore open minded

Except towards christianity. But hey, at least I can spell.

I am toward it too as long as it's kept away from me

And when did I ever say I was against teaching islam in schools?

That comes from the government so it should be more like "In this money you shoudl trust" or maybe "In government we trust" or something to eather effect or nothing at all

And yet, you didnt reply to my statement that you would not accept it if it were for christianity instead of islam.

Well if it were like "Cristians belevae in this and this and they worship like this and blablabla" not teachinmg something of theirs as fact

Also, I dont care if they get rid of abstinince, but at least do it for a good reason for once.

it is a good reason a source that isnt supposed to be taught as fact in schools

Or live in the USA where gods even on the money!

which people dont pay attension to.

Where COngress beguins sessions with prayer where God was only recently removed formt he pledge of allegence ((Orrigionally no mention of god was there))

why should we have to we live it

not by much with people like you.

Yeah I ammore open minded

but it is a moronic ideal that is impossible to reach

And? Teaching Islam in a time we're at war with iraqis is pretty moronic isnt it?

Open your ears fucktard WERE AT WAR WITH TERRORISM TERRORISM ISNT A SEXUAL INCLINATION NOR A RELIGION NORE A RACE IT'S A FREAKIN MINDSET

I attended one of those classess all it said was "The Islams beleave in this and this and have these rules called the 7 pillars they bow like this and worship 5 times a day"

And yet, you wont accept it if it were christianity. I mean, you acually get upset over something as small as "god" on the dollar.

That comes from the government so it should be more like "In this money you shoudl trust" or maybe "In government we trust" or something to eather effect or nothing at all

At 9/1/05 11:44 PM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 9/1/05 11:17 PM, TheReveiwer wrote: well the children do learn cristianity all the time

only those who at least go to church.

Or live in the USA where gods even on the money!

but all it said was they were teaching it not saying Worship this it's studing a culture

Then lets study christian culture while we're at it.

why should we have to we live it

theirs a big line between teaching a culture and forcing a religion those parents were too much of fucktards to see it

We're not forcing anything when they teach abstinence with few parts from the bible. It's not like they're saying, "hey, read this part of the bible and you'll know".

but it is a moronic ideal that is impossible to reach

But, you dont like it even when we use the bible partially, but you're in full agreeance with islam in schools teaching them how to bow and whatnot.

I attended one of those classess all it said was "The Islams beleave in this and this and have these rules called the 7 pillars they bow like this and worship 5 times a day"

At 9/1/05 11:20 PM, BeFell wrote: I don't recall learning about sex in school just STD's.

the whole hting should be taught manditory

At 9/1/05 11:20 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:

At 9/1/05 11:17 PM, TheReveiwer wrote: well the children do learn cristianity all the time

Ehh?

most of the parents the annoying churches etc etc...

At 9/1/05 10:51 PM, TheReveiwer wrote: tell me when the last time the ACLU put Islam int he study books
when was the last time they gave the students Korans

Change of tune I guess.

sometimes you must see the world through different eyes

theirs a big line between teaching a culture and forcing a religion those parents were too much of fucktards to see it

How come you cant teach the "culture" of Christianity? Or Buddhism for that matter? Or Voodoo?

hey it's the fucktard parents that's at fault for the last two mentioned

well the children do learn cristianity all the time

but all it said was they were teaching it not saying Worship this it's studing a culture

theirs a big line between teaching a culture and forcing a religion those parents were too much of fucktards to see it

YAY ACTIVIST JUDGES!

Booyah! ((In the class I was in they just showed how everything worked and warned about deseases but not any pictures of desease

besides it's possible for it to be a spontanious erection

At 9/1/05 11:00 PM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 9/1/05 10:51 PM, TheReveiwer wrote:

man your brainwashed

I said pushed for it you asswipe.

when did they do that?

Once again your brainwashed by the Cristian Colition and the right wing nutbars

We, in America, limit many peoples rights in order to "protect" them. When someone is rowdy at an event, they are thrown out so they do not injure anyone else, or are injured by anyone else. This may infringe on that persons rights, but we still do it.

Now, I'll have to agree with you that that is wrong. Limiting someone's rights, no matter what the event (execpt perhaps crime on the individuals part) is wrong.

Wow

FLASH007 FOR PRES!

and in addition taking advantage of a tragicv event like 9/11 hiding behind it and other terrorist acts to pass some coco crackpot laws and policies ((Tarriffs Patriot act etc)) is also flat out wrong

to me national security is securing the freedoms we have free expression seperationm of church and state right not to have our crap searched if we so decide not to

sao once again FLASH007 FOR PRES!

if we dont teach kids sex at puberty they'll ferak out I already posted why

At 9/1/05 07:14 PM, TimeFrame wrote: Hey, I was right on the other thread. When a school even slightly hints christianity, a bunch crackpots scream seperation of church and state. Yet when the ACLU goes in to push islam into schools, the same people who scream church and state now say it's educational.

without a long lengthy blablabla
tell me when the last time the ACLU put Islam int he study books
when was the last time they gave the students Korans

That's just hyped uyp BS fromt he right wing nutbars and the cristian colition

man your brainwashed

where's the fun in that?

the problem is that'll just build up the rape rate simply put where else would someone release their pent up sexual desire?

Besides you cant contain life it smashes through barriors painfully maybe even dangerously but...life finds a way

Parents are just too stupid or lazy to do anything about it

and without sexual education the children get freaked out when puberty hits

I mean it makes them like "WTF Hair THERE!" or "WTF I used to find girls gross now this thingy grows when I'm near em!"

that's why Sex Ed should be MANDITORY

if Paretns teach kids sex ed then easy A for the children they already know

if they dont then new lessions

if they teach them to be prudes ((which resaults in children feeling worse about their desire for sex)) then Sex Ed can teach em it's normal

2. Using one religion selectively is discriminatory
Y'know, I don't have a problem with christian views on sexuality being taught. But if your going to teach the christian views you had better also teach the muslim views, hindu views, buddhist views, atheist views, and all the other belief systems that may have views on sexuality. Using christianity as the sole educator in sex ed is wrong because it promotes the views of one religion over all others.

((Due to me wanting to make short posts I'll reply to this one))

and that my friends is a church state violation

once again the ACLU does what it's supposed to stomp out religions infection of state at all costs