931 Forum Posts by "The-Last-Cynic"
At 7/7/06 10:46 PM, YoureAllStupid wrote:At 7/7/06 10:38 PM, Reverend_Kyle wrote: Presidents, prime ministers, kings, queens: All synonyms for murderer.murderer?
The mainstream media is racist.How so?
Don't think that Hussein is really any different from Bush, Harper, Blair, or any other whitey/leader. Having white skin doesn't make a thousand murdered lives any more just.Who did Bush murder?
It's a stretch but Bush and anyone else who knows about the new WoT methods can be charged with war crimes. Obviously it won't happen, but it's not just fiery rhetoric either.
Source
If you hate O'Reilly, this is really the only link you need. Not to advertise, I just really like this site. I wish conservatives had a site like this for Air America.
Initially I was relieved, though I doubt that it will make much of a difference in the insurgency, they have a replacement picked out already. A few days later, when I heard his wife and child were killed with him, I did feel sorry for them, but I don't understand why that makes me a traitor.
I know that there are predators are on the net, but they don't say that they're predators they just act like a friend until they can get into the kids pants. Needless to say, this would be far easier to judge if I could see the myspace in question, until then I can't really say whether or not the page is obviously a joke, so I'll admit I'm wrong after I see the page. Either way, it's the ACLU's job to defend free speech even when it's on the fringe so long as they don't see it as illegal. Sometimes that involves douchebags of all stripes, and I'm tired of hearing people complain about the ACLU doing what its name describes.
At 5/9/06 11:09 PM, WolvenBear wrote: I love cock, Nothing is better for me than the taste of a hard cock in my mouth.
Is your stand that that^^ is actual slander. No one proudly admits to being a pedophile, so my first reaction is to say, it is obvious that this is a fake profile. I'm not saying this girl isn't a total bitch, I'm just saying she hasn't done anything illegal.
At 5/9/06 10:41 PM, MarkyX wrote:At 5/9/06 10:35 PM, The_Last_Cynic wrote: She's with in her rights. Can't you people come up with something better to attack the ACLU with, I'm sure one of their members has a parking ticket O.OYou are not within your rights when you are deframing them to the point of slander.
You can say you learned something today.
DID YOU READ THE LINK?
It's not slander if it's obvious you're doing it out of malice, it's a 20 year standing precendent.
She's with in her rights. Can't you people come up with something better to attack the ACLU with, I'm sure one of their members has a parking ticket O.O
This is a jail and therefore, at least half the people there haven't even been tried yet. But don't let that get in the way of your sadism.
At 5/3/06 06:17 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:At 5/3/06 06:11 PM, The_Last_Cynic wrote: Don't be an ass."according to The Guardian, "[e]ven among Charedi, or ultra-Orthodox circles, the Neturei Karta are regarded as a wild fringe"
Anti Zionism isn't Anti-Semitism.
The Neturei Karta are the total opposite of modern Judaism. Even Chassids consider them wacko.
I never said that they were mainstream, but I doubt they hate Jews. Which I was using to prove ML wrong who was pretending to be you, I figured it out 2 seconds after posting, hence the apology.
At 5/3/06 06:11 PM, The_Last_Cynic wrote:At 5/3/06 06:07 PM, mackid wrote:...
That was my bad, sorry.
At 5/3/06 06:07 PM, mackid wrote:At 5/3/06 06:00 PM, JOEBIALEK wrote: only a Jew finds the truth anti-semiticHow dare you? You're anti-semitic if you don't believe that Jews belong in Jerusalem because you're denying Jews their resolve to live in Israel.
Don't be an ass.
Anti Zionism isn't Anti-Semitism.
I'm sorry to bump, but I feel 3rd_Front owes me an answer.
...AHHHH...
Look, I am half white an half black, the boogeyman of your entire philosophy, and I can tell you from all 18 years of my experience living as a mutt, that being of mixed race DOES NOT UNDERMINE MY INDIVIDUALITY. Ask anyone involved with the Human Genome Project, and they will tell you there is no scientific reason to put so much stock in one's race. Yet, all you nationalist types press forward to strenghen this stupid social construct which in itself limits one's ability to be an individual. If you can't venture into other races, you are limited as a human being into only acting like your race does, so how does segregation foster individuality? Please, I'm begging to know.
At 4/23/06 10:50 PM, altanese_mistress wrote: Nation of Islam is a religion, not a hate-group. Ku Klux Klan is a hate-group, not a religion. (for the record, I don't agree with either group)
I always thought it was pretty well accepted that Nation of Islam was a hate group. How much can offing Malcolm X do for your PR.
Either way the Sothern Poverty Law Center has them listed, and they pretty much have the monopoly on who is racist.
wait that didn't make way to much sense, from the first sentence to last.
I don't understand the race warrior comment, I'm talking about one group of individuals that are overly sensitive.
What I'm saying is that you are being overly sensitive. Just like that lady.
It's not about race so the "six arbitrary links" thing made no sense, it was about sensitivity
My thoughts jumble sometimes, sorry.
Don't try to cover up your own ignorance by calling me a little bitch, you didn't read what you were supposed to and you made yourself look like a moron, live with it.
I'm not trying to cover up anything, I shoud've read the full body of your post, I didn't, it was stupid. Either way, here you are, bitching about some lady who you've never met, never adressed you, and isn't going to do anything to you. So, in laymen's terms, yes, you are a little bitch.
(what the fuck does the internet movie database have to do with racism)
Have you ever been to those forums, a lot of racist shit going on there.
At 4/15/06 02:36 PM, Makaio wrote: Oh, you jerkhead, you hurt my feelings, boo hoo...
Sorry, I've been spending most of the day posting a imdb, so I might be a little paranoid about racism, either way, most minorities don't think white people are out to get them. Race, like it or not, is six arbitrary links in a DNA strand. So I think going around complaining and being angered enough by one letter sent from a women is just as bad as complaining and being angered by the shirt in the first place. Both are just two people expressing their free speech. This thread was useless to begin with, because no one wants to hear another white kid complain about how he is being oppressed by annoying people over the internet.
I also have bought shirts from tshirthell, I'm just saying all of you race warriors need to calm down.
At 4/15/06 11:38 AM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: As long as you're equally racist, it's ok? Is that what you mean?
No, it's ok as long as you don't take yourself seriously, which it's clear t-shirthell doesn't.
They had an "Arrest white babies before they become cannibal serial killing psychopaths" t-shirt, or something along the same lines. Rendering pretty much this entire thread useless.
At 4/1/06 08:10 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:At 3/31/06 11:49 PM, The_Last_Cynic wrote:See, He sold weapons to terrorists in Iran then used the money to donate weapons to terrorists in Nicaragua. What kind of strict policy is that?Old news. It's now called the iran-Contra scandal.
Really? Because I couldn't read the title of the link I posted. I'm so glad I have brainy people like you to tell me what scandals are called and then tell me it's old news as if I brought it up to attack Bush. I bow to you, Sir.
At 3/31/06 11:49 PM, furball1 wrote: The_Last_Cynic, they were aimed at Americans and American allies. If I step out of the border between thUnited States Canada and get shot that is an attack directed at me.
Not all of them, there are those that don't involve America at all, and others had no motive concerning Americans, they were just on the plane by coincidence, you haven't answered my question concerning the huge amount of terror attacks under W. Or Iran/Contra. If you're gonna put down info, don't put such a large list that even you can't see that it is skewed, for what you are using it to prove.
Also regarding Reagan's tough policy with terrorists...
Linky
See, He sold weapons to terrorists in Iran then used the money to donate weapons to terrorists in Nicaragua. What kind of strict policy is that?
At 3/31/06 11:12 PM, furball1 wrote: Here is a list of terror attacks from 1961-2003.
http://www.state.gov../ho/pubs/fs/5902.htm
Notice how the most terror attacks were carried out through Clintons years? The snopes article I read over only covers a few incidents in which Clinton detains a few, or no terrorists at all. Terrorists want Democrats to rise to power because it is easier for them to plot and carry out attacks.
Do you realize how few of those took place on US soil, and disregarding that, the list is half way through at 2000 which means 2000-2003 makes up half of that list.
At 3/30/06 11:46 PM, WolvenBear wrote:At 3/30/06 07:59 PM, The_Last_Cynic wrote:
:: --
Gee the kids aren't passing, despite the fact that they don't meet state standards? Well, gee, how horrible. They're embarassed. Of course if you don't pass you should be held back. What the hell is your point? The simple truth is: we've lowered standards for decades, and now we're raising them again. Of course kids are failing. That is far from an indication that the NCLB act is a failure. Any positive change to the schools will make it get worse before it gets better. Might say something bout the teachers....
The problem is the kids aren't being prepared for the real world, like schools are supposed to do, but the NCLB puts so much stress on the school to focus on the test, which is exclusively reading and writing, they focus completely on that, and kids who may have gifts in other areas end up getting held back stunting their development in that area along with their social life. Where as before hand, the kid would be recommended extra-tutoring, or a less durastic change in their education plan.
Furball for fuck's sake...
Terror attacks aren't taken out by hundreds of people, they're planned by 4 - 5 people working under a banner of a shared opinion. So when he captured "just a few", he had captured most of perps, which is much cheaper than declaring war on a whole country. Next you'll be asking why Clinton didn't declare war on all White Nationalists after the Oklahoma bombing.
I know a lot of teachers and from everything I've heard the NCLB Act does the exact opposite of what it's supposed to. Apparently, teachers are so worried about getting to kids to pass the test that they are only teaching what is on the test. Many children with educational issues, are being held back instead of helped so that they don't have to take the test the following year, which can be detrimental to the kids social growth. I've also heard cases where school officials altered scores to get more funding.
At 3/29/06 06:45 PM, furball1 wrote: I know, but you make it seem like Republicans are Jew-killing racist homophobes.
THAT WAS THE POINT OF HIS POST, you said terrorists would vote democratic, but I haven't seen Ted Kennedy suicide bomb a mall.
I'm sorry, what were you saying?
At 3/26/06 05:41 PM, 1WingedDragon wrote: No one on our side of the aisle is quite as extreme as Michael Moore. Liberalism is not really a mental disability more as it is a learning disability. Why do you think so many liberals are slow to grasp economics and demand socialism?
Michael Moore never bombed a clinic, less extreme my ass.
At 3/24/06 12:09 AM, SteelSwilla wrote: Yes. Boys justwant it more than girls. That's the way the world works.
Statutory rape isn't about wanting it, it's about being able to handle it psychologically. The way I see it, since girls statistically mature faster than boys, Boys are more sensitive to damage from these things than girls. Right?
