Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

http://www.redcorner.cjb.net/

Wow. You're not only arrogant. You have ABSOLUTELY no clue what you're talking about!
Read his topic on imperialism. its a riot.

At 3/16/05 08:25 PM, Master_Unlucky wrote: People talk about ethics like there's some right way to live. There isn't. There is no right and wrong. There are too many different cultures to accurately define what is "correct". Think about this: Someone is raised in a, what some would call, "immoral" fashion, and they are taught that that way is right. Are they unethical? And if they are taught that the way you live is "unethical", is it so?

Since no one actually knows what is "right", I'm going with the only plausible answer: There is no "right".

oh come on you guys, just let him pretend to be smart for a minute will ya? Look at all the big words that he used, and probably doesn't understand. Are you gonna make it all go to waste?

fascism is essentially anarchary with an OD of nationalism. Its always Totalitarian, but in a different way than in other dictatorships. The people are kept in line by a strong(but small) and efficient government but also by pure fear

At 3/2/05 03:37 AM, LiL_ReEpEr_SnIpEr wrote: What i do not get is why judge someone by there religion? it's not like we wanted that religion and most of the time we dont care. So why do you do it? to make fun of our familys leaders and who chose what religion for our familys? Come to think of it we are all in the same family for there were only 2 people on the earth who started out and its fisicly impossible for 2 more people to just apear.

What really bugs me is how Catholics are all expected to behave like retarded Italian Zombies, just blindly following the Pope and obeying his every whim. I know a lot of Catholics are like that, but when I saw The Cardinals at the Vatican Praying for the MOLESTERS when the first reports of abuse were coming in, I was just pissed. The belief that everyone controls their fate is one of catholicisms founding principles

Is it really that hard to judge a person based on their own personal merits and not what they believe?

At 3/1/05 11:17 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: Neutral people have always been the target of hate aswell.

If I die, tell my wife "hello"

At 3/1/05 02:29 PM, PapalSmurf wrote:

At 2/28/05 04:47 PM, The_General_Public wrote:

At 2/28/05 04:45 PM, PapalSmurf wrote: Do we need organized religion? Not unless you're a weak little pansy.

and what if you are?

Are you?

maybe I am, maybe I'm not. It doesn't matter. What matters is that "weak little pansies" are a dime a dozen. So what's your point?

At 2/28/05 04:45 PM, PapalSmurf wrote: Do we need organized religion? Not unless you're a weak little pansy.

and what if you are?

I wish people would cite sources when they make outrageous claims.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allende

I know wikipedia isn't exactly the best reference site out there, but I've seen people give links to Pravda in the past

you sure gave him what's for

At 2/24/05 03:37 AM, Jimsween wrote: I'm assuming they would quickly nationalize thier mining industry.... I mean.. why wouldnt you?

have you taken a good look at Africa lately? They couldn't nationalize their way out of a paper bag. When I was in middle school they couldn't teach us about the entire continent except Kenya and Egypt since the books went out of date after a week. They should just convert to the skull standard. Plenty of them lying around.

I disagree with the entire premise of it. I think it's insulting to minorities. What if you're a middle-class, well-educated black boy? Even though it might be nice for you, people are gonna give you special treatment you don't really deserve under the erroneous impression that ALL african americans need special treatment to get anywhere. I don't think race should be a factor at all when it comes to jobs and education. Income and standard of living should though. Its a win-win situation. A lot of African Americans are poor, so they're getting help. But no racism is occuring since poor inner-city caucasians are getting treated just as fairly.

I have never, not once gotten a straight answer to what homosexuality is . I've never seen any serious links describing the chemical process that creates homosexuals, or whatever extra chromosomes a person alledgedly has, and of course, there is no way that it can be proved as totally a person's choice to be gay. And the clincher is, I don't think anybody really knows. Nobody should really make a decision regarding another person's life until they at least have all the information

At 1/9/05 01:51 PM, Maus wrote:

Have those girls ever been raped? I think you're talking out of your ass, and making things up. I cannot believe for an instant that you have sat down with 'alot (sic)' of girls and discussed with them their feelings on pregnancy due to a rape.

once again, you underestimate our devotion to conservative beliefs. You don't know the power of the dark side

http://seattletimes.nwsource.c...rld/2002117512_russarms13.html

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/14/content_2330421.htm

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20041213-043631-4633r.htm

http://www.iwmf.org/ewire/6916/iwmfwire1002/ch-6942

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/me...an-june03/russiatvs_06-23.html

take a look at some of those. Then tell me what you think. Some of those are only a couple hours old

I've yet to see any evidence for or against that the death penalty acts as a deterrent against crime, so until then, I don't have an opinion

At 12/13/04 09:41 PM, ohp-kyle wrote:

Seeing people cheer about it bothers me more than the murder itself. I was reading 'The Case Against Christianity', and it appears as though some Christians are sadists. If those people cheering out front claimed to be Christians, I wouldn't be surprised.

Sadists you say? The Crazy thing is, even the Marquis De Sade was opposed to the death penalty(probably because he faced it so many times)

If you choose to do something, it's obvious that you can be punished for it.

pun·ish Audio pronunciation of "punish" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pnsh)
v. pun·ished, pun·ish·ing, pun·ish·es
v. tr.

1. To subject to a penalty for an offense, sin, or fault.

yeah, those Jews sure had it coming to them didn't they? Is that what you're trying to say?

You know, more men support the idea of abortion then women, so why don't we let men have abortions and forbid women from having them? That way everybody loses and I win

At 12/5/04 06:23 PM, CountPoopoo wrote: No, this is one of those things that had to happen in order to shape our world today. If you kill him, you'll completely destroy today's balance. Russia would be the world power, and we'd all be working as communists.

I doubt that. I think the entire Eastern Hemisphere would be a smoking crater however. The "Red Scare" came about the moment WWI ended, it would've built up gradually, but without Hitler, we would be on the brink of war with the Soviets by the 1940s. Without the development of the Atom bomb The Russians, and whoever else they'd annexed by that time, would certainly try to invade the west. I do think, however, that we'd have successfully developed" the bomb" some time during this hypothetical world war, then we'd end up having to carpet bomb all of asia essentially.

At 11/30/04 03:35 PM, Maus wrote:

That's the Pledge of Allegiance. Taking out the 'under God' out of the pledge actually restored it to it's original form. The line was added during the Red Scare to combat the 'godless communists.'

True, but what benefit would be had by taking it out? Like every president saying "so help me God" on his innauguration, it really serves no purpose to say it. But to INTENTIONALLY not say it speaks volumes.

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1175807.htm

Most animals work for a reward, as the article shows there is a chemical reaction in the brain that controls motivation to work.

Funny How Slizor left right after that.

They had newer technology, newer tactics, the pride had little to do with their victories I don't think, and their arrogance is what caused them so much trouble with Britain.

Well it is what let them invade sovereing nations in the first place. You a rational nation would up and invade all of Western Europe for shits and giggles?

Also look at the fact that 1400 years ago it was in fact the christians who had decided to be the warmongers

If you're referring to the Crusades there. the First Crusade began around 900 years ago and was actually a Christian attempt to reclaim territories originally under their control... so both sides were equally responsible for the ensuing conflicts.

So don't be an Ignorent American Please.

Don't be an ignorant Pseudo-Intelectual please.

Hey she volunteered. Its her funeral

loved it till the very end. Anything related to Che takes a way a whole lot of credibility in my book. The Politics in general were very well thought-out though.

At 11/24/04 07:33 PM, mofomojo wrote: Why hasn't bush stopped or even touched the topic of Boycotting trades to China ? A communist/extremely autocratic (mildly fascist) nation... when they have sanctions against Cuba still ...

Because of the money...well duh

If the grandmother, police officer, and diseased child all reside in some woman's belly...then yeah, they're as human as a liver. Or alternatively, they're as crazy as a fox for still calling a womb home.

A fetus that doesn't even have a brain yet is way less than equal to people that, you know, have been born and stuff.

...and they accuse pro-lifers of not using logic in their arguments. What does it matter where the fetus is located? The baby is dependent on the mother either way. If you're going to use a lame "well she's physically attached to it!" argument you might as well go out and say that siamese twins have the right to kill their siblings if they feel too cramped. Its scientifically documented that a fetus's nervous system will respond to stimulii around the twelfth week of pregnancy, along with a beating heart, so what is the difference between you and that fetus?

When the Dalai Lama has given up on liberating Tibet, you can be pretty sure it's a lost cause

Topic: the Netherlands / Holland

I'm sure this is stupid...but which is it?