Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/13/05 11:26 PM, Solthiel wrote:

if you wanted to come off as an all-knowing, overzealous, self-righteous, typical vegetarian activist, you've done it quite well, in fact you fit it down to a tee, it almost seems like you don't even realize how much of one you are.

Mark my words, one of these days Skunk is gonna announce to this board that he's some bible-belt republican, and has been all his life. It seems like he's putting on a show sometimes.

oh, by the way, Vegans have higher death-rate than meat-eaters.

At 7/14/05 10:21 PM, Dinodoode wrote: I dont see any problem with Abortion, sure your killing AN UNDERDEVELOPED HUMAN WHICH DOESNT HAVE ANY : Feelings, brain power, Can't (Naturally) Respond to its surroundings, and cant survive without its mother even after its born

all you've got going for you on that list is the ability to survive without your mother(provided you don't live at home like a bum) Be careful or we might abort you

At 7/2/05 04:30 AM, jagon82 wrote: Communism is a good idea, but it always happens the Communist leader has to be a crazy guy or a drunkie or whatever. If Roosevelt or Kennedy ran a communist country, then it would probably be the best country on earth.

The Soviet Uniun could have been better but thier leaders were all stupid and because of the bad leaders, communism is looked at as a bad way of running a country, but guess what, Communism is the best way of running a country, but you need a wise leader who makes good choices.

The system makes them that way. They have absolute control, so they abuse that control absolutely. When Saddam Hussein was kid, he would ride through towns and give food and clothes to needy children. Later in life, he became more powerful, and crueler, that's why most countries have systems of checks and balances.

At 6/25/05 04:42 AM, Matt_ wrote:

At 6/17/05 10:46 PM, commie-hentai wrote: Communism is not that bad. Look what it made to the Soviet Union, a powerful country with little or no crimes. People live happily. People co-exist. People are being made into goodness. The Soviet Union fell because the human nature is greed. Boris Yeltsin is Greedy. So thats why the soviet union fell.

But look at what happened when Lenin died. Russia quite literally popped.

Lenin died in tears because of what was already happening. Stalin was well on his way to power. People started abusing the system from day one, its the same thing every time.

At 6/22/05 03:59 PM, TimeFrame wrote:

At 6/22/05 03:50 PM, -BAWLS- wrote:

How so?

Taking your freedom for granted

so the answer for people to stop taking things for granted is to get rid of it?

makes sense, I sure will miss breathing air when God takes it away cuz I take it for granted.

1+7+7+6=21

21 divided by 3=7

3=trinity

7=good luck

Americans are naturally luck because of God. Hooray, I just made up my own BS, crackpot religious theory. Good for me

At 6/17/05 11:51 AM, MrCrawford wrote: Can't we all stop the hating?

NO now shut up

At 6/20/05 02:57 AM, Kind_reaper wrote: forget about right! turn to the left, to socialism, communism, a better world!

Comrade Napoleon is always right.

And remember, these terms vary from country to country. The French consider politicians like Thatcher and Reagan ultra-liberals, while in America they are considered ultra-conservative. Its very confusing.

At 6/19/05 09:27 PM, VGwithtophat wrote: japan, it has hot woman, good videogames, good anime and there leader is not a asshole, like the one we have

yes it does have hot womAn. I've been on vacation in Japan, that whole story about beatiful women is total BS. While there is good anime, that's not really reason to like a country, plus most anime(like with any other genre) is total garbage. While Richard Gere-san is a good Prime Minister, its pretty hypocritical to like him and hate the Bush administration, since the LDP is basically an ultra republican party minus the Jesus.

At 6/11/05 05:46 PM, MisterJoeful wrote: I say Japan.Awesome culture,most technologically advanced, and America has to defend it according to it's constitution that was rewritten by Americans.

3 abortions for every birtth, epidemic suicide rate. Nice cell phones=/=most technologically advanced

At 6/4/05 12:12 PM, Cahenn wrote: Israel, we have the fastest growth, through 50 years we have risen from nothing to an economical force.

If you're so powerful economically, can we have out $100,000,000 back?

Britain's government seems pretty mild to me(I mean that in the best possible way) of course your country does have David Blunkett, so that's a bit disturbing to say the least.

At 6/14/05 05:14 AM, FAB0L0US wrote:

At 6/14/05 01:10 AM, Jimsween wrote: It is, believe me. Were the only one with a battleship, I think Britian and France are the only other ones with Carriers, and we have more destroyers. What thier navy is made up of is likely just a sort of coast gaurd, maybe some missile boats.

Russia, China, and India I am almost positive all have aircraft carriers.

Russia's navy, like the rest of the country, is in shambles. China bought an aircraft carrier from Russia after its collapse. Of course the Varyag doesn't really count since it doesn't have

Airplanes
a rudder
operating systems
the capacity to carry airplanes
engines

or even electricity

India has one aircraft carrier, which is is good condition seeing that it was completed before the end of World War II.

so don't lose sleep at night America.

At 6/13/05 03:35 PM, Socialiste wrote:

I don't know if you read a little bit of history but, remember, Hitler was elected (it was democracy) and he took the liberties of german people for fighting the jews and created a powerful but terrible empire that killed billions of people. Bush was elected, he took the liberties of american people for fighting the arabs. You see the link???

or even better. Abe Lincoln was elected, he took the liberties of the american people for fighting rednecks! OMG Lincoln is hitler!

He also loved hookers!

At 5/31/05 03:48 PM, punisher19848 wrote: So europe won't become a single nation, huh? Well, less major powers for us to contend with! By the way: France sucks!!!

Replace "France" with "Athens" and you have the very attitude of Sulla as his troops tore down and built siege weapons from the trees in the park where Plato and Aristotle taught. The Athenians were so proud and arrogant, they remembered when they were an empire, and believed their culture was far above that of Rome(which it was) or the other Greek cities to deal with them. And look what it got them? the works of art they were most proud of were put to the torch or carried of piece by piece to Italy.

The real problem is the myth that most border-crossers are immigrants who just want a better life for their families. Doesn't anybody ever wonder how Cocaine from all the way down in Colombia gets all the way up to New York? If we guarded the border better, a lot less lives would be ruined by illegal drugs(a lotta weekends would be ruined too, however)

yes, you are different. your leaders are more childish and psicopathic than any empire-leaders preceding them, and will probably make this the last fall of nations. but hey... that's just me.

I missed the newsflash where President Bush made his horse Vice President while he watched 5 year old slaves have sex with each other under penalty of death. Yeah, just you.

At 5/16/05 02:10 AM, VerseChorusVerse wrote: MORE Roman Catholic doctrines we Protestants have a problem with:

Prayer to ancient Christians is acceptable.
The pope is "God on Earth".

No well-educated Catholic should claim that. He is the Pontifex Maximus which literally means the greatest bridge maker. The title "Vicar of Christ" was only introduced years after the institution began.

Mary is co-mediatrix with her Son, Jesus Christ.

Wasn't it Martin Luther who said that Mary was the highest woman and that we can "never honor her enough?
"

Mary is the "Mother of God".

it sounds like your problem is with Christianity, and not Catholicism

Mary is co-redemptrix of this world.

Saying that crosses the line between veneration of Mary, and worship of her, which is strictly forbidden.

I'd like to see these addressed by actual CATHOLICS using the Bible to support their claims.

At 5/11/05 07:42 PM, fenrus1989 wrote: dude why fuck the british. without us and russian you guys would have never won.

without England and Russia there wouldn'tve been a war at all. If the Empires of Europe weren't so greedy for power, there wouldn'tve been a world war one. And without a World War One the germans wouldnt've felt so oppressed and hopeless because of the treaty of versailles' draconian punishements that the US did not support. and without hopelessness there never would've been Hitler.

I've read about entire towns being obliterated by just a few platoons of ten year olds in Africa, it would be a mistake to underestimate them.

At 4/24/05 12:39 PM, -Manic- wrote:

At 4/23/05 09:36 PM, goldenbednclock wrote:

Scuse the French but that is absolute bollocks. Hitler launched Operation sea lion ( invasion of england) in 1940.The battle of britain happened the same year and the RAF drove back the NAZI's and they called off operation sea lion.

The RAF fought valiantly, but they would've failed if it weren't for the $1,000,000,000+ worth of supplies and equipment(which hasn't been paid off) we sent the English before we entered the war. If it weren't for the planes we sent over, the RAF wouldn't stand a chance. Do you really think an English spitfire alone was a match for the BF 109 Messerschmitt?

America didn't get involved untill the 7 December 1941 when pearl harbour was bombed. And if I'm right about my dates( and this place says I'm right about pearl Harbour Click but I'll be damned if I can't find a site thta tells then you don't have damned thing to say about how " you saved the british Ass" or whatever

The USA helped bring down the Nazis but you didn't win it by yourself and you most certainly didn't stop Britain getting invaded as you weren't even involved when we were being invaded.

Sorry if this is off topic but I felt the need to point this out to GoldenBednClock. PAtriotic pride and all that I suppsoe :-)

At 4/17/05 06:57 PM, Rooster349 wrote:

I dont' like illegal immigration because 1) it's illegal 2) It costs billions of dollars a year 3) it's a National security risk waiting to happen.

It's not immigrants themselves that annoy me, but the whiny ACLU types that try to guilt you into giving your house to illegal immigrants and making spanish the official language of the US

At 4/12/05 02:59 PM, SpamWarrior wrote: No arguments about why people would work without the incentive of material goods?

Or are you just enjoying your expensive goods, locked in a bubble away from a real world of pain and misery?

sounds good to me

At 4/14/05 02:32 PM, SpamWarrior wrote:

At 4/14/05 02:06 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote: So if I came and seized your assets right now, you wouldnt have a problem with me redistributing them among the poor?

I would have a problem, as it would stop me getting my message to the masses through the internet. YOU taking my meagre "assets" would only hinder the cause.

This is Deja Vu all over again, you're following in the exact same footsteps as the Russian communists. You need your assets...you don't want them , you're selflessly keeping your material posessions for the good of the people.

Sorry, the Russian serfs bought it, we won't

At 4/15/05 08:39 AM, SCARECRW wrote: If you are christian you may know that jesus had his 12 disciples have the "LAST SUPPER" but if you look at the picure provided there is 12 disciples but on jesus's right it's not a man but Mary Magdalene NOT JESUS'S MOTHER BUT THE OTHER MARY (PROSTITUTE))

Either it was a mistake or leonardo was a dickheadPICTURE OF LAST SUPPER

ENLIGHTEN ME

its not mary, Dan Brown just wrote that in The Da Vinci Code its not true, and you'd have to be very gullible to believe it.

The uber compressed version, which looks simply stupid by itself is

Rich people = evil
Poor people = oppressed

You could say that in 1000 words and it would still be just as stupid

At 4/9/05 06:22 PM, SpamWarrior wrote:

At 4/9/05 03:34 PM, Gladius1000 wrote: Well I thingk that Sociolism can work...With a small population below 1,500 1,000.Other than that socialism falls apart within 5/10 years...

Proof?

the khoisan peoples of southern africa. of course they're being slowly destroyed by the more numerous bantu, but if you ignore that fact....

At 4/3/05 03:47 AM, DawGdoG wrote: F u soviet gay

wow, you sound almost as dumb as the topic creator...almost

The only country in the world to ever have 100% perfect gun control was Nazi Germany.