3,173 Forum Posts by "Ted-Easton"
I'm certain liljim and Wade have better things to do than worry about why some affiliates are not posting and explain it to you.
I have a plaid apron. I wear it over my housecoat, as my house is eternally cold, and I tend to sing along to music while I bake. It's very fun and relaxing.
I'm sure Cannibal is estatic to learn the DAG finally won the DAG-PC war.
And I made brownies today! (No, they weren't magic brownies, either.)
I really don't have any advice. I've never had to deal with something so terrible, and I don't know how I would. My condolences to you.
Wade recently modded a lot of new moderators. We currently have no need for more.
This message brought to you by the people who don't support the -Michael- For Mod Campaign.
Second game quickly degenerated into random killings and trying to confuse the other player so they ran out of time.
My opponent ran out of time.
And I didn't mean to imply that you meant to imply that. I was making my own similar but equally valid statement. :)
I'm playing some random person, but I haven't played in about 18 months, so I'm dying.
Where on Pogo is the tourny? What level/room, or is it everywhere?
Doesn't matter at all. Though I am going to eat dinner in a moment, so I suppose I'll play a round when I return.
I was going to enter, as I have nothing better to do, but Pogo is being a bitch and won't let me sign up.
Bitch, Pogo. That's what you are.
Oh. No.
Not a lower population!
It certainly isn't like the Earth is overpopulated or anything.
And change Maus' statement. People are jerks, no matter their preference.
There's no point in re-posting old posts, as they've already been posted. Read people's posts if you want their first post.
I had been under the impression that the U.S. annual budget was closer 1.1 Trillion. Obviously it would increase, over time, but this seems a huge jump.
Unless I've merely neglected to update my statistical knowledge.
Hee hee! Anyone else remember this strange old man?
I hope this "Second Warning" that "isn't friendly" isn't violent, either. You certainly wouldn't deck a woman who hit on you after you said you weren't interested, would you?
Though I do applaud your tolerance, as it is greater than many.
A major point of contention among those who are against judicial supremacy is that the supreme court judges are appointed. This is the same, in the US, and is equally controversial there, I believe.
I was just reading old pages of this thread. Back in the early pages, with the PC at its peak, this thread occasionally slipped off the front page. FUNK was applying for PC membership, and Shrike was at the top of his form, making sigs for everyong.
And I was a bitch. A bastard, technically. Man, if I met me on the street, I'd slap me and steal my wallet. Then kick myself in the ass and run away from me.
Let's turn our sights north for a moment and discuss a topic that isn't quite as pressing as "Bush Sucks". It hasn't been discussed a lot before in here, and frankly this forum needs new material.
With the decision of the Canadian government to turn the question of whether their proposed Same Sex Marriage bill over to the Supreme Court of Canada to decide if it was in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Canadian Constitution, basically), and the overturning by the Supreme Court of the laws regarding marriage, many people in Canada are fed up with the judicial supremacy that may seem common here in Canada. Many people feel our elected officials and lawmakers are not really in charge as long as the supreme court can overturn laws if they are against the charter.
What are your feelings on the position of judiciaries in relation to the government and what powers should each wield?
Discuss to your heart's content.
At 2/7/05 10:32 AM, FatherVenom wrote: (not really sure what I could do, but I'm sure Shrike, Ted, and Funk will help tremendously).
I'm always glad to help. Not like I have much better to do.
At 2/6/05 09:43 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote:
Dammit, your always one step ahead of me. Dam you and yoru advanced education system.
Join the Yoru Advanced Education system and get YOUR diploma by mail in only three weeks!
But your fingers can never be stopped!
No, I'm not. As I said to the other mods earlier, I'm a four year old asian girl who can't speak english. But don't tell anyone. It's a secret.
A lot of the mods already have them, as users who got banned seem to need something else to occupy their time.
I am, Justice. I've taken up more of my modding duties, and it's brought me around to politics more often. Which is a big positive, as I've been trying to come back more often for quite a while, without success. Thanks for noticing!
All it was was Paul! Not that I have anything against him, but even I was bored. And I don't like sports, so they should have made the show more interesting so I would have enjoyed it.
With dancing cats, or frogs or something.
Welcome, Maus, and congratulations. We of the politics forum are drastically over-represented as mods, but we make the best of them.
At 2/6/05 03:13 PM, SPQRI3 wrote: I dislike homosexuals yet am tolerant of the bastards.
I don't think you can use the word tolerant and bastards together like that.
No other species those with advanced brain structures have had homosexuals in their populations.
Which other species, specifically? Chimps, closest relatives, speaking of species, have indeed had homosexuals in their populations. See this for more.
Now the same goes for depression and both depression and homosexuality are caused by hormonal imbalances or in other words, mistakes in your body chemically.
While depression can be caused by a hormonal imbalance, the fact that this imbalance often changes without medication, only psychotherapy, suggests that the imbalance is the body's physical response to psychological depression, rather than the other way around. There is also depression in chimps, to relate back to the previous point. See this for more.
It is my belief that eventually pharmacists will be able to use medication, much like that to treat depression, to treat homosexuality.
If you claim to be "tolerant" of gays, why would you want to "treat" them?
Only 2 or 3 percent of the human population has this brain malfunction...
It is very difficult to define the percentage of the population that is gay. Or has this "brain malfunction". See this.
...yet they all try and push to get what they want even if it is contrary to the beliefs of the other 97 percent. This is the reason I dislike them. Much like liberals, they can't stop bitching and they have to ruin the fun for the majority.
Why is gays gaining the same rights as heterosexuals contrary to the beliefs of the "other 97 percent"? How would this "ruin the fun"? That implies that the majority is gaining some enjoyment from denying rights to a minority.
If I ever listen to an interview with a homosexual and they don't bitch about not having equal rights, then I will be able to accept them. But it hasn't happened. Just wait until they make a medication to reverse the effects of homosexuality then we'll see that this whole gay rights thing is a waste of time.
Again, you're contradicting your claim to be tolerant by also stating that you want to "reverse the effects of homosexuality". And surely even if this is a disorder, they are under no obligation to be treated. Would you deny the right to marry to two depressed people? It is entirely their choice in the matter whether to be treated and whether to marry, and not at all the concern of others. If you claim that homosexuality is a disorder, you certainly can't decide to not allow people who "suffer" from this disorder to not be able to marry, while those who suffer from others, such as depression, are able to. Unless your next argument is claiming depressed people shouldn't be allowed to tie the knot.
