40 Forum Posts by "Tanktunker"
At 10/21/08 10:52 PM, Tanktunker wrote: I honestly don't know why you bother with this fool, he's done nothing but assert that his opinion is the only opinion, and more or less tried to frame you as a "heretic" to his beliefs.
At best, the OP was sophism, thick, ugly sophism, at worst this is some sort of turing test that we have all fallen for, although I guess that's not that bad, except maybe the inevitable (LOL ALMOST SURELY GONNA HAPPEN AMIRITE NO EVIDENCE NEEDED) robot uprising.
Sorry, forgot to add quotes, I refer to the guy with the black arm in his avatar as the person who bothers with the fool, and the OPer as the fool.
I honestly don't know why you bother with this fool, he's done nothing but assert that his opinion is the only opinion, and more or less tried to frame you as a "heretic" to his beliefs.
At best, the OP was sophism, thick, ugly sophism, at worst this is some sort of turing test that we have all fallen for, although I guess that's not that bad, except maybe the inevitable (LOL ALMOST SURELY GONNA HAPPEN AMIRITE NO EVIDENCE NEEDED) robot uprising.
At 2/14/07 07:12 PM, Oro wrote:At 2/14/07 07:06 PM, Tanktunker wrote: What exactly did America gain in the invasion of Iraq?I don't think we went in for our own benefit, although most 13 year olds would argue that we are fighting for oil.
I mean, you're losing alot of money, so what do you have to show for it?
Then why did you go?
You lost political face, an assload of money and soldiers, so why did the US invade Iraq?
I mean, it was Israel's problem, and it turns out it wasn't even a problem, he didn't have anything to shoot at us, so what's the point in committing an incredibly costly coup all like that?
At 2/14/07 06:09 PM, JakeHero wrote:At 2/14/07 08:00 AM, LolOutLoud wrote: Americans have already got raped in the ass with their Iraq scheme... I don't think they would want to risk a repeat...How the hell did we get raped in the ass when we eradicated Saddam's military within days and continue to kill insurgents left and right? Not only that, but the terrorist can't even fight conventional warfare and lose a score of their own men. This statement just shows what an utter dipshit you are.
I wish you were aborted.
What exactly did America gain in the invasion of Iraq?
I mean, you're losing alot of money, so what do you have to show for it?
At 2/11/07 10:42 PM, Microset wrote: Does anyone notice that America has been supplying the Israelites with weapons for years to :kill Muslims?
Yes, and?
Israel is America's only ally in this entire region, it's their metaphorical foot in the door of the middle east, so obviously they're going to want to keep us in good terms with them.
At 2/11/07 11:39 PM, LardLord wrote: Israel's Six Day war seems like provocation enough that other countries' existances are threatened by Israel.
Pre Emptive Strikes are an act of war.
Yes, you're right.
Attacking another country first is an act of war, surprisingly.
Although I hardly think it was unprovoked.
And regarding threats to other country's existance, I assume you mean the annexing of arab lands, didn't we return the bulk of the land we conquered?
I mean, the Sinai peninsula is about 2 or 3 times the size of the country, and we gave it back in exchange for for peace, so how is that a threat to their existance?
And yes, we didn't give it all back, but the uh, "Thumb of the Galil", or whatever you'd call it in English, looked really, really nice with all the other mountains around there, plus, then you couldn't keep bombing the settlements in the north.
At 2/13/07 11:57 PM, Demosthenez wrote:At 2/11/07 11:46 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Other than that. The reason we support Israel isn't for religious purposes. In case you didn't know, Israel is the only functioning Democracy in the middle east.Apparently Turkey, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon dont exist in your fantasy world.
Turkey isn't in our shitty little desert club, we aren't that inclusive.
At 2/8/07 01:59 PM, shohaib wrote:At 2/8/07 12:32 AM, Grammer wrote:and youre not a scientist either.At 2/7/07 02:24 PM, shohaib wrote:You're not a scientist; you're incredibly irresponsible for pretending to know what the fuck you're talking about, when you clearly don't.
that takes time, even if it weekened the steel, it shouldnt have fallen.
Many Scientists do agree with a conspiracy.
Nope, no credible scientists agree with the 9/11 Government did it conspiracy.
At 2/8/07 01:24 PM, shohaib wrote:At 2/7/07 10:42 PM, chocolate-penguin wrote:not what i meant.At 2/7/07 07:42 PM, shohaib wrote:You're right, it is because they are religious fanatics who hate the West because they know that there are very few Muslims and are therefore infidels.At 2/7/07 07:38 PM, TheMason wrote:What does that have to do with anything? But I guess it does make as much sense as most conspiracy theories...or terrorists flying into WTC because they hate our freedom. lol
its hard to believe that Muslims would want to fly in the WTC, even though its against their religion to kill innocent people.
It's all a matter of interpretation, it's against their religion to kill anyone, just like it's against the Christian religion, and almost the Jewish religion (Amalekis are ok), but the religious leaders interpret (read: twist words) in a fashion that makes killing so called infidels alright.
At 2/7/07 02:24 PM, shohaib wrote: that takes time, even if it weekened the steel, it shouldnt have fallen.
And you got your degree at which university?
At 2/8/07 12:16 PM, shohaib wrote: 3. She will get New York’s electoral vote (this is a key state for winning the election).
Then why did both Gore and Kerry get NY, and lose?
At 2/4/07 03:00 PM, MidgetHobo wrote: That's what you do in a war, you kill lots of people and spread propaganda to promote yourself. :How do you not get that?
You kill 6 million Jews?
How does that contribute to the war effort?
At 2/4/07 02:47 PM, MidgetHobo wrote:At 2/4/07 02:39 PM, SyntheticTacos wrote: Wow, how do you just dismiss the Holocaust like that? Genocide and trying to take over the world kind of outweighs whatever good he did for Germany. And it was still a repressive regime. All he helped was Germany's industry, not the actual people.Every great leader does irrational and sometimes inhumane things. It's life.
>.>
<.<
Give me one more supposed great leader who killed millions of people and annexed countless countries while spreading malicious, hate filled propaganda and caused a huge war that cost the world more than it had ever had to pay before and I'll give you someone who you just made up.
I need someone to turn my shitstain into an swf.
http://img55.imagesh..clocksketchesdx5.jpg
Ahmadinijad is a nutjob, luckily he's just the president, and the actual government are only lesser nutjobs.
At 8/13/06 11:29 PM, JoS wrote:At 8/13/06 07:01 PM, Tanktunker wrote:Lead would set off the metal detector, it would block an x-ray from penetrating it, which woudl then cause the screener to investigate what it is.At 8/12/06 05:33 PM, Durin413 wrote: So what happens when someone implants bombs inside of themselves?That's hardly necessary, put a peice of plastic explosives in a condom, swallow it, then perform surgery on yourself in flight and remove it.
Or just get someone to put a thin sheat of lead on your gun so that the metal detectors don't go off, then hijack the plane.
Which is why you're better off with some sort of explosive in the shape of a cell phone.
Make up some cockmaine story about why your phone is encased in a material that blocks out calls, and hope none of the security guards aced physics in high school.
At 8/12/06 05:33 PM, Durin413 wrote: So what happens when someone implants bombs inside of themselves?
That's hardly necessary, put a peice of plastic explosives in a condom, swallow it, then perform surgery on yourself in flight and remove it.
Or just get someone to put a thin sheat of lead on your gun so that the metal detectors don't go off, then hijack the plane.
At 8/13/06 06:19 PM, Korriken wrote:
what is this visit center made of anyway? marble and gold?
Ivory, actually.
At 8/13/06 05:34 PM, JoS wrote: If all men are equal why is the life of one Israeli worth more than that of a Lebanese? In short one Isael life is wortht hat of 18-43 Lebanese.
To one's own country (In this case Israel, mine), a million other inocents is worth one of your own.
At 8/13/06 11:20 AM, Idyes wrote: Let's say you make $6.00 an hour. That is 600 cents an hour. 5 seconds is 1/720 of an hour or 8.3 cents. If you make 1 purchase per day and spend just 5 seconds fooling around with the stupid pennies, then you have lost money. The pennies are therefore not worth the hassle.
600/720=0.83, not 8.3, so if you spend 5 seconds looking for pennies, you've used less than a penny up.
Also, if your logic is correct, anybody working less than 12 hours a day is LOSING money every day, even if he doesn't eat, or spend any money, since he's losing money whenever he's not working.
At 8/13/06 11:31 AM, Blamitality wrote: First of all, they arent "noobs" the missiles merely went off course. at least i think... let an expert get back to you
Those are presicion guided missiles, so no, they didn't go off course.
Something that is infinite can be of finite size yet is expanding infinitely.
For instance, you can have a finite number and an infinite number, and the infinite number will never be larger than the finite number;
100 is the finite number, 50 is the infinite.
50 grows by 25, and then by half of what it grew by before, i.e. It grows in the following patrn forever:
50, 75, 87.5, 93.75, 96.875, 98.4375, 99.21875, 99.609375, 99.8046875...
You can continue adding to it half of what you added before, but it will never reach 100, although it's infinitely expanding.
BTW, the amount of copper required to make 1 US penny is USD0.02, and the amount required to make a British penny is just under USD0.03, although the British penny is worth more than the US penny, so the cost vs. worth is the same.
I calculated this myself, so no, I don't really have any sources.
At 8/13/06 06:53 AM, Blamitality wrote: Um.. TANKTUNKER... what does Al-Jazira have to do with weapons to israel? Please explain i really want to know
He linked to Al jazira as a source, which it cannot be on this situation, since it's biased against Israel.
At 8/13/06 06:55 AM, Blamitality wrote: lol im sure right?
Well no, but if Leiberman were in office I wouldn't put that kind of thing above him.
At 8/13/06 06:47 AM, Blamitality wrote:Point of the thing is, that the villages which we are bombing are villages that support the Hizballah cause and hide hizballah militiants.True, but sometimes they dont have a choice and are forced by the Hezbollah just lettin you know
This is not the case most of the time.
And regarding Beirut, the Hizballah officials are there because they were voted into the senate by the Lebonese public.
At 8/13/06 06:48 AM, Blamitality wrote: He would definitely bomb them to the point that Lebanon would look like the bottom of the ocean--nothing there.. seriously
Not to that extent, but I can see crop dusters filled with nerve agents.
At 8/13/06 06:14 AM, Lidov wrote:
especially if the minister of defense wouldn't have been as dumb as a shoe.
Not so much dumb as a shoe, but a socialist with no experience in the field at all.
Hell, all Peretz knows how to do is call a strike, really.
At 8/12/06 11:40 PM, Hammer_and_Sickle wrote: what would you think Sharon would've done to solve this conflict? Unlike Olmert, a stupid puppet of Bush i think Sharon would use DIPLOMACY.
Seeing as Sharon was found personally responsible for the causeless massacre of hundreds to thousands of palestiniens in the Sabra and Shatila massacre, I doubt whether Sharon would not bomb Lebanon on a far more agressive scale.
At 8/13/06 01:20 AM, GothicTerrorist wrote: lol i dont care
i drink since i was 9
If you really started drinking since you were 9, then you're going to be really fucked up.
I'm 14, and I get drunk off the odd glass of Whiskey.
At 8/12/06 08:07 PM, GothicTerrorist wrote:At 8/2/06 05:06 PM, Korriken wrote: a lot of people spell israel wrong.wtf r u talking abut we" (ISRAEL) atacked after hesbala lounched rockets over here not 1 sec befor
personally, i think if the other countries would stop attacking israel, the fighting would stop. its simple logic, but if israel attacked when no one else has, then you can blame israel.
>.<
Missiles were a daily occurence even before the war, there were rockets being shot from Gaza all the time.
But I'm fairly sure we dropped a bomb before they fired a missile, although that doesn't justify the kidnapping of our soldiers.
At 8/13/06 12:14 AM, Hammer_and_Sickle wrote: NO question about it...Israel want more weapons!
Of course we can rely on Al-fucking-jazira, an propoganda filled, terrorist supporting, Islamic news channel to bring us unbiased reports on Israel and the war, right?
Really, are you so fucking stupid that you though someone wouldn't notice that it's Aljazira? Or do you think we're just incredibly dim witted?
