Be a Supporter!
Response to: NERF trains children for military.. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 07:22 PM, Scary-Kids wrote: Well that's what i think..

I mean all these Nerf guns out now kinda resemble real life weapons..

Like the nerf longshot rifle..
This gun teaches kids to build a sniper rifle..aim it..and hit a target from long range with a fake bullet..
think about it if it was real?

Then this commercial i just saw for some Nerf Vulcan thing...which is highly resembled to a SAW

I believe if someone ever invaded the U.S and all the soldiers were dead they could easily give the weapons to the children and make them fight...

sounds alot like the plot of Toys, that movie with Robin Williams. Except that was about training children to pilot tanks with videogames.

Response to: The small mcdonalds bags offend me. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

Le gasp!

Mcdonalds is synonymous with the Corporate America...

Monopoly is Capitalism at it's purest....

All right angles are apparently swastikas...

That must mean world war II is still being waged within the fastfood market and has undermined the worlds economy and food sources!

Response to: The small mcdonalds bags offend me. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 07:13 PM, LOLZILLA wrote: That looks like the Go from the Monopoly board.

It is, their doing the monopoly contest at McDonalds right now. Any right angle is going to look like the edge of a swastika, it's an unfortunate design, but I hardly think McDonalds is antisematic.

Response to: England sucks. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 06:46 PM, Steve3377 wrote: Sorry. I got ahead of myself there.

Meh, It's cool

Not my point. All I'm saying is that we need some recognition. The voting system, for example, doesn't offer shit. Electoral college does all that, and we merely decide the popular vote, like the country is one big American Idol.

Almost every state requires the electoral voters all vote according to the popular vote of their state. It's a bit of an archaic system, it's meant more to indicate that state governments in addition to the national population get a say in the overall federal government.

Exactly the point here. I am a high schooler who goes to an elite school in Manhattan, and in the public school I go to, rated 34 or 35 in the nation, there used to be drug deals the previous year before. Does that tell you anything on what's going around in the country?

There's drug deals in every ring of society in every imaginable country on Earth. I doubt drug abuse is any more prevalent in America than the rest of the world, just the media in the United Starts if far more pervasive and every little thing that seems like it would make for a good story makes it onto the evening news.

Response to: England sucks. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 06:22 PM, Steve3377 wrote: Fuck off.

Mature.

We complain because people don't even recognize our sufferings. Half the economy goes out to foreign countries "in need" when millions in the US work for minimum wage 13 hours a day to feed families at home. Sure, other countries deserve recognition and help, I'm not saying they don't.

America's in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If we don't help countries in need, we loose face with the rest of the world, and America has always pledged to help other countries in need who truly need it. The cost of that is that some Americans will end up with a lower standard of living. Not everyone can win all of the time. However, the person working for minimum wage still has a much higher standard of living than the refugees or impovershed nations they are trying to help And the sad thing is, the American dream is just as viable as it was when the country was founded, however, most people refuse to just try and make something more of their lives, instead resigning themselves to bettering their lives. Sadly, not everyone can be that intelligent, and so menial labor is what they will have to do with the rest of their lives. But we need this menial labor to make the economy work. Not everyone could be on top, if they were, that would be communism.

But I feel we need a little help other than being abandoned by our higher-ups.

The government isn't there to give everyone a hand out. It's there to give us the opportunity to help ourselves.

Response to: England sucks. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 06:21 PM, RussianGiant wrote: u brit's are luky it isnt middle ages if yur complainin now i heard a girl got hanged for stealing a loaf of bread she was a fukin child!!! Moscow go there unless ur black right now people from racist times are alive so its better to stay away from Russia if yur black

How can you be lucky not to live in the past?

Response to: England sucks. Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

You know, from the way America is stereotyped both by Americans and people from around the world, you would think that it was all one giant suburn surrounding one giant city where culture is completely homogonized. It's fine if you don't like the states, but at least recognize that New England, the Midwest, The Southern States, the South West, the West Coast, The Rocky Mountains, Hawaii and Alask are all VASTLY different from each other geographically and culturaly.

If you want to immigrate to the states, that's fine. I've lived here all my life, am currently receiving a college education, and have never had a problem with my country. People seem to forget that every where has its shortcomings, and many Americans seem to have adopted the thought that Europe is just one giant Xanadu of continent where everyone lives contently and there is no crime or poverty or disease.

Americans, suck it up and stop your bitching, you have it alot better than most places in the world. The only reason you complain all the time is because you like to make yourself feel important and intelligent on the internet in front of complete strangers.

Response to: So Exactly When Is Clock Day? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

It's August 15th, the day the last prophet of the Portal, StrawberryClock, delivered salvation onto Newgrounds through the ancient sripture, B.

B

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 12:28 PM, Murad136 wrote: Haha, my favourite was 5. But I doubt vampires exist, it's more about cannibals and crazy people who THINK they are vampires.

I don't know why everyone thinks I believe Vampires exist. I was just saying that if all the stories that supposedly kill vampires are true, that WITHIN THE WORLD OF VAMPIRES, no ours, would this stuff work

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 08:35 AM, ebubekir wrote: are u really serious ?_
do u really believe in vampires?
or are u ,...
there is no vampire!

Very astute deduction. Here is a red rubber ball. Perhaps you would like to bounce it?

Killing Vampires?

Response to: The Spoiler Thread Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

Ok, let's continue shall we?

The traveler had discovered that you can technically check out of the Hotel California any time you wanted, but you could never leave, not unlike Jack Nickelson who freezes to death in the hedge maze after trying to kill his family once the wife discovered that Red Rum backwards was murder. Meanwhile, Archimonde was destroyed by wisps on the summit of Mount Hyjal, which is much different than Mount doom which gollum falls into along with the one ring to rule them all, leading to the ruin of Sauron. On the other hand, the murderer at the camp grounds wasn't really the drowned boy Jason, but his mother seeking vengence, except in the sequels where it IS jason. Speaking of which, Billy is Scream, Maggie shot Mr. Burns, and all except for one of the 300 Spartans die.

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 02:33 AM, DavidTheSandslash wrote: A, vampires don't exist. B, if you didn't want them near you if they existed, which they don't, the biggest mistake you could make would be inviting them into your house. That's the only way they could get in, if they existed, which, I repeat, they don't.

It was all hypothetical, most of us are capable of distinguishing fiction from reality for ourselves. Sort of like how when you notice something in a movie that doesn't make sense and want to point it out.

Response to: The Spoiler Thread Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 02:22 AM, Spirosgod wrote: Snape kills Dumbledore

Oh yeah? Well Aizen killed the entire ruling council of the Soul Society!

The Spoiler Thread Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

This thread contains Spoilers.

Like when, shortly after learning that Darth Vader was Luke Skywalker's father, Eragon the dragon rider (who is actually Brom's son, not Morzans) proceded to page 728 where Harry Potter dies, but not really as he comes back and kills Voldemort since he was really a horcrux all along. After attending the wedding of Harry Potter and Ginny Weasly, Jack Sparrow cut out Will Turner's heart so that he would become the new Davey Jones, while Micheal Corleone had each of his rivals killed so that he could gain full control of the mafia. Citizen Kane remembered his sled Rosebud, and then died, much to the grief of Bruce WIllis, who had actually been dead the whole movie but didn't realize, because he was distracted that the villiage was actually an isolated community and the aliens hated lakes because water melted their faces off. Then we all found out that Lars fillmore was actually a time paradox duplicate of Phillip J. Fry, and so he exploded, but it was ok because sheik had actually been Zelda in disguise all along. This revelation caused Mario to remember that the ancient treasure buried under Rogueport was really the soul of an ancient demon, so he later went on to help the pixl Tippi, who in turn was actually the long lost human lover of Count Bleck who was amnesiatic. At this point, the judge ordered Pink to tear down the wall, while Aslan decided to cause the apocalypse in Narnia for some reason because a Donkey put on a lion suit. Speaking of which, the lion from the wizard of Oz had courage all along, and Dorothy always had the power to go home, but the sequel implies that she was in fact just crazy all along, sort of like how that one season of Dallas was in fact a dream. Then Ross and Rachel got back together while Monica and Chandler moved to the suburbs to raise their adopted twin babies.

Oh yeah, and SOILENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!!!

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 01:31 AM, TheSouthernTower wrote: its not hard as long as this man is on your side

I don't know who that is...

Response to: Which hero has the best superpower? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

psh, you guys...
It's obviously Broly, his power is maximum

Which hero has the best superpower?

Response to: Big ass spider eats bird Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

That is one big ass scary spider. That's it. In the name of humanity in general, I declare war on spiders! First they kill us with their venom. Now they are eating innocent birds.

Soon they will be dividing by zero

OH SHI-
Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 01:22 AM, igott wrote: Four ways to Cripple and/or End a Vampy:

1) Slit the through and blast a hole between the eyes, Nothing gets up after that, NO EXCEPTIONS.

2) Rip out the heart or brain and feed it to an animal, congrats, you just fed a stray and killed some evil.

3) Slice the veins (neck, wrists, etc.) and keep them open. Every time the Vampire needs to feed, it will leave the body from the wounds, the vampire will eventually starve and die.

4) Set it on fire. The vampires hate the sun because it's made of FIRE, even the light of small embers hurt them, why not drench them in Gasoline and send them to hell?

with the exception of the third one, which I'm not sure would work as I'm pretty sure vampires can heal their wounds very quickly, it kind of breaks the spirit of the thread, as I'm looking for nonconvential ways to kill a vampire. 1 and 2 and subsets of beheading, and 4 is already well known.

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/26/08 01:01 AM, Phantox wrote:
At 10/25/08 10:07 PM, swordsman21 wrote:
3. This one may be a little iffy, but if you use batteries that were recharged with solar energy to power a flash light, does that make it more lethal?
No. It's not like the flash light will shoot sunlight rays

Yeah, but the energy that is powering the light is stored solar energy

Response to: Roffle Mao Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

you know poozy, if anyone else had posted this, you would have locked the thread and sent directed them to the video thread.

God it must be awesome to be a moderator

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 26th, 2008 in General

At 10/25/08 10:26 PM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote:
At 10/25/08 10:16 PM, swordsman21 wrote:
At 10/25/08 10:13 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: Why would you kill a vampire if you could just as easily have sex with them? That's what I would do.
Because Vampires' bodies are dead. Having sex with one would be necrophilia.
Dead =/= undead.
Seriously, tell me you wouldn't hit this.
Don't fucking lie, you would.

Undead's bodies are dead. Only the spirit remains to have a semblance of life that continues to animate the corpse. A vampire's body will not rot, but that is because the curse that keeps the controlling spirit alive a;so stops the decay. However, the body is lifeless. Vampire's hearts don't beat, they don't eat normal food (and don't digest blood though their stomachs), they don't need to breath, and it differs from source to source, but I'm pretty sure that they can't get have sex (unless they can summon rigor mortis)

Response to: Killing Vampires? Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

At 10/25/08 10:13 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: Why would you kill a vampire if you could just as easily have sex with them? That's what I would do.

Because Vampires' bodies are dead. Having sex with one would be necrophilia.

Response to: Ultimate most painless way to die Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

Spontaneously combust on a bus full of people while on all sorts of pain medication so you don't even care

Killing Vampires? Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

I've been thinking, if all of the stories about how to kill vampires are true, would they really be that hard to avoid or kill?

1. If Vampires can not be around garlic, why not give yourself a good garlic rub down before setting off to hunt a vampire?

2. If a wooden stake to the heart kills Vampires, then why wouldn't a crossbow be an ideal weapon?

3. This one may be a little iffy, but if you use batteries that were recharged with solar energy to power a flash light, does that make it more lethal?

4. I know they did this in a movie, but hello, Holy Water Squirt guns

5. Just go into the layer during the day, and drag the coffin out into the sunlight...

I don't know, but if you knew there was a vampire down the road who was killing people at night, wouldn't any of this stuff work?

Response to: Most Important Debate of them all Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

At 10/25/08 03:51 PM, Bacchanalian wrote:
At 10/25/08 03:36 PM, swordsman21 wrote: Yes, but when I say hot dogs, I mean all class of frankfurter and weiner, not just the mere oscar meyer weiner that, again, is just a step away from bologna.
I actually can't stand Oscar Meyer. Nathan's, at least the ones around here, used to be very good. Hebrew National is about the only hot dog I've been eating otherwise.

I would say that the right kind of potato does indeed have a good flavor, but it does often come down to what you mix into them before frying.
All processed meats have more flavoring than they do meat. In fact, it's usually the processed meats with the stronger flavor that have more spices pumped into them at either the cost to or augmentation of the flavor of the actual meat involved. There's a reason there's so much salt - not much unlike fries.

Good sir, while we may differ on opinions regarding the proper flavoring of our various culinary delights, I must admit this is surprisingly one of the best and most intellectual conversations I have ever had on the Newgrounds forum, and for that I thank you.

Response to: Most Important Debate of them all Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

At 10/25/08 03:44 PM, ChickenReaper wrote: Hot dogs actually have a fairly weak flavor compared to a lot of similarly shaped meat my dick for example (sorry I couldn't resist)

I was actually surprised no has said that yet

At 10/25/08 03:42 PM, flashplayer5 wrote: Ketchup has always, does, and always will belong on the top of a hot dog. It's a tradition.

The thing about tradition is it changes depending on where you are. In most of the places that have a claim to hot dog authority, such as New York City and Chicago, Ketchup is widely considered to be a no no. However, while I may disagree with you, I respect your opinion.

At 10/25/08 03:45 PM, DraGoN-RaGe-9001 wrote: horse radish > ketchup + mustard

I would agree depending on the type of hot dog. A good German Frankfurter would go very nicely with some horse radish. I still think some good spicy brown mustard would help though

Response to: Deadly Sin and Heavenly Virtue Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

For myself I would probably have to say Pride and Justice

Response to: Most Important Debate of them all Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

At 10/25/08 03:31 PM, milinko959 wrote: Hotdogs are a mixture of a bunch of shitty animal parts that no one would buy if it weren't ground up and put into a container, who gives a shit what you put on a log of indeterminable meats.

you see, this is the failing of most parents who only allow their children to experiance generic unflavored hotdogs, and those stupid enough to buy into the jokes about hot dogs that are only true on the television shows they saw them on. Good hot dogs are made from either pork or beef, not "indeterminable meats". Do not assume the rest of the world is as ignorant as yourself.

You have my pity.

Response to: Most Important Debate of them all Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

At 10/25/08 03:29 PM, Bacchanalian wrote:
And I don't think it's a matter of quantity of flavor. Hot dogs actually have a fairly weak flavor compared to a lot of similarly shaped processed meats. The right amount of ketchup softens the flavor, for something actually pretty pleasant. The right amount of mustard gives the hot dog a kick.

All that aside ketchup really is a very low class condiment.

Yes, but when I say hot dogs, I mean all class of frankfurter and weiner, not just the mere oscar meyer weiner that, again, is just a step away from bologna. Especially those in a natural casing, that give a good snap when you bite into them. I would say that the right kind of potato does indeed have a good flavor, but it does often come down to what you mix into them before frying.

Deadly Sin and Heavenly Virtue Posted October 25th, 2008 in General

Which of the seven deadly sins do you think applies to you the most and why?

Envy, Gluttony, Greed, Lust, Pride, Sloth, and Wrath

And which of the seven heavenly virtues?

Charity, Faith, Fortitude, Hope, Justice, Prudence, and Temperance

Note: This isn't meant to be a religious discussion, just for fun