367 Forum Posts by "Sully"
At 11/16/09 10:40 PM, Tykwa wrote: You can buy every single one of these things, But none would give the satisfaction of a Fleshlight.
HAHAHAHA.
You made me laugh a lot at that, and yet no one else noticed what you said.
I didn't read everyone's comments, but I will assume that they are condemning you as being a future father.
Don't listen to them. I hope you do well and make a great father.
At 10/6/09 04:49 PM, reviewer2 wrote:At 10/6/09 04:48 PM, ImaSmartass2 wrote: You don't get to change from serious to trollingExpected post received.
I've switched from serious to trolling.
Commence end of planet nao.
1. There is no way you are 42 years old.
2. Wasn't this thread a troll thread from the start?
3. If not, you really are dumb. Even if you are 42.
Sup.
How do you download files like this one:
http://www.rozhlas.cz/d-dur/download/01_
track.mp3
Quicktime automatically plays it for me when I open it.
Thankees
At 10/4/09 07:31 PM, MICHhimself wrote: Even though time travel is technically impossible, let's just be hypothetical.
I would probably go back in time and tell my grandfather he has cancer earlier.
Meh.
Not true. Scientists have already been able to send a neutron back in time.
Problem is that you can only send something back in time as far back as when the time machine was first turned on. I.e, if you switch the machine on and leave it on for 100 years, then you can travel back those 100 years to when it was first turned on, but not sooner.
At least that is where scientists are at so far.
At 9/30/09 10:57 PM, hdxmike wrote: The minimum age for NGers is about 13
comeback in 5 years or so
Read his profile, numb nuts.
I don't know the exact game you are talking about, but I used to love playing those old Cartoon Network games (CN Vacation Island, or something like that, was awesome).
If you go on the CN website, in the games section, just go back to the farthest page possible, and start looking from there. They still have all the original games, believe it or not.
I don't know if someone said this already, but whatever.
The truth is, there is no such thing as gay/straight/bi. You can associate yourself with one of those, as it is closest to your preference, but in reality no one can be pidgin holed into one of those three categories. There is realistically a scale. At one end, completely 100% straight, and the other 100% gay. Yes, it is possible to be right on the end of the spectrum, but very unlikely. Most men who identify with "straight" usually fall somewhere close to the straight end, but the truth is that THEY ARE STILL A TAD GAY. Same goes for gay dudes.
There are people out there who are, like I said, 1000% GET YOUR COCK OUT OF MY ROOM completely straight, but it is extremely rare.
I hope you have talked to a lawyer already. If not, get on that.
At 9/27/09 11:58 PM, Sensationalism wrote: I read about this one guy who lived a long healthy life and smoked like everyday but said that since he didn't consume dairy, it didn't have a negative effect on him.
That may be one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
Tell me more please.
At 9/28/09 12:03 AM, PenguinKommando wrote:At 9/27/09 11:55 PM, STEM wrote: You counterbalance it by talking shit and believing yourself enough for it to be true. Billions do it everyday!I used to know a guy who said the only reason people got lung cancer or shit from smoking was because they believed that smoking could do it to them, and that if you didn't worry about it and didn't stress or even imagine that it could happen, then nothing bad could come of it.
I've thought about that before. But if that were true, then you couldn't get cancer or any disease, or even die for that matter.
It makes a lot of sense, actually. In the book, the guy essentially transcends into the afterlife, but doesn't necessarily die.
At 9/27/09 11:54 PM, Tykwa wrote: Well not everyone instantly refers smoking as tobacco, which only has about one negative effect ( as lung damage ) but other things have negative effects, ideally drugs, is probably more what he's/she is mentioning.
I'm pretty sure the book was referring to direct physical effects on your lungs (and other parts effected). It was talking about tobacco also.
At 9/27/09 11:55 PM, STEM wrote: You counterbalance it by talking shit and believing yourself enough for it to be true. Billions do it everyday!
What?
I'm not sure if this is true or not, but I'm certainly not a source of medical knowledge, and thought I should call on the all-knowing community of Newgrounds to help.
Anyway, in a book that I read, there is a passage where a person talks about how he smokes when he feels like smoking, but is aware of the effects it will have. In fact, he says that after he smokes, he then takes measures to counterbalance the negative effects.
Is that even possible? How would one counterbalance the effects on your lungs and such from smoking, other than just giving your body time to heal?
At 9/25/09 04:20 PM, FurryFox wrote:At 9/25/09 04:14 PM, Itsbroken2 wrote:Maybe if I don't end up spending it on shit today.At 9/25/09 04:14 PM, FurryFox wrote:Will you buy me a shirt? :3At 9/25/09 04:09 PM, Itsbroken2 wrote: Buy something from the NG store?That's the best idea i've heard all day.
Or donating it.
Maybe you should donate it to an organization of some sort.
Think about it: You weren't expecting to find $50 when you went out. Therefore, if you donated it, it would be as if you had never found it in the first place. Plus, you would be doing a really nice thing and actually feel good about yourself instead of just stew in your own alcohol-ridden juices.
I'll make sense out of that when I get an answer.
At 9/24/09 11:01 PM, Timmy wrote: All porn movies should be 37 seconds long. No more. No less.
....
Why did you choose that number?
That number is The Follower.
StCyril: A dumb ass or a troll.
Why hasn't anyone asked why he got pepper-sprayed in the first place?
So...
Why did you get pepper-sprayed?
I really like Sriracha. However, there has been an influx of other brands (other than the one with the rooster on it), and they SUCK NUT.
Has anyone ever had any hot sauce that has a humongous Scoville scale rating? You know, those little bottles that you can dip a toothpick into and cry from the hotness? I've always been interested in having some of that.
At 9/20/09 11:53 AM, Orange-Jews wrote: don't know how eating eggs makes any damn sense, but good luck bro.
Thanks. Yeah, I don't know about the eggs; I might have to play that one by ear. I'm only eating those because it will be hard to get a lot of protein otherwise.
At 9/20/09 10:58 AM, Upyourface wrote: All of the stuff that you wrote.
I hope you find the answers that you're looking for. You clearly have a long way to go, you poor fool.
At 9/20/09 10:31 AM, MissileMastar wrote: Being a vegetarian is tolerable. Useless, but tolerable. Don't become a vegan though. Not only is it even more useless, it's 'fucking' stupid.
I'll agree with you that I will not become a vegan. I don't think it's stupid, but it is extremely difficult to maintain all of your nutrients that way.
At 9/20/09 01:34 AM, GiantDouche wrote: For every post you make I am going to buy 10 triple cheeseburgers. I'm not going to eat them I'm just going to buy them and throw them away so you can know that you were responsible for the death of an animal.
I hope you do that. Really, I do. I'd like to actually see you stand up in real life for ethics that you throw around online. It might surprise everyone here about you.
P.S. That I meant to say that when you read this, read the General Conduct section. Third point down. "Lurk first, post second. Read the entirety of every thread you post in before you post."
All the best.
At 9/19/09 11:49 PM, knightsofthecircle wrote: You think humans are the only beings in existence that kill other animals? No, almost every animal does it to survive. Granted we sometimes do it in some unorthodox ways, but when you're being but up with a meat cleaver or a pair of claws, you're not really caring about the difference.
Not to mention, humanity has been doing since the first time we figured out that meat was edible. Vikings, Romans, Indians, Americans, an entire race has been built on the notion that Darwinian philosophies have been a fact; that only the strongest survive.
Besides, humans are the only animals in the tire world, if not, the UNIVERSE that have a moral "conscience". If you were to ever be stranded on an iceburg for a week and the only way to survive until the rescue team comes is to eat a nice, succulent pig, I think you'd eat it wouldn't you? Where do the lines of right and wrong differ? Does eating another animal make you another animal? Of course it does, because YOU ARE AN ANIMAL.
Also, flora are living things to and you don't see them complain about being eaten. And don't give me that, "but plants can't feel pain" crap. Scientists have proved that trees and other plants have some degree of thought, so you're eating a living thing too, assholes.
Vegetarians, stop trying to be all morally rightous on us and announce to the world that killing animals is wrong and that the only way to live is by only eating fruits, grains and vegetables. Don't get me wrong, those things are good for your health too, and I love them as well, but for god sakes, either shut up or go out and eat a steak that isn't made of tofu.
Well, I just have a few things to say to you:
1) The fact that we are the only animals in the world to have a "moral 'conscience'" gives us the ability to decide one of two ways, meaning that there is not a necessarily wrong choice. My choice is to not eat animals. Also, I'm not quite sure that other animals do not have moral consciences (search for video of cougar/cheetah/panther/lion (one of those) taking care of baby monkey).
2) Totally agree with you that eating plants is just as bad as eating animals. However, animals clearly have a more advanced level of consciousness, and therefore I think that it is best to eat things that are least advanced as possible (we have to eat something after all).
3) Look, I didn't create this thread to force my ideas onto you or anyone else. I did it to seek advice. Take that sort of prejudice somewhere else. Please.
At 9/20/09 12:29 AM, physicsman09 wrote:At 9/19/09 10:43 PM, Sully wrote: Well, I am thinking of becoming a vegetarian. The reasons for such are: spiritual, health, and moral (killing of animals). Please don't make an ignorant argument against, but feel free to give any factual reasons as to why this may not be a good decision.It's not immoral to kill animals for food. It is immoral to delight in torturing animals and enjoying watching them be slaughtered, seriously, that's just fucked up.
But don't think you're better than me because I like to eat meat, that's just going to make you look like a self-righteous prick who's got his head so far up his ass he can smell what he had for breakfast that morning.
If you want to become a vegetarian, fine, I won't stop you. But the second you try to either convince me to stop eating meat, or join an organization against eating meat, or even talking about why it's "wrong" to eat meat, that view will change very quickly and I will view you no better than those peta scumbags.
Please refer to what I said above to knightsofthecircle. There is apparently a veil draped over your eyes that makes you think any post asking for ADVICE about being a vegetarian is automatically a propaganda post to convert carnivorous jackasses. It's not. Carnivorous jackasses are apparently too smart for that.
At 9/20/09 01:18 AM, GiantDouche wrote:At 9/19/09 10:43 PM, Sully wrote: spiritual,You're an idiot.
health,What could be more healthy then depriving your body of essential proteins and amino-acids and sub sequentially substituting meat for fats and sugars to satiate hunger cravings. What. Could. Be. More. Healthy.
I won't be depriving my body of essential proteins and amino-acids. If you had read my first post in it's entirety, I stated that I will be a lacto-ovo vegetarian, meaning I will be eating eggs and dairy products.
Maybe you should read this post on Newgrounds. I think it will help you for next time you come back to post.
and moral (killing of animals).Hey, newsflash dipshit. Humans are animals. We're just more advanced in intelligence but we still have definite animal instincts and characteristics. We just perceive things differently but that doesn't make us any less of animals. Animals eat other animals for survival. There is nothing morally wrong about it. Ending the life of a sentient being can be perceived as wrong, but killing a fucking cow to eat it is not morally inept in the slightest.
Morality is subjective. But it's not debatable that animals killing animals doesn't happen every second.
Ah, but there's the crux. The fact that there is morality means that there are a multitude of degrees of morality. One end of the spectrum is a man who kills anything and everything for pleasure, and is most likely insane. He still has morality; his morality is that killing is all right. The other extreme is the man who doesn't kill anything. That's right; he has an epiphany that he should not eat anything because it is murder, and he thus dies of starvation/dehydration.
Who is to say who is right? No one, at least on this planet, can say that any point on the spectrum is "right". Why? Because it is a personal choice.
At 9/19/09 11:47 PM, disingenuous wrote: The only thing you need to know about being a vegetarian is that it's a terrible idea, and you should probably just eat meat.
Why?
At 9/19/09 11:44 PM, Blademaster7 wrote: As long as your not a PETA nut job...
Haha, no, far from it I think.
I don't like the abuse of animals, which is I guess the only thing i share in feelings with PETA. I just don't personally like the idea of having animals killed. And then eating them. Also, there is a lot of animal abuse in the food industry. Blah blah blah, one person isn't going to make a difference, blah. So what? People can decide for themselves what they want.
P.S. I thought it was funny how the first three people to reply systematically picked apart my three reasons behind wanting to be a vegetarian.
At 9/19/09 10:44 PM, Proottalfain wrote:At 9/19/09 10:43 PM, Sully wrote: spiritualEnlighten me about how food changes your soul.
Food is a superficial way that changes your mind. Improper food alters your thinking; it can make you more irritable, depressed, and less-energetic. In a word, not eating the right food can cloud your mind a great deal.
At 9/19/09 10:53 PM, JustsTrollingAlong wrote:At 9/19/09 10:43 PM, Sully wrote: Well, I am thinking of becoming a vegetarian. The reasons for such are: spiritual, health, and moral (killing of animals). Please don't make an ignorant argument against, but feel free to give any factual reasons as to why this may not be a good decision.So you'll be drinking growth hormone filled milk from tortured cows and eating lots of balut eggs?
I will be a lacto-ovo vegetarian, so I will be eating plenty of milk and eggs.
There is not a lot of milk that still contains rBGH, and it will say on the label that it does not contain it (also, organic milk).
Yes, eggs are not the best things to eat (I don't know what "balut" means) if on a vegetarian diet, but you do need protein somehow, and it will be very hard to get whole protein from just milk.
At 9/19/09 11:22 PM, D3NTATUS wrote: There's a vegetarian community in the clubs and crews section. We're much friendlier and more informed about vegetarianism than General, believe me.
As for your questions, 1. there's nothing you need to worry about with milk and eggs, though avoid eating tons of eggs, because they're high in cholesterol, and that would pretty effectively counteract the myriad health benefits of vegetarianism. 2. weightlifting is viable, as long as you balance your meals accordingly (lots of dairy, legumes, nuts, etc).
Thank you for your input. I saw that community, but saw that the last post was on the 10th, so I thought I would get an answer quicker on here.
I would like to here from you again, specifically regarding your opinion on eating eggs (do you do it personally? do you think that it defeats the whole purpose of being a vegetarian?).
Also, do you have any input on the intake of carbs? I have read about vegetarians not having a lot of energy by eating TOO MUCH carbs, as well as not enough. An increase in energy is supposed to be a big benefit from being a vegetarian (from what I've heard), so it would be nice to not ruin this.
Thanks again for the input (even those who don't agree or like to speculate).
Well, I am thinking of becoming a vegetarian. The reasons for such are: spiritual, health, and moral (killing of animals). Please don't make an ignorant argument against, but feel free to give any factual reasons as to why this may not be a good decision.
So, I am asking a couple of things of all vegetarians:
1) Is there anything I need to know about the diet? I will be a lacto-ovo vegetarian, so I will be eating plenty of milk and eggs. Do I need to be careful of my consumption of milk and eggs due to developing allergies? Are there any special things I need to know about eating carbs (I heard that if you eat too much, you will feel LESS energetic)?
2) Is it possible to be a vegetarian and be very athletic? Specifically, will weightlifting be feasible while being a lacto-ovo vegetarian?
Also, I am thinking about going on a 7 day fast before switching to vegetarian (to cleanse the body), so feel free to put in your 2 cents about that if you feel like it.
Thanks.
At 9/11/09 10:57 AM, SoulMaster71 wrote:At 9/11/09 10:50 AM, Sully wrote: The weight with 9's are in pounds, not meters. Therefore, it doesn't count.Since when is the meter a measure of mass? Grams, kilograms, get it right half-wit.
Also, maybe the child will grow up obsessed with Touhou and become a Cirno fan... Nah, too coincidental.
Lol you caught my mistake!
Lawlawlawlawlawlawl it's not like I made a simple mistake that changes nothing in the world! It's like I made a catastrophic mistake that will ruin all things in time! Lololololl SHUT THE FUCK UP PISS ANT.

