Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I'd like to say that she was doing it playfully, but no, she wasn't.

It was "drink, drink, drink" and her loving the attention that she was getting by two guys and getting handsy with them.

You did the great thing by saying that there was no connection right away. This girl I was with needs some serious fucking growing up to do.

At 5/10/09 04:41 AM, Gagsy wrote:
So she deserves such a horrible letter because you BOTH felt nothing for each other romantically?

I think you have some serious problems.

Let me clarify. She, obviously wasn't feeling anything for me. However, I thought things could work out like the idiot that I was. The next day I pretty much filled in the gaps and had to deal with her shaking her ass at other Marines and getting wet for them.

Which is awesome because all they would have done was fuck her and then leave her ass making her wonder why she couldn't get in a realtionship with such a hot Marine. Which is really obvious because she is a horrible fucking human being.

At 5/10/09 04:38 AM, Effsix wrote: I'm not really sure what the problem is, except that I didn't think marines came online, to newgrounds to whine about girls. In fact, I'm sceptical about alot that goes on here.

Don't worry about it. See, Marines have the same girl problems everyone else does. They just don't whine about it online mostly. They whine about it in other media.

At 5/10/09 04:33 AM, Ozcar wrote:
She said she was in love with me...I told her I didn't feel any chemistry between us...

But she was ugly as hell...

She wasn't ugly, but yeah, no chemistry. The thing is, with the great inventions of Facebook and camera phones we had already seen pictures of each other. So we both knew what we were getting into.

Keep in mind that I never EVER have called a woman a whore. In fact I've almost upgraded said girl to "cunt", but we'll see how things go out.

BACKSTORY: A fellow Marine decided to hook me up with a friend of his girlfriend's. So, before we set a date to do something, we talked on the phone a bit. Oh man, was the girl awesome. She was the coolest thing every until I met her. Things fell apart then...

My letter I sent to her:

Hey Jess,

I hope you are having a great day because you'll obviously never know just how much of a horrible person you are.

Now, you may be asking yourself, "What the hell is this guy's problem?"

Well, let me explain.

When my fellow Marine NAME OMITTED tried to set me up with you I was generally uninterested. However, he convinced me to call you and I did. You know what? You actually sounded like someone I wanted to meet. I got to talk to you more on the phone and we generally had similar likes and dislikes. I liked your blunt and honest nature that you had and I could tell I was going to like you. You even explained to me that you liked me.

I'm also pretty sure things fell apart when I met you. It started with general disinterest which I played off as shyness. Ha ha, wow, shyness? Really? No, you didn't care about me which by the way is fine. You know what though? When you DON'T tell somebody that you DON'T like that person. See that way they don't have to spend one of the worst weekends they ever had in their entire life like I did. You did say you were a honest and blunt person right? Well, in that case you weren't with me and that is pretty fucking sad that you couldn't even say that to me.

What? Were you afraid you'd hurt my feelings? PLEASE, spare me, I'm a fucking big boy and the fact that I had to basically just stick around for the ride made it a fucking nightmare. That contradictory mindset was pretty obvious too when you were acting whorish around other Marines.

See, when we went to Edgefest you traded in a"cute" Marine (your words by the way) for a "hot" Marine. I don't think I've ever seen a young woman quite ready to drop panties so fast. What makes the situation even greater (This is sarcasm in written form, something you'd probably know nothing about) is that you said and done those things right in front of me. You had to be well aware what I was there for.

I was there, as a date, plain and simple. However, I was very ignorable to you and you went off and did something really fucking horrible. Life would have been really simple on my part if you were straightforward with me, but despite you being the only girl I've met to make me absolutely furious, let me go ahead and tell you something that will burst your little bubble:

You are just about as mediocre, crazy and immature as every other party girl in existence. You aren't special and definitely not as attractive as you think you are. Guys are more attracted to the fact that you dress like a whore. Which explains why you have always had shitty relationships because you always go after moron deadbeats who are just attracted to the fact that they can get their dick wet. You obviously want something more, but you don't know what you want so you'll just jump from one guy to the next in hopes you'll find that perfect little dream guy that you fantasize about. Good luck with that and God love the man who can stand you.

Anyway, what's really sad about this is that I had to write you a letter to let you know how much of a horrible fucking human being you are. You probably didn't care or even knew what you were doing. What's even worse is that, like the nice guy that I am, I didn't tell you off right then and there when I had the chance. Which, by the way, I really wanted to do because you really deserve to be brought down from your high whorse (see, that's a play on words: A mixture between the words whore and horse. It's funny.)

Oh well, because the only worse part about meeting you is that I'll never get that horrible time back that I spent talking to you and being around you.

There IS hope for me though. See, despite the fact that you totally pissed me off and acted like a complete jackass I made me think, "Wow, I am so better than you." I know that you'll probably talk with your friends or NAME OMITTED or whoever and say things about me and I can deal with that. Know why? Well, because I'm actually doing something with my life and I see you doing nothing but dragging everyone down with you.

I go to college and am getting my education in something I LOVE doing. I am a Marine and while I'm only a Reservist I do something respectable by serving my country. I actually live in my own apartment by myself and can afford it very well. Minus the crappy car, I live a great life and it's going to be even greater.

Don't bother sending a reply because I'm not going to read it.

Don't ever contact me again.

At 5/6/09 03:52 PM, Jon-86 wrote:

At 5/6/09 03:17 PM, Stoicish wrote: a post 9/11 world is changing.

Firstly fuck the "post 9/11" thing. Their have been far worse atrocities before and after that. The world didn't change when this happened. Its still the shitty same place it always was. Next you cannot got to war against a feeling/state of mind. First the war on terror and when thats done what will we have a war on insecurities? A joke made by many a comedian the world over by now but still it has a point.

Depends on what kind of world you are talking about.

If you are talking about a natural world in which nature and the environment keep on going then you are absolutly right. On 9/11 the planet Earth was completely oblivious to the fact that some towers fell.

However, if you are talking about the world in which PEOPLE and POLICIES change then you are wrong. Because the world did change as we had a total shift, worldwide, around the present threat of Global Terrorism with the United States being at the forefront. You might sit at home, twiddle your thumbs and not give a shit, but that doesn't stop the fact that the CIA and FBI are working on a day to day basis just combating this stuff in collaboration with various other agencies around the globe.

Also, no shit you can't have a war on terror. The last chapter of the book even mentions it. Maybe you should read it first before you get all pissy.

There is nothing fantastic about war and to give a pessimistic outlook on society is pretty shameful.

For there to be a World War III there would, in fact, need to be unconditional war. Even since the invention of atomic weaponry all warfare has been pretty restricted. So nations are no limited to Restricted Warfare rather than the classical Total War that has dominated the world until the early 20th century.

Now Total War is not possible without the annihilation of mankind.

So, essentially, what you are saying is that there will be a breakdown of all diplomacy and the world will descend into apocalyptic chaos.

Also, if there were a World War it wouldn't happen in a piss poor region such as the Middle East regardless of all the oil. Because in 20 years a good chunk of that oil is going to be gone and many countries are going to move on from that region.

TA-DA! You know absolutely nothing.

Read it.

It's essentially a long book/school created by various authors that include articles relevant to everything you would ever want to possibly know about a modern terrorism society. What makes it even greater is that it constantly updates for the fact that a post 9/11 world is changing.

This is literally the one stop book on Terrorism and it is great. In coalition with this I suggest people read the 9/11 Commission Report if you already haven't.

In our readily available world of the Internet people are too quick and trusting of other people's opinions when it comes to websites and forums. It's a nice change of pace to actually read a goddamn book once and a while and get a better structured explanation of the politics and tactics when dealing with terrorism.

Also, this books touches on the success and failures of the war on terror and even subjects I didn't even think about; such as Terrorism and its relation to the Media.

All culminated in a final chapter called, "Winning a War on Terror" that take 5 considerations in how the United States (and the world) can win a global war on terror. It's great.

Well, we are only touching on the people we've read in our classroom.

So I'm going to talk about Mark Twain, Stephen Crane and Frank Norris. I also need 12 sources, but I already gave myself a large "fuck that" because there is no way I'm going to find 11 non-electronical sources at this time at night. Hell I'll be lucky if I even get 10 sources two of which include the fucking books.

I, too, am in the same boat.

I am also on PAGE FUCKING TWO on my 7 page final paper with a test tomorrow morning. Yes, I have to create an extensive and well critical essay detailing literary realism and naturalism. I am on page 2.

I have been working on this for a little while and a great bunch o' writers block is just making this better. This paper has no forgiveness to is and its mocking me with its dastardly notions that I am going to make an 'F'.

To make matters worse I have ANOTHER 6 page paper due in which I got to read a whole bunch o' shit that I haven't been reading since the beginning of the semester. It's due at midnight on Wednesday.

So while I try to enjoy my very sleepless night doing this crap I get the occasional distraction by watching an episode of South Park and working on two more pages of the paper.

To make matters even better I need to try to read up on at least 5 stories I neglected over the course of the semester because of my own stupidity. So I have to rely on Spark Notes and my all time favorite tool known as Wikipedia.

So, to all those experiencing finals. I share your pain and I assume that those going to a better college right now is no doubt feeling my pain, but it has to be so much worse.

Listen, I never even argued against the case of owning guns, but I was unaware of the strong lifelike grip people have on their guns.

Let me backtrack a bit, I'm just talking about the issue of people buying up ammo. That's it. Period. Statement.

I do not, I repeat, do not give a shit if people own guns. In fact, as far as I'm concerned the only thing that should be a mandatory necissity for owning guns is for people to take gun saftey classes.

I don't think you can make an argument about that.

However, it seems Proteas and MrMason want to go on this severe rhetoric tangent about various gun laws and restrictions that a Democratic congress aren't even worrying about yet. I think they have more things to worry about.

And yes, I believe that when it comes to this issue you obviously have a bigger grasp on gun laws and background behind it. When I focus on politics I usually worry about silly foriegn policy rather than domestic.

This story, however, caught my eye as stupid parinoia and I'm not going to appoligize for my stance on that.

I realized how retarded it was when I mentioned the Taxes and the Military spends, but I digress from that point because I don't enjoy looking stupid.

Anyway, I think its just silly that people are buying the hell out of ammo, but then again it's their money and they can do what they want with it. These gun and ammo companies obviously are making huge profit off of the parinoia so why shouldn't they even encourage people to spread this rumor? MrMason you even said yourself that your don't believe its going to happen.

So at this point I'm not even sure why we are arguing.

At 5/5/09 08:22 AM, TheMason wrote:
So then according to your logic what follows would be for me to be:
a) not only stupid...but fucking stupid
b) don't know anything about politics or gun laws.

Listen, I probably should have been clear about my indication about gun owners. I don't think there is anything wrong with owning guns. However, I do think there is something wrong with the sudden ammo grab that has no real merit. I mean it is their own money, but I think buying ammo based on a stupid rumor is, well, stupid.

Also, you are right I know little about gun laws (other than a few loophole laws like being able to own a flamethrower), but I do know a bit about politics.

However I:
Have a Master's in Political Science and am pursuing a PhD in the same. Thus you fail from the start.

Hey, I'm studying Political Science too, but I don't boast about it. Saying this is just like you are telling me, "Hey, I'm the biggest asshole here and I want everyone to know about it." Since you were nice enough to call me a retard without having a civil conversation about a subject then I'll be inclined to call you asshole. A lot.

1) Rifles in general are used in only less than 1% of ALL gun crimes. Statistically speaking Assault Rifles are used in ZERO% of crime...hardly the epidemic the gun control crowd promotes.

Cool, where are the statistics for that. I mean, I can believe it but handgun gun crimes are the more likely killer than assault rifles. However, I actually think people should be able to own handguns. Assault rifles are war time weapons that our military should used and I think should be out of civilian hands.

3) Assault rifles are not used in crime because they are particularly ill-suited for it. a) a high-cap mag makes the rifle more heavy and unwieldy. b) the high-profile of the high-cap mag makes it even more unconcealable than it already was being a rifle and all. c) Military ammo, while very good basic armor piercing rounds...are actually very, very ineffective at being lethal or causing massive tissue damage.

I'm pretty sure the person who is using it is not going to be thinking about effectivness of the bullet if they do use it. Also, you never really explained to me the purpose of owning such a rifle. I mean, I get that its cool and fun to collect, but other than that I don't see a general purpose. You can't hunt with those rifles and a best they are just fun to shoot. I'll be okay with saying that, but like I said before these are weapons meant for war.

Also, a bullet is a bullet and there are only slight differences when you are firing (lets say) a 5.56mm NATO round and a hollow point (which are illegal to use in warfare). Because if you are shooting someone in the head then the differences in the bullet really doesn't fucking matter at all.

Oh, and the bit about 'taxing ammo'? We are, in Obama's own words, in one of the gravest recessions since the Great Depression. Guess what happened? FDR raised most of his revenue not by increases in taxes on the wealthy...but through excise taxes. Couple this with anti-gun rhetoric, and a party that has a history of representing the anti-gun voices of the nation...and I don't think it is really that far of a logical leap for gun owners to be concerned.

I'm just talking about ammo, not guns.

Is there some manipulation from extreme pro-gun proponents? Undoubtly, but sometimes just because you're paranoid does NOT mean they aren't out to get you. :)

You seem to know a bit about your weapons and that's all fine and dandy, but a weapon and politics don't mix (unless you are talking about war). Since you mentioned the hunting rounds then your average gun owner really isn't going to buy those rounds until they are withing a reasonable price range.

Anyway, I'm just talking about the ammo issue and how I don't think there is anything a Democractic Congress can do to limit the sell of weapons to the people seeing how we have the Second Amendment, no matter how much you want to believe they will.

This discussion is on the Taxing of Ammo and how its really stupid how people think it's going to happen. If you read what I mentioned about the Military buying more ammo than any American combined then you'd realize it would make sense for them to NOT tax ammo.

Ever.

Jesus that is what I'm trying to say!

There is literally no logic in anyone saying, "Well, he's a Democrat so at some point he's just going to tax our bullets."

Fuck no, he is not. Know why? BECAUSE NO ONE SAID HE WAS! Obama didn't say it, no one in his administration said it and FUCK no Republican has even made claims that he was going to do that. Know why? Because it's just retarded.

It's that kind of logic that runs in the same line of, "Hey, there's a gay guy. He's gay so he obviously wants to buttfuck anything that moves. I need to keep my children away from him."
or
"Hey, there's a black man. He's black so he obviously wants to break into my car. I need to put extra security on my car and call the cops just to be safe."

Seriously, that's what this assumption sounds like to me. I mean, CNfuckingN just said on that news report that the Obama administration has made no indication that he was going to tax bullets.

Here, I'll give you a simple reason why Bullets are being taxed and its a good fucking reason:

Guess what gun nuts? All of you collectively who own a lot of guns. Let's say roughly 100 million Americans own guns. Try to imagine how much ammo that is between that many Americans especially after this hike in ammo. Now imagine that much ammo put together and you STILL wouldn't even come close to how much ammo the US military buys and distributes in one week.

Seriously, there is so much fucking ammo to go around in the US military. A lot. Our defense budget is big and the Military goes through more ammo during training exercise than during war itself. Not to mention it isn't making its own ammo. So where is that ammo going to come from? That's right my friends, private military companies who sell their ammo to the US military.

So, if Obama taxes the ammo, you know what he's doing? He's essentially raising the costs of buying the tons of ammo the US military needs and literally causing us to be in even more debt than before. We would, in a perfect term, be shooting ourselves in the foot.

That's why Obama, and no President, is ever going to tax ammo.

At 5/5/09 12:25 AM, Tancrisism wrote:
This sounds a lot like what happened in Oakland about a month ago, and if that's what you are talking about you have it all wrong. I'm pretty sure that is what you are talking about, since it would have made the news if another guy killed 3-5 cops within the same month as that massacre.

What happened in Oakland was a guy got stopped by the cops for a traffic violation, so he killed 2 of them, sped off to a safehouse, and waited for the SWAT. He then killed 2 more of them with an AK, an illegal gun.

No, no, this was a different story. However, I can't find it. If I can then I'd link it, but at best you all can ignore it if you don't believe it's true.

And this scares me.

Obviously because they know absolutly nothing about politics and gun control laws, but are more than willing to believe any hype that is being brought up because the .5% chance that the Obama administration, "Is gurnna teak er gyuns!"(Try saying that outloud. It's fun.)

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/05/04/ammo.sh ortage/index.html

Besides Obama stating in his campaign that he wants re-enact a very smart act that says you cannot own automatic rifles and various other weapons like that. There is, I repeat, there is NO INDICATION that he is going to tax ammo. You know why? Cause' that is mental. That is the thought process of a collective group who listens to what Jimbob said and assumes it's true because he got an Associates in Electrical Engineering. Jimbob was always the smart one.

Listen, I like guns myself and I get a bit of self satisfaction every time I fire an M16 because it's just a fun weapon to fire. However, I don't ever want to own one because I see no point. The Second Amendment is there for a reason and there is going to be no reversing a classic Amendment like that one. YES! You can own weapons and a Democratic Congress is not going to make that any different retards.

You don't believe me how scary this is? Last month a man bought up as much guns and ammo as he could for the same reason I mentioned above. Was, apparently, afraid when Obama hit office. He holed himself up in his house and killed 3 police officers when they tried to arrest him before they killed him.

God Bless America.

What was your intention on replying?

At 4/30/09 12:54 PM, Lost-Chances wrote:

At 4/30/09 12:42 PM, Stoicish wrote: Of course, I'm just expressing my upset tone through a letter.

Did your mother teach you to let out your anger that way or did you pick it up from one of your closer friends?

No, from my pshychiatrist who helped me after I suffered my mental breakdown and attacked some guy named Harold James at Starbucks while waiting in line.

Of course, I'm just expressing my upset tone through a letter.

In all seriousness, my college campus is smack dab right in the middle of a "ghetto" and people are getting robbed, mugged and stuff stolen pretty much all the time.

Eventually it got so bad that there was a drive-by shootin on campus by some guys who thought they could get away with it, but failed to realize they were going to get a lot of attention because of the year previous college shooting at Virginia Tech.

So right now the college is upping everything to make it safer including security cameras that point everywhere. While I hate the 1984 style for the campus, in this case I feel it to be really necissary.

Dear Desperate Thief/Crackhead/Rebellious Teenager,

This weekend I trusted my instincts and parked my car in an area I thought was safe. Mostly because there was a lot of car's there, but also because my car looks like a piece of shit compared to all 2008 Models lined up near me.

So naturally I thought that you wouldn't touch my vehicle. I was sorely mistaken however.

Doing the responsible thing I refuse to drink and drive otherwise I would have moved my car to a safer location, but you prayed upon my trust and left me upset.

Initially I assumed that you stole nothing, but just trashed my car. I felt lucky nothing was taken (besides loose change) and decided against calling the cops. Recently, however, I was mistaken as I figured out that you have stolen my backpack.

Did you know that my backpack had all of my school books which, by the way, are completely worthless to you? Did you know that at least 5 of my very expensive T-shirts were in there or were you thinking about how awesome you would see those in a thrift store? Did you know that Finals are in 1 week and I have nothing to study with now?

Of course you didn't because of the choices you made and the world revolving around you. I don't know your story or motivations other than to take something that was not yours to have. You could have been desperate for one more rock. You could have just wanted money. You could have just been a little prick who parents didn't discipline enough.

Whatever the reason, now, I have to find someway to pick up my life. I know, for a fact, that I do something productive. I go to college, I serve my country and I contribute to society. It is my fondest wish that you would take those books and find some sort of educational purpose out of there.

My skepticism for that is pretty high though.

Have a good life with whatever you are doing and stop stealing. You will go to prison eventually and what will that even prove.

P.S. To the Man Who Stole My Friends Laptop

We saw you on security footage dear man. You are a tall very dark (black) man who looked right into the security camera. We know by now that the laptop is long gone, but why did you take it? You barged into a dormitory room with the only purpose being theft. I know you aren't a crackhead because you do not look like it. We know you don't go to this campus because you would have been found fast.

No we know that you are in fact one of the many small gangs that encircle our little campus in crime neighborhood who thought he could get something from the college students.

P.S.S
To the Men who Mugged the Janitor and 5 other college students and shot another one in a drive by.

Seriously, what the fuck?

At 4/22/09 11:30 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:

agreed also Note for the OP the Navy SEALs aren't Americas elite fighting force its DELTA FORCE.

I didn't say they were THE elite fighting force. I said that they were A elite fighting force and besides I just wasn't going to waste my time going through all the special forces which are technically units of an even larger fighting force such as the Navy or the Army.

Delta Force is a counter-terrorism unit anyway the same as the Navy's DEVGRU which is attached to the Navy SEALs.

All of these special forces have their own function to contribute to the larger effort and by all means aren't the only thing out there.

But, for you I'll tell you that the US has:
Air Force 24th Special Tactics Squadron
The ISA
Army Green Berets
Army Rangers
Several Air Force Special Operation Units
USMC Special Operations Command and Special Operations Capable Forces
The Intellegence Community as a whole.

There, happy?

SECOND BATTLE The US vs Israel

pros:
Great Military
Israel is set up for a perfect naval blockade
Experience in fighting in the Middle East
Probably would get a large support from most Arab countries
Cons:
Israel, despite lack in numbers, has one of the most modern military technology that rivals the US
They know Krav Maga
Due to conscription EVERYONE in Israel is eligable to fight in the IDF which means a, "Down the last man, woman and child situation."
Israel really knows how to fight in their own homeland and has more experience fighting in the Middle East than the US

Barring the fact that this is going to be one of those, "Never Gonna Happen" situations lets just pretend that it DOES happen.

It won't be easy for the United States. It would take many months of fighting with many US and Israel casualties on both sides. The IDF is small, but their technological advantage and tactical advantage more than make up for in numbers. The US will encounter rough fighting and slowly take territory before the inevitable "victory".

Then it has to deal with an occupied Israel which is going to be impossible for the United States. You think Iraq is bad? Try to deal with a country who thrives on survival and being its own nation. All the people will not take kindly to an occupying force and the US will have to deal with years of fighting with freedom fighters.

In the end there is no such thing as an unconditional victory in the battle and the US will just abandon the war torn country after so many losses.

Even in my technical scenario there is really no point in the US actually staying inside the country anyway and the war will most likely end in a treaty of some sort. Where the treaty will most likely favor the Israeli side rather than the US.

So I'll likely just call this one a draw and if you want to be technical a win for Israel because they were able to keep their country. Which is the whole point of the IDF.

NEXT UP: The US vs. Australia...CATCH IT!

At 4/22/09 10:12 PM, poxpower wrote: XXXth Battle: The USA vs The Empire

Stats:
US: Stuff

The Empire:
- Death Star
- AT-ATs
- LAZORS
- Darth Vader
- Couple thousand star destroyers

Winner: The Empire

I would still love to see that battle.

I mentioned them and I also said to ignore nukes.

I've grown weary of the stupid nationalistic discussion detailing who would win in a fight if their country were pitted against the United States. Then someone says, "Nuh uh!" and then they just fight about which country is greater.

Personally being in the military I get a first hand look on how the U.S. trains and have read a plenty about how basically this country is damn parinoid about anything hitting it. This country will flip shit if a small cessna plane doesn't check in. So it comes as a shock that people think in a conventional war their country can beat essentially the strongest military force in the world.

So in this fun series I'm going to try to cover pretty much every fun loving nation out there who thinks the US is the devil and pit them together in a battle with one another. It's going to be very detailed including home turf battle's. I'm going to ignore the politics and how the unlikly situation may happen. Just pure and simple war stats people. Also, no nukes.

The United States of America Stats
Military includes:
US Army
US Navy
US Air Force
US Marine Corps
US Coast Guard

People, this military is massive. With over $711 billion a year in funding they have it all.
Over 1,454,515 active duty and 848,000 reserve units. This country, in terms of manpower, is the second largest military power in the world.

There are 280 ships in the Navy and over 3,700 aircrafts in the Navy as well. This country dominates in high tech naval eqipment and power. Including one of the most elite fighting forces known at the Navy SEALs.

The US also has vast air superiority with the dawning of the F-22 Raptor which is a beast. They have 135 of these planes and the airforce having a total of 2,402 fighter planes.

Tanks? You want tanks? Oh baby does this country have tanks. They have over 9,000 M1Abrams in service most of which have been beast's in current wartime. These baby's are hard to kill and kill hard. They have also been surprisingly reseliant against roadside bombs in Iraq.

Coupled with hard training and a rigirous military who is constantly evolving and you have the deadliest force in the known world.

AND the US barely uses a quarter of its forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Use the above stats as further refrence to any fictional battle I put up.

FIRST BATTLE: The US vs. CANADA

US pros:
-Better military
-Close proximity to the country
US cons:
-Have to withstand cold temperatures
-Close proximity to Canada is also a con
-Shared information with the country via
NORAD could cause some serious problems

Canada Stats
Canada has a combined force known Canadian Forces which consist of pretty much everything you want in a military. MARCOM, LFC, and AIRCOM all rolled into a nice strategic package. However, with this strategic and cost efficiant command it seemed to come at a price of shear numbers.

Canada has only 65, 251 active duty military in its command and only 34,678 Reserve Forces including the Canadian Rangers. This doesn't even scratch the surface of US military might. Their Navy has a sad 36 ships and submarines.

Their Air Force here is small and they have pretty much a stock list of everything they have on Wikipedia.

While Canada has an advantage of extreme cold temperatures in the Winter. The fact that their capital is so close to US boarders doesn't help them. In terms of an all out war my prediction is that it would take a month, maybe less, before the US can take control of the capital. The entire country is problimatic, but the military would be wiped out in no time flat.

Join me next time when the United States takes on Israel!

Wikipedia has gotten pretty stict when it comes to finding proof though.

You can't go in there and say, "The Panda's are all extinct."

I know because I've tried this.

Making a wiki must be so much easier today compared to the original Wikipedia.

Wikipedia, however, doesn't do massive covers on subjects such as Final Fantasy, Dragonball, Harry Potter or 4chan like most people would want.

So people have taken the time and the effort out of their lives to make their own wiki's to completely cover subjects that had enough cover time on Wikipedia.

In this series we explore...DUN DUN DUN...THE WIKI JUNGLE!

#1. Dragonball

Today we cover our jungle exploration with a 20 year old Anime and Manga series that is just as popular today then it was about 20 years ago. This, of course, pisses off people who find the entire series bogged down by long "dramatized" circle shots, pointless breaks in action and episodes that mean absolutly nothing after you watch it.

This is supposed to be fixed in the new Dragonball Kai series which makes the action short and to the point.

However, we are talkng about Dragonball. A series that people apparently dedicate way too much time to create a wiki that covers almost every subject.

Fetured Article
Who in the Dragonball world don't love them som Super Saiyan? It comes to no shock that the featured article is this and HAS been this for the past week. This article covers everything that you need to know about Super Saiyan's, including hypothetical things that they don't even bother to cover in the anime.

Does this cover everything?
More than you'll ever want to know or care about.

#2-The Twilight Saga Wiki
Twilight became a new comfort to adolecent overweight romantic girls and young men who question their sexuality. After the first book the Twilight series began to get bigger and bigger until it spawned 3 more books and a shitty movie featuring the most stoic actress I've seen.

I've read the first book. While I like to keep on nueteral grounds on a few things I really connot on this book series. Why? Quite simply beause they suck. Bella (the main character) is obviously a young manifestation of the author in literary form. This actually isn't uncommon in a lot of novels as authors tend to put a little bit of themselves in all their characters. However much was put into Bella is unknown, however it should be noted that Bella is horribly horribly annoying character and the fact that she is the main character makes the novel just harder to read. Edward, her love interest, is a vampire. He's also horribly creepy and this book just begins to go downhill the more you read it.

Oh yeah, did I mention there is a dedicated wiki to it?

Featured Article
The Volturi

After Anne Rice went some sorts of batshit insane there needed to be a vampire gap filled. This was obviously filled with the Twilight saga for a new age of even lamer vampire who don't even burst into flame when they go out into the sun. How stupid is that?

Anyway, I have no idea who the Volturi is because I never read past the first book as they appear in the last one, but the wiki says:
The Volturi are an organized coven of vampires in the Twilight series of young adult novels. They enforce the laws of the vampire world. They "invite" other vampires with powerful gifts to join their coven. They are the largest, and most powerful Coven of vampires in the series.

So essentially they are some gay coven of vampires who blah blah blah blah. Just read the wiki.

Does it cover everything?
You be the judge.

For those who don't feel like clicking on the link. This covers everything you ever wanted to know about the diet that the unholy child Bella and Edward had in the final book. Also, for kicks, read the synopsis of the final book and just how fucking odd it is.

#3-The Korea Wiki

FUCK YEAH! You ever just sit back and wonder to yourself, "Man, I wish there was a wiki describing the wonders and joys of Korea and Korean culture." Now there is! With a picture of a Koean guard standing at a train station this looks like to be a horrible trip into Korea lifestyle. By that I mean North Korea.

However, this website plays more like a tourist guide rather than an actual wiki.

Featured Article
Sadly, there isn't one.

Does it cover everything?
Obviously not.

I will cover more wiki's later in this series. Keep a lookout!

I sex'd a 28 year old woman a couple of times.

It was great.

C'mon people step up!

Do you got some free time in your life? How much time do you spend on this forum a day? How much time do you waste watching TV or playing video games?

There is always something out there you can do for your fellow man.

I recently come under the discovery that living my life the way I was living it just didn't cut it. So I decided that I was going to do something to help others. So I've decided after I finish with my summer training that I'll volunteer my time at Arkansas Children's Hospital. I don't care what I do as long as it is considered helpful.

I think Newgrounds can do something too. There is always charities out there willing to help those who are in need or helping your community in general.

Not only does it look great on college and work applications, but you get a sense of satisfaction knowing that you made a change no matter how small.

Hell, there is an entire website dedicated to matching people up with volunteer work and work with nonprofit organizations.

I honestly think that our time on this Earth can be better if we all do a little something.

So what's up Newgrounds? What are you going to do?

So, by your logic, just because other countries did some things that can be considered just as bad in the past makes it allright for other countries to do it in the future.

By your logic that's exactly what you are saying.

You are saying that Adolf Hitler...an evil man...a man who called for the extermination of all Jews, Gays, Gypsies, etc....and obviously wasn't going to stop there...was an okay person...because these other countries did bad things.

Do you realise how asinine that sounds? The only thing that makes it worse is that Hitler's final solution overshadowed what these other countries did in the past.

Which, by the way, have worked a long way for trying to make up for their mistakes. Germany too.

It's our job to look at the past and remember it so nothing like this ever happens again.

Moron.

I get the feeling that this topic may fall by the wayside.