Be a Supporter!
Response to: Every one here hates me... Posted June 18th, 2007 in General

At 6/18/07 03:17 PM, Wyattfilms wrote:
: No 'dout about it... Im hated. For what I don't know...

Being hated on this site is a badge of honor.



Response to: Recomend me a good anime Posted June 12th, 2007 in General

banned?

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted May 5th, 2007 in Politics

At 5/3/07 05:18 AM, fli wrote:
: Tal Con--
: 
: Don't post at General. You're better off here.
: 
: A few weeks ago, I was having problems. Not about my depression although I've been depressed and have written about them ad naseum on Politics. It was a friend who started to scare me in such a way that I thought it was best to contact people. It was a "Just in case" situation and I knew that I was going to freak them out, but I said... Just in case. It was something that freaked me and I thought if something happened, then at least people knew.
: 
: It's still an ongoing issue, btw--


: 
: Do me the favor and visit a counselor. They can help even if it means just talking. Counselors have helped me in a huge way to handle mourning. There was a point in my life where a lot of my family kept on dying spontaneously.
: 
: PM somebody you think is a good listener and ask if they can hear you out. I think nearly everyone here is cool enough to be a person to at least listen to you.

Re: " ...a lot of my family kept on dying spontaneously."

Boo Fuckin' Hoo.

:-(

Don't worry, faggot, there are literally hundreds of thousands of filthy 
cockroaches crawling across the boarder to replace them.

Doesn't that make you feel better?

Flashless bitch.



Response to: question of the day #2 Posted March 5th, 2007 in General

How about this one?

If you can suck your own cock, does that make you a faggot?

The Peaceful Majority Posted February 11th, 2007 in Politics

by William Haynes

I used to know a man whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War Two. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.

"Very few people were true Nazis "he said," but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories."

We are told again and again by "experts" and "talking heads" that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace.

Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history.

It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard quantifiable fact is that the "peaceful majority" is the "silent majority" and it is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia comprised Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

The average Japanese individual prior to World War 2 was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And, who can forget Rwanda , which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were "peace loving"?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points:

Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awake one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

As for us who watch it all unfold; we must pay attention to the only group that counts; the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

Lastly, I wish to add: I sincerely think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or doubts the seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without paying heed to it, or sending it on, is part of the problem. Lets quit laughing at and forwarding the jokes and cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war against terror. They are trying to protect the interests and well being of the world and it's citizens. Best we support them.

William Haynes

Response to: Race and intelligence Posted September 26th, 2006 in Politics

The gap in intelligence between blacks and whites in Africa is wider than the American racial gap, yet blacks were not enslaved in Africa and colonialism, that began in the 19th century, ended after WW II.

Extensive economic investment in black Africa (I.E. Pissing taxpayers money away) has not been accompanied by economic growth, nor prevented Africa from reverting to pretechnological conditions (mud huts etc.).

OccamÕs razor, paring away multiple explanations of the economic failure of similar populations, implies that oppression is not a significant cause of the intelligence gap in the United States.

The major passage of time makes reference to slavery progressively less and less plausible. Slavery in the United states ended almost a hundred and fifty years ago, yet the attainment gap, while narrower than decades ago, has continued, while other mistreated populations, conspicuously Jews and Asians, have come a whole lot farther in a lot less time less time.

The Asian comparison is particularly telling since Asians, like blacks, are visually indentifiable, cannot be a factor distinguishing blacks from more successful (intelligent) ethic groups.

In a nutshell, the darker the skin color of a populous, the more backward and poverty stricken it will be.

Africa, Haiti, South America, etcetera.

You get the picture.

Have a nice day.

Source: Why race matters

P.S. Beaner doth protest too much, no?

Response to: Being gay is a mental disorder now. Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 02:39 PM, Doitzel wrote:
The fact that you're citing psychoanalysis as valid psychological theory

...not to mention revealing of your character.

Ho hum. Ad hominum attack.

You put down psychoanalysis, yet you try to psychoanalyze me--based on an internet post no less!

What a delicious irony!

Funny (intentionally).

is proof enough that your entire post ...is bullSHIT..

...SHITtiness of Freudian psychoanalytic theory.

I think someone may have a scatological fixation here.

No wonder you defend butt-slammers.

Hmmmm.

Happy 4th of July and God bless this great country of MINE.

Response to: I will probably get banned for this Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 02:44 PM, Centurion_Ryan wrote: You know..Genrally, where I am a kid with an I.Q. of 130(ish) is looked down upon.Not because of eveyone being smart, I think you can guess the real reason.If you can't...it's that if you're even the slightest bit smarter than average people hate you, for some reason.

Trust me--kid who does not know how to spell
nor create a coherent post--no one is going to hate
you for being smart.

Genrally speaking, that is.

Really.

I kid you not.

Response to: I will probably get banned for this Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

I learned that my IQ was between 147-184 (several different tests, one conducted by a psychologist), but I've learned not to brag about trivial shit like that which doesn't matter.

Wow! The American Heritage dictionary defines genius as any IQ over 140.

Stephen Hawking has a 144 IQ.

Between 147 and 184, Whaoa! That's quite a swing.

147!

Lowballing your I.Q., youre 6 points above genius.

Wow!

Oh, also, writing that you've learned not to brag about your IQ, yet mentioning it, is actually bragging about it, genius.

Get it?

Just thought you would like to know.

Response to: I will probably get banned for this Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 02:21 PM, x_Toadenalin_x wrote:
At 7/4/06 02:13 PM, Centurion_Ryan wrote: Also, my I.Q. is somewhere around the 130's.I can't remember exactly what it was.
Really? Did an online test tell you that, because they are baseless. An IQ of 130 puts you slightly under Stephen Hawking (144), but still in the top 0.05% of the population of the world (assuming Bell Curve devience, and all that jazz).

An I.Q. of 130 or above puts you in the top 2%.

(I'm a member of Mensa and you need an IQ of 130 or an SAT of above 1400 to become a member).

Not flaming. Just setting the facts straight.

(google it).

BTW, you're right, 144 IS in the top .05%

I'm a mere 139. In the top .25%. Check out the graphics and vioce work on my flashes.

Genius is 141.

Happy July 4th.

God bless America.

Response to: I will probably get banned for this Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 02:13 PM, Centurion_Ryan wrote: Also, my I.Q. is somewhere around the 130's.I can't remember exactly what it was.

If you were administered a test by a licensed psychologist
(takes about three hours), you'd know EXACTLY what your
intelligence quota was.

Somewhere around the 130s?

Sounds very scientific.

Nice try.

Hopefully mommy will be making you a nice bowl of mac
and cheese tonight, genius.

Somewhere around the 130s.

Funny!

Response to: I will probably get banned for this Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 02:11 PM, mikeysevilarmy wrote: most pedophiles are not homosexuals they are not attracted to men just children and its wrong to tell people they cant adopt chidlren and raise them in a better place than the orphanage.

Misleading.

Numerically, yes.

But given the (alleged) figure that ten percent of the population is homosexual.

A disproportionate amount of pedophiles are homosexuals.

This is a fact.

Response to: I will probably get banned for this Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 01:25 PM, Centurion_Ryan wrote: Yes I will....BUT THOSE SICK BASTARDS WE CALL THE GOVERNMENT HAVE DONE SOMETHING THAT DEFACES QUITE A FEW BIBLE VERSES!You know what they legalized?

ADOPTION FOR GAY COUPLES!(of **** I said it)!!WTF IS THE MATTER WITH THEM?!I SPIT on their stupid overpriced shoes!C'mon guys!Sure, for Iran trying to nuke Isreal was one thing, but this for Britain!?(and america I assume)This is just immoral, they have legalized marrige and adoption, what next!?WHAT NEXT!?Honestly...what next?

This is a plain outrage, Britain is becoming corrupt (americans gasp with excitement) but we still own americas ass(they grunt in anger).

P.S. Im gonna get banned, aren't I?Wait, I only said it once, did i not?

On February 7th 1994, the European Parliament, in Strasbourg,
voted a resolution assimilating the sexual orientation to a fact of birth,
like the color of skin or the gender, and asking for the total
recognition of homosexuality. It includes the right to marry and to
enjoy the same social advantage as heterosexual marriage, and the
right to be parent through artificial insemination or through adoption.

Such laws already exist in Denmark.

A study realized in France in 1993 reveals that 39% of homosexuals

have a desire of children (enquete ralise en Rhone-Alpes par 'Agence
franqaise de lutte contre le Sida, Le Quotidien du medecin, 21 decembre 1993).

This facts assures us that, unless the trend of laws favorable to homosexuality
is reversed, we will soon have many children raised in homosexual couples
and homosexual communities. Given the taste of many homosexuals for
pedophily* (NAMBLA is allowed to ÒmarchÓ in gay ÒprideÓ -isnÕt pride
one of the seven deadly sin?-parades?)

Tacit approval of pedophilia, we can fear the worst for our children.

The "Catholic Church" pedophilia scandal was actually a homosexual scandal.

Between 90 to 94 percent of child molestation cases were man on boy.

Now the faggots are advocating homosexual scoutmasters.

How convenient.

The degenerates wonÕt have to weed through adult males and females to get
to the young boys.

Talk about efficiency!

Maybe the homosexuals can do for the boy scouts what they've done for the church?

Then theyÕll denigrate the boy scouts as an institution.

Wait, they already do!

BTW, there is a fat ugly dyke with no flash on this site that contends the majority of
pedophiles are heterosexual.

Untrue.

Given that ten percent of the population is homosexual (A figure that has long
been proven to be inflated), the perpetrators of child molesters are
Disproportionately homosexual.

Fact.

Happy July fourth and God bless America.

Response to: Being gay is a mental disorder now. Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/4/06 11:59 AM, Hamslice wrote: What's the military's stance on bisexuals?

There's no such thing as a "bisexual".

Once you suck dick you're a faggot for life.

Response to: How American Are You? Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

At 7/2/06 11:47 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: Everyone knows a true American is judged by the kind of burger they eat. I shall list some basic gauges of how American you are, and you may feel free to flesh this out so that we have a complete list of Americana.

Raw/Rare - Truly American
Medium Rare - Midwest, Very American.
Medium - Pennsylvania, Oregon, Somewhat American.
Medium Well - New Jersey, Florida, American by boredom.
Well Done - New York, Hardly American
Vegan/Vegitarian - Fucking Terrorist

Now what about types of burgers?

The embodiment of New York is Manhattan.

Manhattan has more and better restaurants than any place in the country.

Especially steakhouses.

The original Palm, Smith and Wollensky, Sparks and the penultimate U.S.
steakhouse, Peter Lugers, to name a few.

Being a regular at said establishments, I can assure you, New Yorkers, of
which I am one, prefer their red meat rare (I.E.Òblack and blueÓ).

At most upscale restaurants in New York, the chopped beef of choice is
ÒSteak TartareÓ , which isnÕt cooked at all.

Steak Tartare, incidentally, is french.

Does that mean the french the most American of all?

Please.

Happy fourth of July and God bless America.

Response to: Being gay is a mental disorder now. Posted July 4th, 2006 in Politics

One of the great success of the homosexual movement has been won in 1974,
when the American Psychiatric Association voted homosexuality out of its list of
mental illnesses. It was the first time that a supposedly scientific decision
was made by vote.

This was the result of continuous arrasment of the APA by a group of homosexual
activists over many years. The story of this victory is told by Ronald Bayer, a sympathisant
himself to the homosexual movement, in Homosexuality and American Psychiatry :
The Politics of Diagnosis (New York, 1981).

Until 1970, the overwhelming majority of psychiatrists believe that homosexuality is a
mental illness. Some psychiatrists believed that it had physical causes, like many other
mental illnesses.

But most of them believed that it was caused by a deviation of the sexual orientation,
due to a defect in the psychosexual development. Psychoanalysts, more precisely,
always admitted that it was linked to a negative of deficient identification process during
early childhood, that is to the failure of the child to find his autonomy and to define his
gender identity, in relation with the parents.

Because of this, the homosexual movement accused psychiatry at large to be the -
instrument of oppression against them. They declared psychiatry the most dangerous
enemy of homosexuals in contemporary society ø.

They voiced wherever they could that psychiatrists' views were racists and repressive,
an accusation that the media were quick to support.

They began an intense action to discredit the psychiatrists in 1970, when the APA
held its annual convention in San Francisco. During a panel on transsexualism and
homosexuality, psychiatrists trying to discuss the subject were constantly disturbed
by a group of homosexual activists, who insulted anyone expressing a critical view
on homosexuality. Dr. Irwin Bieber, a specialist on the subject, was almost physically
attacked.

The meeting was adjourned.

The same strategy was repeated at the 1971 convention, when one leader of the
homosexual movement declared : Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination
against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you.

After much intimidation, the homosexual activists finally won the right to be represented
whenever homosexuality was discussed.

Finally, in 1974, they pressured the APA to remove homosexuality from its list of
mental disordersø. It was then proposed to call it a form of irregular sexual development.
The news was widely publicized in the headlines : Doctors Rule Homosexuals Not Abnormalø.
Some psychiatrists, however, appealed the decision and asked for a referendum on the
question by all members of the APA, which represented several thousands psychiatrists.

But the homosexual activists made an intense lobbying effort and wrote a letter to all members,
not in their name, but in the name of the APA, asking them to support the decision already
made by the APA, less it be discredited in the eyes of the public opinion.

They wan their battle, as the members of the APA confirmed the decision by
58% for and 40% against or abstaining.

It must be noted that psychiatrists are not necessarily psychologists, let alone psychoanalysts.
They are formed as medical doctors who consider someone sick only if this person complains of
some symptoms. If homosexuals claim to feel healthy, they have no reason to say otherwise.

But there is a category of psychiatrists who still believe, unanimously, that homosexuality is abnormal :
I mean psychoanalysts, who look at people from the inside and are able to find the unconscious
wounds which lie behind homosexual compulsion. There is virtuously no psychoanalyst who regards
homosexuality as healthy.

One last remark : the WHO (World Health Organisation) (OMS, Organisation mondiale de la Santâ)
has taken homosexuality off its list of diseases only since january 1st 1993.

Response to: genius check Posted February 27th, 2006 in General

I'm a member of mensa, does that count?

How can you download a SWF? Posted February 15th, 2006 in Game Development

Recently, I started working on the sequel to Ghetto Ghilligan's Island
and found that I had accidentally lost my original FLA file.

I'd rather not re-draw all the characters and backgrounds all over again.

So tell me, is there any way I can download the SWF file from this site?

BTW, whoever helps me out of this predicament will get a thank you
call out in the closing credits of said flash.

(The last one was a daily 4th place, so you know a lot of people will see it!)

Response to: Apology to african americans. Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 05:02 PM, SmilingAssasin wrote: At 11/17/05 05:00 PM, hermtheworm wrote:d thank you.

Can you explain the me how slavery erases the fact that africa has always been--and still is--the back backward continent on the planet?
Now i'm convinced that you really dont have a goddamn clue what youre talking about...... are you on crack?

Here are some facts that are meticulously footnoted.

The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren icefields. It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the telescope, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, computers, and millions of other technological miracles.

It has discovered countless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific progress, etc. Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, Graham Bell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Devinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers.

(Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA; Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the Black African Negro has invented nothing.

Not a written language, weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, a system of measurement, or even the wheel. (Note: This is in reference to the pure-blooded Negro.)

He is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or domesticated a single animal for his own use (although many powerful and docile beasts abounded around him.) His only known means of transporting goods was on the top of his hard burry head.

For shelter he never progressed beyond the common mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable.

(Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization, Noontide Press; Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

Response to: Conservatives, Liberals, History Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 04:35 PM, red_skunk wrote:
So in other words you've fallen off the wagon again?

Contributing award winning flash=Falling off the wagon.

Hmmmmm.

Am I missing something here?

Response to: Apology to african americans. Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 04:45 PM, RedScorpion wrote:
You forgot the hundreds upon hundreds of years of slavery and other atrocities.
Go read a history book, please and thank you.

Can you explain the me how slavery erases the fact that africa has always been--and still is--the back backward continent on the planet?

Response to: Apology to african americans. Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 04:38 PM, DirtySyko wrote:
Oh, and if you want to go on a rant about how we helped blacks,

It's not a “rant”. George Bush just authorized sinking 15 billion dollars into that hopeless shit hole.

If you made a nation comprised entirely of black Americans, it would be the 13th most prosperous nation on earth (google it).

What other nation on earth besides America are blacks so affluent?

That's not "ignorance" that's factual.

you might as well put in the part where white people enslaved them for 500 years before actually giving them a chance.

Fact, they were captured and sold to us by other blacks.

I'm not going to lock this, but if another mod wants to do it I don't mind. I don't see anything positive in this thread. Just racism and ignorance.

Ignorance? I can multi-source everything thing I referenced.

Can you tell me about the "positivity" of threads like "Is america evil?", "You can't argue with christians" etc., etc., etc.?

Response to: US and white phosphorus in Iraq? Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 04:32 PM, red_skunk wrote:
Hey Jew.

Good come back.

Lucid. Measured. Coherent.

“Red_skunk” and his ilk are known for their ad hominum attacks and anti-semitism (see above).

They are also known for their proclivity to advocate insane rambling conspiracy theorys.

Don’t just take my word for it, just reference “skunks” post to open this thread.

Or better yet check this out...

George Bush is a war criminal

Funny!

Apology to african americans. Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

Dear Most Noble and Honorable Kings and Queens,

We (white devils) deeply, humbly apologize. We apologize for not allowing you to continue on in your utopian society of cannibalism, voodoo, and mud huts.

We apologize for introducing you to the horrors of your first encounter with a written language, your first knowledge of any mechanical device whatsoever.

We apologize for laying upon you the burden of wearing clothes, and for introducing you to the concept of a woven cloth. We apologize for making you live in an orderly, civilized society, with laws and cooperation, rather than leaving you to enjoy the bliss of constantly fending for your lives against your headhunter/cannibal tribal enemies. We apologize for laying upon you the grief of having to endure intelligent medical practices and sanitation, and burdening you with extending your life expectancies beyond your thirties.

We apologize for putting upon you the horrible anguish of being exalted to “most favored race” status, where you are held to unbelievably low standards of performance and conduct and given
preferential treatment over more qualified individuals whenever you seek admission to college or employment. And we apologize for forcing you to go through the perplexity of constantly being portrayed as the “good guys” in movies and television, while we carefully avoid ever
saying the truth about how much violent crime you commit.

Response to: Conservatives, Liberals, History Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 04:12 PM, Monoceros wrote:
BTW, when are you going to submit anymore flash movies? You're a real funny guy.

Ghetto Ghilligans island II on or around Christmas.

Be there!

Response to: US and white phosphorus in Iraq? Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/16/05 05:01 PM, red_skunk wrote:
Some of you jackasses need to leave politics at the door.

He’s right.

When posting on a political forum, you must leave politics at the door.

(Methinks somone’s left common sense at the door).

Response to: Conservatives, Liberals, History Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/17/05 03:57 PM, Monoceros wrote:
At 11/17/05 03:30 PM, hermtheworm wrote:
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant.
I find it amusing that the GOP chose the elephant for its symbol. This is because the elephant is known to tramples all that stands in its way, and yet it cowers in terror over all the little things.

Contrary to popular belief, elephants are not afraid of mice.

Guess what else?

Yup, they like other food besides peanuts.

And this you may find the most difficult of all to believe: although they have large, floppy ears, elephants have never been known to fly (except in the animated movie, Dumbo).

Fancy that.

Conservatives, Liberals, History Posted November 17th, 2005 in Politics

Humans existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunter/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer & would go to the coast & live on fish & lobster in winter. The 2 most important events in all of history were the invention of beer
& the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization & together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into 2 distinct subgroups: Liberals & Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered it required grain & that was the beginning of agriculture.

Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early human ancestors were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking & killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as "the Conservative movement."

Other men who were weaker & less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's & doing the sewing, fetching & hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement. Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as 'girleymen.'

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy & group hugs & the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat & beer that conservatives provided.

Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, & French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood & group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't "fair" to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat & still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, Marines, athletes. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to "govern" the producers & decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tame & created a business of trying to get MORE for nothing.

Response to: Animal testing Posted July 16th, 2005 in Politics

At 7/16/05 03:34 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote:
At 7/16/05 03:20 PM, stevenherman wrote: If you have an open mind regarding my point of view, check out what happens to this Maus.
Thats kinda sick, and not really funny at all, and I am fairly opened minded and not an animal activist, but I do know that some people woudl find ths amusing.

It's just mother nature doing here thing, kiddo.

Consider it “Discovery Channel: Extreme”.

Whoa dude, sweet!

Peace out,

Herm

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted July 16th, 2005 in Politics

Ah, my good amigo, spanish fli, que pasta?

Previous photos of me are mucho inaccurate as they are mostly 3 years old or older.

Here's some pics of me from one month ago.

I really hope you like them.

oooxoxoxoxox,

Herm

P.S. You said that you loved licorice! And anise...

Was that a typo?

Didn't you mean licorice and anus?

Just trying to be helpful, honey.

I must be gay.

In fact, everything is gay.

Don't believe me?

Try this Link, twink.

You'll love this schlong.

Ahem...I mean song.

everything is gay (catchy tune)

- The Regulars Lounge Thread -