Be a Supporter!
Response to: Tattoos are retarded Posted June 17th, 2008 in General

original poster is correct

everyone else is either really foolish or just slightly confused for those who can construct english sentences logically.

Response to: How the fuck do you lose fat from Posted June 17th, 2008 in General

At 6/17/08 03:19 AM, RaharuHaruha wrote: No. All of these people are wrong. Bicep curls and play halo a lot.

you LIE

Response to: Sexiest Voice Ever Posted June 17th, 2008 in General

At 6/17/08 03:14 AM, KagomeHigurashi wrote: Wrong.
David Hayter's voice tops all when it comes to sexiness.

beat me to it

Response to: My friend is going to comitsuicide. Posted June 11th, 2008 in General

At 6/8/08 01:22 AM, ZeroNegative wrote: Jeez. That sucks. Well to cheer you up...
FULP FIGHT!

how about you fuck yourself off

Response to: "lil' bush" creator arrested. Posted June 11th, 2008 in General

What kind of idiot are you? who cares if you hate the series? You've ruined SMBZ forever! Now alvin can't put the REAL 7th episode on NG! delete this crap! If you don't, I'll call my lawer and he'll rip you to shreds and eat them with horse radish while I sneak onto your computer, delete it for you and laugh whil you're being eaten with the worst topping ever by a bloodthirsty lawer!!!

Response to: Jealously of iPhone 3G Posted June 9th, 2008 in General

At 6/9/08 05:58 PM, GiantDouche wrote: I am so PISSED that I bought my iPod touch and now a new one is coming out. I was just wondering what I am missing out on by just upgrading to 2.0 and not blowing another $250

haha look at you now you fucking idot

Jealously of iPhone 3G

Response to: Ewww hybrids Posted June 9th, 2008 in General

how about fuck you

Ewww hybrids

Response to: favorite ffx song??? Posted June 9th, 2008 in General

the song wehre shit hits the fan

Response to: Funny Advertisement on NG Posted June 9th, 2008 in General

gdam dam you're dim

Response to: If you were in an exam... Posted June 9th, 2008 in General

At 6/9/08 12:08 AM, 091 wrote:
At 6/9/08 12:04 AM, NeuronKiller wrote: I'm asian.

I don't need to study.
I'm American.

I DON'T study.

asian isnt a nationality you fucking priock

Response to: If you were in an exam... Posted June 9th, 2008 in General

suck my own dick

The basic faults of Runs Created Posted June 7th, 2008 in General

Runs created (RC) is a baseball statistic invented by Bill James to estimate the number of runs a hitter contributes to his team.

James explains in his book, The Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract, why he believes, runs created is an essential thing to measure:

"With regard to an offensive player, the first key question is how many runs have resulted from what he has done with the bat and on the basepaths. Willie McCovey hit .270 in his career, with 353 doubles, 46 triples, 521 home runs and 1,345 walks -- but his job was not to hit doubles, nor to hit singles, nor to hit triples, nor to draw walks or even hit home runs, but rather to put runs on the scoreboard. How many runs resulted from all of these things?"

Runs created is believed to be an accurate measure of an individual's offensive contribution because, when used on whole teams, the formula normally closely approximates how many runs the team actually scores. Even the basic version of runs created usually predicts a team's run total within a 5% margin of error. Other, more advanced versions are even more accurate.

Some critics point to the ecological fallacy when discussing the validity of runs created (or any run estimator, for that matter). Just because a formula does a good job of estimating team runs (so the argument goes), that does not mean it can be accurately applied to individual production. However, this may be a misuse of the ecological fallacy; while that fallacy does deal with incorrect assumptions being made about individuals based on group data, the actions it often applies to are purely individual in nature-voting distribution in a community is a common example. Since each person makes their choice independent of everyone else, voting data at the community level is a very different function than voting at the individual level. But run scoring is, by nature, a team process. And individual run creation is essentially the same function as team run scoring, except on a smaller scale, because all of things that make teams score runs (getting on base and driving runners in) are being done by individuals. So, because team runs and player runs created are essentially measuring the same thing, the ecological fallacy is generally seen as not applicable to run estimation formulas. However, the ecological fallacy aside, there are still other significant problems with runs created.

While even the simplest version of Runs Created estimates team runs with reasonable accuracy, the multiplicative (A*B)/C structure of the formula is fundamentally flawed when estimating the runs produced by each individual hitter, particularly in the case of hitters with extremely high on-base and slugging percentages. The reason for this is that it is impossible for a player to get on base and then drive himself in -- players' on-base and slugging averages must interact with those of their teammates. Yet RC's simple OBP*TB form assumes that a player's own slugging is interacting with his own on-base percentage, which artificially inflates RC for players who score well in both categories.

Take an example: in isolation, Ryan Howard's on-base percentage and slugging average each have a real, discrete effect on the Philadelphia Phillies' offense, but when combined they overstate Howard's contribution by treating it as though he is both driving in players with equal on-base ability as himself, and simultaneously being driven in by players with equal slugging ability as himself. This model would be appropriate with regard to a theoretical lineup of nine Ryan Howards, each of whose on-base and slugging abilities would interact in precisely this manner; however, Howard is in a lineup with players of lesser on-base and slugging abilities-his actual contribution to the Phillies in terms of runs is influenced by the fact that some of his on-base skills are being wasted by teammates who lack his slugging ability, and that some of his slugging skills are being wasted by teammates who lack his on-base ability. Therefore, Howard's RC production must be adjusted downward to reflect this reality.

This is generally not a major issue for most players, as their OBPs and SLGs are not high enough to significantly distort their Runs Created; however, superstars who put up impressive OBPs and SLGs will frequently see their RC artificially inflated by this phenomenon. In recent years, James has modified the Runs Created to correct this error, effectively placing a player in a lineup of average players, rather than assume that a player's own slugging is interacting with his own on-base percentage.

Runs created does not take into account the stadiums in which a player hits. Certain stadiums, such as Denver's Coors Field prior to the introduction of the baseball humidor, generally increase offensive production in games played there. Since each run scored in such stadiums is less valuable, the same number of runs created will translate into fewer wins in a stadium like Coors than it would elsewhere.

Runs created also does not take into account the era in which a player played. Due to various factors, some eras of baseball history have had lower or higher average levels of offensive production.

However, I personally love to know Runs Created.

Although the absolute most pertinent baseball statistic is LOBSPLTTO or left on base in score position with less than two outs. The lob splitto is the ultimate stat, Jamesian or not.

Response to: posting from my iPod touch!!! Posted April 29th, 2008 in General

At 4/27/08 07:04 PM, cr0mx wrote: im posting this from my ass

m,e t00

posting from my iPod touch!!!

Response to: So, I sold my WoW account Posted April 29th, 2008 in General

jesus fuck

Response to: So my friend wants to be a virgin.. Posted April 29th, 2008 in General

congrats on being 14 years old

Response to: MySQL 5 Upgrade! Posted April 29th, 2008 in NG News

FLASH ads

Response to: LAST star day? Posted April 27th, 2008 in General

IT REFRESHES the loins

Response to: Kitty Krew Revival Effort Posted April 27th, 2008 in General

WHY DNOT YOU JUST GO PLAY PATTY CAKE WITH Yer moOMS VAGIAN

Response to: If you could name a new console Posted February 17th, 2008 in General

the phantom gaming console

Response to: What's up with Cartoon Network? Posted February 17th, 2008 in General

howa bouta fucka you

Response to: how many assholes... Posted February 17th, 2008 in General

fcYKU OYU

Response to: Whered All These Depressed... Posted February 13th, 2008 in General

i confess, i admit, i'm impressed, when the tornado from the west crushes buildings i'm impressed

Response to: No More Heroes Posted February 11th, 2008 in General

travis touchdown could kick manhunt 2's pussy ass fucker whatever the fuck his shitbag name really is jesus fuck

Response to: No More Heroes Posted February 2nd, 2008 in General

travis touchdown is

Response to: Best Wiki Edit Ever Posted February 2nd, 2008 in General

NO the best wiki edit is the page for "the philadelpiha project" once described the philadelphia project as being a "secret apple" fuck you

Response to: Your Not Hot/Sexy Posted February 2nd, 2008 in General

king kong is pretty rad

Response to: I Am So Sexy Posted February 2nd, 2008 in General

fucking fucking fuck you all ok

Response to: Westboro Is At It again Posted January 24th, 2008 in General

freddy phelps

Response to: I'm so fucking mad right now!!! Posted January 24th, 2008 in General

since when has this website had a time limit

Response to: Im watching CloverField as we speak Posted January 24th, 2008 in General

thanks for the update