Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/15/07 01:58 AM, Memorize wrote: I don't think he cut off his mic though.

no, no mic cut, but i don't think Geraldo was able to get a word in at all after he got started. he just seems to have a tendency to overreact. i've seen plenty of polar opposites argue without shouting matches and silencing. i mean Ted Haggard and Richard Dawkins didn't attack each other during that little interview.

how is this such a bitch fest? Canada bought a few planes to fulfill the limited needs of its comparativly small army.

At 8/15/07 12:40 AM, animehater wrote: You mean the legendary Geraldo Rivera?

ya there you go.

At 8/14/07 01:34 AM, LordJaric wrote: Yeah because they are being put into a state of depression because of all the people who treat them like shit and a disease.

ummm, i don't know if you realised this but your statement is absolutley incomprehensible.

At 8/15/07 12:15 AM, Memorize wrote: That guy and some anti-war lady who was pushing to stop funding the troops to end the war.

that would be the mic cut lady, did the guy have a moustache? because he may be the one that got O'Reilly shouting like mad. bah, it just makes him look relatively insane.

At 8/14/07 02:53 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: The reason god always looks like a big man with a white beard is because the Christian God's image is based on the most powerfull of the gods in the roman pagan patheon; Zeus.

the most powerful god of the Roman pantheon was Jupiter Optimus Maximus; Zeus was the Greek one of him.

fun to know.

At 8/14/07 01:35 AM, Ravariel wrote: Those (incorrect) drawings are still often used in high school textbooks despite the controversy.

bope, don't recognise them and the books i had seemed relatively old.
other question, Memorize made mention of the little change in earth age in text books but i don't recall any studies hinting at a (significantly) different age.

nothing personal, just trying to figure out if i missed something.

At 8/14/07 01:22 AM, Memorize wrote: Highly exaggerated.

no exaggerated, just from limited viewings of his interactions with people. entertaining to say the least.

even if what i saw were flukes, it was absolutley ridiculous.

At 8/12/07 03:44 PM, Over-Load wrote: That's illogical. Homosexuality is a choice. People can go from liking the same sex to the opposite.

or they feel so pressured by social norms that they create the illusion of being heterosexual until they can bare the lie no longer.
hell of a choice there.

At 8/14/07 01:09 AM, Memorize wrote: Oh wait... he's practically the only person who contacts people who disagree with him onto his show... ah ha!

and talks extremely loudly making it impossible for them to say anything, and when that fails, he cuts off their mic.

why is he so angry?

At 8/14/07 12:04 AM, animehater wrote: Holy shit. He should start a vigilante militia or something.

clone Bill and have them assault people with incessant shoutng.

i missed out on that embryo bit, link to explanation anyone?

At 8/12/07 02:51 AM, troubles1 wrote: I did not imply it either, read my post.

sorry, i was somehow convinced Mohammed hiding behind a baby carriage meant something.

i think i can sum up this entire thread in very few words: "once again (insert name here) has ignored what i said".

At 8/13/07 01:18 AM, fli wrote:

At 8/12/07 11:00 PM, fli wrote: You decide if this is a good simpsonized version of me...

Why wait? I want to see Simpson versions of everyone...

a friend did this one for me. why are my Simpsons ears so big?

At 8/13/07 12:26 AM, Memorize wrote: That's great. It's like saying if I cut off my leg, I won't get athlete's foot."

a more appropriate comparison would probably have been between amputation and gangrene, but eh, i'm not the one giving a lecture about things that have very little to do with evolution.

At 8/12/07 09:40 PM, ProBo wrote: For those of you who think the theory of evelution is soild and definte... It was just changed...

really? elaborate.

Why are people so closed to other explinations besides science? What happens if science fails?

anyone who believes that everything science claims at the moment must be correct, and feels dismayed when things are corrected is a fool. science cannot fail because it is meant to change and correct itself. corrections to currently held beliefs are the entire purpose of the sciences and what we knw will continually change. religion, and religion masquerading as science (intelligent design) is incapable of change and self-correction.

though religion on its own has a different purpose from that of science.

At 8/12/07 05:40 PM, Memorize wrote: Click "Documentary" and you'll see: 100 reasons why evolution is stupid.

Christ all mighty, it's fucking Kent Hovind.

"we've never seen a dog give birth to a non-dog" Dr. Hovind.

theres a camp monitor (it sounds so much better in French because theres a female form of everything) who has the hots for me but i hardly ever work at the pool when the camps come.
the gods are evil motherfuckers.

where? Italy.
why? Rome, baby!

Denmark is making claims too, Canada should stand a chance against them at least.

and for the beaver powered boilers to prepare the maple syrup flood guns.

no for the love of all fucking hell, stop making threads about fucking communism. there are already half a dozen communism related god damned threads on the first fucking page of the politics forum. what in the hell is wrong with you fucking people? why aren't you getting banned for making redundant and stupid threads? you useless fucking hacks, go use the search bar or find something better to do with your pitiful lives.

aw fuck, you already answered my question. damn you Cellar!

in the 80s we were supposed to design and build the biggest ice breaker ever but, as we all know, that didn't happen.

At 8/10/07 07:48 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Haha how cute.

Canada PM asserts Arctic claims

would you rather those damn commies take it and set up super secret subarctic bases? you'll thank us when one of your allies has a monopoly on ice and not those bloody rooskies!

At 8/10/07 02:16 AM, Memorize wrote: It is purely because of that 1 statement that I chose not to take any of it seriously.

and not because the title has both the words "marijuana" and "conspiracy"?

At 8/10/07 12:19 AM, Joe67 wrote: After all the U.S is the only place that I can vent my anger, and I don't want that to change.

actually you can vent your anger freely in just about any first world country.

At 8/10/07 12:22 AM, onefingersalute1 wrote: bet you all 50 bucks that if a muslim channel said things like that the feds wouldbe all over them in a heart beat

what was said isn't something that would fall outside of the law.

At 8/10/07 12:03 AM, troubles1 wrote: And when did I say all Muslims are evil?

it doesn't have o be stated for it to be implied.

At 8/9/07 11:40 PM, Imperator wrote: I'm still playing Rome: Total War.....

But I'm such a Classics nerd that I downloaded and play the mod version; Rome: Total Realism instead.....

who said i was drooling damnit?!