Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

so if the moon goblins are invisible, it is impossible for them to be blue. therefore there are no blue goblins on the moon.

At 9/7/07 05:17 AM, EndGameOmega wrote: This contradict your global flood on at lest two levels, one, 1000 to 10000 bredding pairs, rather then the seven mentiond in the bible; two, it was not a flood.

and three, it doesn't fit the appropriate date.

damn breasteses.

speaking of which, as a sun god, shouldn't i be surrounded by the breasteses of countless vestal virgins?

someone lied to me!

Khancccp posted that not long ago...don't make me get paranoid.

his replies are fucking brilliant.

At 9/6/07 10:41 PM, SevenSeize wrote: I can't ban people for what they write on their userpages.

nuts.

At 9/6/07 10:15 PM, SevenSeize wrote: LOLOLOLOLOL

I have a fan! <3

ooo, ooo, please get rid of him. pretty please?

turn your modship into a dictatorship!

At 9/6/07 10:05 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Superiority is arbitrary to individaul or a complete joke topic.

well considering the topic starter shows little knowledge of genetics, politics, war and the implications of nuclear warfare i would say either joke topic or simply ignorant.

topic starter is 13, which do you think it is?

At 9/6/07 09:22 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: That's a bit like asking "Would Hitler run over a puppy out of spite"?

Hitler loved animals, especially dogs, so i doubt he would. now a Jewish baby, thats a different story.

At 9/6/07 05:47 PM, GaiusIuliusTaberna wrote: Come on! That was the only global flood! So it explains the global flood myth I doubt highly that such a traumatic event would leave no historical record even if it is distorted by religion.

what i said was that there were multiple large floods at different times and different places.

just wanted to make sure it didn't seem as though i was arguing for the global flood.

and now blaster, provide us with a link to your supposed study. what you wrote has very little information upon which a flood assumption could be made.

At 9/6/07 08:14 PM, kahncccp wrote: Need I say More?

no, in fact it would be appreciated if you never say a thing again.

At 9/6/07 04:39 PM, GaiusIuliusTaberna wrote: Also I have a theory on the flood myth

i can simplify it for you:
people live all over the world. most areas of the world are succeptible to flooding. every once in a while massive flooding happens. bingo! a particular society's flood myth is born!

repeat at other time and other place to continue.

At 9/6/07 04:30 PM, kahncccp wrote: Hitler made lampshades out of people, burned them alive, made them into soap, and made them EAT their own dead. So never never compare this fuck to Stalin.

so i guess its quality versus quantity here.

At 9/5/07 11:52 PM, BlasterMaster555 wrote: The flood wasn't just It was a sudden and torrential downpour of the entire water canopy, as well as the simultaneous release of underground aquifers.

thats what was tested.

i'm sorry to say, but 40 days and forty nights to cover a planet in deep water is in fact "*snap fingers* WATER!! OMG!! AAAA!!!".

There is a lot of water vapor in the air even today.

hardly enough to cover a planet. not to mention that there is no proof for any of these underground aquifers or floating ice/water sheets as some suggest.

sort of why i figured being naked with a pitchfork (at least) wouldn't be to far-fetched.

don't forget what happens to those who turn back!

At 9/5/07 07:52 PM, poxpower wrote: haha

DESTROYED.

i tried explaining to him the idea of human cultivation but i guess some people don't get it without a picture.

think he got it?

At 9/5/07 07:58 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Would they have stormed Berlin naked, starving, armed with pitchforks and rocks?

considering Stalin and his policies, something like that actually seems plausible.

At 9/5/07 07:29 PM, Kajenx wrote: Excuse me, the banana was created by God to tempt homosexuals.

i was sort of thinking that after i watched it. if God created it so perfectly then why is it also absolutley perfect for other uses.

i may have backed myself into a corner of awkward. fuck you all.

At 9/5/07 05:11 PM, Dsmano wrote: 1. Just because its a Youtube video, doesn't lower my level of intelligence. Unless your just arrogant or something.

after all, there are such brilliant things on youtube.

*cough*loosechange*cough*

At 9/5/07 05:34 PM, Imperator wrote: I'd say yes, a body requires a soul to live. But that raises the questions of animals. We've already cloned sheep, so either they don't have souls, they don't exist, or we inadvertently found a way to create souls, meaning we've killed God.

i'm torn between the non-existing sheep and the killing of God. such good answers.

Scientist: "this is dolly, the first cloned sheep"
Lay Person: "no its not; theres nothing there"
Scientist: "by Jove! you're right!"

there is something satisfying about destroying perfection.

we already have enough communism related threads; please go burn in hell.

At 9/5/07 04:48 PM, Dsmano wrote: Please watch this.

I find this to be a good enough answer for my standards.

too bad that that banana is only one of many hundred cultivars (i don't know the exact word, but its one type out of many). not only that but bananas have been selectively grown and cultivated, so no hand of God there, only the hand of man. (natural selection doesn't even come to effect in this situation)

At 9/5/07 01:50 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: Yes, but they are quite similar, I think it was around 85%. The same happens with Portuguese, I as a Spanish speaker, can and have read books in Portuguese. Listening is more difficult, though.

i heard soem Portugese during a soccer game on TV and i was almost convinced it was Chinese.

skeptical "on" atheism, and yet this thread is about creationism. i never realised all those religious people who know religion isn't science are atheists too.

anyways, Tony, though Italain and Spanish may sound the same and share many similarities they are not the same language.

At 9/5/07 02:43 AM, Ravariel wrote: Did it also happen to say why he erased all physical evidence of such a flood? Or where all the water came from/went to? Or is this the realm of "god magic" and we're just not to question silly little inconsistencies like this?

the best part is that the energy released by such a massive and sudden "appearence" of watter would cause that water to turn to super-heated steam.

the Greeks were fun.

"it's more appropriate to love another man as women are below men, you just can't go sneaking things in"

and the always entertaining;
Spartan: "psh sodomy is for pansies like the Athenians!"
Athenian: "only Spartans enjoy the back passage!"

At 9/4/07 11:08 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Which one is your favorite?

haven't read any yet, and since i can, i want to read them in Italian.

thanks for clearing up Tony's "watch/read" confusion. anyone want to explain the Italian/Spanish part ot him? i just can't do it.

why is it so bloody hard to find an Italian copy of Dante's The Divine Comedy?

i keep finding Spanish copies.

At 9/4/07 01:20 AM, Imperator wrote:

At 9/3/07 10:14 PM, SolInvictus wrote:

...

All of which is reliant on the idea that souls exist.

the problem is that its difficult discussing the soul if we simply say "it doesn't exist", so in the spirit (...pun...) of this discussion, let us for the sake of argument, assume the soul exists.

If the soul is eternal and no creator is needed, then will we ever be able to clone humans?

does a body require a sould to live? if not, would there be any qualms in using our clones to harvest organs and as slave labour?