4,747 Forum Posts by "Slizor"
Yes, let's shield children from reality. That way when they grow up they're totally prepared for adult life.Dont you mean unprepared?
its a thing called "sarcasm"
Keeping people from telling you something isn't always a bad thing, and shouldn't be unconstitutional like you say. However, I agree to non-censorship. I want to see things for how they really are: the way Holleywood executives want us to.
I really cannot tell if I spelled Holleywood right or not. It looks wrong with an 'e'. Oh well.
Thats utter bollocks(no offence) but Hollywood wants us to see a kind of "super-reality" in which one man can beat up hundreds of people, actually I doubt anything really relates to the audience apart from violence
She may not do it on the American one but normally at the end she winks, it is the most pathetic wink ever!!!
Now it is one thing to rip a tv show format from britain, but to rip that and use the host as well!?!?!?!
At 4/22/01 09:19 PM, traekwon wrote:At 4/22/01 09:11 PM, ray1912 wrote: In the past couple weeks in April, I've been getting lots of smiles from cute and fine girls, who are either blonde or brown hair with tanned or pale skin at my college and at parties. Not bragging or anything. Ever had a total stranger smile at you?No, but I get many purse-clutchings, and women moving to the opposite side of the street.. I deal.
I get both(purse-clutching, smiles), man i'm lucky.
There are two communist ideals: Marxist and Lenin. Marxist Communism is that everyone works for what they earn. No inheritance, any money left over from anything that was done goes to the state. Lenin knew this was flawed, because humans are naturally greedy. So, he introduced the totalitarianist state and introduced corporations into Russia run by the state. That's why members of the communist party are looked on as rich in the former soviet union and everyone else was just . . . there. Do I believe that you should be paid to your ability? Yep. Do I believe that everyone should be paid the same regardless of their jobs? No. Some jobs simply require more money as compensation. For example: Bill Gates is Chairman and Chief Software Architect for Microsoft. He does a shitload more than I do at Best Buy, so he deserves more money. Communist Russia said 'nope, you're all getting paid the same'. So, those who worked 8 hours straight got paid the same as those working in the concession stand waiting for customers.
That is actually utter bollocks. Marx never set up a communist bloc he only gave ideals. Lenin tried to emulate it into a bloc as best he could. It is quite evident that human nature is not greedy, since some people arn't greedy and they are humans! The thing is that in a communist system it is fair since the state pays for people to go on to higher education and who pays for the state? The workers. So they may do a more complicated job but without the workers they wouldn't be able to do it.
This is why communism doesn't and will never work. And if the guy below would read this, I think it'll clear up anything else.
That is utter propoganda bullshit. The reason communist didn't work in russia is that it is a mainly rural area and its fucking massive!
At 4/22/01 08:17 PM, Ethan_Hawk wrote: As I can see , many of you feel that you have been cheated during election 2000 . Now since Bush is in office , all this dirt is rising up on him , but what about Gore . He talks about how he wants a clean environment , but there is always two sides to a story . Al Gore authorized a mining company to get some money to mine his property , recking the environment .
That's an exaggeration, wrecking the enviroment.
Another famous statement is "I invented the internet." B.S. ,it is the working man who invented the internet.
I don't know or care if he made the internet but it definatly wasn't the working man, since he didn't have a computer.
Lets not make light of how Al Gore came out of a wealthy environment . First of all his pappy was into politics , and you don't go to Harvard on nickles and dimes.
Your point? G.W.B.'s dad was fucking president!
Just remember ,ther're three sides to a story , One person's side , the other person's side , and the truth .
Actually the "truth" may not exist at all.
Getting to the popular and electoral votes . Do you realize that if there was just to be a popular vote , the whole U.S. would not be equally represented . Cities would control every election , and that is not the whole U.S. It is the gamble of running for office dealing with the electoral college
Yes but PEOPLE would be equally represented
What you people fail to look at is the other side of the coin . What do you think would of happened if Gore took office ? It would be the same crap , just vice versa .
You can't prove that
I'm not actually a Gore supporter but the stuff i said is true
ps Don't start another thread for it!
pps You only need to space a full stop once
At 2/23/01 11:47 AM, Freakapotimus wrote:At 2/22/01 10:27 PM, P-Chan wrote:Hmmm... I wonder when that little bugger is going to make an appearance.At 2/22/01 04:04 PM, adambomb wrote: one time i went too the zoo and a monkey peed on meActually, you kinda remind me of Bugger_99.
Oi! God damn my poor reading skills, I'm no little bugger!
And how exactly does he remind you of me?!?!?
Look TFX either present us with some evidence that people who are rich work harder than everyone else or bugger off
Well I'll just add to this because it touched on a communist subject :)
6) The tax cuts are his attempt to get popular support. And if anyone would look at the tax cuts, the rich people are screwing over the poor. It's extremely unfair. I can't believe you fell for it. Basically, he's paying you to like him.A wise man said (myself) that 'On the way to being the richest man in the world, you must first become the poorest.' The Rich are Rich because they WORKED FOR IT. Any one of us could work our asses off to get rich like Bill Gates, but we instead waste our time on who's rich and who isn't. If you want to get rich, get off your lazy ass and invent something that will appeal to the masses. Bill Gates didn't get rich by sitting in an office for 25 years and hitting 'destroy' on Microsoft's Monopolization Tour.
Ok so maybe I do quote myself but at least my quotes are right. So if we inherit money, buy some stock with it and become rich you have worked harder than someone who has worked for $0.08 a hour for 16 hours a day for a year?
Its time to go communist on your nationlist asses.
First off, calling Bush a dumbass because he stutters with words is arrogant and incredibly stupid and that's the only reason why people think he's an idiot. I'd love for ANY of these opponents to be able to stand up in front of _millions_ of people and try not to make any mistakes (and if you do, we all call you a dumbass).
It'sn't(new word!!) because he stutters it's because he doesn't know the meaning of words and says the stupidest things.
"It's not pollution thats harming the earth, its the impurities in the air and water"
Secondly W. did _not_ rig the election. At final count, Bush had won Florida, but the state required a recount. After the recount came back and Bush still won, Al Gore wanted yet another recount. Recount numbers came back and Bush still won. Then he wanted them to count dimpled chads (I believe that if you can't remove the entire chad from a ballot then your vote is worth shit anyway and you should go back to kindergarten) to be counted. Gore was trying to rig the election, he cut every damned corner trying to get as many votes as possible, but his legal efforts were deemed unconstitutional (the greedy dumbass) and he LOST.
You seem not to be able to understand democracy it's about everyones vote counting for the same, of course anyone who supports the republican party mustn't be able to understand simple things since they follow their leader.
Fourth, Bush is for big business. Hell yeah. If you don't think so, remove every logo from every single piece of clothing (shoes, shirts, everything) and say you're against big business. What operating system are you using? What was that? Windows? From that Microsoft corporation? That slice of Big Business??? Shame!
Being against big buisness and trying to operate without big buisness with big buisness's around is actually quite different, but yet again republican minds
Fifth, 53% of tax-cuts for the wealthiest 1%: deservedly so. Rich people, despite what you may think, don't go buy a new car with every influx of cash they receive. All this shit about 'they can buy a Lexus and Joe Citizen can only buy a muffler' is all flying crap! Rich people pay for 7 Lexuses each year (and with returns, invest it) and Joe Citizen pays for about 5 mufflers every year (speaking in averages). Is that really fair as it stands? Some argue 'But they have a lot of money, they don't need it!' That's stupid, to say the least. Rich People made and are heads of the economy. Without the rich entrepreneur and his rich business of mass production, we'd all still be hand-stitching our own clothes, creating our own computer code . . . or even worse, we wouldn't have computers at all. We call that communism, kids.
How fucking stupid are you?
Do rich people make clothes? Do they actually physically make them? Or do they make the machines that make them? No you dumbass. And before you go around mislabeling things find out what the words mean.
Do you think Jesus was kinda taking the piss when he said that he was the son of god?
I mean according to the bible we are all the son and daughters of god.
Face it, everyone holds racists/prejudice beliefs, regardless of what race you are. Some are not open and some show it blantly. I am strongly against Affirmative Action, even though I am Korean-American. Affirmative Action will not solve the problem, but only give the preferred an incentive not to work hard and succeed. AA is a form of "feel good" policy. As for oppression, every race has faced oppression in history, Asian, Black, White, and Hispanic. Just to trickle down, we are all the same.
Now that kind of attitude is what segregates communities and is probably the cause of most racial tension
The US invests a large amount of money on their military.
They fully intend to protect their own international interests.
In order to protect their international interests they must keep tabs on everyone in the world.
Whether this is morally right or wrong is a different issue. Whether this is a form of indirect oppression from the so-called "free world" is another argument.
I support it because if the US intends to keep their dominance and if keeping an "enemy" will justify their military expenditure, it is logical to make sure they know what they're dealing with to minimize losses, react more effectively etc.
I would not and do not support military intervention if China invaded Taiwan but I think it is important to know what is happening in all parts of the world- not keeping an eye on your neighbours seems foolish to me- even more foolish if you country has the resources to do so and does not.
So basically what your saying is that it is right because it is good for the american people?
How do you not think its good?
It means when they are in church they are concentrated so one tiny little explosion could kill alot of em
I would just like to add that they ain't fucking nazi's!!! Nazi=National Socialist it's alot different from a plain nationalist.
Its actually abit of a paradox, if you want people to spread out(instead of being in their own little racial community) you have to convince them that the place they're moving to isn't racist, to convince them of that they need to see that its not segragated(or split up in to their own racial community)
4) I fully support reconnaissance missions on China.
But if complications occur, no one should bitch. It's part of the job.
You support it?!?! Why exactly do you support it?
It's all boys with their toys.
That is possibly the campest thing I have ever heard out of you, or on this bbs
People voted for it. That's democracy. End of story.
People stupid, people vote, democracy stupid
Looks like the CIA where just being lazy.
Dao qian
Chinese for "I stole your bicycle, sorry"
buggerall99.com?
fuckmegran.com?
reallylarge.org?
oldgrounds.com?
com.com?
Ihatefucking.com?
mos already said my whole thing about "america is not a democracy" but let me add that I am thankfull that it is not, too many people are morons to give that much power to them, too bad that the people chosen to represent the people in the United States tend to be morons themselves...
OK so let me get this right, the people are morons and the candiates are morons, isn't that kinda moronic?
Here is an e-mail I got:(It took me fucking ages to find!)
>> >> If we could shrink the earth's population to a village of precisely
>> >> 100
>> >> people, with all the existing human ratios remaining the same, it
>> >> would look something like the following:
>> >>
>> >> There would be:
>> >>
>> >> 57 Asians
>> >> 21 Europeans
>> >> 14 from the Western Hemisphere, both north and south
>> >> 8 Africans
>> >>
>> >> 52 would be female
>> >> 48 would be male
>> >>
>> >> 70 would be non-white
>> >> 30 would be white
>> >>
>> >> 70 would be non-Christian
>> >> 30 would be Christian
>> >>
>> >> 89 would be heterosexual
>> >> 11 would be homosexual
>> >>
>> >> 6 people would possess 59% of the entire world's wealth
>> >> and all 6 would be from the United States.
>> >>
>> >> 80 would live in substandard housing
>> >> 70 would be unable to read
>> >> 50 would suffer from malnutrition
>> >> 1 would be near death; 1 would be near birth
>> >> 1 (yes, only 1) would have a college education
>> >> 1 would own a computer
Now of those six americans how many do you thik are black?
I am not going to even reply to this crap, beyond this sentence, anyway.
By writing the next thing yu replied to it dumbass. ANyway why arn't you gonna reply? Too much for you?
Enjoy your FIFTY PRECENT tax! Of course, the Canadian government can tax as much as they want. What can a bunch of unarmed (Gun bans suck) Canadians do against "The Man?"
Ahh now if Mos had the slightest bit of intelligence it would be nice to argue with him, but since he is an american media bugger-boy I'm not even going to try.
Question: Did they shoot them down?
Question: Did they make them land?
I'm talking about the olympics dumbass
I don't know, but it's a huge number. It doesn't matter though. In Japan, guns are strictly illegal, but the number of homocides is about the same as here. They use knives instead. People will always kill other people, regardless of the tool.
Ok since I'm not even gonna pretend I have any facts to back one arguement up, I'll use another. Now what is more likely to kill you a man with a gun, who is 10 meters away, or a man with a knife that is 5 meters away?
I'm assuming you're from Britain since you spell "realize" with an 's'. I don't know how this affects your view on guns. I'm an American.
Very good! I would also like to point out not many Americans use the word "Bugger". Anyway nationality has nothing to do with it, unless of course your media-washed.(Actually that would even be nationality, it would be where you live)
How many people are shot everyday by people who own guns?
