Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Well considering that is extremely stressful on the body, and more so when younger, it's not just morals it has a medical basis too.

At 6/12/06 02:46 PM, SirLebowski wrote: All of those with the exception of number 6 are illogical,

Make that Number 5, sorry. Aliens suck ass.

All of those with the exception of number 6 are illogical, as the human race has survived worse than the Bird Flu, more manical people than Bush and Osama Bin Laden.

We have evolved into thriving little things haven't we?

Of course, when the Sun expands, which it will, the entire Earth will be blown to oblivion, and unless we have space colonies in other Galaxies, you would be hard pressed to exist after your engulfed in a giant star.

At 6/12/06 09:57 AM, BigBlueBalls wrote: If I tapped my neighbours phone AND I was caught... should I be arrested for invasion of privacy? Why should it be against the law at all to spy on my neighbours because if they got nothing to hide... they got nothing to fear right? If I should be arrested for invading someone's privacy, then why should government officials be allowed to do the exact same thing, without a warrent?

I don't agree with the wiretapping without a warrent bit, and it's an unwanted little power struggle by the administration. However, your example is flawed because YOU are a citizen not charged with the duty of protecting citizens or gathering intelligence, while a government official may very well be. Though in all but some of the strangest events they should have a warrant.

At 6/12/06 02:26 PM, MeSmashie wrote: No, communism can NOT work; if you actually knew what you were talking about you would realize that. For communism to work everyone would need to be lobotomized for it requires mindless servitude from everyone.

Did you even read the thread? Or see the title and want to throw your opinion in without giving consideration to say, reading the content?

The forum has been stuck on why Communism can and cannot work, and what it comes down to is people for it say it can work but countries just don't implement TRUE Communism. And those opposed say it only works on paper and the realistic form of communism would cripple the country in various aspects.

Beyond that, I cannot say much because I don't feel like researching indepth on Communism so untill I find time enough to take an unbias look at it all, I like being an ignorant bastard. =)

Both parties change views all the time. About 60 years ago, Democrats had almost the exact same platform as Republicans today. It's always changing.

So no party has ever always represented one issue in the same throughout history.

I am pretty sure British government was screwing us in some way or another. That isn't to say were weren't dishonorable little rebels, but, you don't just cause a revolution for no reason whatsoever.

China culturally, very intresting. =)

China government wise, not so much. Like said before, it is hard to keep a country running smooth with over a billion people.

I would just like a president to be in the middle on everything. Not to the left or right of any issue, and to actually give both sides a chance instead of siding with your party on all your ideals.

I know not everyone can agree with everything one party stands for.

It seems like it is always one extreme or the other with the parties.

At 6/11/06 06:34 AM, Laduguer_Fisto wrote: This is huge in Canada as it's the first time in a while we've had any terrorist activities going on.

That is because America steals your thunder. We get all the REAL terrorist. You have pseudo-terrorists.

At 6/12/06 12:55 AM, VigilanteNighthawk wrote: I think there are a few things that compel conspiracy theorists.

1) Helps people to make sense out of bad things. It is hard to accept that bad things can just happen. Instead, by making a clandestine group responsible, it makes it seem like bad things are controllalbe and thus preventable.

2) Similar to 1). Knowledge is power. By knowing about the group, you have more power than someone who doesn't. The big bad can't hurt you as badly if you can see it coming.

I like those two thoughts. The making sense out of something bad was what I was trying to explain, as well.

At 6/12/06 12:44 AM, afterdeath wrote: It also pissed off a bunch of brits because about 30 years ago two other authors wrote a detailed analysis of various supernatural things that they believed pointed to the holy grail being the blood line of christ, and they think Dan Brown is copying them.

I think that plagerism case was nonsense. The Grail Bloodline thing is a common theory, and they didn't create the idea or theory, just wrote about it. Dan Brown wasn't even taking it in the same context as the where, he turned it into a dull mystery fiction where everybody they met had guns and wanted to shoot them.

I think the reason people are so willing to believe in theories that chalk up national tragedy to secret organisations and powerful Satanic Devil Jews because of the following reasons:

A) The theory often blames a group of rich men or corporations that put their own money before human lives.

The truth is many big corporations are more than willing to rape you of free-will and spirit. But only to an extent of what the government and loopholes will let them.

B) Giving an explination for the unexplainable.

Wouldn't it be nice to think it wasn't just some crazy guy with a gun that ended one some of the most iconic presidents of are nation. (Though I doubt so many people would have enjoyed Kennedy if he wasn't shot so early in presidency)

What do you think compels conspiracy theory?

I don't even really know how to reply to a conspiracy theory, but you would think if you were so willing to believe the insane theories of internet crackpots out there, you would believe the insane theories of the internet crackpots right here.

So yeah, do what all those before me said. Don't be such a swayful dipshit.

At 6/10/06 09:16 AM, bang_hammer wrote: I mean the war in Iraq BTW....doya think Bush talked Blair into it, or is he just stupid? Tell me what you think

Let me tell you first off, Bush isn't a very persuasive guy. So I think it may just be the stupid. Then agian, we toppled the regime of a considerably big asshole. Genoside, anyone?

At 6/11/06 10:27 PM, Hybrid-Of-Souls wrote: I've heard of people on the news who have more than one spouse. I know it's illegal, but why is that? I never really understood.

No clue, but I would think the complexity of having more than one spouse would enough for the government to say FXXK it and make it illegal out of spite.

I just don't like Macs because of the new commericals. That and compatibility most likely sucks, but I've always owned a PC so I should shut up.

Christians don't even know what the protest. A few do, but the majority just protest it cause a few groups said it's anti-religious.

At 6/12/06 12:17 AM, Hunter-X wrote: No one has mentioned yet An Inconvenient Truth, the recent documentary film about global warming, starring former vice-president Al Gore. Any comments?

Yes, I think Jon Stewart put it best when he called it the highest grossing Powerpoint presentation of all time. Boring.

Of course Global Warming exists. Well, either Global Warming or Global Freezing. You can't pump crap into the atmosphere without one negative effect or the other. So while Global Warming may not exist, the problems that are suppose to cause it do.

Besides, Global Freezing sounds more fun anyway.

Reading those reasons, it seems to me you believe every crackpot death theory the internet threw your way.

All races are uncivilized, we are all big retarded monkies with computers. =) That sounds more like it.

I really doubt it. You have to remember that the thing that probably led to Zarqawi's demise was his high profile and disagreements within Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaeda in Iraq. What will happen now is that the insurgency in Iraq will fracture in local cells, much in the same affect that happened when bin Laden lost his base in Afghanistan, but the localized cells will be more secretive than the highly centralized Al-Qaeda in Iraq led by Zarqawi.

True. I guess what I ment to say the problem would be the fact that alls these spread out little radical groups with no leader to guide them, would be probably equally or more destructive then a secular group. As they can do equal damage with suicide bombings and planting bombs and such, without a massive army or leader.

At 6/8/06 11:28 AM, x_Toadenalin_x wrote: I only know one of your links - www.jesus-is-saviour.com - and that is because I have it saved in my favourites under 'Funny'. All of your sources are Fundamentalist Christian to the point of being insane. I cannot accept anything they say as truth, since I know so much of it to be untrue.

Hey is Jerry Fawell and Pat Robison thought MK was evil because they were old enough to know the comforts of slave-owning, then I say let the crazy Mofos have that opinion. I just wish they would stop finding a forum to preach the stupidness.

At 6/7/06 11:11 AM, ManosAriba wrote: If each race got their own equal islands, what would happen? Who would make war? Who would subjugate who? Opinions and theories please.

First the White people who give blankets filled with deadly viruses to the Indians. Then when when they are all dead take that island. Then we would go to the Black island, and buy 99 percent of the black people from a slave trader, and then kill the slave traitor to finish the job, then take that island.

Next Asians would get mad and try to attack us, but we blow their island off the face of the earth. Finally the Hispanic island would start swimming over to our island and eventually everyone their dies of stupid. The end.

At 6/8/06 11:24 AM, Flashthinker wrote:

At 6/8/06 11:17 AM, SirLebowski wrote: MK slapped them hos up quite nicely. =)

Doesn't matter, historical figures have done worse.

Still... It's a bit of a shock! Especially back in his time!

His time? His time was one of the most prominent eras for woman beating.
The 50's and by lesser extention the 60's were notorious for keeping secrets
like that. But yeah, from a guy teaching change, I admit it is not 'expected'.

MK slapped them hos up quite nicely. =)

Doesn't matter, historical figures have done worse.

I wish we were fighting an enemy that would just give up after we capture and kill half of it's figure heads. But nooo...*sigH*

It explains everything about the creationalistic moment, except what happened the second before that, the thing that truly created the Universe.

At 6/8/06 01:01 AM, mofomojo wrote: I hate political opinion shows (i.e: Bill O'Reilly, Lou Dobbs' show, etc) that guise themselves as news shows.

They always sneak these little tidbits of editorial along with covering an issue, it's a sneaky way to convince people, and it kinda works too.

Yeah, I don't watch Lou Dobbs' show, but I see Bill O'Reilly's ugly face when surfing around. There are entire sites dedicated to taking the statics he uses and shows how he spun it to his like. Yet the guy has enough of a fan base to write a best selling book and a kid's version. The day I let Bill O'Reilly teach children is the day I let them go to Neverland ranch with wine in their backpacks.

Why are people so up in arms. Is it really so suprising that maybe a few phychos are in the army, signed up for the killing, and did just that? Or some of them are just still somewhat teens who are fresh out of high school? So why are these always so surprising. Like being suprised somebody who grew up in a crack house became a prostitute.