2,316 Forum Posts by "SirLebowski"
At 7/11/06 01:45 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: That’s what you guys said about Vietnam.
Vietnam was a loss due to the terrain, it was very difficult. A lot of things have changed in war since then.
At 7/12/06 01:18 AM, Camarohusky wrote: Most successful in history?! Hahahaha! Good one. We control no more than maybe 5% of the known world... I think that is about 60 or 70 percent lower than the Greek and Roman Empires at their height.
Yeah but things were a lot easier to rule over back then. The good ole' days. *sigh* Get my cane, I'm going to tell you kids about the Industrial Revolution next.
At 7/11/06 03:52 PM, ReiperX wrote: Well, you can tell the elections are right around the corner. In some ways I hope that maybe this is how he really feels and not just some reelection ploy, but I do remain doubtful.
Hey, I don't care the motivation. As long as SOMETHING good comes out of these past terms.
It's better than the usual election time politics. Ban flag burning, and raise cig. tax, anyone?
At 7/9/06 06:40 AM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: Will hitting fat people in their wallets stop them from filling the mouths? Should the US follow suit?
Oh, yeah. Of course it will work. I mean- cig. tax has had such a tremendous success here in the states.
*rolls eyes* Alls it does is make people spend more money and become more poor than they really should ever be. I bet all the skinny people want to charge taxes on fatty foods to feel good about themselves, like non-smokers and the cig. taxes.
Besides, you take away are fatty foods and we will learn how finacially wise cannablism could be and end up eating fellow citizens.
At 7/12/06 01:10 AM, -Thestalos- wrote: how dare you stay in topic!
I'm sorry, I don't know what came over me. =(
At 7/12/06 12:58 AM, Naoki09 wrote: I do believe though, that we will win in a war without Nukes. We have FAR superior strategies.
I'm not sure about the winning part, but I agree with the fact that sheer number of men hasn't being a heavy factor in war for a long time. Like we are seeing with the war in Iraq now, a few small factions can do some heavy damage if they are determined enough.
Spell check is for you New York liberal fancy-dos with your wine and swanky apartments and culture.
No, it isn't an issue of race, as American are not of a different race. Most of us at least.
And the reason many other countries have a negative view of us is because many of them only know America via it's politicians and policy. And that reflects on us as a whole, sadly.
Unless you live in North Korea, in which case you have been typically brainwashed to believe America is the devil.
At 6/14/06 09:10 PM, 3rd_Front wrote:
Hawking said that if humans can avoid killing themselves in the next 100 years, they should have space settlements that can continue without support from Earth.
I don't entirely agree, but, there are gamma ray blasts and the Sun expanding all, the latter is unstoppable. So yes, space settlements why not?
There are a lot of small little minor complications as well, which will be hard to bypass with in the next thousand years. Weakness due to lack of gravity, deformed children as to the same effect.
Settlements in 100 years? Not with the current mind-frame we are in.
Kind of like those guys off of Dilbert.
Don't know where that came from, but it's amusing.
At 6/13/06 12:25 AM, Hershizzle wrote: damn this is some gay fagget acoustic song. wtf
Typically people won't commit suicide because some prick screams gory things into a microphone. Slipknot anyone?
But songs that kind of remind you of truly depressing things tend to make so me people want to well...blow a bullet through their skull.
Only instead of doing good he decided to be a freaky self-centered dipshit with parlor tricks! :0
Shit-in-a-can commericials are becoming more provactive than beer commericals and the spice channel combined. =) I can't wait for the full frontal nudity.
Hmm. Hamster fuck toy? Which aisle of Wal-mart is that in?
At 6/13/06 12:13 AM, ornery_scotsman wrote: The only song I know of that caused people to kill themselves is sarah mclahuglin's gloomy sunday
Yeah! That was it. Banned in some countries.
Uneffected, as he was only one small influence, and more extremeists will jump in and take his place soon enough.
At 6/13/06 12:11 AM, Hershizzle wrote:
was it like by ozzy or someone like that?
No, older than Ozzy. Besides, only one kid ALLEGEDLY killed himself because of that song.
Yeah, I remember. That was one great show. Not since 2 Stupid Dogs has such beauty graced my late-night Cartoon Network watching expierence.
You are not the first person to do it, so you won't find the satanical message you are looking for.
Well there was one old old song that caused a lot of people to do it, enough where it is banned in some countries. I wish I could remeber the name. It's on the tip of my tongue.
At 6/12/06 09:00 PM, MrsCrawford wrote: Aww it's cute. I just wonder how her parent's celebrity life is going to affect her.
I am more worried about her adopted kids. They might get jealous and smother the poor thing.
The first one freaked me out, but so do all children with creepy gazes. *shudder*
If you wish to live in the United States you must be in either:
Hurricane Prone areas,
Tornado Alley,
Earthquake areas,
There might be some places where you are save from virtually all natural disasters, but Montana is boring as shit.
The guy (Fred Phelps) has been doing it for years. I heard about it way back in 1999 I think, but it has been going on before that.
For some reason it's really picked up now because he changed his topic too Hating Fags to blaming soldiers as well.
Giving nutjobs like that a forum to speak their mind is the worst thing you can do, just ignore the bastards.
Well the only opposition for it is religious beliefs.
Not even that really, it's not really agianst peoples religious beliefs, more of people who fear it using God as a reason to hate.
I believe it's their bussiness, when there are two consenting adults who want to marry, why not? But it's not as simple as that I suppose.
He has done nothing that would qualify him for impeachment.
At 10/2/04 05:36 PM, -Gooch- wrote: Do you agree with them? Or do you see something wrong with them? Discuss.
I think there may be a lot of cultural differences, but all marriage sucks so- I guess there is little difference anymore.
At 6/12/06 02:58 PM, punisher19848 wrote: If you love ignorance, then what are you doing here? The idea of a forum is to share and exchange knowledge and ideas, not spouting half-baked ideas without doing your homework.
For your own sake, I suggest you do the research before you just start posting claims.
First of all, that was more of a joke than something to be taken literally, and I am not saying I am COMPLETELY void of knowledge on the subject, I just don't go into indepth research on certain topics, this being one. But in comparison, I can garuntee at least half of the people posting on the forum don't do 'homework' of anykind.
At 6/12/06 02:50 PM, punisher19848 wrote: So yeah, do what all those before me said. Don't be such a swayful dipshit.
My "conspirisy theory" was a joke! I was satirizing other conspiricy theorists!
Geez, don't take everything so literally...
Sorry, I should have quoted. I was replying to the first post, not your satires.
There is nothing rational about terrorism, and nothing rational with accusing an entire religion with terrorism.
