Be a Supporter!
Response to: It's a Boy! Posted March 29th, 2009 in NG News

Fucking sweet! Did the doc make any cock jokes when he popped out ;)

Response to: 2008 Political Predictions Posted January 1st, 2008 in Politics

1. Romney and Hilary will be the canidates.
2. The date for the troops to come home will be pushed to 2009.
3. Osama Bin Laden will still be Wanted.
4. Whitey Bulger will still be Wanted.
5. Patriots will win the superbowl.

Response to: Katrina Conspiracy? Posted January 1st, 2008 in Politics

At 1/1/08 10:37 PM, Grammer wrote: This is fucking retarded

You're joking, right?

The sad part is, he's a U.S. Marine.

Response to: If you haven't noticed Posted October 28th, 2007 in General

GO SOX 3-4 IN THA NINTH.

And we didn't even get to play the yankees in the play offs. :(

Response to: Fucking Frustrated!! Posted September 26th, 2007 in General

Get some concrete evidence that this is true, like a video camera and then you present it to the police.

Check with the chick before you do this, she might not want her family in a huge lawsuit.

Response to: What does one do... Posted August 13th, 2007 in General

At 8/13/07 06:44 AM, SUPA-SAMOAN000 wrote: When they're best lady friend stops talking to you because

Is she actually your girlfriend or just your best friend?

If she is your girlfriend just remember, "you walk the dog, don't let the dog walk you."

What's with all the fettish german literature in this thread???

Response to: My math teacher gave me this. Posted August 13th, 2007 in General

At 8/13/07 06:25 AM, Stilianos wrote:
lol you got it!!! But what did u search?

"i forgot to tell you that the oldest one likes chocolate pudding"

Response to: My math teacher gave me this. Posted August 13th, 2007 in General

*SPOILER*

Google is great for homework.

Response to: The troops are coming home in '08?? Posted July 13th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/12/07 10:47 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote: They are?

Apparently so, says the House.

I don't understand why the senate would say the troops would be out in 2008 (while Bush is still president), instead of 2009 (after the election has passed). These sure are some smart people we elected.

Response to: The truth about oil. Posted July 13th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/13/07 04:36 PM, Joe67 wrote: In case you want to know, the REAL ALTERNATIVES I was talking about was how people could turn their waste (old food, paper, ect) into oil. Neat huh, plus it's not that costy.

Everyone wishes that we could just snap our fingers and make anything into oil. I don't doubt it will be possible in 500 years, but is there a possibility of it happening in the next five years?

Hell no.

The world is researching a new energy source but all we can come up so far is ethanol. If somebody actually had a more convenient fuel source then we would know it.

Response to: The truth about oil. Posted July 13th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/13/07 01:49 PM, simple-but-sandy wrote: Ok, there is more oil under North America than has ever been used before, but it is too fucking expensive to extract right now.

We have enough reserves of coal and shale in the mountains to keep us alive for 200 more years but it's "bad for the environment."


Of course the companies arn't going to extract it if they arn't going to make a profit from it. This isn't child play, this is the big world of capitalism.

America uses the money you pay for gas to buy more.


Thats why America invades other countries, to secure an energy source before the mad dictators of said country shut off the supply.

If the entire middle-east decided to stop pumping oil from the ground just for one day, we would either be paying ten dollars a gallon or be walking to work.

Response to: **official** 2007 Best Game Ever Posted July 6th, 2007 in General

1. Resistance: Fall Of Man (PS3)
2. Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion (PS3)
3. Mercenaries (PS2)
4. GTA San Andreas (PS2)
5. Socom (PS2)
6. Scarface: The World Is Yours (PS2)
7. The Darkness (PS3)
8. Burnout 3 (PS2)
9. Mortal Combat Deadly Alliance (PS2)
10. Starwars Battlefront 2 (PS2)
11. Bully (PS2)
12. Starcraft (PC)
13. Call Of Duty 3 (PS3)
14. Oddworld: Abe's Oddysey (1997 PC)
15. Time Splitters 2 (PS2)

Response to: School enforces No-Toching Rule Posted June 20th, 2007 in Politics

They are restricted from shaking hands with someone, so how the hell are they supposed to get a job?

Manager: Pleased to meet you Hal. *extends hand*
Hal: Um...I'm not allowed to shake hands.
Manager: Well, I see you have no references or previous experience, so we'll give you a call.

Heck of a job school district!

Response to: Death Penalty Posted June 19th, 2007 in Politics

At 6/19/07 04:07 PM, MissingNYC wrote: i got a simple question about this... WHAT is the big deal!? let's be clear about this, you are found guilty of lets say, murder1... you deserve to die... what's a better choice?

To administer a death penalty to a murderer requires killing them. To kill someone you need a killer, which means using an executioner to carry out the job. This means that the executioner would have to live with a murder on HIS head for the rest of HIS life.

life in prison? WHY?! its a waste of Tax money to keep those cases in jail. now, im not saying lets kill everyone either, but if they are found guilty,

The amount of money to keep prisoners alive in prison is not that much. The amount of energy and time people spend on supporting the death penalty takes much more money than just locking someone up in prison for life.

with like a STACK of evidence+DNA, why not?

This is not CSI. Everything doesn't work out like that in the end.

Response to: Le Reconquista Posted April 3rd, 2007 in Politics

At 4/3/07 12:00 PM, DarkSarafan wrote: Funny, US still has the very same bad habit of invading other nations' territories without asking anyone if they care.
And you still get mad with people wanting what was theirs in the first place? Please...

This situation is nowhere close to what went on in Iraq.

At 4/3/07 03:14 PM, EmperorManpig wrote:
"What was theirs in the first place?" They lost that territory fair and square. They signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1846. We have had that land for about 160 years. They have no right to the territory and no right to complain.

Here is the link for the nonbelievers.

Response to: Le Reconquista Posted April 2nd, 2007 in Politics

At 4/2/07 07:36 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: I think your downplaying the feeling of these immigrants.

He is not talking about legal immigrants, he is talking about illegal immigrants.


I often consider immigrants even more patriotic then native Americans, because they know what other countries are like and know the freedoms that are here.

So just because people in Mexico have been to other countries in the area, you call that patriotic? I know people, legally born in America that have been to Iraq, England, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Canada...


To say that the immigrants are anti-American in essence and that they want to strip away what America is is counter to our entire history.

Most of them don't work, they carry unwanted firearms into the country, cocaine...


Immigrants have made our country what it is and still do. I welcome these people with open arms. These people are far more loyal and patriotic then that.

Have you ever noticed that the immigrants that came to America originally aren't around anymore? That was 350 years ago. Countries back then were in a different state then they are today.


These people mearly want to live better lives and have the chance to suceed. I think that they want to be Americans as much as you do and every other American.

I do not have a problem with immigrants but there is a process to become an American. It is not as easy as walking over.

Response to: my theory on the universe Posted April 2nd, 2007 in Politics

At 4/2/07 06:13 PM, zero-gravity wrote: well we know there are 3 dimentions....well i believe we live in the 6+ dimention and i will explain why:

1. the first dimension is time. Time has no width and only goes in a strait line

The first dimension is height.

2. the second dimension is space. Space has length and width

The second dimension is width. That is why we refer to photos as 2D images.

3. mass is the third dimension because it has length width and depth. see 1+2=3

Depth is the third dimension. Three dimensions = 3D.


4. motion is the fourth dimension because mass within time is in motion. 1+3=4

Time is the fourth dimension according to scientists

These calculations are rediculous, math does not solve everything.

Response to: The Chocolate Jesus Posted April 1st, 2007 in Politics

At 4/1/07 10:25 PM, SolInvictus wrote:
i think there may be more implied with "chocolate Jesus" phrase. which reminds me, i should go read the lyrics of Tom Waits' "Chocolate Jesus".

Chocolate is also known as a substitute for sex, which could arise some action among the activists seeing as most of them are women.

Some people might just look on the surface of this statue and see the statue as being brown. There has always been a conflict to whether Jesus was black or not.

Response to: Grand Theft Auto Iv Trailer Thread Posted March 29th, 2007 in General

At 3/29/07 06:22 PM, RacistBassist wrote:
Guess again

Looks like I fucked up.

I was in such a blind rage after rockstar screwed us over I couldn't even see what I was typing.

Response to: Grand Theft Auto Iv Trailer Thread Posted March 29th, 2007 in General

At 3/29/07 06:14 PM, bigbadron wrote: From: RacistBassist
Sent: 3/29/07 5:56:11 PM
Subject: Question

Why would you lock the GTA4 trailer thread and then make your own?

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

FAGGOTS, SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTHS!

Let me guess. Lvl 1, Exp. points 30/50, sign up date 3/29/07, Blams: involved in the termination of 0 crappy entries, Saves: involved in the termination of 0 quality entries, BBS posts 0 0.000 per day)......

Response to: Grand Theft Auto Iv Trailer Thread Posted March 29th, 2007 in General

I got this:

Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
Most likely causes:
You are not connected to the Internet.
The website is encountering problems.
There might be a typing error in the address.

It's definately not the first or the third so....

Response to: WTF is wrong with ppl Posted March 29th, 2007 in General

Wanna see something funny?

Click.

Look at how many of them are locked.

Response to: Free money for you Posted March 28th, 2007 in General

If you were wearing that coat you'd probably bring that 315 email count up to 500.

Response to: The University of Newgrounds Posted March 28th, 2007 in General

Will you enstate corporate punishment? If you do, when someone answers a question wrong, Wade gets to smack them with a ruler.

Response to: Americans curcumsized Posted February 26th, 2007 in General

In america it's mostly jewish people that are curcumsized. For some reason it's part of their religion.

Response to: How to really deal with Iraq Posted January 23rd, 2007 in Politics

At 1/23/07 02:07 PM, troubles1 wrote: that is the stupidest idea ever. We are trying to help the innocent people, and not kill them.

Yes, Innocent people would die if we nuked Iraq. The truth is that innocents die in any war no matter what. People were dying in Iraq before America declared war on them seeing as Saddam put people in meat grinders and put people to death in other ruthless ways. Nuking Iraq would have solved our problem of killing Saddam and would have taken care of the terrorist groups in there. If we had done that many problems would end but even more problems would start. Most of the world would retalliate and America would probably be nuked by another country. That would screw us over.

if you have not been over there and saw what we have accomplished, and saw the children, who we are protecting then just STFU!!

After what we have done in Iraq <BNuking Iraq now would make us lose all of our progress most of the world would hate America. We would be fucked and perhaps dead.B> The starter of this topic (TheH3ntaiGuy) is just trigger happy. Nuking will not solve anything. NOT for the fact that innocents in Iraq would be killed but for the fact that the human race will be dead the next time one is used.

Response to: A Portal Question Posted December 28th, 2006 in General

At 12/28/06 12:05 PM, blah569 wrote:
At 12/28/06 12:04 PM, Suffering wrote: You mean it got blammed?
Yeah... but I got a good 1 reply, and it was a good reply

(This movie is malicious.......multiple submission)
Use this option if an entry has malicious intent.......or was submitted repeatedly after being BLAMMED with no effort made to improve the entry.........

this is from the FAQ's. Resubmitting is against the rules.

Response to: ms dewey talks dirty to me Posted December 28th, 2006 in General

Don't ask questions to women like this. Show them who's in charge.

:you c*nt!!!!!

Response to: What should i do with my $200 cash? Posted December 6th, 2006 in General

At 12/6/06 08:44 PM, the-come-back-kid wrote: hookers!

Two hundred dollars might buy you ONE night of happiness.

Response to: When eating spicy food Posted September 11th, 2006 in General

No matter what I'm eating i need something to drink. What the fuck is wrong with people.