Be a Supporter!
Response to: Myths Posted July 15th, 2010 in General

I heard a myth that you're a gigantic faggot.

Response to: Mew Posted July 15th, 2010 in General

At 7/15/10 02:01 AM, drknes wrote: I'm sorry sir but your daughter has been raped and murdered...mew

Wouldn't it be "was raped and murdered?" I mean, the girl's dead, right? Otherwise it gives the impression that the rape and murder just happened and that someone, probably the rapist, is now telling the parents just after the fact, or that it was state-sanctioned and a form of punishment.

Response to: What's the point of Diet drinks? Posted July 15th, 2010 in General

A way for beverage companies to partner with mad nutritional scientists and further goad the American consumer into accepting the fraudulent diet-food scheme.

Response to: Make your own word. Posted July 15th, 2010 in General

Lallavagantacular

An event or period of time - often involving moderate to heavy usage of recreational drugs and/or alcohol - during which so much pleasurable or atpyical activity occurs that dissection of the event in hindsight requires extensive mental effort and concentration.

Below: Me decyphering just what the hell happened last weekend at the drug-fueled lallavagantacular that is the Oregon Country Fair

Make your own word.

Response to: Mew Posted July 15th, 2010 in General

Terrible. Just terrible.

Response to: Anyone Not Do Drugs? Posted June 26th, 2010 in General

At 6/26/10 05:17 AM, Canas wrote: anyone who doesn't DO drugs or hasn't even DONE drugs is a fucking god damned psychopath and should be locked up. Idiots who don't understand the tragedy of humanity

Fucking AMEN. Everyone acts like "users" of any and all sorts are "addicted," or "need" to do drugs to fill some void in their lives. Bull fucking shit. I do drugs to expand my worldview and knowledge. I learn from drug usage and use it to benefit my life.

To all of you non-drug-users: I experience feelings, emotions, and sensations that you will never understand or comprehend in your misguided arrogance.

Response to: 2010 Fifa World Cup Thread Posted June 24th, 2010 in General

At 6/24/10 12:11 PM, Trystlions wrote: Italy were simply amazing today, they really do deserve the title of ''World champions''

What? Italy were barely present in the first half.

I think Italy deserved to make their comeback but NOT to win; they were outplayed and outclassed by a bottom-of-the-group team which was overcome by the dread of potential elimination...which has happened a few times during this cup, hasn't it?

But congrats to BOTH sides for a great game. Best I've watched so far!

Response to: 2010 Fifa World Cup Thread Posted June 24th, 2010 in General

At 6/24/10 12:03 PM, LinkSilvermane wrote:
True, the goal that was knocked out of the net by that bald defenseman was technically INSIDE the net.

I saw multiple replays and couldn't come to a definitive conclusion. It looked like the ball hit Skrtel in the groin. If it did go in, the view was obstructed by both of his legs anyway.

I thought it only just crossed the line but maybe you saw a replay angle that I missed.

Response to: 2010 Fifa World Cup Thread Posted June 24th, 2010 in General

At 6/24/10 12:01 PM, Sentio wrote:
At 6/24/10 10:27 AM, LinkSilvermane wrote:
I thought Webb and the linesman did a good job, and I hope they don't get blamed by the Italian press.

Webb SHINED amongst a sea of incompetent officials present in the WC. I've always respected the man's eyesight and judgment. No glaring mistakes, really. No red cards dished out for a handful of challenges on both sides that honestly deserved them; I appreciate reserved officiating. The Italian offside was a good call.

I would've liked to see MORE stoppage time added, maybe seven or eight minutes. The Slovaks was really milking their pains and spent a lot of time on the pitch in the last few minutes; I almost wondered if they were purposely making fun of the Italians since they knew Slovakia was gonna win.

DENMARK - JAPAN in two hours! Be there!

Response to: 2010 Fifa World Cup Thread Posted June 24th, 2010 in General

At 6/24/10 11:59 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:
At 6/24/10 11:56 AM, jonthomson wrote: LOL ITALY
did they lose shit I was watching the paraguay game.

Ha, I've heard that game was bit boring. Yes, Slovakia 3 - 2 Italy. Great game.

I had thought the NZ/Paraguay match would be more interesting but was pleasantly surprised.

Wow, two of the powerhouses - France and Italy - not only disqualified but settling to the bottom of their respective groups! Amazing cup.

Response to: Damn Cowards Posted June 17th, 2010 in General

I know, you make such thought-provoking and relevant topics like this one. Wonder why you get banned so often.

Response to: 2010 Fifa World Cup Thread Posted June 17th, 2010 in General

An interesting note on the Mexico-France match:

Maybe you noticed that the crowd would, against all odds, occasionally overcome the sounds of the vuvuzelas. Those were the Mexican supporters - who, every time the French keeper launched the ball into play with a goal kick, would all shout "PUTO!" Apparently it is a time-honored tradition. :)

GOOD RIDDANCE FRANCE. Your team should've been denied qualification for both the 2006 AND 2010 World Cups. I hope Uruguay dives even more than they did during their match against South Africa and grinds your squad into the soil.

Response to: Boobs cause earthquakes. Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

At 4/27/10 06:33 AM, I-RULE-OVER-ALL wrote: found this on the same site

So, truly, the mesmerizing and often-magical appeal of boobage is now empirically proven. Praise Allah!

Response to: The mods are fucking corrupt. Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

At 4/27/10 06:53 AM, mdf99 wrote: i get a similiar thing, i cant give a low rating in my review otherwise its automatically banned! I dont bother reviewing now lol

No, you're blocked because you give shit-ass terrible reviews.

Response to: Dragons! Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

At 4/27/10 06:17 AM, Usernamemyarse wrote:
At 4/27/10 04:18 AM, FBIpolux wrote: It's an invasion.
OH
MY
GAWD!

Kill it whit fire!

Even paper dragons are immune to hell's hottest flames.

Man, I'd to get drunk with a dragon sometime.

Response to: The mods are fucking corrupt. Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

No trolls. All I see is a gargantuan douche who, through his idiocy, ruined a perfectly good thread.

Thanks asshole. Thanks for ruining our thread.

Response to: No gays allowed! Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

The Thai Spice restaurant in Adelaide is representative of Australia as a whole and every one of its inhabitants. That's how this shit works. So I ask now:

THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH Y'ALL, AUSTRALIA?

Response to: The mods are fucking corrupt. Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

At 4/27/10 06:30 AM, I-RULE-OVER-ALL wrote: aww someone's cranky..........

all you succeed in by insulting me is making yourself look like a troll. Personally if people with your mindset hate me, it means I'm doing something right.

go troll somewhere else, and everyone else, stop feeding the troll.

You don't have the authority or clout to designate anyone else as a troll, champ. He copy-pasted that an enormous insult back there ya know. If anything, you're the victim of ingenious reverse trolling.

YA JUST DON'T GET IT, DO YA

Response to: Naturally Slim? Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

Baaah you're suckin' it in a bit there fatty

Nah, I'm naturally slim too. Not to your magnitude but, at 160 lbs., I've always been a dude who can eat anything he wants and not gain a fuckin' pound.

Maybe start a protein regiment and some semi-serious weight training. That's the path I'm about to take anyway.

Response to: The mods are fucking corrupt. Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

oh by the way i-rule-over-all

http://www.ultimateflame.com/

In case you thought he was just an insult cyborg

Response to: The mods are fucking corrupt. Posted April 27th, 2010 in General

The mods have always sucked dick. Even they know they suck dick. I always thought that was part of the appeal of the place.

Response to: Girlfriend died nearly 2 weeks ago Posted April 26th, 2010 in General

Ya wanna know why this is fake? 'Cause no man would spend this much time whining about his problems on the internet.

Seriously. As soon as you mention "depression pills," the jig is muthafuckin' UP.

Response to: Furry fans! Look here if curious. Posted April 3rd, 2010 in Clubs & Crews

Evenin'! Or Mornin' rather. Hope everyone's Easter weekend is proceeding delightfully. Sitting here with a homebrewed beer coupled with a pot of Mac 'n Cheese and wishin' y'all the best.

cocks

Response to: My break was ruined by... Posted December 30th, 2009 in General

Yeah, but learning the quirks of the book's Missouri drawl is part of the reading experience. I loved the whole Tom Sawyer/Huckleberry Finn era of required-reading.

Shit, you think HF is tough? Pick up a novel called Ulysses. HOOO-ly shit.

Response to: Avatar sucked. Posted December 30th, 2009 in General

It's really just "Pocahontas 3000: 3-D."

It's easy to recognize the parts of Avatar that James Cameron had been waiting to mold into a movie: the discovery of an alien planet and race; the decline of Earth; the concept of telepathically controlling a sentient, lab-grown, humanoid being; etc.

These aspects honestly could have been paired with his experienced directing and lovingly crafted into a beautiful tale if the movie had been six hours long. But it wasn't, so Cameron had to cut corners here and there. He flattened every character personality (except the protagonist) and forced them to correspond to the cliched dichotemy of "Save the ____" or "Kill 'em / exploit the land." The dialogue is terrible and interactions between the characters just aren't organic; all social interaction in this movie creates a niggling little feeling in the back of your mind, telling you, "This has been done before."

And it morphed into a very thinly-veiled political message, especially in the latter half of the film...but the movie doesn't work without the culturally-friendly message it conveys, so you've gotta take it as a whole.

See it, really, but don't expect it to be memorable.

Response to: Be Gay, Be Furry, Get Aids, Or Die? Posted December 30th, 2009 in General

At 12/29/09 07:24 PM, ReverendMayhem wrote: Can I fuck all three?

You're gonna throw a helping of HIV into the mix? For, what, for shits 'n giggles? AIDS, mahn.

Response to: Sexiest Artist On Newgrounds! Posted December 30th, 2009 in General

At 12/30/09 03:51 AM, GOTHCLAWZ wrote: PennyPigtails. Could I vote on anyone hotter?

Probably.

Response to: Be Gay, Be Furry, Get Aids, Or Die? Posted December 29th, 2009 in General

Heh, I saw this thread seven months ago and left shortly after. Now I stop by on a whim and the topic's been revived like Tourette's Guy.

Answer hasn't changed; furry. Anthro-hatin' hypermales would rather get fucked in the ass than sex up a hot vixen, commitment-free? Puh-lease.

Response to: The Attendance Sheet Posted December 29th, 2009 in General

At 12/29/09 03:49 AM, GeneralHumor wrote: This is to show the activity of members here daily and give an idea of who is active and on at what day. The format is like this, hopefully most of you will find this simple enough to understand the concept:

Month / Day

1. User name

A specialized tag to identify the individual poster, you say? GOOD GOD IT'S CRAZY ENOUGH TO WORK. After that maybe would could add a TIME FUNCTION to the internet website so we could look at our digital time-clocks and see when a fucking post was made. OH and a way to track every user's posts, like, ever!

You're a shoe-in for the administration team

Response to: Tourettes Guy Is... Alive! Posted December 29th, 2009 in General

Fans of Tourrette's Guy are on par with fans of Homestar Runner.