At 1/10/08 02:04 AM, AndrewRoss wrote:
Here is the actual article; http://internetsafetyadvisor.info/journa l/2007/7/12/stickam-disturbing-in-the-ne ws.html
" I saw young girls, who appeared to be in their bedrooms," and get this, the age requirement is 14 to get on that site, but I've seen 12 year olds on that site.
"A true voyeur's playground." This is true. I signed on one time late at night and I saw all of these girls on. I walked into a room and saw, literally, hundreds of viewrs in the room. She was strip teasing and all of these guys were asking her to show her breasts. I checked her age and she was 16.
"It is being alleged by former Stickam Vice President, Alex Becker, Stickam has close ties to a large online pornography business." Well gee, I think that solves our problem.
"If you are a parent, please visit Stickam yourself, especially if you own a webcam." Yes, you should. I;m no parent, but if I had a child that was internet-savvy, I wouldn't want him OR her to be on that site. Actually, the most I would do is not get a webcame at all.
Discuss.
I think it is disturbing that the children don't realize that once something's on the internet, it's there for good. I mean, if they're on their cam showing their goods, then I guarantee there are ten guys watching and pressing "screenprint screenprint screenprint".
It's sad that some parents don't educate their children on the dangers of the internet sufficiently enough. I mean, I've been using the internet since I was 12 (granted, it was a little different back then), but I had a ton of common sense and over-protective parents.
What happened to going online to talk to people you know IRL? or going to a place where you're interested? I think the start of youtube, blogs, myspace, whatever has made self-interested people flock here to gain any sort of fame. It's a shame, really.
Punchline: That's why kids need to stay in school.