Hello Fellow Newgrounders,I was just watching a show on the B2 bomber and its cluster bombing missions.It prompted me to look up the wide array of cluster bombs used(normal,incendiary,ect ect)
in the bombing raids through out various wars.With wikipedia's many links I soon found a list of "inhumane" weapons and battle tactics that had been abrogated through legislation.It included your run of the mill controversial things such as incendiaries,land mines,cluster bombing,and more primitive things such as booby-traps,ect.Anyways these methods of combat were done away with because the were seen as "inhumane",but how humane is any paraphernalia used to commit murder in the name of war?With that being said,one could make the argument that this futile fight for humanity in an inhumane prospect is limiting our methods in which to defeat an enemy who shares no such conscience,or concerns.An enemy who wouldn't hesitate to go to any extreme to exert their whim,in hopes of gaining a dominant edge.Through showing servant concern and compassion towards such a remorseless,psychotic foe, we may have given some form of advantage to an enemy that would unhesitanly;and by any means,destroy us with no thoughts to the humanity in which they did the deed.
