Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

odin_mage:

Some people have sex just for pleasure, and over populate the world with bastard children.

Gays endulge themselves in pleasure and it is a means-to-an-end (as we will cease to exist without reproducing)

We wouldn't over populate the world if half of the people were gay(50% men, 50% of them women; hell maybe 99% men and 1% women if we could practice polygamy) and the other "bastard" half that have 4 or 5 children.

By that standard homosexuals will burn in hell as indicated in the Bible

Where? The only part that there is hatred against homosexuality is in the New Testament. This part about homosexuality was written hundreds of years after the death of Jesus.

Now tell me this, If Jesus of Nazereth was the prophet of God, and God told everything people should be through Jesus and his disciples, how in hundreds of years after Jesus's death, anti-homosexuality started in the bible?

At 9/16/03 01:00 AM, odin_mage wrote: I am comitted to the advancement of hetrosexual rights!

And the KKK is to the advancement of white peoples rights, what is your point?

Please note: your_indignation, has now been educated that The Bible is not always the first source. He has now shut his breath and left this topic. Further flaming of his homophobic ideas and his uneducated information about the Bible's source and ideas of its viewpoints is useless.

Anyways, haven't we covered these ideas in another topic?

This is why everyone hates america

US Congress

To exclude United States persons from the definition of `foreign power' under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 relating to international terrorism.

Double standards are we?

At 9/10/03 03:34 PM, your_indignation wrote: The police probably tipped them off for a share in the money.

Actually, according to the Digital Millenium Act, the RIAA just has to ask about a certain IP address to an ISP and they are required to tell their name, address, state and etc. They get the person's IP by downloading or searching for a 'copyrighted' song

We should stop buying music, let them know who they work for.

Join the Boycott. Boycott-Riaa.com

http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/5349.htm

September 9, 2003 -- The music industry has turned its big legal guns on Internet music-swappers - including a 12-year-old Upper West Side girl who thought downloading songs was fun.
Brianna LaHara said she was frightened to learn she was among the hundreds of people sued yesterday by giant music companies in federal courts around the country.

"I got really scared. My stomach is all turning," Brianna said last night at the city Housing Authority apartment on West 84th Street where she lives with her mom and her 9-year-old brother.

"I thought it was OK to download music because my mom paid a service fee for it. Out of all people, why did they pick me?"

The Recording Industry Association of America - a music-industry lobbying group behind the lawsuits - couldn't answer that question.

"We are taking each individual on a case-by-case basis," said RIAA spokeswoman Amy Weiss.

Asked if the association knew Brianna was 12 when it decided to sue her, Weiss answered, "We don't have any personal information on any of the individuals."

Brianna's mom, Sylvia Torres, said the lawsuit was "a total shock."

"My daughter was on the verge of tears when she found out about this," Torres said.

The family signed up for the Kazaa music-swapping service three months ago, and paid a $29.99 service charge.

Usually, they listen to songs without recording them. "There's a lot of music there, but we just listen to it and let it go," Torres said.

When reporters visited Brianna's home last night, she was helping her brother with his homework.

Her mom said Brianna's an honors student at St. Gregory the Great, a Catholic school on West 90th Street.

Brianna was among 261 people sued for copying thousands of songs via popular Internet file-sharing software - and thousands more suits could be on the way.

"Nobody likes playing the heavy and having to resort to litigation," said Cary Sherman, the RIAA's president. "But when your product is being regularly stolen, there comes a time when you have to take appropriate action."

At the same time, the RIAA offered amnesty to file-swappers who come forward and agree to stop illegally downloading music over the Internet.

People who already have been sued are not eligible for amnesty.

Brianna and the others sued yesterday under federal copyright law could face penalties of up to $150,000 per song, but the RIAA has already settled some cases for as little as $3,000.

"It's not like we were doing anything illegal," said Torres. "This is a 12-year-old girl, for crying out loud."

cold_killa, anarchy never works. Simple line of greed. Even in the old stone age, they had some order. Do you want to be dumber than an old stone age person?

At 8/27/03 08:56 PM, punk_disease wrote: "...more and more of our imports are coming from overseas."
-- On NPR's Morning Edition (9/26)

Isn't that statement basically contradicting, since imports only come from overseas and other countries?

Isn't it odd that he got into Yale when he was a C student?

Don't forget he ski'ed the slopes a lot(think, white stuff, table, straw, THERE YA GO!)

This is a politics board right? Why is it primarily about current events. Sure some do tie into politics, like North Korea and Iraq. But aren't we all tired of seeing the same topics over and over again?

So here I propose something, books that have had great influences on politics and the organization of governments. People can post any books that they feel has or should change eyes on what politics is and how politics should be.

The first book I'll put on is, "The Prince" by Machiavelli. Old, but it tells how a ruler should be. Kinda ruthless too, thus the saying "Machiavellian" which means deceit and cunning.

The next book is "Utopia" by Sir Thomas More. This is another old book, telling More's view on what a perfect place would be.

Any books other people recomend about politics or books that influenced politics?

At 8/28/03 07:35 PM, BaKsHi wrote: Why is North Korea worried about security guarantees when their people are starving and dying?

I view as if North Korea is going to try to hold a gun to South Korea's head and say "Give me food bitch or I'll backhand you, ya' cracker."

It is really bad, though, that they did not join the international agreement of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. It doesn't really mean anything that great, since if North Korea does use it, there are going to be at least 500 Tomahawks heading to Kim.

Best thing for North Korea is for them to collapse. Once they do collapse, NATO will call in humanitarian aid, and more likely set up a better government. It might not necesarily be democracy, but it probably will.

Their terrain is quite useless, so there is nothing we want there.

True, but wasn't Afghan the same. Wait n/m, I forgot about the pipeline they needed to build through afghanistan in order for us to get cheap east asian oil. As well os opium plants for bush's drug habit.

Here is a picture. She was 17 years old and drinking.

At 8/22/03 12:37 PM, RoyBatty wrote: If you read the posts in his/her history, you may note that this type of mindless homophobic barrage fills every page of posts he/she has made.

She has a right to be pissed at gays, that's her competition. :)

At 8/22/03 10:55 AM, Furious_Angel wrote: in which movie do you live? welcome to the real world: israel has no colonies!

I'm sorry, but in the United States it is percieved that the Jewish people are expanding into different "packets" of israel that were supposed to be the palestinians land. These packets of land we call colonies. The constant colonizing by the Israelis into the west bank and such is preventing the return to these 1967 borders.

Let me name some of the cities we call colonies: Ariel, Psagot, and many others

I would ask for your complete view and what is happening in Israel right now, but I feel your views are just too biased.

At 8/22/03 01:13 AM, kittie_cross wrote: why don't we, the Americans, have suicide bombers on our team?

Why don't we have three balls?

At 8/22/03 02:39 AM, Anpu wrote: Well I have a jackal in my profile, it doesn't make me one. Could have grabbed that pic from anywhere.

Yeah, but then again, she does have a lot of pics in her history of herself. Also, I believe she was drunk when she wrote this topic, so give her some slack.

At 8/18/03 11:06 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: We sure liberated the millions Pol Pot killed, or the tens of thousands that Pinochet murdered. We're so nice.

Sometimes people are hesitant to act fearing what people will think if they did act. As in Pol Pot and Pinochet, they were both horrific acts. But if you ask anyone who they were, no one could tell you who they are or what they did. As such, the media didn't present it to the public unlike in Iraq.

Also didn't the UK charge and prosecute Pinochet for crimes against humanity?

At 8/18/03 03:26 PM, mikemiller1234 wrote: the united states like to say who can have what weapons and who cant have them its all dumb to me

I may be wrong, i'll try to find some sources on what I am about to say. Doesn't the US have an agreement with many other nations, which also have nuclear weapons, that they will not use nuclear weapons. Iraq wasn't one of the governments that signed this document. As a such, the US felt a threat from them. One nuke can easily kill thousands, as such we learned at Hiroshima.

Also, I really am getting pissed at our government on wasting money on the military. Just the other day I heard of the nuclear sub called Virginia, a 2 BILLION dollar craft. Want to know what it does? It helps fight terror.

At 8/18/03 11:14 PM, Adept_Omega wrote: I'm trying not to come off as hostile here

But I am......

At 8/18/03 01:18 PM, haxz29 wrote: communism is cool, but I don't want to be equal with fags and hobos

Your joking right? Let me guess if you aren't joking. You are white, caucasian, haven't had sex in 3 years, american (most likely from the south)

True?

At 8/18/03 11:03 PM, mikemiller1234 wrote: theres not much to say when you put ingorant oppions out like that it takes very little to prove your wrong

Plz enlighten us with your views , including sources and links to the QURAN and BIBLE

At 8/18/03 10:24 PM, Adept_Omega wrote: *Absolutely cracks up!* XD

Humor helps proving a point :)

Judge, i have a question. Don't you feel like slapping mikemiller1234 around a bit. I mean he has dropped the IQ level in this room from around 105 all the way down to 70. His posts are ridiculously stupid, nothing supports them. Is it possible for the admins to re-route his posts into the general forum?

At 8/16/03 01:24 PM, punk_disease wrote: If you don't like being told that meat is murder, then either suck it in like a man or eat some god damned vegetables, it's good for your cardio-vascular health.

Hell, meat is murder, but dam it tastes good with worceshire sauce (can't spell). It provides a large amount of energy compared to veggies. My next door neighbor had to stop being a vegetarian just because it was so damned unhealthy. She still weighed 80-90 lbs and she was 5' 6".

I forgot, is fish a type of meat? Because the omega fats in that are actually good for your heart.

At 8/18/03 09:22 PM, mikemiller1234 wrote: the idea of marriage was reproduction and love along time ago read the quran and or bible

..... your wearing my patience down mikemiller1234

the idea of sex is reproduction, not marriage. Have you ever been to a wedding? What do they say while exchanging vows? That they will have sex with each other every night or do it doggie style on thursdays and sundays? NO! They say "Do you promise to love and trust...." NOTHING ABOUT SEX.

What passage is it in the quran or the bible? Do you know? Why haven't you read it? Not even the bible?? So your saying you believe it is in there even though you haven't read it? GRRRRRRR, stop posting stupid shit!

At 8/18/03 09:34 PM, mikemiller1234 wrote: its wrong to make sex offenders regester every where they go now. if someone knows you were a sex affender then they already think down on you everyone deserves a second chance

And the person that gets killed by a murderer should get a second chance too? The majority of sex offenders have severe mental issues. The things they do occur almost on instinct. If someone knows that they are a sex offender then they know they should get the fuck out of the situation with the dude if he starts looking at the girl weird.

And the castration for women would be to cut the clit out. They do it in some africa tribes so that the women stays faithful.

Also, please have better posts in the future miller, i'm getting tired of hearing you say only your opinion without any facts of the story. You do not have ways to back what you say, you just don't back up what you say, and/or you just don't know what you are talking about. maybe sometimes you should think 5 minutes before you click on the "Post it!" button

PLZ PLZ PLZ Let this post die, we have far too many Bush posts, instead of creating a new topic, post on another topic, maybe you have to go 2-3 pages back.

Anyways, liberating Iraq was in some ways a good idea. It helped the Kurds as well as the Shi'ites. Oh, don't you remember saddam ordering the gassing (chemical warfare)of the kurds killing numerous amounts of civilians?

At 8/18/03 12:38 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: It's such a depressing thought when you really get down to it.

Yeah it is really depressing. People are just too stupid in this generation and follow blind faithfully behind someone. No one ever leads or takes account of what they did or do.

At 8/18/03 03:39 PM, mikemiller1234 wrote: yes in the middle east many women are oppresed but that does not serve as muslims as a whole that is called culture

True, but Roman Catholic priests rape lil children, not other christians. Still christians get blamed.

At 8/18/03 02:47 PM, Kirk_Cocaine wrote: 2 wrongs dont make a right.

Well, you can think of it in two different ways. If you were a prisoner that will get his ass raped for the next 60 years because he killed someone or only get raped for 5 years then get a PAINLESS injection.

you cant go and kill someone just because they did.

You need to realize that most people that kill in cold murder have a psychological problem, which is a lot of times irreversible. Sure, some murders do not warrant a death penalty, but the jury is to decide whether the person is to decide or not. As well as this, you need every single juror to agree to sentence the man to death.

can we plz get a Bush board?