Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

You can't forget about them voting anarchists.

At 10/7/03 10:24 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: Should any limits be placed on free speech?

If there would be a limit, I would say put a muzzle on all of the stupid people say they can't talk. Also, due to the text messaging, have an electric shocker on their hands so they can't use these devices.

At 10/8/03 09:31 PM, Solamnus wrote: Shame really. Sounds like old fashion Nazi book burning to me. People's right to express their views trumps any personal grievances or feelings IMHO.

Why? Why do you even compare such a thing to the Nazi's? Why are you advocating for a priest that condemned a person to hell only due to their genetical makeup (it is genetics which causes people to like certain things in other people)? Would he[minister] comdemn a retard, disfigured person, and a down syndrome person?

People's right to express their views trumps any personal grievances or feelings IMHO.

Personal grievances and feelings are views.

At 10/9/03 12:13 PM, Solamnus wrote: Now you guys are being ridiculous. It is one thing to shout someone down if you don't like what they are saying but committing violence toward a person or property, even if the message is revolting, is reprehensible. Freedom of Speech is the bedrock of American society

Freedom of Speech at the time of the Bill of Rights is referred to the freedom of speech to talk about things that are often wrong or immoral, ie taxes that the colonies were facing at the time. What you are referring to is something that is taken out of context of the original intent of the constitution (if you really want to be a dick about this, the amendments to the constitution).

If this person does create a monument and display it on public grounds, then I will be one of the ones knocking it down. In it's place I will put a priest and a little boy with his mouth at his crotch. On or near this monument it will say "This is what god wants." What will be so wrong about that?

Some words are constructive in todays world. This blatant excuse for glorifying a homosexuals death is not one of them. I will give an example of how a religious group can be constructive to society. At a cementary, place 4000 tiny crosses and have a sign that says "For the 4000 babies aborted daily." Wait, an abortion group beated them to the punch.

At 10/6/03 09:45 PM, izuamoto wrote: i know someone who almost died from them.

I know someone as well. His heart stopped beating for around 30 seconds till someone hit him and it then his heart started beating at around 180-190 bpm. Stackers are not good if you are:

a) Exercising Really Hard
b) Using more than recommended
c) Both A and B

I cannot take these people seriously anymore. Here let me quote once again:

""After reading about the life of a great Austrian leader in the 1930s[this is my comment right here, but who was this austrian leader, hitler?], I became convinced that certain types of people should not be allowed to live: the lebensunterwenlebens. Now if a woman comes to me I agree to get rid of their faulty child. However, I only dispose of defective ones, not the perfectly healthy ones. By 'defective' I mean physically disabled and mentally retarded babies. Sometimes I get rid of children who the parents feel might grow up to be a communist, Jewish or homosexual and those that show precocious atheistic behaviour."

I felt uncomfortable at this point. It is fine to kill babies if they might grow up to be communists, Jews or homosexual; but physically disabled and mentally retarded people? They are not evil. "Some of them are evil", asserted Dr Prime, "I have devised a test to find out which ones are sinners. I ask whether they are disciples of Satan, I tell them that staying silent implies guilt." At this point I objected, babies cannot speak so they will all be guilty. "I thought about that", Dr Prime continued, "but God would not let me murder an innocent, he would use the Holy Spirit to put the words into the child's mouth". Fully reassured, I commended the doctor on his work. I asked whether any babies had spoken when questioned about their loyalty to Satan, but Dr Prime said no.

Out of curiosity I asked Dr Prime how he got rid of the babies. "Quite simple, just drown them in a big bucket in my back garden." "

Further up the page it says this "How could they even consider this horrible operation? Do they think nothing of killing innocent babies?" "

And my next article I'm going to read from them IS:

Brad Pitt and his Satanic Powers !!

I don't really get most christians either. At a local church, they have "Don't put another god before me" or something like that. It's a quote from the Bible. Then I look at this page and see "Try as they might the Atheist Movement will never silence us permanently!" Hypricrisy maybe? How can one be an atheist but still worship another god.

Also, the first commandment is though shall not kill, right? Then why on this page does it say "Heretics, blasphemers and Atheist Movement agents should be publicly burnt at the stake."

Other funny phrases from this site:
"torture can be used to extract confessions from sinners."
"We support the death penalty "
"The BCC reject all forms of violence"
"The BCC reject all forms of racism"
"We believe that the inferior races..."
"It is amazing that science has become accepted as fact by most educational boards"
"It is vitally important that the teaching of the theory of evolution be banned, as should the teaching of atheist philosophy and sex education."
"With the liquidation of Atheist Movement agents in the United Kingdom our children can be taught the truth at school."
"These evil [poverty strucken] people are being punished for their disobedience to God."
"These unfortunate people live in poverty due to no fault of their own and we should give alms to help them through difficult times. "
"The BCC were founded in 1933 by Martin O'Connell." (grammatical mistake on their part. "Were" should be changed to "was.")
"The BCC is the only Christian organisation to publicly acknowledge the existence of the Atheist Movement and we work tirelessly to counter their lies."
"Tests in Albania have shown that the electronic anti-erection ring is 100% successful in curing masturbation. "

But my favorite quote of the all is:
"Christian doctors and scientists agree on the harmful side effects of masturbation which are:
Blindness
Acne
the desire for a greater thrill which leads to drug addiction
homosexuality
atheism"

Really messed up quotes from the site:
"When my son had an erection I watched as he was blasted with the anti-erection ring. When the sparks started flying it reminded me of that scene in 'Return of the Jedi' when Luke is being zapped by the Emperor. The irony of the situation was not lost as he screamed, 'save me father!!!'"

"I got the anti-nocturnal emission bed sheet for my son. I had a fiddle with the wiring to give him a strong spark, the little bugger had a wet dream and his bed caught fire! My other son can't walk since the anti-erection ring gave him a good blast. At least it taught them a harsh lesson!"

"Buying the anti-masturbation pants made a drastic improvement to our son's life. No longer does he stay indoors playing with himself. He is a much healthier boy now who spends most of his time outdoors with a group of friends who beat up blacks and homosexuals."

Now I'm starting to think this site is a joke.....

"Although castration has been forbidden in the western countries since the last century, it is still legal in the small island of St Egdums' which is located in the Pacific Ocean south of Hawaii. "

"Who knows, perhaps after your son has been castrated he could be the next Farinelli?"

"Not only will your son have a special voice but he will never be able to pleasure himself with the dirty, depraved and horrible practice of masturbation."

I need to stop, I've been basically been quoting every single paragraph I've been coming to....

At 10/3/03 10:06 AM, BleedingGumsMurphy wrote: the Record execs have been stealing more money from artist then I ever could by downloading one song that happens to be the only good song on the freakin album

If everything I read in an article by the producer of Nirvana's "In Utero" then you are very correct.

Steve Albini, producer of "In Utero"

Dagodevas I have some questions for you. What prevents the RIAA to make a competitive P2P program that charges a monthly fee? What allows them to use hacking techniques(which is illegal, and considered a felony to the new Department of Homeland Security) to get information to sue people? What prevents the RIAA from wasting $70 million on lobbying to Congress and Senate?

For the First question, let me give you some information. At the present moment there are approximately 4.1 million people on Kazaa. At $10 a month, this would be 41 million dollars. This would probably be more since the number of subscribers does not equal the number of people on at a given moment. Staying with the 41 million dollars per month, this would equal $492 million dollars a year. That is almost a half a billion dollars per year.

For the second question, let me give something from the US code. In Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Section 1030 it states several things that are AGAINST what the RIAA is doing.

They list songs that are not songs just to get peoples IP address. Now for the US Code against it

"knowingly and with intent to defraud traffics (as defined in section 1029) in any password or similar information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization"

Now, this could mean anyone in P2P can be sued by anyone right? Well not exactly, an interpretation of this code allows people to determine who can access their computer and who can't. One reason for a program like PeerGuardian is to disallow the access from unauthorized source (namely the RIAA and MPAA) from accessing their computers.

With the third question, your on your own.

At 10/5/03 11:06 AM, Trolling wrote: You stupid morons. Everyone hates America because we are the best. Shit on the others! They live in socialist shit countries who wish they could do anything they damn well please.

America is not the best. We have the highest rate of violence, we are the most obese, the unhealthiest, the least efficient, wastes natural material, highest trash per person ratio, and we actually have less freedoms than a lot of countries in western Europe. The only thing America is good at is in business, besides Enron, Worldcom, and other crooks. Do everyone here a favor and shut your breath.

Fuck you all 13 old girls who have an opinion on politics. Fucking go to college before you open your mouth!

Somebody had a bad childhood.....

This reply brought to you by:

TrollKingdom.com

This is going to be considered spam if you put this in your posts anymore, instead put it in your sig.

At 10/3/03 03:16 PM, darkphantom wrote: Childish. Picking on someones mispelling granted he could try abit harder, but this is a politics forum. not an english class.

Ironically, I feel it is childish to not have correct english since it does not allow you to express your opinions fully and to be taken seriously.

Also, if he did take an english class, he would be quite aware that you must back a statement up with facts. This is one of the rather annoying parts of most people on this forum.

You are supposed to express your opions not your gramma & spelling skills.

Grammar not gramma :)

At 10/3/03 06:20 AM, jewboy23 wrote: u may not no but i do i want bush out iu think he as been one of the worst presidents ever! he is wasting are money to spend on his war and hes got are natinal guard over in Iraq

Hey jewboy, learn some grammar and I may think about your opinion. Besides that, I am not going to waste my time deciphering what you write. I will, though, waste my time to try to improve your grammar for next time you post.

Some hints for you:
Our is the possessive form of we.
You is not spelled u.
I is always capitalized.
Know means to have an understanding of something.
Has is spelled "H-A-S".
The beginning of a sentence is always capitalized.
"He's" is the contraction of "He is."
The end of a sentence ends in a period.

It always seems to me in this forum that there is 10 posts of arguement then the rest ends up people agreeing.

Well I don't agree the fact that file sharing is wrong. I don't agree that every single P2P should be shut down this instant. One thing that I will agree on is that P2P programs like Napster and Kazaa filled a void that the record industry forgot to fill, the internet.

It is to its own ignorance that the record industry is failing (and we're sort of in a depression, so spending on entertainment is not at its peak). The RIAA cannot try to close Kazaa without opening a legitamate program with reasonable rates to the public. It is like trying to make a hole in the middle of the ocean, using only a shovel. Material will fill its place.

Also, you need to remember that a lot of business people that are against P2P are also against text messaging, listening booths, and various other ways to determine if a product is good or not. Note: The MPAA is the one that is against text messaging since it allows people to text message people while they are still in the movie to tell people outside the movie if the movie is worth the money. The recording industry is against listening booths for the same reason, to disallow people to determine whether a certain product is worth the money.

Another issue is the total amount of crap the industry is releasing total crap. With this crap that you purchase, you can't return it and say crap workmanship, trust me I've tried with Linkin Park's new CD. People will not buy CD's if they know if its crap, and that is what listening booths, mp3's, and og vorbiss does.

Half of the stuff I do listen to is not in the stores, a lot has been discontinued. This is another problem about RIAA's allegations. Some of the copyrighted work they are referring to are not in stores anymore. They are not providing these songs to a new medium, and the singers can't provide these songs into another medium since the companies own the copyrights, not the artists. Ironically, this hurts the singer or writer by requiring people who want to listen to these people to go to an "illegal" source.

Side Note:

In Napsters glorious years, if the RIAA and such charged one NICKEL per download, they would've received $500,000 a day (give or take a few thousand), 365 days a year.

CNET News

Last October, RIAA lobbyists said they were concerned that anti-terrorism legislation being rushed through Congress would block them from using these tools. They suggested language that they said would preserve their anti-piracy tactics.

Immune to crimes as well?

Berman has not introduced his bill yet, but his description says that it will immunize copyright holders from civil and criminal liability who use technological methods such as hacking to "prevent the unauthorized distribution of their copyrighted works via P2P networks."

Dell, Intel, and Microsoft Disagree

"Any solutions to the problem of piracy must not compromise the innovations this (technology) has to offer," the executives wrote. "Peer-to-peer technologies constitute a basic functionality of the computing environment today."

Reading the prince are we Newpoxling?

A world government will not work if it is like the current United States government. Why do I say this? This is due to the fact that we don't really see sub $40,000 salary people in office(before they get into the office, of course). This seems to me that the American Democracy is slowly but surely becoming an Aristocracy. Don't believe me, investigate the pre-president salaries of the past 5 presidents as well as the senators and congressmen.

Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" due to disunity in the Italian Peninsula. This to his eyes was caused by people that couldn't be leaders since they were too weak. "The Prince" is basically a guideline on how someone should get power and how to keep it.

At 9/25/03 02:36 PM, Marty918 wrote: its because new music sucks

Thats why I mainly listen to oldies, mainly Pink Floyd and Zeppelin. The only new music I listen to is Ill Nino and Tool.

Also, If you don't like the RIAA, don't buy their CD's. If your buying CD's to support the artists, send them a check in the mail instead. When buying a CD, most of the time only 40% goes to the artists, the rest goes to the label to pay the CEO's and manufacturing costs (which is about $1-3 including packaging and recording costs).

My god, 1-10 years for anal sex? 1-5 years for oral? That means I would be in jail for the maximum sentence of 55 years.

Also, all of the resources he uses is 10-15 years old. At this time, everyone blamed blacks and homosexuals for AIDS. The newest book is from 1994, and from there, the next is 1990.

Also, if this dude ever read the homosexuality post, he would know that homosexuality does not cause people to get diswayed by Christianity. It does sway them to stay away from Roman Catholics and others who discriminate against themselves. You also don't have to go to church to practice christianity, all you need is a Bible and some literacy.

73% of all fags have had sex with boys under 19 years of age

Isn't that around the age of "coming out of the closet"

I'm tired of this site, moving on...

At 9/23/03 10:12 PM, smokey86 wrote: The main reason is that the whole basis of the religions is the Bible and the Tora. In the old testement(tora) and the new testement, it states a few times that marriage is a holy bond meant to be between one man and one woman.

I'm an atheist but still what verses please that you are referring to since you must have read the bible to know that the bible said, as well as in the torah(so you must also know hebrew), that marriage is between a dude and a dudette

In the animal kingdom, if the animals started mating with the same sex one major occourance would happen. That species would make itself extinct.

Then why aren't monkeys extinct by now? They have same sex. Read this entire topic, all 390 posts of it to find what I am talking about.

At 9/23/03 04:53 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: O...K... so BWS was bored. And what language is that?

You don't understand redneck, here let me translate:

"I call them fuckers taters. I am probably going to eat some of those dam fuckers[taters] for supper."

At 9/23/03 05:07 PM, dudeitsallama wrote: ... since most/many of them were slave owners.

Wasn't Lincoln the father of a slave baby?

I just read that Jacques Chirac, the French president, said this "In an open world, no one can live in isolation, no one can act alone in the name of all, and no one can accept the anarchy of a society without rules. There is no alternative to the United Nations."

Isn't anarchy a rule based on society, and society automatically forms the rules people follow? Is this a bad translation?

At 9/20/03 08:57 PM, punk_disease wrote: In an anarchistic society, countries don't exist so therefore there are no wars over borders and since countries don't exist, the race attributed to that country (i.e. French, German, American, etc.) doesn't exist either so people don't hate each other because they're fome a different country than their own.

Competition for food, resources (including land and water), and women(primative, happens more in animals). Ring a bell? The reason there are conflict over borders half of the time is due to these reasons. Not because it is the patriotic thing to do or because of religion (even though most of the time this gets tied in).

Anyways, drop country border disputes. What do you have now? A bunch of people disputing whose land is who (think small sub-urban towns). Sure if most of people aren't jackasses, then it will go along fine. The fact is that so many people are jackasses and will fight over a piece of land. That is the world today.

The only way to start an anarchy is by removing all of the elderly people since their opinions are too strong and cannot be swayed. Children on the other hand, can be easily swayed from way one way to another.

Also the people that say they are practicing Anarchy right now I will have to question how. In order for something to be an anarchy, you can't have a government to tell you what to do by stating predisposed laws. Instead society has to be the one that tells you if it is right or wrong and society is the one that punishes. Also, under anarchy, no one should in theory(at least in my head) own land(quite the contrary to today). It should instead be the society which determines who should get what land and how.

Yes I do like sidenotes in my paragraph.

At 9/22/03 10:47 AM, firebird1985 wrote: Could you ever imigane ordering Fish n Fries?

Actually I was a bit disappointed when I was 8 when I ordered Fish n Chips, I thought they were going to be potato chips. Chips sound more reasonable if your a gambler since the chips that you use are called chips, and potatoe chips look like these chips. hopefully that sounds right, even if its a run-on sentence)

Who the hell came up with freedom fries anyways?

Also, doesn't the RIAA control 80-90% of the market. Isn't that a monopoly. Isn't there an act called the Sherman Antitrust Act?

Anyways, why do you have a red sperm squirming around in your sig Scaletail?

All praise to be JMHX, ahhhmennnn

I'm feeling better already

School Makes Girls Wear Trash Bag Skirts

NEW YORK (AP) - Two Bronx girls reportedly had to wear skirts made of trash bags to class as a punishment for coming to school in jeans rather than their uniforms.

The sixth-graders at the Bronx Preparatory Charter School were made to wear the bags by principal Marina Bernard Damiba, the Daily News reported Friday.

Damiba called the garbage-bag skirts ``Damiba fashions'' and said they weren't meant to be humiliating.

``It was more of a fun way to say, 'Listen, guys, wear the uniforms,''' she told the News. ``Let's not dwell on something as simple as wearing the uniforms when we have a lot of business to take care of. We have a lot of learning to get done.''

Joy Vasquez, whose daughter, 12-year-old Christina Zuniga, was one of the girls who wore the skirts, at first said the punishment was ``really wrong,'' the News said.

But after meeting with Damiba, she told the News that her daughter ``got a lesson out of it.''

Students at the school are required to wear a polo shirt with the school's logo and khaki, black, gray or navy blue pants or skirts that are at least knee-length.

Source

tranman,

The purpose of life is to find what your purpose of life is. Think about it. People spend their entire lives just doing what is told of them, trying to get improved on upon, but yet they have no focus of where they want to go. This causes them to be disappointed in everything, their sex life, their job, their house (this is sometimes called mid life crisis). They have not found their purpose of life.

Some people end up helping others by being doctors, volunteer at a soup kitchen, or helping the homeless. Others live their lives trying to get the most adrenaline pumbing through their bloods by playing sports or skydiving. These people have found the purpose of life, and their purpose of life is what they love. Whether this love is to another or an activity.

At 9/19/03 04:16 PM, blueloa13 wrote: ok listen up ppl this is pretty much how it is. anarchy would rock if it was a peace loving anarchy, not the riotus, chaotic, kill all love none concept.

Anarchy would be sweet, but there are too many ethical and religious differences today. Where there is a difference there is a problem. These differences causes people to compete with each other, thus outbreaks of violence and etc. That is the problem with Anarchy, it can't compensate for differences of people. The minority usually gets oppressed by the majority society.

If the population was primarily buddhists, then Anarchy would work and work quite well.

It was 18 years in America until the 80's, dam go-go tight wearing spandex women that have mullet haircuts.

Odin_Mage, give me a link to a distinguished science site that says homosexuality is unnatural and I will graciously acknowledge your views as rightful and true.