At 5/27/09 05:50 PM, Kittykylie wrote: serouisly some dick down end of street pips his horn every 5 minutes for a good few hours, and the whole town met up when the team came back. Was horrifed as everyones know getting pissed for whole week!

Well, carrying on with your logic, we have to blame car horns too.

Obviously people wouldn't be stupid if there was no football, shoes, streets or car horns.

At 5/27/09 05:46 PM, Bigbaddragon wrote: Ehh U.S customs teach us to regard Football as a pussy sport.

Well that's OK then.

As long as you do what everyone else around you does then you'll be an awesome dude.

At 5/27/09 05:43 PM, Kittykylie wrote: footballs shit, My hometown just went to wembley and won and what happened? Fucking hooligans keeping me and my kid up with horns and ranting. So footballs shit

Were the hooligans wearing shoes? If they were then you should blame the shoes too.

They were probably on the street as well.

Fuck streets.

At 5/27/09 05:40 PM, Bigbaddragon wrote: Because everyone cares about Soccer or Fotball however you call it.

What's the point in posting in a thread you don't care about?

More to the point.

Messi was was fucking unbelievable. The media really hyped up the Messi vs Ronaldo thing, but there's no comparison. He got hacked down numerous times and just got back up and not only gave it his best, but actually did it with style and skill that surpassed all around him.

Ronaldo could be great if he didn't fall over whenever you looked at him.

At 5/27/09 05:14 PM, Techno wrote:

At 5/27/09 05:11 PM, WilliWowza wrote:

At 5/27/09 04:54 PM, All-American-Badass wrote:

At 5/27/09 04:41 PM, Eddyking wrote: WWIII NOT IMMINENT. Why? Because who's going to side with NK?

Iran, Venezuela, and Al Queda

N.Korea is not a radical Islamic nation.

That was what i was thinking.

From what I've gathered, thinking is strictly forbidden in this thread.

At 5/27/09 03:42 PM, HotActionYiffFur wrote: I just set mine up, everyone go watch my flash movies and show all of your friends.

I have no friends >:(

I've been abandomund.

Why not!

Some friends of mine.

At 5/26/09 03:32 PM, Diein60s wrote:

At 5/26/09 03:31 PM, YiffyKitty wrote: Homophobia.

You're an asshole.

Being an asshole is probably the best reason for being afraid of homosexuals.

Scottmale's completely right.

Sure, it's understandable that you'd be pissed off about spending so much and getting nothing in return. Personally I'd be annoyed in the same situation.

But at the same time she didn't ask for these things and you shouldn't be giving gifts if you're expecting something in return. If that's the case, then they're not gifts. They're credit.

And actually asking for compensation is just plain lame.

What you should have done was said nothing, or even better, tell her it doesn't matter whether or not she gets you anything.

If she didn't get you anything for a long time after that then you could make a judgement about how she treats you and, from there as well as with other factors of your relationship, decide whether or not you should continue with it.

Basically, buying a gift and saying 'When do I get mine?' is just a terrible approach.

At 5/25/09 08:14 PM, Porkchop wrote:

At 5/25/09 08:02 PM, gothicawolf wrote: MEGGER

What the fuck?
Is that some of that thar english talk?

You never owned a Segger Megger Drive?

The dog looks like Tintin's dog, Snowy.

At 5/15/09 11:51 PM, hijackreaper wrote: I'm not one to confirm the truthfulness of this site, but I have a safe reason to believe that this is bullshit. This says that the gun used was a common model used in construction. However, most nail guns that are used today have a safety feature that keep them from firing into something other than wood, so they have a switch that checks the hardness of the material it's shooting into, so that you can't shoot nails into thin air. Even if you jam the nail gun up to his face and start jamming the nails into him, unless you have skin harder than wood, than you're not getting shit done.

Also, there are a few shots in his neck and other softer spots that are mostly skin and tissue...

Feel free to call me a dumbass if I'm wrong, but I haven't heard anything like this before.

I use nail guns all the time.

There's basically a metal plate at the front that has to be pushed back to allow the gun to shoot. We often pull it back with our fingers and shoot nails at targets when we're bored.

The gun would have no problem firing into a skull. I think the neck could possibly give you trouble, but it'd still fire and, if it didn't, you could just pull it back with your fingers.

At 5/13/09 01:03 PM, ThePortalGuru wrote: How do you get in to the castle?

Front door.

At 5/12/09 10:45 PM, Polioman wrote:

At 5/12/09 10:43 PM, Raguel wrote: Stupidest.

Fucking.

Thread.

Ever.

Seconded

Now you're just fucking around.

Stupidest.

Fucking.

Thread.

Ever.

At 5/12/09 10:09 PM, xports wrote:

At 5/12/09 09:59 PM, Raguel wrote: Use a : at the start of the sentence.

If you actually click reply to a post you'll see that there is a colon at the beginning of the text that you're quoting which, in turn, shades it.

Also, make sure to throw a space between the semi colon and your sentence.

This is true except for the fact that it's a colon and not a semicolon.

At 5/12/09 10:02 PM, speakerlight wrote: Mine basically says "Fuck you I'm on my own".

Which is why it would be funny if everyone started using it.

At 5/12/09 09:57 PM, Sunglasses wrote: My sig is straight to the point. It identifies me.

That's the main purpose of a sig if you ask me.

I agree.

At 5/12/09 09:57 PM, SolidLiquid wrote: since this is a topic about help...how do you do those shaded letters that people be doing at the end of there posts

Use a : at the start of the sentence.

If you actually click reply to a post you'll see that there is a colon at the beginning of the text that you're quoting which, in turn, shades it.

I love it all.

Tis a joyous day.

At 5/12/09 03:50 PM, The-Hitman wrote: Someone should donate $2,500 to them.

They'd shit bricks.

Only if it was a black guy that donated it.

At 5/12/09 03:47 PM, Scarab wrote: I don't want to make too many assumptions based off of previous development Hell projects that have finally come about, but I agree completely that it's been too long for an appreciable, good quality sequel to Roger Rabbit. It's an emergency button for film producers unfortunately, at least, that's how I often see it.

I've not seen the Dragonball Z film, but I've not heard good things about it at all, and that was in talks for years as this Roger Rabbit sequel has. Similarly, the film version of Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy was disappointing to say the least. A load of other films in various "considerations" are just sequels that seem exhausted... without even being made! A part of me is hoping any work they do for this Roger Rabbit sequel goes towards a new idea that people along different lines can appreciate... but a part of me has already given up on that front.

I'll admit that this isn't exactly related to your point but it still works from it to a degree.

When making a film based on a book or classic film, it normally isn't in the filmmmaker's best interest to copy the original.

Everyone who read and liked the book or was a big fan of the original film will go to see it regardless, so all they really need to do is bring in the mainstream people. They do this by making the film pretty much the same as every other film ever made because the mainstream person doesn't like to be surprised.

Action, excitement, love interest, car chase, special effects, at least one explosion, a pathetically linear bad guy and somebody getting hit in the balls are pretty much the formula for a box office hit now.

It especially helps if you show all of that in the trailer.

At 5/12/09 12:47 PM, Kooblo wrote: Jumpy jumpy.

Your jib.

I fucking like the cut of it.

I wish I could find Arthur Dent's quote where he's going nuts at God's useleness because of the fact that he invented pain.

I just remember him saying that any jukebox maker worth his salt could have put a tube that lights up in the middle of your forehead so that you know something bad is happening to you.

Then Fenchurch said you'd look silly with a neon tube sticking out of your head.

He replied to this by saying that people, in her opinion, must look far better writhing and screaming in agony.

At 5/12/09 03:32 PM, Spirosgod wrote: An Athens Meetup 2009 wouldn't be bad at all...
Also if I was older...

I personally wouldn't be pushed to go to Athens for a NG meetup. Mainly because I'd rather spend my time seeing the place itself.

I cannot see this being an alright film.

It will be so super God damned awesome that it can't be described in mere human words or it will be so damned God fucking awful that it'll make me want to puke in the face of whoever was involved in the production of it.

At 5/9/09 07:05 PM, Insanimation wrote: An Ireland Meet would be good. It would probably mean having it in Dublin though, which is 5 hours travel from where I live, but meh.

I'd absolutely have to go to an Irish one and Dublin would be the best place for it really.

At 5/8/09 12:11 AM, reveihca wrote: You have to admit as a kid he was like the Chuck Norris of cartoons, he was a bad ass before you knew what a bad ass was. Even with that leotard on.

Except that he wasn't really a joke.

This also another thread that makes me feel too old for Newgrounds :(

I was about 10 when it was on.

If he ate it and it ended up in his lungs, then he fails at eating.

I've actually considered getting a tattoo of aleph null.